Decreasing pelvic incidence is associated with greater risk of cam morphology

Alpha Angle and Anterior Femoral Neck Offset Identify Different Cohorts of Cam Morphology: An Osteologic Study

PURPOSE

To explore differences in cam morphology defined by alpha angle (AA) and anterior femoral neck offset (AFNO) in the context of other anthropometric parameters in an osteologic collection to further elucidate whether each measurement tool is identifying the same underlying pathology.

METHODS

Anthropometric measurements of 992 cadaveric hips from the Hamann-Todd Osteological Collection were analyzed. Femurs with cam morphology were identified by AA >55° or AFNO <7 mm. Anthropometric parameters stratified by cam morphology were assessed with Wilcoxon rank-sum and Pearson χ2 tests. Multivariate logistic regressions were performed on significant variables in univariate analysis to examine the predictive ability of anthropometric variables to cam morphology.

RESULTS

Cam morphology was identified in 242 hips via AA, 344 hips via AFNO, and 123 hips via both measures. Multivariate logarithmic regression analysis demonstrated that sex negatively predicted AA (females with less pathology, β = -0.14, P = .04), race negatively predicted AA (Blacks with less pathology, β = -0.21, P < .01), and proximal femoral osteoarthritis was positively associated with AA (β = 0.16, P = .02), while none of these were associated with AFNO. On the other hand, right-side specimens were associated with AA (β = 0.15, P = .02) and AFNO (β = 0.25, P < .01), whereas the combined version was unassociated with both measures.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, cam morphology was identified in a modest percentage of osteologic specimens by both AA and AFNO in our study. Further, associations of multiple demographic, anthropometric, and anatomical parameters to AA and AFNO suggest they may identify different subsets of cam morphology.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Cam morphology identified by AA versus AFNO may represent 2 different pathologic entities. Future studies should assess differences between these measures in a clinical cohort and determine whether these 2 definitions of cam morphology identify different clinical populations.

Does Periacetabular Osteotomy Change Sagittal Spinopelvic Alignment?

BACKGROUND

There are few data on the impact of periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) on sagittal spinopelvic alignment. Prior studies have attempted to delineate the relationship by performing measurements on AP radiographs and using mathematical models to determine changes in postoperative pelvic tilt. This information is clinically significant to a surgeon when evaluating acetabular/pelvic position intraoperatively and understanding spinopelvic alignment changes postoperatively; therefore, radiographic changes from PAO should be described in more detail.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

In this study, we asked: (1) Does the performance of PAO result in consistent changes in spinopelvic alignment, as measured on EOS radiographs? (2) Does this differ for unilateral versus bilateral PAOs? (3) Does this differ in the setting of a mobile spine versus an immobile spine? (4) Does this differ based on preoperative pelvic tilt?

METHODS

Mean preoperative and at least 1-year postoperative (15 ± 8 months from surgery, minimum 11 months, maximum 65 months) EOS hip-to-ankle standing and sitting radiographs for 55 patients in a prospectively collected registry who underwent PAO with a single surgeon from January 1, 2019, to January 11, 2022, were measured for pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, lumbar lordosis, lateral center-edge angle, L1 pelvic angle, and pubic symphysis to the sacroiliac index. Normality was assessed and paired sample t-tests (normally distributed data) or Wilcoxon signed rank tests (not normally distributed data) were utilized to assess if any measurements changed from preoperative to postoperative. Patients were then divided based on whether they had unilateral or bilateral dysplasia and unilateral or bilateral surgery, and these subgroups were analyzed the same way as the entire cohort. Two more subgroups were then formed based on lumbar mobility, defined as a change in sitting-to-standing lumbar lordosis less or greater than 1 SD from the population mean preoperatively, and the subgroups were analyzed the same way as the entire cohort. Finally, two additional subgroups were formed, preoperative standing pelvic tilt less than 10° and more than 20°, and analyzed the same as the entire cohort.

RESULTS

For the entire cohort, the median (IQR) standing lateral-center edge angle increased 17°, from a median of 21° (10°) to a median of 38° (8° [95% confidence interval (CI) 16° to 20°; p < 0.001). The median sitting lateral center-edge angle increased 17°, from a median of 18° (8°) to a median of 35° (8° [95% CI 14° to 19°]; p < 0.001). Standing pelvic incidence increased from 50° ± 11° to 52° ± 12° (mean difference 2° [95% CI 1° to 3°]; p = 0.004), but there were no changes for other measured parameters. There were no changes in any of the spinopelvic parameters for patients with unilateral dysplasia receiving a unilateral PAO, but patients with bilateral dysplasia who underwent bilateral PAOs demonstrated an increase in pelvic incidence from 57° (14°) to 60° (16°) (95% CI 1° to 5°; p = 0.02) and a decrease in pubic symphysis to sacroiliac index from 84 mm (24 mm) to 77 mm (23 mm) (95% CI -7° to -2°; p = 0.007). Patients with mobile lumbar spines preoperatively did not exhibit any changes in sagittal spinopelvic alignment, but patients with immobile lumbar spines preoperatively experienced several changes after surgery. Patients with less than 10° of standing pelvic tilt demonstrated a median (IQR) 2° increase in pelvic incidence from median 43° (9°) to 45° (12° [95% CI 0.3° to 4°]; p = 0.03), but they did not experience any other changes in sagittal spinopelvic alignment parameters postoperatively. Patients with preoperative pelvic tilt more than 20° did not experience any change in sagittal spinopelvic parameters.

