Do post-operative changes of neck-shaft angle and femoral component anteversion have an effect on clinical outcome following uncemented total hip arthroplasty?

Novel radiographic stem version predictor from anterior-posterior radiographs

BACKGROUND

Implant orientation has been linked to postoperative outcomes and is frequently assessed on radiographs. However, the projection of the three-dimensional joint and implant structure to a two-dimensional radiograph complicates its assessment. The main objective of this study was to demonstrate a novel method for evaluating radiographic stem version, in a manner robust to multiaxial rotations, particularly AP tilt and flexion.

METHODS

Radiographic features where synthesised using a computational stem geometry and radiographic simulation, building in clinical error sources. Features trained a Gaussian process regression predictor of radiographic stem version. The impact of AP tilt on the accuracy of the Weber technique was then evaluated and the feasibility of AP tilt assessment from the same radiograph investigated.

FINDINGS

Radiographic stem version prediction accuracy was evaluated on in vitro radiographs with R2 rising from 0.85 (P < 0.01) using the Weber technique to 0.98 (P < 0.01) using the trained model. Similar results were observed in a larger in silico dataset with R2 rising from 0.89 (P < 0.01) to 0.98 (P < 0.01). Tilt was shown to reduce the accuracy of the Weber technique. Projectional symmetry was then demonstrated about the femoral implant with AP tilt, elucidating ambiguity when assessing tilt on an AP radiograph.

INTERPRETATION

The novel feature-based method is a reliable measure of radiographic stem version that is robust to variation on multiaxial orientation, allowing assessment of changing rotation in series of postoperative radiographs. However, a controlled radiograph is required to ensure this mirrors implanted stem version.

Do Cementless Stems Match Any Hip? A Description of Anthropometric Measurements of the Proximal Femur in Colombia

Background

Leg length discrepancy following hip arthroplasty causes dissatisfaction to the patient; thus, preoperative planning and implant selection is critical. The purpose of this study was to measure the articular-trochanteric distance (ATD) and femoral neck length (FNL) in our population and compare them to those of 3 of the most used uncemented stems.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, 401 hip radiographs of healthy adults were collected between January and July 2022. The vertical ATD and FNL were measured. A linear regression model was used to identify the relationship between these measurements and age, sex, and height. A logistic regression model was used to assess the matching of native hips with the neck length of the stem.

Results

Mean age was 60 years, and 74.56% were women. In 94.3% of hips, the ATD was negative, 3.73% neutral, and 2% positive. In our population, 0.25% of FNL were shorter than POLARSTEM (Smith & Nephew, UK), 10.72% shorter than MetaFix stem (Corin, UK), and 11.97% shorter than Corail stem (DePuy Synthes, USA). In the logistic regression analysis, matching for the POLARSTEM was associated with age but not with sex or height. Conversely, for MetaFix and Corail, stem matching was associated with sex and height.

Conclusions

Anthropometric hip measurements vary among individuals, and variables such as age, sex, and height must be considered during preoperative planning and implant selection to avoid leg length discrepancy. Additional studies, including different implants, are required to guide surgeons in selecting a femoral stem that best matches the patient's native hip.

Native hip geometry restoration in total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis of eight different short stems

PURPOSE

To compare different types of short stems (SS) in terms of native hip geometry reproducibility, analyzing centrum-collum-diaphyseal angle (CCD) and femoral offset (FO). These parameters allow the SS to be adapted to patient's anatomy in order to ensure better functional outcomes in total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

A total of 387 cases of SS met the inclusion criteria. CCD and FO were measured using MediCAD® software Version 6 in preoperative (preop-) and postoperative (postop-) X-rays at 6-12 months after surgery. Considering preop-CCD, the sample was divided into three groups: ≤ 124.9° (A); 125°-129.9° (B); and ≥ 130°(C). Preop- and postop-CCD and FO and the respective average difference (Δ) were examined considering the SS individually and within groups, to verify reproducibility of these parameters.

RESULTS

The SS considered were eight: Fitmore Zimmer, Pulchra Adler, TRIS Adler, Trifit Corin, Trilock Depuy, Actis Depuy, Profemur Microport, and SMF Smith&Nephew. Groups A, B, and C consisted, respectively, of 113, 124, and 150 cases. Considering all cases, there was a statistically significant (p < 0.05) increase in CCD and FO with surgery. Overall, Trifit and Trilock stems were the best in reproducing preop-CCD, Trifit itself followed by Pulchra and Profemur for preop-FO. In groups A and C, the reproduction of preop-CCD was better than preop-FO, in contrast in group B. With regard to preop-CCD reproduction, in group A Trifit and Pulchra, in group B Fitmore and Trifit, and in group C Fitmore and Pulchra were the best. Fitmore in group A, SMF in group B, Pulchra and Trilock in group C were the worst in reproducing preop-FO.

