The administration of intermittent parathyroid hormone affects functional recovery from trochanteric fractured neck of femur: a randomised prospective mixed method pilot study

Executive summary: Italian guidelines for diagnosis, risk stratification, and care continuity of fragility fractures 2021

Background

Fragility fractures are a major public health concern owing to their worrying and growing burden and their onerous burden upon health systems. There is now a substantial body of evidence that individuals who have already suffered a fragility fracture are at a greater risk for further fractures, thus suggesting the potential for secondary prevention in this field.

Purpose

This guideline aims to provide evidence-based recommendations for recognizing, stratifying the risk, treating, and managing patients with fragility fracture. This is a summary version of the full Italian guideline.

Methods

The Italian Fragility Fracture Team appointed by the Italian National Health Institute was employed from January 2020 to February 2021 to (i) identify previously published systematic reviews and guidelines on the field, (ii) formulate relevant clinical questions, (iii) systematically review literature and summarize evidence, (iv) draft the Evidence to Decision Framework, and (v) formulate recommendations.

Results

Overall, 351 original papers were included in our systematic review to answer six clinical questions. Recommendations were categorized into issues concerning (i) frailty recognition as the cause of bone fracture, (ii) (re)fracture risk assessment, for prioritizing interventions, and (iii) treatment and management of patients experiencing fragility fractures. Six recommendations were overall developed, of which one, four, and one were of high, moderate, and low quality, respectively.

Conclusions

The current guidelines provide guidance to support individualized management of patients experiencing non-traumatic bone fracture to benefit from secondary prevention of (re)fracture. Although our recommendations are based on the best available evidence, questionable quality evidence is still available for some relevant clinical questions, so future research has the potential to reduce uncertainty about the effects of intervention and the reasons for doing so at a reasonable cost.

Role of Supplemental Teriparatide Therapy to Augment Functional and Radiological Outcomes in Osteoporotic Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures in the Elderly Population

With improved life expectancy and ever-increasing geriatric population with concomitant osteoporosis, there is increase in osteoporotic intertrochanteric hip fractures. Even the best surgical advances fail to provide satisfactory and early results. As a result, researchers' focus has lately shifted to developing a more integrated approach that combines the pharmacotherapeutic capabilities of teriparatide, a recombinant version of human parathyroid hormone (1-34), a new anabolic drug that enhances bone mass and strength by promoting osteoblastic activity and hastens fracture union in both human and animals. We attempted to evaluate the therapeutic efficiency of teriparatide therapy on outcomes of surgically managed Intertrochanteric hip fractures in osteoporotic patients. A total of 31 patients with established osteoporosis and Intertrochanteric fractures were selected and divided into two groups, managed surgically with proximal femur nailing, and then prospectively compared with one group receiving teriparatide therapy in addition to standard treatment after taking necessary consent and allocation into two groups based on the preference of patients to take additional teriparatide or not after understanding the benefits and risks involved. We aimed to assess the functional and radiological effects of teriparatide on bone mineral density, the time taken for fracture union, and other fracture-related postoperative complications such as weight bearing and residual bone pain. All patients were followed up at 6, 12, and 24 weeks. Time to fracture union was significantly shortened, with considerable improvement in bone density and functional outcome in the teriparatide group. Varus collapse, the rate of migration of the helical blade, and shortening of the femoral neck were also significantly less in the study group. From the assembled data, we can safely assume that with early union rates with better functional improvement with additional advantage of increased bone mass, we favor supplemental teriparatide therapy in the management of osteoporotic patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures to augment healing. Further studies with a larger sample size are required to support our observation.

Teriparatide and pelvic fracture healing: a phase 2 randomized controlled trial

Pelvic fracture patients were randomized to blinded daily subcutaneous teriparatide (TPTD) or placebo to assess healing and functional outcomes over 3 months. With TPTD, there was no evidence of improved healing by CT or pain reduction; however, physical performance improved with TPTD but not placebo (group difference p < 0.03).

INTRODUCTION

To determine if teriparatide (20 μg/day; TPTD) results in improved radiologic healing, reduced pain, and improved functional outcome vs placebo over 3 months in pelvic fracture patients.