CONCLUSION

PAO increases pelvic incidence, potentially because of anterior translation of the hip center. There were no changes in other spinopelvic parameters postoperatively except after bilateral PAO. Additionally, patients lacking spine mobility preoperatively, indicated by a minimal change in lumbar lordosis between standing and sitting positions, may experience several changes in spinopelvic alignment, including increased mobility of their spine after PAO. This may be because of decreased compensatory spine splinting after increasing acetabular coverage, but further research including patient-reported outcomes is warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

The Effect of Pelvic Incidence on Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement and Acetabular Labral Tears

BACKGROUND

In the setting of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), decompression osteoplasties reconcile deleterious loading patterns caused by cam and pincer lesions. However, native variations of spinopelvic sagittal alignment may continue to perpetuate detrimental effects on the labrum, chondrolabral junction, and articular cartilage after hip arthroscopy.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of pelvic incidence (PI) on postoperative outcomes after hip arthroscopy for acetabular labral tears in the setting of FAI.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A retrospective query of prospectively collected data identified patients ≥18 years of age who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for FAI and acetabular labral tears between February 2014 and January 2022, with 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-ups. Measurements for PI, pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), and acetabular version were obtained via advanced diagnostic imaging. Patients were stratified into low-PI (<45°), moderate-PI (45°≤ PI ≤ 60°), and high-PI (>60°) cohorts. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), clinically meaningful outcomes (ie, minimal clinically important difference, Patient Acceptable Symptom State, substantial clinical benefit, and maximal outcome improvement), visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, and patient satisfaction were compared across cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 74 patients met eligibility criteria and were stratified into low-PI (n = 28), moderate-PI (n = 31), and high-PI (n = 15) cohorts. Correspondingly, patients with high PI displayed significantly greater values for PT (P = .001), SS (P < .001), acetabular version (P < .001), and acetabular inclination (P = .049). By the 12- and 24-month follow-ups, the high-PI cohort was found to have significantly inferior PROMs, VAS pain scores, rates of clinically meaningful outcome achievement, and satisfaction relative to patients with moderate and/or low PI. No significant differences were found between cohorts regarding rates of revision arthroscopy, subsequent spine surgery, or conversion to total hip arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

After hip arthroscopy, patients with a high PI (>60°) exhibited inferior PROMs, rates of achieving clinically meaningful thresholds, and satisfaction at 12 and 24 months relative to patients with low or moderate PI. Conversely, the outcomes of patients with low PI (<45°) were found to match the trajectory of those with a neutral spinopelvic alignment (45°≤ PI ≤ 60°). These findings highlight the importance of analyzing spinopelvic parameters preoperatively to prognosticate outcomes before hip arthroscopy for acetabular labral tears and FAI.

Association of Idiopathic Cam Morphology With Femoral and Acetabular Version: Analysis of 986 Cadaveric Hips

Background

Studies have correlated symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) with femoral retroversion and cam lesions.

Purpose

To investigate any association between femoral and acetabular versions with cam deformity in a largely asymptomatic population.

Study Design

Descriptive laboratory study.

Methods

A total of 986 cadaveric hips were selected from a historical osteologic collection. Each hip was assessed to determine the femoral and acetabular versions, anterior offset, and alpha angle. Cam morphology was defined as an alpha angle >60°. Multiple regression analysis was performed to determine the relationship between age, femoral version, acetabular version, and either alpha angle or anterior femoral offset.

Results

The mean alpha angle and anterior offset for the sample population were 48.1°± 10.4° and 0.77 ± 0.17 cm, respectively, with cam morphology in 149 of the 986 (15.1%) specimens. No significant difference was observed between hips with and without cam morphology with respect to the femoral (10.8°± 10° vs 10.3°± 9.6°; P = .58) or acetabular versions (17.4°± 6° vs 18.2°± 6.3°; P = .14). Multiple regression analysis did not demonstrate an association between the femoral or acetabular versions and the alpha angle, and it showed a small association between the increasing femoral and acetabular versions and a decreased anterior femoral offset (both P < .01).

Conclusion

In a large random sample of cadaveric hips, cam morphology was not associated with femoral or acetabular retroversion. Combined with the existing literature, these findings suggest that retroversion is not associated with cam development.

Clinical Relevance

This study provides insight into the development of cam morphology, which may eventually aid in the evaluation and treatment of FAI.

Hip-Spine Syndrome in the Nonarthritic Patient

Hip-spine syndrome refers to concurrent hip and spine pathology with overlapping symptoms. Most of the literature has studied it in relation to total hip arthroplasty literature and has been shown to increase dislocation risk. Lumbar spine and pelvic mobility have been studied less frequently in relation to nonarthritic pathologic hip states. Understanding the biomechanical relationship between the lumbar spine, pelvis, and hip can help elucidate how hip-spine syndrome affects the nonarthritic hip and how it impacts outcomes of hip arthroscopy. Changes in lumbar spine motion may be the reason certain predisposed patients develop symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) or ischiofemoral impingement. Some athletes may be "hip users" with a low pelvic incidence, making them more reliant on hip motion due to less-intrinsic lumbopelvic motion. When these patients have FAI morphology, their increased reliance on hip motion makes them prone to experiencing femoroacetabular contact and concurrent symptoms. Other athletes may be "spine users," with larger pelvic incidence and more baseline lumbopelvic motion, making them less reliant on hip motion and therefore less prone to experiencing hip impingement even with hip FAI morphology. Hip-spine syndrome also appears to have an impact on patient selection, role of nonoperative treatment, and hip arthroscopy surgical outcomes. Identifying patients with concurrent pathology may allow surgeons to recommend targeted physical therapy or counsel patients better on their expectations after surgery.

No Significant Change in MRI Abnormalities or Back Pain Prevalence in the Thoraco-Lumbar Spine of Young Elite Skiers Over a 2-Year Follow-Up

Background

Young athletes are at increasing risk for spinal column injuries due to overloading the spine with excessive sports activities, with potential development of complications later in life.

Purpose

The purpose of this 2-year follow-up study of young elite skiers and non-athletes was to investigate any potential change in the thoraco-lumbar findings on MRI and to outline any change in back pain prevalence with continuing sporting activity and age.

Study Design

Longitudinal cross-sectional study.

Methods

MRI of the thoraco-lumbar spine was performed on 30 skiers (mean age 20 years, female 43%) and 16 non-athletes (mean age 19, female 75%), available for the 2-year follow-up. The intervertebral discs were evaluated for signal, height, bulge/herniation, and additionally according to Pfirrmann classification, and the endplates were graded according to endplate defect score. Any of the following disc findings was defined as disc degenerative change: reduced signal, reduced height, bulge, or herniation. All participants answered a specific back pain questionnaire.