CONCLUSION

Each hip anatomy is unique, and reproduction of preop-CCD and preop-FO can be achieved with different SS characteristics. Accurate knowledge of the stems and performing correct preop- planning are crucial to allow the best restoration of the patient's native hip geometry in THA.

Stem anteversion is not affected by proximal femur geometry in robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

In the present study, the surgeon aimed to align the stem at 5° to 25° in anteversion. The robotic technology was used to measure stem anteversion with respect to proximal femur anteversion at different levels down the femur.

METHODS

A total of 102 consecutive patients underwent robotic-arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty (RTHA). 3D CT-based preoperative planning was performed to determine femoral neck version (FNV), posterior cortex anteversion (PCA), anterior cortex anteversion (ACA), and femoral metaphyseal axis anteversion (MAA) at 3 different levels: D (10 mm above lesser trochanter), E (the midpoint of the planned neck resection line) and F (head-neck junction). The robotic system was used to define and measure stem anteversion during surgery.

RESULTS

Mean FNV was 6.6° (SD: 8.8°) and the mean MAA was consistently significantly higher than FNV, growing progressively from proximal to distal. Mean SV was 16.4° (SD: 4.7°). There was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.16) between SV and MAA at the most distal measured level. In 96.1% cases, the stem was positioned inside the 5°-25° anteversion range.

CONCLUSIONS

Femoral anteversion progressively increased from neck to proximal metaphysis. Aligning the stem close to femoral anteversion 10 mm above the lesser trochanter often led to the desired component anteversion.

Analysis on association between sagittal stem alignment and early functional and radiological outcome following primary cementless total hip replacement

INTRODUCTION

Accurate reconstruction of hip anatomy and biomechanics is mandatory for achieving good clinical outcomes following total hip replacement (THR). Optimal stem alignment is essential to avoid impingement or loosening. This study aimed to evaluate sagittal stem position following cementless THR and its relationship with patient's functional outcome and post-operative radiological parameters.

METHOD

We performed analytical observational study with cross-sectional design on 71 hips (67 patients, ranged 18-85 years old) that underwent primary cementless THR in two orthopedic centers in Jakarta, Indonesia. All hips were operated through either anterolateral or posterior approach using either extended/full-coating wedge-tapered stem or proximal-coated wedge-tapered stem. Clinical outcomes were evaluated at follow-up time using mHHS questionnaire, VAS level of thigh pain, and hip ROM. Stem sagittal alignment and other radiological parameters, including combined anteversion and offset, were measured from conventional radiograph.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences on mHHS score, VAS level on thigh pain, and ROM between stem alignment groups. Post-operative anteversion and offset of the implant were not affected by the stem sagittal position. All influencing factors have significant effect on sagittal stem alignment. Linear regression test on femur morphology showed 0.69° increase in stem posterior tilt for every 1° increase in the anterior bowing (coeff. = 0.502).

CONCLUSION

Stem tilting in sagittal plane did not affect patient's functional outcome or post-operative radiological parameters. In addition, for every degree of increased anterior femoral bowing, 0.69° increase in posterior stem tilting can be expected.

Evaluation of the native femoral neck and stem version reproducibility using robotic-arm assisted direct-anterior total hip arthroplasty

The intraoperative measurement of the femoral version (FV) has gained attention in wake of an optimised combined version (CV) philosophy. Whereas some data is available utilising different approaches, to our belief this study provides the first in vivo FV data in DA-THA using the MAKO™ robot. To improve the accuracy of the femoral stem version in DA-THA, we want to ask the following question: How effectively can we reproduce the native femoral version in DA- THA using the MAKO™ robot? The first 125 total hip cases through DAA with the use of the combined anteversion concept and the help of the MAKO™ robot from a single institution, single surgeon from January 2020 to July 2021 were retrospectively analysed. The native version (NV) and broach version (BV) were determined with the use of the MAKO™ preoperative computed tomography planning software. The data of the NV and BV of 115 withheld patients was normally distributed. The native femoral version ranged from -12° till 33° (mean 7,8° +/- 8,1) and the broach version ranged from -18° till 43° (mean 8,2° +/- 9,9). The Pearson correlation coefficient between the NV and BV was 0,78. The native femoral version can be reproduced by broaching the proximal femur, in a robotically implanted direct anterior cementless THA, with 78% effectiveness. Stem placement seemed to be more precise with growing experience, however this appeared not to be significant.

Hip offset and leg-length restoration in revision hip arthroplasty with a monoblock, hydroxyapatite-coated stem

AIMS

Restoration of normal hip biomechanics in arthroplasty surgery is important in order to achieve good muscle function and joint stability.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we examined the postoperative radiographs of 131 femoral revision arthroplasty procedures using a monoblock, fully hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated titanium stem. Femoral offset, modified-global offset and leg length were measured of the operated and contralateral hips.