METHODS

This randomized, placebo-controlled study enrolled 35 patients (women and men >50 years old) within 4 weeks of pelvic fracture and evaluated the effect of blinded TPTD vs placebo over 3 months on fracture healing. Fracture healing from CT images at 0 and 3 months was assessed as cortical bridging using a 5-point scale. The numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain was administered monthly. Physical performance was assessed monthly by Continuous Summary Physical Performance Score (based on 4 m walk speed, timed repeated chair stands, and balance) and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test.

RESULTS

The mean age was 82, and >80% were female. The intention to treat analysis showed no group difference in cortical bridging score, and 50% of fractures in TPTD-treated and 53% of fractures in placebo-treated patients were healed at 3 months, unchanged after adjustment for age, sacral fracture, and fracture displacement. Median pain score dropped significantly in both groups with no group differences. Both CSPPS and TUG improved in the teriparatide group, whereas there was no improvement in the placebo group (group difference p < 0.03 for CSPPS at 2 and 3 months).

CONCLUSION

In this small randomized, blinded study, there was no improvement in radiographic healing (CT at 3 months) or pain with TPTD vs placebo; however, there was improved physical performance in TPTD-treated subjects that was not evident in the placebo group.

Timing of osteoporosis therapies following fracture: the current status

In most patients, osteoporosis is diagnosed only after the occurrence of the first fragility fracture. It is of utmost importance to start osteoporosis medications immediately in these patients to prevent future fractures and also to reduce associated mortality and morbidity. There remains a hesitancy over initiating osteoporotic medications, specifically for antiresorptive agents like bisphosphonates following an acute fracture due to concern over their effect on fracture healing. The purpose of this review is to study the effect of the timing of initiation of different osteoporosis medications on healing after an acute fracture. Most of the human studies, including randomized control trials (RCTs), did not find any significant negative effect on fracture healing with early use of bisphosphonate after an acute fracture. Anabolic agents like teriparatide have shown either neutral or beneficial effects on fracture healing and thus can be started very early following any osteoporotic fracture. Although human studies on the early use of other osteoporosis medications like denosumab or strontium ranelate are very sparse in the literature, none of these medications have shown any evidence of delay in fracture healing. To summarize, among the commonly used anti-osteoporosis agents, both bisphosphonates and teriparatide are safe to be initiated in the early acute post-fracture period. Moreover, teriparatide has shown some evidence in favor of reducing fracture healing time.

The effect of osteoporosis and its treatment on fracture healing a systematic review of animal and clinical studies

Introduction

Osteoporosis is characterised by low bone mass and micro-architectural deterioration of bone structure. Its treatment is directed at the processes of bone formation or resorption, that are of utmost importance in fracture healing. We provide a comprehensive review of the literature aiming to summarize and clarify the effects of osteoporosis and its treatment on fracture healing.

Material and methods

A literature search was conducted in PubMed and Embase (OVID version). In vivo animal and human studies on long bone fractures were included. A total of 93 articles were included for this review; 23 studies on the effect of osteoporosis (18 animal and 5 clinical studies) and 70 studies on the effect of osteoporosis treatment (41 animal, 26 clinical studies and 3 meta-analyses) on fracture healing.

Results

In animal fracture models osteoporosis was associated with decreased callus formation and bone growth, bone mineral density, biomechanical strength and delayed cellular and differentiation processes during fracture healing. Two large databases identified osteoporosis as a risk factor for non-union whereas three other studies did not. One of those three studies however found a prolonged healing time in patients with osteoporosis. Anti-osteoporosis medication showed inconsistent effects on fracture healing in both non-osteoporotic and osteoporotic animal models. Only the parathyroid hormone and anti-resorption medication were related to improved fracture healing and delayed remodelling respectively. Clinical studies performed in predominantly hip and distal radius fracture patients showed no effect of bisphosphonates on fracture healing. Parathyroid hormone reduced time to union in several clinical trials performed in mainly hip fracture patients, but this did not result in decreased delayed or non-union rates.

Conclusion

Evidence that substantiates the negative influence of osteoporosis on fracture healing is predominantly from animal studies and to a lesser extent from clinical studies, since convincing clinical evidence lacks. Bisphosphonates and parathyroid hormone may be used during fracture healing, since no clear negative effect has been shown. Parathyroid hormone might even decrease time to fracture union, without decreasing union rate.