Results

No significant difference in spinal column abnormalities, nor back pain, was found between baseline and 2-year follow-up in neither skiers nor controls. There was significantly higher prevalence of disc degenerative changes in skiers (73%) than in non-athletes (44%, p=0.05). Skiers (63%) had significantly more Pfirrmann grade ≥3 discs compared to non-athletes (25%) (p=0.03). There was no significant difference in number of endplates with score ≥4 between skiers and non-athletes (50% vs 38%, p=0.40) nor in lifetime prevalence of back pain between skiers (46%) and non-athletes (40%).

Conclusion

There was no significant change over time of the spinal column MRI abnormalities, nor back pain prevalence, during a 2-year follow-up of skiers and non-athletes. Young skiers had significantly higher prevalence of spine abnormalities compared with non-athletes. There was no significant difference of the back pain lifetime prevalence in skiers compared with non-athletes.

Is there a correlation between pelvic incidence and orientation of the acetabulum? An analysis based on a three-dimensional statistical model of the pelvic ring

The pelvic ring is a complex anatomical structure building up the connection between the trunk and the legs. Whilst there is a broad discussion in the literature about the dynamic interaction between spine, pelvis and the hip joints, there is still little information about the relation and interaction of the constant pelvic parameters. Based on a three‐dimensional (3D) statistical model consisting of 150 uninjured and bony healthy pelves (100 Europeans, 50 Japanese; 81 males, 69 females; average age 74.3 years ± 17.5 years) an evaluation of pelvic incidence (PI) and acetabular orientation in anteversion and inclination was performed and potential correlations of these intraindividual constant parameters were investigated. Pelvic incidence is defined as the angle between the perpendicular to the sacral plate at its midpoint and the line connecting this point to the middle axis of the femoral heads. Acetabular anteversion is defined as the angle between the perpendicular to the best‐fit plane on the acetabular rim and the coronal plane measured in strict lateral view. Acetabular inclination is defined as the angle between the perpendicular to the best‐fit plane on the acetabular rim and the sagittal plane in strict frontal view. Data were further analysed with regard to different subgroup's age, sex and ethnicity. A positive correlation between PI and acetabular anteversion could be demonstrated. Further, PI and also the acetabular parameters anteversion and inclination were found to be significantly higher in the European individuals than in the Asian. The results of the present study demonstrate a relation between the anatomical configuration of the constant pelvic parameters building up the connection points to the next proximal respectively caudal skeleton section. The findings might lead to more comprehensive treatment strategies in case of trauma or degenerative pathologies of the pelvis in the future.

Cam Morphology Is Associated With Increased Femoral Version: Findings From a Collection of 1,321 Cadaveric Femurs

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the relationship between femoral version (FV) and α angle (AA) in a large osteological collection of human femurs.

METHODS

The University of Iowa-Stanford osteological collection was used to evaluate the research aims. To measure FV and AA, axial photographs of the proximal femurs were taken, referenced from the posterior condylar axis. FV and AA measurements were obtained using ImageJ software, and the relationship between FV and AA was assessed with repeated-measures analysis of variance and generalized linear models. A P value of <.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 1321 cadaveric femurs (666 left and 655 right) in 721 cadavers were examined. The average AA for all femurs was 47.8° ± 10.9°, and the average FV for all femurs was 8.53° ± 8.09°. Overall, 191 femurs (14.5%) exhibited cam morphology (AA ≥ 60°). Of the 721 cadavers, 600 had both femurs available for side-to-side comparison. The average FV of femurs with cam morphology was significantly higher than that of femurs without cam morphology (11.70° ± 8.82° vs. 7.99° ± 8.82°, P < .001). Linear regression analysis demonstrated that increased AA was significantly correlated with increased FV (β ± standard error of the mean = 0.21 ± 0.02, P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

In a large osteological collection of human femurs, a significant positive relationship between AA and increasing FV was identified.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

FAI and hip impingement morphology are more complex than cam or pincer morphology. Cam morphology with high femoral anteversion may allow for normal or near-normal hip mechanics without impingement, and this may partially explain the high rates of asymptomatic cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) morphology in active and general populations. Given the multiple morphological factors implicated in the development of FAI syndrome, these findings warrant further investigation.

Comparison of pelvic incidence measurement using lateral x-ray, standard ct versus ct with 3d reconstruction

PURPOSE

Pelvic incidence (PI) is a position independent parameter used to quantify spinopelvic sagittal balance. PI is generally measured on lateral radiographs, but more recent studies have suggested better accuracy with standard CT scans versus three-dimensional (3D) CT scans. This study compares PI obtained from lateral XR, standard CT scan and CT scan with 3D reconstruction.

METHODS

A total of 77 subjects with lateral XRs of the pelvis or lumbosacral spine and CT scans of the pelvis were randomly selected. Pelvic incidence on lateral XRs, standard CT scans and CT scans utilizing multiplanar reconstruction were measured and compared using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). PI was also measured on serial images in 28 individuals using the same imaging modality within 3 years and evaluated using ICC.

RESULTS

Mean ± SD of PI measurements on XR, standard CT and CT with 3D reconstruction were 56° ± 13°, 53° ± 12° and 53° ± 12°, respectively, demonstrating a small but significant elevation of PI measurement on XR (P < 0.001). ICC values demonstrated a higher correlation between standard CT and 3D CT (ICC 0.986), compared to XR and standard CT (ICC 0.934) and XR and 3D CT (ICC 0.937). PI measurements on repeated imaging of the same individual also demonstrated that both CT methods produced more consistent measurements (ICC 0.986 for standard CT, 0.981 for 3D CT, 0.935 for XR).

CONCLUSION

Although standard XR does provide a high level of reliability, it appears to slightly overestimate PI. CT scans do provide increased reliability, with no additional benefit of 3D reconstructions over standard CT.

Acetabular Morphology and Spinopelvic Characteristics: What Predominantly Determines Functional Acetabular Version?

Background:

In addition to the relative size of the acetabular rim and how the pelvis is positioned in space, the plane in which the acetabular version is calculated also affects its measurement.

Purpose:

To determine the relative contribution of pelvic and acetabular characteristics on morphological version (measured relative to the anterior pelvic plane angle [APPA]) and functional version (measured relative to the horizontal table).