RESULTS

Femoral offset was restored to ±10 mm in 108 cases (82%), modified-global offset was restored ±10 mm in 93 cases (71%) and leg length was restored to ±10 mm in 102 cases (81%). There were 4 dislocations with a mean follow-up period of 38 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Restoration of hip biomechanics is achievable with a monoblock stem and thus is a viable option in revision hip arthroplasty.

The role of 3-dimensional preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty based on artificial intelligence technology to different surgeons: A retrospective cohort study

Preoperative planning with computed tomography (CT)-based 3-dimensiona (3D) templating has been achieved precise placement of hip components. This study investigated the role of the software (3-dimensional preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty [THA] based on artificial intelligence technology, artificial intelligence hip [AIHIP]) for surgeons with different experience levels in primary THA. In this retrospective cohort study, we included patients, who had undergone THA with the help of the AIHIP, and matched to patients, who had undergone THA without the help of the AIHIP, by age and the doctor who operated on them. The subjects were divided into 4 groups, senior surgeon (Chief of Surgery) with AIHIP group, senior surgeon without AIHIP group, junior surgeon (Associate Chief of Surgery) with AIHIP group and junior surgeon without AIHIP group. The general data, imaging index, clinical outcomes and accuracy of stem size prediction and cup size prediction were retrospectively documented for all patients. There was a significant difference in discrepancy in leg length (P = .010), neck-shaft angle (P = .025) and femoral offset (P = .031) between the healthy side and the affected side, operation duration (P < .001), decrease in hemoglobin (Hb) per 24 hours (P = .046), intraoperative radiation exposure frequency (P < .050) and postoperative complications (overall P = .035) among the patients in junior surgeon group. No significant differences were found between senior surgeon groups with respect to discrepancy in leg length (P = .793), neck-shaft angle (P = .088)and femoral offset (P = .946) between the healthy side and the affected side, operation duration (P = .085), decrease in Hb per 24 hours (P = .952), intraoperative radiation exposure frequency (P = .094) and postoperative complications (overall P = .378). The stem sizes of 95% were accurately estimated to be within 1 stem size, and 97% of the cup size estimates were accurate to within 1 cup size in senior surgeon group with AIHIP. A total of 87% stem sizes were accurately estimated to be within 1 stem size, and 85% cup sizes were accurate to within 1 cup size in junior surgeon group with AIHIP. In conclusion, our study suggests that an AI-based preoperative 3D planning system for THA is a valuable adjunctive tool for junior doctor and should routinely be performed preoperatively.

Achieving Target Cemented Femoral Stem Anteversion Using a 3-Dimensional Model

Background

Total hip arthroplasty aims to provide patients with a pain-free and stable hip joint through optimization of biomechanics such as femoral anteversion. There are studies evaluating the limits of cementless stem version, however, none assessing the range of version achieved by a cemented collarless stem. A computed tomography (CT)-based study was performed, utilizing a contemporary robotic planning platform to assess the amount of rotation afforded by a cemented collarless stem, whilst maintaining native biomechanics.

Methods

The study utilized 36 cadaveric hips. All had CT scans of the pelvis and hip joints. The CT scans were then loaded into a contemporary robotic planning platform. A stem that restored the patients native femoral offset was selected and positioned in the virtual femur. The stem was rotated while checking for cortical contact at the level of the neck cut. Cortical contact was regarded as the rotation limit, assessed in both anteversion and retroversion. Target range for stem anteversion was 10°-20°. Failure to achieve target version triggered a sequence of adjustments to simulate surgical decisions.

Results

Native femoral offset and target version range was obtained in 29 of 36 (80.5%) cases. Following an adjustment sequence, 4 further stems achieved target anteversion with a compromise in offset of 2.3 mm. Overall 33 of 36 (91.7%) stems achieved the target anteversion range of 10°-20°.

Conclusions

Target femoral stem anteversion can be achieved using a cemented, collarless stem in a CT-based 3-dimensional model in 80.5% of hips. With a small compromise in offset (mean 2.3 mm), this can be increased to 91.7%.

Femoral antetorsion after calcar-guided short-stem total hip arthroplasty: A cadaver study