•

Osteoporosis negatively influences fracture healing in animal models.

•

There is no convincing evidence for a similar effect in humans.

•

In animals, bisphosphonates delay bone remodelling

•

In animals, parathyroid hormone improves fracture healing

•

In humans, anti-osteoporotic drugs do not interfere with fracture healing.

Effectiveness of parathyroid hormone (PTH) analogues on fracture healing: a meta-analysis

This meta-analysis evaluated the evidence for the use of parathyroid hormone (PTH) analogues to improve fracture healing. Eligible studies were prospective randomised controlled trials of adults with acute fractures treated with a PTH analogue. PTH improved functional outcomes but did not affect fracture healing rate or reduce pain.

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis evaluated the evidence of parathyroid hormone (PTH) analogues in fracture healing. The use of PTH analogues to prevent osteoporotic fractures is well investigated, and studies are emerging on extended indications. One such indication receiving increasing attention is the effect of PTH in fracture healing; however, the overall degree of efficacy remains inconclusive.

METHODS

A systematic electronic database search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library was conducted for relevant articles in August 2019 with no date restrictions. Randomised controlled trials of adults with acute fractures treated with a PTH analogue were included. PTH was compared with a comparator intervention, placebo or no treatment.

RESULTS

PTH analogue treatment improved functional outcomes in a range of fracture types but did not affect the fracture healing rate or reduce pain. Most trials included in this review were in elderly patients with osteoporosis. There was no evidence that PTH treatment caused harm or impeded fracture healing.

CONCLUSIONS

Meta-analysis of published data supports the use of PTH analogues to improve functional outcomes but not fracture healing rate or pain for different fracture types. The evidence for PTH analogue use in fracture healing is less clear in younger, non-osteoporotic patient populations. Trial design was heterogeneous and of limited quality, justifying further original trials.

Role of supplemental teriparatide therapy in management of osteoporotic intertrochanteric femur fractures

BACKGROUND

Despite the surgical advances, obtaining the desired outcome in osteoporotic intertrochanteric femur fractures is still a tough row to hoe for the surgeons. Consequently, the interest of the researchers has shifted towards establishing a holistic approach for managing such injuries. Teriparatide, a recombinant form of human parathyroid hormone, is a novel drug that has been proved to hasten fracture healing and in both animals and humans. We attempted to evaluate the influence of Teriparatide therapy in surgically fixed osteoporotic intertrochanteric femur fractures and provide the groundwork for further research in this area.

METHODS

The results of osteoporotic patients who underwent only Proximal Femur Nailing [PFN] for intertrochanteric femur fractures were prospectively compared to the patients who received an additional Teriparatide therapy. We aimed to identify the effect of Teriparatide on the time to fracture union, bone mineral density [BMD], and other fracture related post-operative complications. The functional outcome was assessed using the Lower extremity functional scale [LEFS].

RESULTS

All patients were followed up for 6 months by which time all the fractures united. However, in the Teriparatide group, time to fracture union was shortened by about 2 weeks and improvement in BMD and functional outcome were significantly better. The rate of migration of the helical, varus collapse, and femoral shortening did not show any relevant difference.

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary attempt shows that early union coupled with better functional improvement and a substantial increase in BMD tips the balance in favour of the Teriparatide therapy in osteoporotic patients with intertrochanteric femur fractures. Well-designed clinical trials conducted in a similar vein are further required to support our claim.

Effects of Teriparatide on Treatment Outcomes in Osteoporotic Hip and Pelvic Bone Fractures: Meta-analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have reported the effects of teriparatide on bone-healing in osteoporotic hip and pelvic bone fractures to determine the efficacy of teriparatide in lowering the rate of treatment failure. A total of 2,809 studies were identified using a comprehensive literature search (MEDLINE [n=1,061], Embase [n=1,395], and Cochrane Library n=353]). Five RCTs were included in the final analysis. Treatment failure rates at the last follow-up of osteoporotic hip and pelvic bone fractures between the teriparatide and control groups was the primary outcome. Treatment failure was defined as non-union, varus collapse of the proximal fragment, perforation of the lag screw, and any revision in cases due to mechanical failure of the implant during the follow-up period. The number of treatment failures in the teriparatide and placebo groups were 11.0% (n=20 out of 181) and 17.6% (n=36 out of 205), respectively. Although the rate of treatment failure in the teriparatide group was lower than that in the control group, this difference was not significant (odds ratio, 0.81 [95% confidence interval, 0.42–1.53]; P=0.16; I²=42%). This meta-analysis did not identify any significant differences in the rate of treatment failure between the teriparatide and control groups at final follow-up. Based on these results, we believe that there is a lack of evidence to confirm efficacy of teriparatide in reducing treatment failures in osteoporotic hip and pelvic bone fractures.

