Identification of the biopsy track in musculoskeletal tumour surgery: a novel technique using India ink

Recurrent lacrimal gland pleomorphic adenoma

Pleomorphic adenoma is the most common tumour of the lacrimal gland. Correct preoperative diagnosis is essential as the tumour should be removed en bloc. Incisional biopsy is contraindicated due to risk of recurrence and subsequent risk of malignancy. We identified 13 patients who were diagnosed with lacrimal gland pleomorphic adenoma in our institution over a 31-year period from 1990 to 2021. Of these, we describe four patients, three males and one female, who underwent incisional biopsy. One of these patients had a number of recurrences and required an orbital exenteration. The other two were treated with radiation to the orbit and experienced severe dry eye post-radiotherapy. All three patients are currently disease-free. The fourth patient underwent an incisional biopsy of his lacrimal gland pleomorphic adenoma (LGPA) within the last 6 months and has been referred for radiotherapy. The reasons for a lack of preoperative diagnosis of LGPA included clinical uncertainty and broad radiologic differential. None of the patients who had an en bloc resection experienced recurrence. We recommend that a fine needle aspirate (FNA) biopsy in lieu of a tissue biopsy should be performed where LGPA is included in the clinical and radiological differential diagnosis. If incisional biopsy is required, the suture track should be marked so that the entire biopsy track is removed with the specimen.

Percutaneous biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors and the potential for needle tract seeding: technical considerations, current controversies, and outcomes

Multidisciplinary communication and planning between the musculoskeletal radiologist and orthopedic oncologist are essential for proper biopsy planning when a primary musculoskeletal malignancy is suspected. Image-guided percutaneous biopsy allows for real-time visualization of the biopsy needle and surrounding structures, combining high diagnostic accuracy with safety and cost-effectiveness. However, determining a surgically optimal biopsy trajectory for a mass can be technically challenging due to critical surrounding anatomy or challenging needle approach angles. Inappropriately placed biopsies can have serious repercussions on patient function and oncological survival. The potential for needle tract seeding and local recurrence after biopsy of sarcoma has been central to the debate regarding the need for excision of the biopsy tract. This multidisciplinary review highlights current controversies in the field, including the issue of core needle biopsy tracts and their excision, technical considerations and advances in image-guidance in the setting of challenging biopsies, advances in histopathological diagnostics with implications for targeted therapy in sarcoma, as well as surgical and oncological outcomes after needle tract biopsy.

Ewing Sarcoma-Diagnosis, Treatment, Clinical Challenges and Future Perspectives

Ewing sarcoma, a highly aggressive bone and soft-tissue cancer, is considered a prime example of the paradigms of a translocation-positive sarcoma: a genetically rather simple disease with a specific and neomorphic-potential therapeutic target, whose oncogenic role was irrefutably defined decades ago. This is a disease that by definition has micrometastatic disease at diagnosis and a dismal prognosis for patients with macrometastatic or recurrent disease. International collaborations have defined the current standard of care in prospective studies, delivering multiple cycles of systemic therapy combined with local treatment; both are associated with significant morbidity that may result in strong psychological and physical burden for survivors. Nevertheless, the combination of non-directed chemotherapeutics and ever-evolving local modalities nowadays achieve a realistic chance of cure for the majority of patients with Ewing sarcoma. In this review, we focus on the current standard of diagnosis and treatment while attempting to answer some of the most pressing questions in clinical practice. In addition, this review provides scientific answers to clinical phenomena and occasionally defines the resulting translational studies needed to overcome the hurdle of treatment-associated morbidities and, most importantly, non-survival.

Image-guided core needle biopsy for Ewing sarcoma of bone: a 10-year single-institution review

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance of image-guided core needle biopsy (IGCNB) for the diagnosis of Ewing sarcoma of bone.

METHODS

All patients with a confirmed diagnosis of Ewing sarcoma who underwent IGCNB between January 2007 and December 2016 were included in this retrospective study. Analysis included mean age, skeletal distribution, imaging modality used for biopsy guidance, type of anaesthesia, needle type, number of passes, type of tissue sampled, and complications.

RESULTS

The study included 139 patients (94 males and 45 females; mean age 18.7 years) who underwent 141 image-guided core needle biopsies as the primary diagnostic test. Of these, 101 were CT-guided, 38 ultrasound-guided, and 2 utilised both CT and ultrasound guidance. A total of 97.9% were diagnostic at first procedure. Of the 3 non-diagnostic cases, 2 underwent a further IGCNB and were positive, while 1 patient required an open surgical procedure. Only 1 patient (0.7%) suffered an immediate complication, and there were no recorded delayed complications.

CONCLUSION

IGCNB is a safe procedure providing a positive diagnosis of Ewing sarcoma of bone in a very high percentage of cases. It should be the first-line method for establishing a diagnosis in suspected Ewing sarcoma of bone.

KEY POINTS

• Image-guided core needle biopsy is a safe procedure providing a positive diagnosis of Ewing sarcoma of bone in a very high percentage of cases. • Image-guided core needle biopsy should be the first-line method for establishing a definitive diagnosis in Ewing sarcoma and should be performed at a specialist sarcoma referral centre. • When technically feasible, extra-osseous soft tissue alone can be sampled with confidence as there is no difference in diagnostic performance whether bone or an extra-osseous soft tissue component of the tumour is sampled.