Calcar-guided short stems in total hip arthroplasty (THA) permit surgeons to successfully reconstruct postoperative femoroacetabular offset, accurately restore leg length, and adequately re-establish a wide range of caput-collum-diaphyseal angles. However, their effect on femoral antetorsion is less known. Indeed, controlling antetorsion of the femoral stem can be challenging because of the differences in individual femoral geometry and curvature. Therefore, we investigated if calcar-guided short-stem THA alters femoral antetorsion and compared it with conventional-stem THA. Using 12 Thiel-fixed, full-body cadaver specimens from donors without known hip disorders, we compared an uncemented calcar-guided femoral short-stem prosthesis with an uncemented conventional straight-stem prosthesis. In a paired study setup, each specimen received a calcar-guided short stem on one side and a conventional stem on the other. On the acetabular side, all specimens received a press-fit, monobloc acetabular cup. Femoral antetorsion angles were measured using the Waidelich method, and pre- and post-operative angles of both sides were recorded. The mean preoperative femoral antetorsion angles were similar in both groups (24.8°  ± 7.5° vs. 23.8° ± 6.1°, p = 0.313). Mean postoperative femoral antetorsion angles were 23.0° ± 5.5° in short-stem and 13.5° ± 7.1° in conventional-stem hips. Short-stem hips had a small but nonsignificant difference in femoral antetorsion angles pre- and post-operatively (1.8° ± 3.2°, p = 0.109), while the difference for conventional-stem hips was much larger and highly significant (10.3° ± 5.8°, p < 0.001). Calcar-guided short-stem THA effectively restores femoral antetorsion. However, how this affects long-term clinical outcomes and complications warrants further exploration.

Associations between implant alignment or position and patient-reported outcomes after total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the associations between implant alignment/position and patient-reported outcomes following total hip arthroplasty using CT-based simulation software.

METHODS

We reviewed hips of 137 patients (27 males, 110 females, mean age: 67.3 years old) who underwent total hip arthroplasty. Radiographic evaluations were based on the software for evaluation of the parameters related to implant alignment/position and femoral/3-dimensional offset using post-operative CT data. Pre-operative and one-year post-operative patient-reported outcomes using Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire scores were evaluated.

FINDINGS

The total and movement scores of normal combined anteversion and stem anteversion angle groups were significantly higher than those of lower and higher groups. The pain and movement scores of decreased femoral offset group were significantly lower than those of restored and increased femoral offset group. There were no significant differences in all scores in cup inclination and anteversion angle, stem coronal alignment, and 3-dimensional femoral offset among groups. Moreover, investigation of the associations between combined anteversion angle/stem anteversion/femoral offset and movement scores revealed that combined anteversion angle and stem anteversion were significantly associated with the movement that needs deep hip flexion and occasionally deep abduction, and high femoral offset was also associated with the movement that needs deep hip flexion.

INTERPRETATION

Surgeons should consider the stem anteversion, stem sagittal alignment, and combined anteversion, in addition to the femoral offset to achieve patient's post-operative satisfaction, although the surgeon may have a relatively larger choice for the implant positioning, especially on the cup side.

Abnormal Femoral Anteversion Is Associated With the Development of Hip Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature and to evaluate the relationship between abnormal femoral version and the development of hip osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

A systematic review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, evaluating Level I and II studies. Included studies had to provide granular femoral version (FV) information. The severity of OA was ranked on the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) scale. Excel version 1808 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA) was used to perform a student t test statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Our review identified 19 qualifying studies-5 Level I and 14 Level II with 1,756 patients. Patients with FV above normal range (>14°) had greater KL scores than patients with normal range FV (mean ± standard deviation; 3.37 ± 1.44 vs 2.05 ± 1.72, P < .05). Analysis of KL scores in patients with FV >24° (>1 standard deviation) versus patients with FV >14° but <24° also demonstrated a positive correlation between increasing FV and KL (4.00 ± 1.96 vs 2.34 ± 0). This was significant independent of the presence or absence of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Retroverted hips (FV<10°) in the present study showed variable OA results upon analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The present review suggests that elevated FV may be a risk factor for more severe hip OA with or without the presence of concurrent dysplasia of the hip. The relative amount of increased anteversion appears positively correlated with severity of OA. Although femoral retroversion may impact hip mechanics, in this review it does not appear to strongly correlate with the development of OA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II: systematic review of Level I and II studies.

Geometrical restoration during total hip arthroplasty is related to change in gait pattern - a study based on computed tomography and three-dimensional gait analysis

Background

The effect of change in hip anatomy on change in gait pattern is not well described in current literature. Therefore, our primary aim was to describe and quantify changes in hip geometry and gait pattern 1 year after total hip arthroplasty (THA) in individuals with hip osteoarthritis. Our secondary aim was to explore the effect of postoperative change in femoral neck anteversion (FNA) and femoral offset and acetabular offset (FO/AO) quota on postoperative change in hip rotation and hip adduction moment during gait, respectively, 1 year after THA”.

Methods

Sixty-five individuals with primary hip osteoarthritis, scheduled for THA, were analyzed in this prospective intervention study. Participants were evaluated pre- and 1 year postoperatively with computed tomography-scans, three-dimensional gait analysis, and patient-reported outcome measures. Multiple linear regressions were performed to evaluate the association between change in joint anatomy and change in gait pattern after THA.

Results

One year postoperatively, global offset was symmetrical between sides as a result of decreased acetabular offset and increased femoral offset on the operated side. Quality of overall gait pattern improved, and participants walked faster and with less trunk lean over the affected side. FNA and hip rotations during walking changed equally in external and internal directions after THA and change in hip rotation during walking was associated with change in FNA in the same direction. An increase in external hip adduction moments was, on the other hand, not associated with change in FO/AO quota but with a more upright walking position and increased walking speed.