The Efficacy of Teriparatide in Improving Fracture Healing in Hip Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the role of teriparatide in improving hip fracture healing and function to provide a clinical guide.

Methods

The systematic literature review identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled studies evaluating teriparatide for elderly hip fractures. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan version 5.3.

Results

This study included two RCTs and four retrospective studies comprising 607 patients, with 269 and 338 patients in the teriparatide and control groups, respectively. The quality of these six studies was moderate. Compared to the control group, teriparatide reduced the time to union (weighted mean difference (WMD) = −1.95; 95% confidence interval (CI): -3.23–-0.68; P = 0.003) but did not improve the rate of fracture union at 3 months (odds ratio (OR) = 1.46; 95% CI: 0.50–4.24; P = 0.49) or 6 months (OR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.44–1.81; P = 0.75). In addition, teriparatide did not decrease the complications, need for reoperation, mortality, rate of deformity after fracture healing, and subsequent fracture or improve hip function.

Conclusions

The current limited evidence did not support that teriparatide improves fracture healing in hip fractures, due to study heterogeneity and various sources of biases. Further high-quality, large-sample trials are needed. This trial is registered with PROSPERO with registration number CRD42020152205.

Does short-term weekly teriparatide improve healing in unstable intertrochanteric fractures?

Slow recovery after hip fracture has been associated with negative consequences. Thus, there is medical need to improve healing and functional recovery after intertrochanteric fracture. The aim of this study was to measure whether short-term teriparatide would improve healing in intertrochanteric fractures after internal fixation as measured by (1) clinical scores, (2) radiographic fracture healing, and (3) complication rates. We retrospectively reviewed 96 patients (average age, 82 years) who underwent closed reduction and internal fixation with proximal femoral nail (PFN) for unstable intertrochanteric fractures between 2014 and 2016. Of the 96 patients, 56 patients were treated with a PFN alone (group 1). These patients were compared with 46 patients for whom the same device was used and a weekly subcutaneous injection of PTH 1-34 (teriparatide) was prescribed postoperatively (group 2). Questionnaire surveys or telephone interviews were conducted, and patients completed a self-report Harris hip score and visual analog scale scores. The radiological time to fracture healing was assessed as the primary end point. Postoperative complication rates were compared. Functional outcomes at 6 months after surgery were similar in both groups. There were no differences between groups in the proportion of patients achieving radiographic fracture healing. The frequency of patients reporting adverse events was 20% (10 of 50) in group 1 versus 17% (8 of 46) in group 2 ( p = 0.744). Short-term teriparatide did not improve radiographic signs of fracture healing of an intertrochanteric fracture and reduce the incidence of complications. The effect of teriparatide on fracture healing remains uncertain. Further multicenter prospective studies are needed to demonstrate objective long-term results of parathyroid hormone therapy in patient with hip fracture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

The effectiveness and safety of parathyroid hormone in fracture healing: A meta-analysis

The very large economic and social burdens of fracture-related complications make rapid fracture healing a major public health goal. The role of parathyroid hormone (PTH) in treating osteoporosis is generally accepted, but the effect of PTH on fracture healing is controversial. This meta-analysis was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of PTH in fracture healing. The EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched from the inception dates to April 26, 2018. The primary randomized clinical trials comparing PTH treatment for fracture healing with placebo or no treatment were identified. We did not gain additional information by contacting the authors of the primary studies. Two reviewers independently extracted the data and evaluated study quality. This meta-analysis was executed to determine the odds ratio, mean difference, standardized mean difference, and 95% confidence intervals with random-effects models. In total, 8 randomized trials including 524 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were significant differences in fracture healing time, pain relief and function improvement. There were no significant differences in the fracture healing rate or adverse events, including light-headedness, hypercalcemia, nausea, sweating and headache, except for slight bruising at the injection site. We determined that the effectiveness and safety of PTH in fracture healing is reasonably well established and credible.