Study Design:

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

Included were 50 acetabular dysplasia patients and 109 asymptomatic controls. Using image analysis software, morphological parameters of the pelvis and acetabulum were determined from 2-dimensional computed topography: pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt angle, sacral slope, APPA, morphological and functional acetabular versions, and subtended angles (measure of acetabular rim prominence relative to the femoral head center) around the acetabular clockface in 30° increments. Correlation and multivariable regression analyses were performed with morphological and functional version as dependent variables and spinopelvic and acetabular parameters as independent variables.

Results:

Morphological version was moderately associated with differences between anterior and posterior subtended angles (R = 0.68 [P < .001] and R = 0.57 [P < .001] for differences at 165° and 15° and 135° and 45°, respectively). Functional version was moderately associated with pelvic tilt angle (R = 0.56; P <.001) and the difference in subtended angles between anterior and posterior rims (R = 0.61 [P < .001] and R = 0.50 [P < .001] for differences at 165° and 15° and 135° and 45°, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed a good model for predicting morphological version (R² = 0.44; P < .01) and functional version (R² = 0.58; P < .01). Subtended angle difference between 165° and 15° (B = 0.36 [95% CI, 0.24-0.49]; P < .001) was most strongly related to morphological version, and pelvic tilt angle (B = 0.57 [95% CI, 0.46-0.68]; P < .001) was most strongly related to functional version.

Conclusion:

Functional acetabular version was influenced most strongly by pelvic tilt angle rather than the relative prominence of the acetabular rims. Before determining surgical management for version abnormalities, it would be prudent to assess pelvic mobility and characteristics in different functional positions. In patients with minimal pelvic tilt change dynamically, corrective osteotomy would be the treatment of choice to improve functional version.

Clinical Measures of Pelvic Tilt in Physical Therapy

Pelvic tilt refers to the spatial position or motion of the pelvis about a frontal horizontal axis on the rest of the body in the sagittal plane. It is relevant for several musculoskeletal conditions commonly seen in physical therapist practice, particularly conditions affecting the hip and groin. Despite the relevance of pelvic tilt identified in biomechanical studies, and the historical precedence for assessing pelvic tilt, there is a lack of clarity regarding the utility of clinical measures that are practical in a rehabilitation setting. There are several options available to assess pelvic tilt which are discussed in detail in this commentary. All of these options come with potential benefits and considerable limitations. The purpose of this commentary is to provide an overview of the relevance of understanding pelvic tilt in the pathology and rehabilitation of conditions affecting the hip joint, with a focus applying evidence towards identifying clinical measures that may be useful in the rehabilitation setting and considerations that are needed with these measures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

5.

Is Cam Morphology Found in Ancient and Medieval Populations in Addition to Modern Populations?

BACKGROUND

Cam morphology is thought to originate near puberty and reflects a response of the peripheral aspect of the proximal femoral physis to increased local load. Participation in particular sports activities has been associated with cam morphology in contemporary patient populations; however, it is unclear whether cam is a recent phenomenon. There are limited data regarding the frequency of its occurrence and the general deviations in femoral anatomy in different historical populations. Such information may help to understand the possible influence of lifestyle and diet on cam morphology.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate femoral morphology in three historical populations. We asked: (1) Was cam morphology present in the three study populations, did those populations differ, and were there differences between sexes? (2) Were there differences in neck-shaft angle, version, or inclination between and among the examined populations?

METHODS

We examined 204 adult femurs from the Neolithic population from Iran (n = 37, 3000 BC to 1631 BC), medieval population from Poland (n = 135, 10th to 13th centuries), and contemporary Australian aborigines (n = 32, early 20th century), provided by the Open Research Scan Archive, Museum of the First Piasts at Lednica and the University of Wrocław, respectively. All three human populations represent different chronologic periods and lifestyles. All bones were scanned using CT and then measured on their three-dimensional (3-D) reconstructions in selected planes. Cam impingement was defined as an alpha angle > 55° measured on the inclination view. To evaluate the differences in anatomy between populations, we measured the true neck-shaft angle on the true AP view, apparent neck-shaft angle on the apparent AP view, the version angle on the version view, and the inclination angle on the inclination view. The prevalence of cam morphology and other anatomic parameters were compared among groups using chi-square test, one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey test, and paired t-test.

RESULTS

Cam morphology was present in 5% of the Neolithic population from Iran, in 7% of the medieval population from Poland, and 3% of the contemporary Australian aborigine femurs (OR Neolithic population from Iran/the medieval population from Poland 0.7 [95% CI 0.2 to 3.4]; p = 0.67; OR Neolithic population from Iran/contemporary Australian aborigines 1.8 [95% CI 0.2 to 20.5]; p = 0.65; OR the medieval population from Poland/contemporary Australian aborigines 2.5 [95% CI 0.3 to 20.1]; p = 0.40). There were differences in the presence of cam morphology between the sexes in the medieval population from Poland with both femurs (females: 1% [1 of 76]; males: 15% [9 of 59]; p = 0.002). There was a difference in true neck-shaft angle between the Neolithic population from Iran (121° ± 6°) and contemporary Australian aborigines (131° ± 5°; mean difference 10° [95% CI 7° to 13°]; p < 0.001) and between the medieval population from Poland (124° ± 5°) and the contemporary Australian aborigines (mean difference 7° [95% CI 5° to 9°]; p < 0.001). Apparent neck-shaft angle differed between the Neolithic population from Iran (126° ± 6°) and the contemporary Australian aborigines (134° ± 5°; mean difference 8° [95% CI 6° to 11°]; p < 0.001), and between the medieval population from Poland (126° ± 6°) and the contemporary Australian aborigines (mean difference 9° [95% CI 7° to 11°]; p < 0.001). Moreover, we observed a difference in the version angle between the Neolithic population from Iran (19° ± 7°) and the medieval population from Poland (12° ± 9°; mean difference 7° [95% CI 4° to 10°]; p < 0.001] and in the inclination angle between aforementioned groups (18° ± 7° versus 11° ± 8°; mean difference 7° [95% CI 5° to 10°]; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study found that cam morphology existed in historical populations at rates comparable with a contemporary population.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The presence of cam morphology in historical populations suggests that cam morphology can develop outside of the intense sports activity seen in modern adolescents. Further study will help elucidate the etiology of cam morphology, which may be useful in the development of preventive strategies.