Conclusions

The findings of this study suggest that geometrical restoration during THA impacts postoperative gait pattern and, in addition to known factors such as FO, height of hip rotation center, and leg length discrepancy, the FNA must also be taken into consideration.

Trial registration

Trial registration: Clinicaltrial.gov, NCT01512550, Registered 19 January 2012 - Retrospectively registered.

Influence of different anteversion alignments of a cementless hip stem on primary stability and strain distribution

BACKGROUND

Stem anteversion in total hip arthroplasty is well known to have a high impact on dislocation, but empirical data regarding the clinical and biomechanical influence is lacking. Therefore, we evaluated the impact of different anteversion alignments on the primary stability and strain distribution of a cementless stem.

METHODS

The cementless CLS Spotorno stem was implanted in 3 different groups (each group n = 6, total n = 21) with different anteversion alignments: reference anteversion (8°), +15° torsion in anteversion (+23°), -15° torsion in retroversion (-7°) using composite femurs (Sawbones). Primary stability was determined by 3-dimensional micromotions using a dynamic loading procedure simulating walking on level ground. Additionally, surface strains were registered before and after stem insertion in the 3 different groups, using one composite femur for each group (total n = 3).

FINDINGS

The micromotion measurements did not show a significant difference between the 3 evaluated alignments. Moreover, determination of the strain distribution did also not reveal an obvious difference.

INTERPRETATION

This biomechanical study simulating walking on level ground indicates that there is no considerable influence of stem ante-/retroversion variation (±15°) on the initial stability and strain distribution when evaluating the cementless CLS Spotorno in composite femora.

The Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty Reliably Achieves "Safe Zones" for Combined Anteversion

Background

In total hip arthroplasty (THA), component position is critical to avoid instability and improve longevity. Appropriate combined femoral and acetabular component anteversion is important for improved THA stability and increased impingement-free range of motion. In direct anterior THA (DA-THA), concern has been expressed regarding the accuracy of femoral component positioning. This study seeks to quantify acetabular, femoral, and combined component orientation relative to the accepted “safe zones” in patients who have undergone DA-THA.

Methods

Twenty-nine patients who had THA performed via direct anterior approach had postoperative computerized tomography scans done to assess femoral anteversion. Stem rotational alignment was measured relative to the transepicondylar axis (TEA) and the posterior condylar axis (PCA) of the femur at the knee. Acetabular abduction and version were recorded on anteroposterior pelvis radiographs.

Results

The mean stem anteversion was 17.5° (standard deviation = 10.8°) from the TEA and 21.7° (standard deviation = 11.3°) from the PCA. Ten of 30 cups were appropriately anteverted; however, all the cups had appropriate abduction. Combined version when using the TEA resulted in 79% (23/29) of patients within the “safe zone” of 25°-50°. Pearson correlation coefficients were high for both stem anteversion from the TEA (R = 0.96) and PCA (R = 0.98); however, interobserver reliability for combined component anteversion was greater for the TEA (kappa, 0.83 vs 0.65).

Conclusions

Combined anteversion within the “safe zone” was achieved 79% of the time with DA-THA. Interestingly, most of the “excessive” combined anteversion appears to be related to increased anteversion of the acetabular component with only 10 patients within the acetabular cup “safe zone” of 5°-25°.

Risk factors for iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty using a collared femoral prosthesis

Background

The relationship between collar design of a femoral component and iliopsoas impingement (IPI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is still underrecognized. The purpose of our study was to determine the possible risk factors for IPI related to the femoral component, when using a collared femoral prosthesis.

Methods

A total of 196 consecutive THA patients (206 hips) using a collared femoral prosthesis were reviewed retrospectively after exclusion of the factors related to acetabular component and femoral head. The patients were divided into +IPI and −IPI group according to the presence of IPI. Radiological evaluations were performed including femoral morphology, stem positioning, and collar protrusion length (CPL). Multivariate regression analysis was performed to assess the risk factors for IPI.

Results

At a minimum follow-up of 1 year, IPI was observed in 15 hips (7.3%). Dorr type C proximal femur was found in nine hips (60%) in the +IPI group and in 28 hips in the −IPI group (14.7%, p < 0.001). The mean stem anteversion in the +IPI group was significantly greater than that in the −IPI group (19.1° vs. 15.2°, p < 0.001), as well as the mean CPL (2.6 mm vs. − 0.5 mm, p < 0.001). The increased stem anteversion (OR = 1.745, p = 0.001) and CPL (OR = 13.889, p = 0.001) were potential risk factors for IPI.