Is calcium phosphate augmentation a viable option for osteoporotic hip fractures?

The use of calcium phosphate bone cement has been described to allow for retention of reduction. Therefore, we evaluated whether augmentation with resorbable calcium phosphate could improve fracture stability in osteoporotic hip fractures. The results showed that augmentation with calcium phosphate cement significantly improved the stability of intertrochanteric fractures.

INTRODUCTION

The aim with this study was to measure whether augmentation with resorbable calcium phosphate cement could improve fracture stability in osteoporotic hip fractures.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 82 patients who underwent closed reduction and internal fixation with proximal femoral nail (PFN) for unstable intertrochanteric fractures between 2014 and 2017. In 42 of 82 patients, patients were treated with a PFN alone (group I). These patients were compared with 40 patients for whom the same device combined with calcium phosphate cement for augmentation was used (group II). Questionnaire surveys or telephone interviews were conducted and patients completed a self-report Harris hip score (HHS) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Radiographic outcomes including mean sliding distance of screw, femoral shortening, and varus collapse were compared. Postoperative complications were compared.

RESULTS

Clinical outcomes at 6 months after surgery were equivalent in both groups. Screw sliding, femoral shortening, and varus collapse were all significantly reduced in the cemented group at the last follow-up (p < 0.001, p = 0.005, p < 0.001, respectively). A total of 9 (21%) complications occurred in group I. In contrast, 2 (5%) complications were seen in group II (p = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

Augmentation with calcium phosphate cement significantly improved the stability of intertrochanteric fractures fixed with a PFN and reduced overall failure rates. We believe augmentation with resorbable calcium phosphate cement for osteoporotic hip fractures is a reasonable option in selected patients.

Effect of Teriparatide or Risedronate in Elderly Patients With a Recent Pertrochanteric Hip Fracture: Final Results of a 78-Week Randomized Clinical Trial

We present final results of a study comparing teriparatide 20 μg every day (QD) with risedronate 35 mg once per week (QW) started within 2 weeks after surgery for a pertrochanteric hip fracture. Patients with BMD T-score ≤ -2.0 and 25OHD ≥9.2 ng/mL were randomized to receive 26-week double-dummy treatment plus calcium and vitamin D, followed by 52-week open-label treatment with the same assigned active drug. Primary endpoint was change from baseline in lumbar spine (LS) BMD at 78 weeks. Secondary and exploratory endpoints were change in BMD at the proximal femur, function, hip pain (Charnley score and 100 mm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]), quality of life (Short Form-36), radiology outcomes, and safety. Data were analyzed with mixed models for repeated measures (MMRM) and logistic regression. Totally, 224 patients were randomized; 171 (teriparatide: 86) contributed to the efficacy analyses (mean ± SD age: 77 ± 7.7 years, 77% females). Mean baseline LS, femoral neck (FN), and total hip (TH) T-scores were -2.16, -2.63, and -2.51, respectively. At 78 weeks, BMD increased significantly more with teriparatide compared to risedronate at the LS (+11.08% versus +6.45%; p < 0.001) and FN (+1.96% versus -1.19%; p = 0.003), with no significant between-group difference in TH BMD. Timed up-and-go (TUG) test was significantly faster with teriparatide at 6, 12, 18, and 26 weeks (differences: -3.2 to -5.9 s; p = 0.045 for overall difference). Hip pain during TUG test by 100 mm VAS was significantly lower with teriparatide at 18 weeks (adjusted difference: -11.3 mm, p = 0.033; -10.0 and -9.3 mm at 12 and 26 weeks, respectively; p = 0.079 for overall difference). Other secondary and exploratory outcomes were not different. Teriparatide group showed two new hip fractures versus seven with risedronate (p = 0.171) and more frequent hypercalcemia and hyperuricemia. In conclusion, 78-week treatment with teriparatide showed significantly greater increases in LS and FN BMD, less pain, and a faster TUG test versus risedronate. © 2016 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.