Surgical considerations when reporting MRI studies of soft tissue sarcoma of the limbs

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumours that require prompt diagnosis and treatment at a specialist centre. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become the modality of choice for identification, characterisation, biopsy planning and staging of soft tissue masses. MRI enables both the operating surgeon and patient to be optimally prepared prior to surgery for the likelihood of margin-negative resection and to anticipate possible sacrifice of adjacent structures and consequent loss of function. The aim of this review is to aid the radiologist in performing and reporting MRI studies of soft tissue sarcomas, with particular reference to the requirements of the surgical oncologist.

Are Biopsy Tracts a Concern for Seeding and Local Recurrence in Sarcomas?

BACKGROUND

A biopsy is the final step in the diagnosis of sarcomas. Complete resection of the biopsy tract traditionally has been recommended in musculoskeletal oncology guidelines, as that tract is considered potentially seeded with tumor cells. However, to our knowledge, the frequency and implications of contamination of the biopsy tract-specifically with respect to the likelihood of local recurrence-and the factors that affect cell seeding are not well described.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We asked: (1) How often are biopsy tracts contaminated with pathologically detectable tumor cells at the time of tumor resection? (2) What factors, in particular biopsy type (open versus percutaneous), are associated with tumoral seeding? (3) Is biopsy tract contamination associated with local recurrence?

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of a database with patient data collected from a single center between 2000 and 2013. We treated 221 patients with sarcomas. A total of 27 patients (12%) were excluded and 14 (6%) were lost to followup. One hundred eighty patients finally were included in the analysis who either had biopsies at our center (112) or biopsies at outside institutions (68). Of those performed at our center, 15 (13%) were open and 97 (87%) were percutaneous; of those at outside centers, those numbers were 47 (69%) and 21 (31%) respectively. Median followup was 40 months (range, 24-152 months). During the study period, we generally performed percutaneous biopsies as a standard practice for the diagnosis of bone and soft tissue sarcomas and open biopsies were done when the percutaneous procedure failed to provide a histologic characterization. The mean age of the population was 48 years (range, 7-87 years); 60% were male; 42% had bone sarcomas. Nineteen patients had preoperative radiotherapy and 56 had postoperative radiotherapy. Fifty-seven patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 73 had adjuvant chemotherapy. We determined what proportion of biopsy tracts were contaminated by pathologic analysis of the biopsy tract specimen; during the period in question, our routine practice was to excise the biopsy tract whenever possible at the time of the definitive resection. Using the logistic regression test and Mantel-Haenszel test, we compared open with percutaneous biopsies in terms of the proportion of those that were contaminated at our site and for outside referral biopsies separately, because we do not assume the level of expertise was the same (our site is a referral tumor center). We compared the local recurrence-free survival between patients with and without contamination and between open and percutaneous biopsies using the Kaplan Meier test, again separating those performed at our site from those referred for purposes of this analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-one of 180 biopsy tracts were contaminated (12%). Twenty of 62 (32%) of the open biopsies and one of 118 (0.8%) of the percutaneous core needle biopsies had cell seeding (odds ratio [OR], 56; 95% CI, 7-428; p < 0.001. One of 97 (1%) percutaneous biopsies performed in our center, and none of the 21 (0%) percutaneous biopsies performed in other centers had contaminated biopsy tracts (p = 0.047). Two of 15 (13%) open biopsies performed at our center and 18 of 41(38%) open biopsies performed at other centers had contaminated biopsy tracts (OR, 4; 95% CI, 1-7; p = 0.001). Four of 74 (5%) bone sarcomas and 18 of 106 (17%) soft tissue sarcomas had biopsy tract contamination (OR, 3; 95% CI, 1-10; p = 0.023). The local recurrence-free survival was longer for patients without contaminated tracts (mean, 107 months; 95% CI, 74-141 months) than for those with biopsy tract seeding (mean, 11 months; 95% CI, 1-20 months; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Open biopsies were associated with an increased risk of tumoral seeding of the biopsy site, and tumoral seeding was associated with an increased risk of local recurrence. However, it is possible that other factors, such as increased complexity of the tumor or a difficult location, influenced the decision to obtain an open biopsy. Even so, based on these results, we believe that higher risk of local recurrence may be caused by an incomplete biopsy tract resection. In our opinion, the percutaneous biopsy with neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy is the preferred method of biopsy at our center.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Classification, imaging, biopsy and staging of osteosarcoma

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary osseous malignancy excluding malignant neoplasms of marrow origin (myeloma, lymphoma and leukemia) and accounts for approximately 20% of bone cancers. It predominantly affects patients younger than 20 years and mainly occurs in the long bones of the extremities, the most common being the metaphyseal area around the knee. These are classified as primary (central or surface) and secondary osteosarcomas arising in preexisting conditions. The conventional plain radiograph is the best for probable diagnosis as it describes features like sun burst appearance, Codman's triangle, new bone formation in soft tissues along with permeative pattern of destruction of the bone and other characteristics for specific subtypes of osteosarcomas. X-ray chest can detect metastasis in the lungs, but computerized tomography (CT) scan of the thorax is more helpful. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lesion delineates its extent into the soft tissues, the medullary canal, the joint, skip lesions and the proximity of the tumor to the neurovascular structures. Tc99 bone scan detects the osseous metastases. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is used for metastatic workup and/or local recurrence after resection. The role of biochemical markers like alkaline phosphatase and lactate dehydrogenase is pertinent for prognosis and treatment response. The biopsy confirms the diagnosis and reveals the grade of the tumor. Enneking system for staging malignant musculoskeletal tumors and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging systems are most commonly used for extremity sarcomas.