Greater trochanteric pain syndrome in women: Analysis of magnetic resonance, sagittal alignment, muscular strength and endurance of the hip and trunk

INTRODUCTION

There are many studies on the Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome (GTPS), however its relationship with radiographic and biomechanics parameters is not established.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the magnetic resonance images (MRI) of the hip, radiographic parameters of sagittal alignment (pelvic incidence, sacral slope and lumbar lordosis), muscular strength and endurance in women with and without GTPS.

METHODS

Forty women, age over 45, IMC <30 Kg/m2 and sedentary, were recruited and distributed in two groups: GTPS group (GTPSG, n = 20) and Control group (CG, n = 20). All participants underwent MRI scans and X-ray for sagittal alignment analysis in the hip and performed tests for muscular strength and endurance of the hip and trunk.

RESULTS

No differences were found between the GTPSG and CG for the frequency of tendinopathy (P = .30), peritendinitis (P = .10), bursitis (P = .68) and enthesitis (P = .15), however the gluteus medius tendon tear was more prevalent in GTPSG (P = .05). There were no differences in radiographic parameters for pelvic incidence (P > .05), sacral slope (P > .05) and lumbar lordosis (P > .05). The GTPSG showed lower strength of all hip muscle groups (abductors, adductors, flexors, extensors and rotators; P < .01 for all), as well as lower endurance in the Supine Bridge test and Prone bridge test (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

The results of the MRI and radiographic parameters did not differentiate women with and without GTPS. However, the evaluation of muscle strength and endurance can establish the difference between groups.

The relationship between pelvic incidence and anatomical acetabular anteversion in female Japanese patients with hip osteoarthritis: a retrospective iconographic study

PURPOSE

This study aimed (1) to investigate the relationship between pelvic incidence (PI) and the anatomical acetabular anteversion (AA) relative to the spino-pelvic tilt (SPT) plane (anatomical AASPT), relative to the anterior pelvic plane (anatomical AAAPP), and functional standing AA; and (2) to compare AA and the sagittal spino-pelvic parameters of lumbo-pelvic complex types 1 (PI ≤ 30°) and 2 (PI > 30°), in Japanese females with hip osteoarthritis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on 110 Japanese females with unilateral hip osteoarthritis. PI, standing lumbar lordosis (LL), standing SPT, anatomical AASPT, anatomical AAAPP, and functional standing AA were measured and calculated using radiographs and computed tomography. The PI-LL difference was defined as the mathematical difference between the PI and standing LL angles. Pearson's correlation test was used to measure the relationship between the PI and AA. Student's t test was used to compare spino-pelvic parameters between lumbo-pelvic complex type 1 (n = 24) and type 2 (n = 86).

RESULTS

There was a significant relationship between the PI and anatomical AASPT (r =  -0.532, p < 0.001), but no significant relationship between the PI and anatomical AAAPP (r =  -0.021, p = 0.824) or functional standing AA (r = 0.104, p = 0.299). Lumbo-pelvic complex type 1 had a higher anatomical AASPT (22.4° ± 9.1° vs. 5.4° ± 15.1°, p < 0.001), similar anatomical AAAPP (15.0° ± 10.6° vs. 15.1° ± 15.3°, p = 0.981) and functional standing AA (12.4° ± 8.0° vs. 15.0° ± 14.1°, p = 0.254), a lower standing SPT (- 14.3° ± 11.0° vs. 13.7° ± 12.6°, p < 0.001), and a lower PI-LL difference (- 14.4° ± 18.5° vs. 6.4° ± 17.1°, p < 0.001) in comparison to lumbo-pelvic complex type 2.

CONCLUSION

Our findings will help to improve the understanding of hip anatomy and its relationship with the standing spino-pelvic alignment in Japanese females with hip osteoarthritis.

Effect of Decreasing the Anterior Pelvic Tilt on Range of Motion in Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Computer-Simulation Study

Background:

The influence of pelvic tilt mobility, which can be reproduced in computer-simulation models, is an important subject to be addressed in the understanding of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) pathophysiology.

Purpose:

To use computer-simulation models of FAI cases to evaluate the optimum improvement in hip range of motion (ROM) achieved by decreasing the anterior pelvic tilt and compare the results with the improvement in ROM achieved after cam resection surgery.

Study Design:

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods:

The pre- and postoperative computed tomography (CT) images from 28 patients with FAI treated with arthroscopic cam resection were evaluated. Using a dynamic computer-simulation program, 3-dimensional models with a 5° and a 10° decrease in anterior pelvic tilt from the supine functional pelvic plane (baseline) were created from the preoperative CT scans. Similar models were constructed for hips before (at baseline) and after cam resection. Improvements from baseline in maximum internal rotation at 45°, 70°, and 90° of flexion were assessed for the 5° change in pelvic tilt, 10° change in pelvic tilt, and cam resection models, and the results were compared for all conditions.

Results:

The combination of a 10° change in pelvic tilt and cam resection showed the largest ROM improvement from baseline (P < .001). Improvement in internal rotation in the cam resection model was significantly higher compared with the 5° pelvic tilt change model (P < .001), while there was no significant difference between the cam resection model and the 10° pelvic tilt change model.

Conclusion:

Decreasing anterior pelvic tilt by 10° in the preoperative computer simulation model resulted in an equivalent effect to cam resection, while a 5° change in pelvic tilt was inferior to cam resection in terms of ROM improvement.

Clinical Relevance:

Enough of a decrease in anterior pelvic tilt may contribute to ROM improvement that is as effective as that of cam resection surgery.

Assessing precision and accuracy of false-profile hip radiographs

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy and precision of pelvic rotation in existing false-profile (FP) radiographs and to devise a method to improve accuracy and precision of FP radiographs.