Conclusions

The incidence of IPI after THA is higher than expected when using a collared femoral prosthesis. Among the factors related to collared femoral prosthesis, excessively increased stem anteversion and prominent collar protrusion are independent predictors for IPI. In addition, high risk of IPI should be carefully considered in Dorr type C bone, despite that femoral morphology is not a predictive factor.

Level of evidence

Level IV, clinical cohort study

Effect of symmetrical restoration for the migration of uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a randomized RSA study with 75 patients and 5-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Inferior placement of a femoral stem is predictive for early loosening and failure, but does restoration of the original hip anatomy benefit the function and survival of a total hip replacement?

METHODS

Seventy-five patients with primary unilateral hip osteoarthritis operated with an uncemented anatomical stem were randomized for either standard or modular stems. We used 50 ABG II stems with modular necks and 25 standard stems (control group). We measured the symmetry in hip anatomy between healthy and operated side. The anatomical restoration variables were anteversion, global offset, and femoral offset/acetabular offset (FO/AO) quota. We performed measurements using a CT-based 3D templating and measuring software. Migratory behavior of the stems was then measured postoperatively with repeated radiostereometry (RSA) examinations over 5 years.

RESULTS

Both stem types showed an early (within 3 months) good stabilization after an initial slight rotation into retroversion and subsidence. There were no significant differences in RSA migration between modular and standard stems. Postoperative anteversion and FO/AO quota had no impact on stem migration. The standard stem tended to result in insufficient global offset (GO), whereas the modular stem did not.

CONCLUSIONS

The modular stem gave good symmetrical anatomical restoration and, like the standard version, a benign migratory behavior. Anteversion, GO, and FO/AO quota had no significant impact on stem migration. It therefore seems to be of no importance whether we choose a modular or a standard stem with regard to postoperative stem migration for this stem type. We overestimated the effect anatomical parameters have on stem movement; hence, we believe the study to be underpowered.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01512550. Registered 19 January 2012-retrospectively registered.

Femoral neck preservation with a short hip stem produced with powder manufacturing: mid-term results of a consecutive case series

Stress shielding and thigh pain are not uncommon after cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) using conventional hip stems. It has been postulated that short, neck-preserving stems may overcome these disadvantages of standard stems and, hence, further improve clinical outcome. The purpose of our retrospective study was to assess the mid-term performance of a neck-preserving hip stem for which, as of yet, no clinical results have been published. A population of 146 consecutive patients who received 152 neck-preserving stems over a 1.6-year period was retrospectively reviewed. Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) were collected, along with radiographic data. One hundred and forty-four THAs implanted in 136 patients were available for analysis. After a mean follow-up of 56 months, mean HHS and WOMAC improved significantly versus preoperative values. Aseptic loosening was not observed. Five-year survival with revision of any component for any reason as the endpoint was 99.3% (95% confidence interval, 95.2-99.9%). Excellent mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes were observed with the study device. We attribute this to the metaphyseal fit in combination with retention of the femoral neck. However, our findings need to be confirmed by multicentre studies with larger patient samples.

Evaluating the primary stability of standard vs lateralised cementless femoral stems - A finite element study using a diverse patient cohort

BACKGROUND

Restoring the original femoral offset is desirable for total hip replacements as it preserves the original muscle lever arm and soft tissue tensions. This can be achieved through lateralised stems, however, the effect of variation in the hip centre offset on the primary stability remains unclear.

METHODS

Finite element analysis was used to compare the primary stability of lateralised and standard designs for a cementless femoral stem (Corail®) across a representative cohort of male and female femora (N = 31 femora; age from 50 to 80 years old). Each femur model was implanted with three designs of the Corail® stem, each designed to achieve a different degree of lateralisation. An automated algorithm was used to select the size and position that achieve maximum metaphyseal fit for each of the designs. Joint contact and muscle forces simulating the peak forces during level gait and stair climbing were scaled to the body mass of each subject.

FINDINGS

The study found that differences in restoring the native femoral offset introduce marginal differences in micromotion (differences in peak micromotion <21 μm), for most cases. Nonetheless, significant reduction in the interfacial strains (>3000 με) was achieved for some subjects when lateralized stems were used.

INTERPRETATION

Findings of this study suggest that, with the appropriate size and alignment, the standard offset design is likely to be sufficient for primary stability, in most cases. Nonetheless, appropriate use of lateralised stems has the potential reduce the risk of peri-prosthetic bone damage. This highlights the importance of appropriate implant selection during the surgical planning stage.

Which factors influence proximal femoral asymmetry?

Aims

In patients where the proximal femur shows gross deformity due to degenerative changes or fracture, the contralateral femur is often used to perform preoperative templating for hip arthroplasty. However, femurs may not be symmetrical: the aim of this study was to determine the degree of variation between hips in healthy individuals and to determine whether it is affected by demographic parameters.

