Biology and technology in the surgical treatment of malignant bone tumours in children and adolescents, with a special note on the very young

What Do We Know about Survival in Skeletally Premature Children Aged 0 to 10 Years with Ewing Sarcoma? A Multicenter 10-Year Follow-Up Study in 60 Patients

(1) Background: Younger age has been associated with better overall survival (OS) in Ewing sarcoma (ES), especially under the age of 10. The favorable survival in younger patients underlines the need for minimizing treatment burden and late sequelae. Our study aimed at describing clinical characteristics, treatment and outcome of a cohort of ES patients aged 0−10. (2) Methods: In this retrospective multicenter study, all consecutive ES patients aged 0−10, treated in four sarcoma centers in the Netherlands (n = 33) and one in Spain (n = 27) between 1982 and 2008, with a minimum follow-up of 10 years, were included. OS, local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were calculated. Potential factors of influence on OS (risk and protective factors) were analyzed. (3) Results: 60 patients with median follow-up 13.03 years were included. All patients were treated with chemotherapy in combination with local treatment, being surgery alone in 30 (50%) patients, radiotherapy (RT) alone in 12 (20%) patients or surgery plus RT in 18 (30%) patients (12 pre- and 6 postoperative). Limb salvage was achieved in 93% of patients. The 10-OS, -LRFS and -DMFS are 81% (95% CI: 71−91%), 89% (95% CI: 85−93%) and 81% (95% CI: 71−91%), respectively. Six patients developed LR, of which two developed subsequent DM; all had axial ES (pelvis, spine or chest wall), and these patients all died. Ten patients developed DM; eight died due to progressive disease, and two are currently in remission, both with pulmonary metastasis only. Negative or wide resection margin was significantly associated with better OS. Age < 6 years, tumor volume < 200 mL, absence of metastatic disease and treatment after 2000 showed trends towards better OS. Two patients developed secondary malignancy; both had chemotherapy combined with definitive RT for local treatment. (4) Conclusions: Overall survival of these youngest patients with ES was very good. Limb salvage surgery was achieved in >90% of patients. Wide resection margin was the only factor significantly associated with better survival.

A Reassessment of the Barrier Effect of the Physis against Metaphyseal Osteosarcoma: A Comprehensive Pathological Study with Its Radiological and Clinical Follow-Up Correlations

Osteosarcoma is a primary malignant bone tumor usually arising at the metaphysis of long bones, particularly around the knee. The physis has been regarded as a barrier capable of blocking tumor extension, thus allowing it to preserve their epiphysis and therefore improve functional results. With the objective of clarifying how effective the physis is as a barrier to tumor spread, a large series of skeletally immature patients with osteosarcoma were reviewed. From 452 metaphyseal osteosarcomas a selection of 282 cases in which the tumor was close or crossing the physis were carried out. This sub-sample was split into two groups according to the surgical treatment (epiphyseal preservation or not). The specimens obtained by resection were studied, and the physeal and metaphyseal areas were studied by multiple sections. Immunostaining against VEGF of physis was obtained in selected cases. In about half of the patients affected by metaphyseal malignant bone tumors, the growth plate and epiphysis were not compromised by the tumor. Three sequential invasive growth patterns of an osteosarcoma in its relationship with the physis could be distinguished. An intense angiogenesis and osteoclastic reaction could be observed in the growth plate in the free zone between the tumor and the physis. The local recurrence incidence was lower in the epiphyseal preservation treated patients than it was in the conventional treatment (8% vs. 12%). Most local recurrences appeared in the first 2 years. The overall survival of patients treated with epiphyseal preservation was better than that of the patients treated without preserving the epiphysis (73% vs. 59%; p = 0.03) at a mean follow-up of 18 years. We have described an angiogenic and osteoclastic reaction in the base of the growth plate in the proximity of the advance front of the tumor, which could facilitate the osteosarcoma invasion. It is also shown that the preoperative imaging method for examination is a valid approach for the decision to carry out epiphyseal preservation. Finally, we concluded that epiphyseal preservation combined with protective chemotherapy is an excellent clinical approach for selected patients with metaphyseal osteosarcoma.