METHODS

An imaging protocol was developed to obtain FP radiographs. Pelvic rotation was calculated using the described method for FP images obtained in the 3 months prior to and after implementation of this protocol. Student's t-test and variance ratio tests were used to determine differences in mean and variance of pelvic rotation between the 2 cohorts. Pelvic rotation calculation methodology was validated by using fluoroscopic C-arm to obtain AP and rotated images of 10 osteologic pelvises. The ratio of the distance between hip centres of each rotated image and AP image (W_P/W) was determined. Intraclass coefficient correlation (ICC) was used to verify the relationship between W_P/W and pelvic rotation.

RESULTS

Mean W_P/W was 0.47 (95% CI, 0.45-0.49). There were significant differences in mean pelvic rotation of the pre-protocol group (47.6°; 95% CI, 45.6-49.5°) and the post-protocol group (60.0°; 95% CI, 58.7-61.3°, p < 0.0001). Additionally, there was a significantly wider distribution of measurements in the pre-protocol group (SD = 7.9°) compared to the post-protocol group (SD = 5.7°, p = 0.0035).

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of FP radiographs obtained in the clinical setting may be inconsistent. Standardising FP imaging produces more accurate images. Appropriate FP radiographs should have a distance between hip centres that is approximately 0.5 times the same distance found on an anteroposterior (AP) radiograph.

The severity of developmental dysplasia of the hip does not correlate with the abnormality in pelvic incidence

Background

The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between the severity of Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and the abnormality in pelvic incidence (PI).

Methods

This was a retrospective study analyzing 53 DDH patients and 53 non-DDH age-matched controls. Computed tomography images were used to construct three-dimensional pelvic model. The Crowe classification was used to classify the severity of DDH. The midpoint of the femoral head centers and sacral endplates were projected to the sagittal plane of the pelvis. The PI was defined as the angle between a line perpendicular to the sacral plate at its midpoint and a line connecting this point to the axis of the femoral heads. Independent sample t-tests were used to compare the differences between the PI of DDH group and the non-DDH controls group. Kendall’s coefficient of concordance was used to determine the correlation between the severity of DDH and PI.

Results

Patients with DDH had a significantly (p = 0.041) higher PI than the non-DDH controls (DDH 47.6 ± 8.2°, normal 44.2 ± 8.8°). Crowe type I patients had a significantly (p = 0.038) higher PI (48.2 ± 7.6°) than the non-DDH controls. No significant difference between the PI in Crowe type II or III patients and the PI in non-DDH controls were found (Crowe type II, 50.2 ± 9.6°, p = 0.073; Crowe type III, 43.8 ± 7.2°, p = 0.930). No correlation was found between the severity of DDH and the PI (r = 0.091, p = 0.222).

Conclusions

No correlation was found between the severity of DDH and the PI. The study confirmed that the PI in DDH (Crowe type I) group was higher than that of the non-DDH control group, while the PI does not correlate with the severity of DDH.

Using Magneto-Inertial Measurement Units to Pervasively Measure Hip Joint Motion during Sports

The use of wireless sensors to measure motion in non-laboratory settings continues to grow in popularity. Thus far, most validated systems have been applied to measurements in controlled settings and/or for prescribed motions. The aim of this study was to characterize adolescent hip joint motion of elite-level athletes (soccer players) during practice and recreationally active peers (controls) in after-school activities using a magneto-inertial measurement unit (MIMU) system. Opal wireless sensors (APDM Inc., Portland OR, USA) were placed at the sacrum and laterally on each thigh (three sensors total). Hip joint motion was characterized by hip acceleration and hip orientation for one hour of activity on a sports field. Our methods and analysis techniques can be applied to other joints and activities. We also provide recommendations in order to guide future work using MIMUs to pervasively assess joint motions of clinical relevance.

Pelvic incidence in a femoroacetabular impingement population

Objective

We aim to determine if pelvic incidence (PI) differed between a symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) population and a control.

Methods

We retrospectively identified a cohort of symptomatic FAI patients and compared measured PI to a control group.

Results

The PI was significantly lower in the FAI group compared to the control (51.32±1.07 vs. 55.63±1.04; P < 0.01).

Conclusion

The mean PI was significantly decreased in the FAI population compared to a control.

Correlation between the distance from the pubic symphysis to the sacrum with pelvic incidence

INTRODUCTION

The distance between the pubic symphysis and sacrococcygeal joint has been noted as an important parameter in evaluating pelvic tilt in an anteroposterior (AP) radiograph. Similarly, pelvic incidence measures the sagittal balance of the pelvis and is influenced by pelvic rotation. The relationship between these 2 parameters is unknown and could affect interpretation of pelvic AP radiographs.

METHODS

We reconstructed 248 cadaveric pelvises. Pelvic incidence was measured using a previously validated method. Pubic symphysis-sacrococcygeal joint (PSS) height was measured from the superior pubic tubercle to the sacrococcygeal joint. The pelvises were positioned so that the anterior pelvis lay flush with the surface. A ruler was zeroed on the pubic tubercles and a transverse projecting laser was used to measure the height to the sacrococcygeal joint.

RESULTS

A total of 248 pelvises were reconstructed. Average age of death of the specimens was 33±6.0 years. 80% of the pelvises were male, 56% were Caucasian, and 44% African American. The mean PSS height was 2.2 ± 1.4 cm and mean PI was 44.3° ± 10.6°. Multiple regression analysis found PI and PSS height were not correlated (p = 0.144). Females had a larger PSS height than males (beta = 1.17, p < 0.001) and African Americans a larger PSS height than Caucasians (beta = 0.63, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides useful information for clinicians in evaluating AP radiographs of the pelvis in that it supports the use of PSS height to judge the adequacy of a radiograph even in the context of abnormal pelvic incidence.

Hip morphology predicts posterior hip impingement in a cadaveric model

INTRODUCTION

Posterior hip impingement is a recently-identified cause of hip pain. The purpose of this study is to characterise posterior femoroacetabular and ischiofemoral impingement and identify its predisposing morphologic traits.

METHODS

Two hundred and six cadaveric hips were randomly selected and taken through controlled motion in two pure axes associated with posterior hip impingement: external rotation (through the mechanical axis) and adduction (coronal plane). The range of motion and location of impingement was noted for each specimen. Morphologic traits including femoral/acetabular version, and true neck-shaft angle (TNSA) were also measured.