Materials and Methods

CT-scan based modelling was used to examine the pelvis and bilateral femurs of 345 patients (211 males, 134 women; mean age 62 years (standard deviation (sd) 17), mean body mass index 27 kg/m2 (sd 5)) representing a range of ethnicities. The femoral neck-shaft angle (NSA), femoral offset (FO), femoral neck version (FNV), femoral length (FL), femoral canal flare index (fCFI), and femoral head radius (FHr) were then determined for each patient. All measurements were constructed using algorithm-calculated landmarks, resulting in reproducible and consistent constructs for each specimen. We then analyzed femoral symmetry based on absolute differences (AD) and percentage asymmetry (%AS) following a previously validated method.

Results

We found an asymmetry > 2% for NSA (mean AD 2.9°, mean %AS 2.3; p = 0.03), FO (AD 3.8 mm, %AS 9.1 ; p = 0.01), FNV (AD 5.1°, %AS 46.7 ; p = 0.001) and fCFI (AD 0.2 mm, %AS 5.4 ; p = 0.7). Significant relationships were found for AD regarding NSA and ethnicity (p = 0.037), FL and height (R2 = 0.22), and fCFI and gender (R2 = 0.34).

Conclusion

Our data confirm the presence of asymmetry of proximal femurs, which is mostly independent of demographic parameters. In cases where contralateral templating is used, such asymmetry may lead to inaccurate anatomical restoration of the hip if the templated sizes are routinely implanted. However, the clinical impact cannot be determined from our investigation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:839–44.

Biomechanical Robustness of a Contemporary Cementless Stem to Surgical Variation in Stem Size and Position

Successful designs of total hip replacement (THR) need to be robust to surgical variation in sizing and positioning of the femoral stem. This study presents an automated method for comprehensive evaluation of the potential impact of surgical variability in sizing and positioning on the primary stability of a contemporary cementless femoral stem (Corail®, DePuy Synthes). A patient-specific finite element (FE) model of a femur was generated from computed tomography (CT) images from a female donor. An automated algorithm was developed to span the plausible surgical envelope of implant positions constrained by the inner cortical boundary. The analysis was performed on four stem sizes: oversized, ideal (nominal) sized, and undersized by up to two stem sizes. For each size, Latin hypercube sampling was used to generate models for 100 unique alignment scenarios. For each scenario, peak hip contact and muscle forces published for stair climbing were scaled to the donor's body weight and applied to the model. The risk of implant loosening was assessed by comparing the bone–implant micromotion/strains to thresholds (150 μm and 7000 με) above which fibrous tissue is expected to prevail and the periprosthetic bone to yield, respectively. The risk of long-term loosening due to adverse bone resorption was assessed using bone adaptation theory. The range of implant positions generated effectively spanned the available intracortical space. The Corail stem was found stable and robust to changes in size and position, with the majority of the bone–implant interface undergoing micromotion and interfacial strains that are well below 150 μm and 7000 με, respectively. Nevertheless, the range of implant positions generated caused an increase of up to 50% in peak micromotion and up to 25% in interfacial strains, particularly for retroverted stems placed in a medial position.

Validity of the intra-operative measurement of stem anteversion and factors for the erroneous estimation in cementless total hip arthroplasty using postero-lateral approach

BACKGROUND

Intra-operative estimation of stem anteversion in total hip arthroplasty (THA) using postero-lateral approach is made by the surgeon's visual assessment, using the tibia as a guide, with the assumption that tibial axis is vertical to the trans-epicondylar axis. However, the accuracy of the intra-operative estimation has rarely been verified with postoperative CT-scans, with controversies regarding these measurements particularly in case of knee osteoarthritis. Therefore we performed a prospective study to: (1) determine the accuracy of the intra-operative measurement and (2) investigate factors affecting the discrepancy between the surgeon's estimation and the real stem anteversion.

HYPOTHESIS

Intra-operative estimation of stem anteversion correlated with the real stem anteversion on CT-scan.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-seven THAs using cementless straight stems (65 patients) without ipsilateral total knee arthroplasty were prospectively evaluated to compare the intra-operative measurement of stem anteversion with the real stem anteversion on computed tomography (CT) scans. There were 33 men and 34 women with a mean age of 59.7years (range, 27-84years) at the time of surgery. Age, tibia plateau angle, native femoral anteversion, femoro-tibial angle, body mass index, operative site, gender, coronal and sagittal tilt of the stem, stem type, ipsilateral knee osteoarthritis, and preoperative diagnosis were analyzed to evaluate the factors affecting the discrepancy between the intra-operative and CT measurements.

RESULTS

The intra-operative estimation (mean, 21.5°±8.5°; range, 5.0°-39.0°) was greater than the CT measurement (mean, 19.5°±8.7°; range, 4.5°-38.5°) by 2.0°. The mean absolute value of discrepancy was 4.5°. The correlation coefficient between intra-operative and CT measurements was 0.837. The femoro-tibial angle was associated with the discrepancy between the two measurements. In the presence of genu varum deformity, the intra-operative measurement underestimated the stem anteversion.