RESULTS

External rotation impingement occurred between the femoral neck and acetabulum in 83.0% of hips, and between the lesser trochanter and ischial tuberosity in 17.0%. Adduction impingement occurred between the lesser trochanter and ischial tuberosity in 78.6% of hips, and between the femoral neck and acetabulum in 21.4%. Multiple regression revealed that increased femoral/acetabular version predicted earlier external rotation and adduction impingement. Unstandardised betas ranging from -0.39 to -0.64 reflect that each degree of increased femoral/acetabular version individually accounts for a loss of external rotation or adduction of approximately half a degree before impingement ( p < 0.001 for each). Increased TNSA was associated with earlier adduction impingement only (unstandardised beta -0.35, p = 0.005).

DISCUSSION

Relative femoral/acetabular anteversion was associated with earlier posterior hip impingement. Coxa valga was associated with earlier adduction impingement, but protective against external rotation impingement. These findings highlight the importance of monitoring correction during femoral/acetabular osteotomies, as overcorrection of retroversion may predispose to earlier posterior impingement.

Pelvic Incidence Is Associated With Sacral Curvature, Sacroiliac Joint Angulation, and Sacral Ala Width

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional anatomical study in dry cadaveric specimens.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates how the sacroiliac (SI) joint angulation, midsagittal sacral curvature, and sacral ala width relate to pelvic incidence (PI).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Numerous spinopelvic pathologies have been linked with pelvic incidence; however, the manner in which sacral morphology fits into this association is largely unknown.

METHODS

A total of 120 cadaveric sacra and corresponding innominate bones were obtained from an osteological collection. Pelvic incidence was measured in a previously validated method. To gauge ala width, calipers were used to measure the distance between the midpoint of the sacral endplate and the anterolateral aspect of the right and left ala. Sacral curvature was evaluated by measuring the difference of the direct distance and the curved bony distance from the sacral promontory to the inferior aspect of the fourth intervertebral foramen. Three separate angle measurements were made to quantify the angulation of the SI joint, which we divided into an upper and lower limb. Angle 1 approximated the relationship between the upper limb and the sacral endplate; angle 2 between the upper and lower limbs; angle 3 between the lower limb and a tangential line to the fourth sacral foramen.

RESULTS

Average age at death for all specimens was 31.9 ± 6.3 years with 63% representation of males and an equal distribution of Caucasian and African Americans. The mean PI of our study population was 45.1 ± 12.6°. Results from our regression showed statistically significant associations between our measured angles evaluating SI joint angulation (angles 1, 2, 3) and PI. Standardized beta for angle 1 was -0.421, angle 2 was 0.419, and angle 3 was -0.439 (all P < 0.001). Additionally, the average endplate-ala distance (beta = -0.254) and average difference between tape-caliper measurements, our measurement for sacral arc, (beta = 0.178) were significantly associated with PI (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our data supports the theory that increased PI is associated with a highly angulated and curved sacrum, with corresponding changes in the SI joint, and narrowed sacral alae.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

Can We Discriminate Symptomatic Hip Patients From Asymptomatic Volunteers Based on Anatomic Predictors? A 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Study on Cam, Pincer, and Spinopelvic Parameters

BACKGROUND

Given the high prevalence of patients with hip deformities and no ongoing hip dysfunction, understanding the anatomic factors predicting the symptomatic state is critical. One such variable is how the spinopelvic parameters (SPPs) may interplay with hip anatomic factors.

HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE

SPPs and femoral- and acetabular-specific parameters may predict which patients will become symptomatic. The purpose was to determine which anatomic characteristics with specific cutoffs were associated with hip symptom development and how these parameters relate to each other.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

548 participants were designated either symptomatic patients (n = 176, scheduled for surgery with hip pain and/or functional limitation) or asymptomatic volunteers (n = 372, no pain) and underwent 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. Multiple femoral (α angle, Ω angle, neck angle, torsion), acetabular (version, coverage), and spinopelvic (pelvic tilt, sacral slope [SS], pelvic incidence) parameters were measured semiautomatically. Normative values, optimal differentiating thresholds, and a logistic regression analysis were computed.

RESULTS

Symptomatic patients had larger cam deformities (defined by increased Ω angle and α angle), smaller acetabular coverage, and larger pelvic incidence and SS angles compared with the asymptomatic volunteers. Discriminant receiver operating characteristic analysis confirmed that radial 2-o'clock α angle (threshold 58°-60°, sensitivity 75%-60%, specificity 80%-84%; area under the curve [AUC] = 0.831), Ω angle (threshold 43°, sensitivity 72%, specificity 70%; AUC = 0.830), acetabular inclination (threshold 6°, sensitivity 65%, specificity 70%; AUC = 0.709), and SS (threshold 44°, sensitivity 72%, specificity 75%; AUC = 0.801) ( P < .005) were the best parameters to classify participants. When parameters were entered into a logistic regression, significant positive predictors for the symptomatic patients were achieved for SS, acetabular inclination, Ω angle, and α angle at 2-o'clock, correctly classifying 85% of cases (model sensitivity 72%, specificity 91%; AUC = 0.919).

CONCLUSION

Complex dynamic interplay exists between the hip and SPPs. A cam deformity, acetabular undercoverage, and increased SPP angles are predictive of a hip symptomatic state. SPPs were significant to discriminate between participants and were important in combination with other hip deformities. Symptomatic patients can be effectively differentiated from asymptomatic volunteers based on predictive anatomic factors.

Use of the False-Profile Radiographic View to Measure Pelvic Incidence

BACKGROUND

Pelvic incidence (PI) is an important variable in assessing spinopelvic balance that is associated with hip pathology. A lateral radiograph of the pelvis can be used to measure PI, but this view is not routinely performed in the clinical setting during evaluation of hip pain. The false-profile (FP) radiographic view of the hip is commonly obtained to measure acetabular coverage.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the tolerance of PI measurements to pelvic rotation and assess the feasibility of using an FP radiograph to obtain an accurate measurement of PI.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

A mathematical model was developed to predict the change in PI with rotation. Fluoroscopic images were obtained of 6 reconstructed cadaveric adult pelvis and femur specimens at varying degrees of rotation, including a perfect lateral and FP image. PI was measured with the midpoint between the centers of the femoral heads as a reference point. The findings were confirmed clinically by retrospectively reviewing FP radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans of 40 clinical patients. PI was measured on FP radiographs and CT scans by 2 independent reviewers.