DISCUSSION

Although intra-operative estimation of stem anteversion was slightly greater than the real stem anteversion, there was an excellent correlation between the two. The femoro-tibial angle should be considered to optimize the stem anteversion during cementless THA using postero-lateral approach.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, prospective case control study.

Influence of femoral bowing on range of motion after total hip arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The influence of physiologic femoral bowing on range of motion (ROM) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate the morphology of the femur in patients who underwent THA, and to analyze the influence of femoral bowing on ROM due to implant impingement after THA.

METHODS

The ROM was calculated from 100 hips in 90 patients who underwent THA using computed tomography data with a 3D dynamic analysis software. Lateral and anterior bowing angles of the femur were measured. A modular implant (Modulus system, Lima Corporate, Villanova di San Daniele del Friuli, Italy) was used for simulation. In all subjects, cup inclination, anteversion, and stem anteversion were set to 40°, 15°, and 30°, respectively. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between the morphology of the femur and ROM.

RESULTS

Lateral bowing of the femur was demonstrated to be significantly correlated with age (r = 0.361, p < 0.001) and female sex (r = 0.315, p = 0.001). Lateral bowing of the femur was significantly positively correlated with flexion and internal rotation (Int-R) with 90° flexion. Anterior bowing was significantly associated with decreasing flexion, decreasing Int-R with 90° flexion and increasing Int-R with 45° flexion and 15° adduction.

CONCLUSIONS

A ROM-optimized cup position cannot be calculated from femoral stem anteversion values alone; therefore, when surgeons position the cup in relation to the femoral stem anteversion, the influence of femoral bowing may also require consideration.

Does restoration of leg length and femoral offset play a role in functional outcome one year after hip hemiarthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between specific joint biomechanical parameters and 1year functional outcome scores in elderly patients receiving hemiarthroplasty in the setting of intracapsular hip fractures.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, institutional registry based study. 168 hip hemarthroplasties were captured from October 2013 to June 2015. Patients were excluded based on contralateral hip surgery, perioperative complications or inadequate radiographs. 84 patients were alive at one year follow up. We compared mobility and pain scores to radiographically determined variations of leg lengths and femoral offset. We also compared the performance of fellowship trained arthroplasty surgeons to their non-fellowship trained counterparts.

RESULTS

The operated leg was a mean of 1.12±6.8mm longer than the contralateral. leg length discrepancy (LLD) was less than 10mm in 72 patients. Mean difference in offset between limbs was 0.25±3.3mm. The difference was within 5mm in 79 patients (94%). We found no statistically significant correlation between mobility or pain scores and variations in leg length or offset. We found significantly better performance of the arthroplasty surgeons in restoring leg length but no difference in offset reconstruction or functional benefit for the patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study was unable to demonstrate a significant relationship between leg length or femoral offset restoration and the patient's ultimate functional recovery. Arthroplasty surgeons performed better in restoring leg length, but no associated functional advantage was seen.

Is there a role for femoral offset restoration during total hip arthroplasty? A systematic review

Benefits of femoral offset restoration during total hip arthroplasty should be the reduction of bearing surfaces wear, implant loosening and dislocation rates. Modular neck stems ensure offset customization but fretting corrosion and catastrophic failures are well-documented complications. Since clinical evidences are needed to substantiate the effectiveness of femoral offset restoration and promote modular neck choice, we systematically reviewed the literature to ascertain whether femoral offset itself has a proven clinical influence: (1) on bearing surfaces wear, (2) implant loosening, (3) and dislocation rates. A systematic literature screening was conducted to find papers dealing with the influence of femoral offset on wear, dislocation and loosening, including articles with conventional radiographic femoral offset assessment and with comparative design. Observational studies, case reports, instructional course lectures, cadaveric and animal studies as well as biomechanical studies, letters to the editor, surgical techniques or technical notes were all excluded. No limits about publication date were supplied but only papers in English were taken into account. Data were extracted into an anonymous spreadsheet. Offset values, dislocation rates, wear rates, follow-up and surgical approaches were all detailed. Ten manuscripts were finally selected. A statistically significant correlation between femoral offset restoration and the reduction of conventional ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene wear was found in two out of three papers investigating this issue, but no correlations were found between femoral offset and dislocation rates or implant loosening. Femoral offset modification influences ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene liners wear, but no correlation was found with dislocation rates or implant loosening. Advantages on wear can be counterbalanced by the use of hard bearing surfaces or highly cross-linked polyethylene liners, besides the availability of larger femoral heads improving implant stability further reduces the importance of femoral offset restoration by means of modularity. We believe that efforts in restoring femoral offset during total hip arthroplasty do not translate into tangible clinical profits and consequently, we do not advise the routinely usage of modular neck stems in total hip arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

level III, systematic review of case-control studies.