RESULTS

With dry cadaveric pelvis specimens, the discrepancy in PI measured between fluoroscopic FP and lateral views was 1.6° (95% CI, 0.7°-2.4°). There was excellent agreement between CT and FP radiographs with regard to measurement of PI (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.78-0.98). Mean discrepancy in PI measured between the 40 clinical FP radiographs and CT scans was 2.8° (range, 0.1°-9.1°).

CONCLUSION

Increased rotation from a lateral view results in greater error in measuring PI, although relatively nominally with a 2.8° error with the 25° of rotation in clinical true FP views. These data demonstrate that FP radiographs can be used to measure PI with reasonable accuracy.

Anatomic Predictors of Sagittal Hip and Pelvic Motions in Patients With a Cam Deformity

BACKGROUND

As there is a high prevalence of patients with cam deformities and no ongoing hip dysfunction, understanding the biomechanical factors predicting the onset of symptoms and degenerative changes is critical. One such variable is how the spinopelvic parameters may influence hip and pelvic sagittal mobility. Hypothesis/Purpose: Pelvic incidence may predict sagittal hip and pelvic motions during walking and squatting. The purpose was to determine which anatomic characteristics were associated with symptoms and how they influenced functional hip and pelvic ranges of motion (ROMs) during walking and squatting.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Fifty-seven participants underwent computed tomography and were designated either symptomatic (n = 19, cam deformity with pain), asymptomatic (n = 19, cam deformity with no pain), or control (n = 19, no cam deformity or pain). Multiple femoral (cam deformity, neck angle, torsion), acetabular (version, coverage), and spinopelvic (pelvic tilt, sacral slope, pelvic incidence) parameters were measured from each participant's imaging data, and sagittal hip and pelvic ROMs during walking and squatting were recorded using a motion capture system.

RESULTS

Symptomatic participants had large cam deformities, smaller femoral neck-shaft angles, and larger pelvic incidence angles compared with the asymptomatic and control participants. Discriminant function analyses confirmed that radial 1:30 alpha angle (λ₁ = 0.386), femoral neck-shaft angle (λ₂ = 0.262), and pelvic incidence (λ₃ = 0.213) ( P < .001) were the best anatomic parameters to classify participants with their groups. Entering these 3 parameters into a hierarchical linear regression, significant regressions were achieved for hip ROM only when pelvic incidence was included for walking ( R² = 0.20, P = .01) and squatting ( R² = 0.14, P = .04). A higher pelvic incidence decreased walking hip ROM ( r = -0.402, P = .004). Although symptomatic participants indicated a trend of reduced squatting hip and pelvic ROMs, there were no significant regressions with the anatomic parameters.

CONCLUSION

A cam deformity alone may not indicate early clinical signs or decreased ROM. Not only was pelvic incidence a significant parameter to classify the participants, but it was also an important parameter to predict functional ROM. Symptomatic patients with a higher pelvic incidence may experience limited sagittal hip mobility.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement showed a higher pelvic incidence and, combined with a cam deformity and varus neck, can perhaps alter the musculature of their iliopsoas, contributing to a reduced sagittal ROM. With an early and accurate clinical diagnosis, athletes could benefit from a muscle training strategy to protect their hips.

Origin of Cam Morphology in Femoroacetabular Impingement

Cam morphology of the proximal femur is an abnormal contour of the femoral head-neck junction present in approximately 15% to 25% of the asymptomatic population, predominantly in males. Alpha angle and femoral head-neck offset ratio are 2 objective measurement tools that define cam morphology. Both primary (idiopathic) and secondary cam deformity develops through distinct mechanisms. The cause of primary (idiopathic) cam morphology remains incompletely understood. Mounting evidence suggests that idiopathic cam morphology develops during adolescence through alterations in the capital femoral epiphysis in response to participation in vigorous sporting activity. While the exact cause of epiphyseal extension has not yet been determined, preliminary evidence suggests that epiphyseal extension may reflect a short-term adaptive response to provide stability to the physis at the long-term cost of the development of cam morphology. Commonly recognized causes of secondary cam deformity include frank slipped capital femoral epiphysis, Legg-Calve-Perthes disease, and deformity after fracture of the proximal femur. Recent studies also support subtle slipped capital femoral epiphysis as a unique and silent cause of a small percentage of subjects previously thought to have idiopathic cam deformity.

Spine-hip relations add understandings to the pathophysiology of femoro-acetabular impingement: A systematic review

Relationship between hip pathoanatomy and symptomatic FAI has been reported to be weak. This is explained by the reciprocal interaction between proximal femur and acetabular anatomies, but potentially also by the individual spine-hip relations (SHR). The key-answer for a complete understanding of the pathophysiology of FAI might lie in the comprehension of the SHRs, which have not yet been fully addressed. Therefore we conducted a systematic review to answer the subsequent questions: Is there any evidence of a relationship between FAI and (1) sagittal pelvic kinematics, (2) pelvic incidence, and (3) types of SHRs? A systematic review of the existing literature utilizing PubMed and Google search engines was performed in December 2016. Only studies published in peer-reviewed journals over the last ten years in either English or French were reviewed. We identified 90 reports, of which 9 met our eligibility criteria. Review of literature shows Caucasian FAI patients have a pelvis with higher anterior tilt, lesser sagittal mobility, and lower pelvic incidence compared to healthy patients. We found no study having assessed the relationship between SHR and FAI. In order to help further investigations at answering questions 3 and 4, we have developed a classification for SHRs. The classification according spino-pelvic parameters allows identifying patient at risk regarding FAI occurrence. Higher anterior pelvic tilt in standing, sitting and squatting positions and lower pelvic incidence have been found to correlate with symptomatic FAI. Because defining the individual SHR might increase the understanding of the pathophysiology of hip impingement, we have developed a classification for SHRs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.