Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty

Tibia-first, gap-balanced patient-specific alignment restores bony phenotypes and joint line obliquity in a great majority of varus and straight knees and normalises valgus and severe varus deformities

PURPOSE

The present study focuses on testing the capability of a restricted tibia-first, gap-balanced patient-specific alignment technique (PSA) to restore bony morphology and phenotypes.

METHODS

Three-hundred and sixty-seven patients were treated with navigated total knee arthroplasty and tibia-first gap-balanced PSA technique. Boundaries for medial proximal tibial angle were 86°-92°, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle 86°-92°, and hip-knee-ankle angle 175°-183°. Knees were classified by coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK), with subsequent analyses comparing pre- and postoperative distributions. Phenotype classification within CPAK groups assessed pre- and postoperative distributions.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, the largest CPAK group was type II (30.8%), followed by type I (20.5%) and type V (17.8%). Postoperatively, type II remained the largest group (39%), followed by type V (30%). All groups with varus/valgus deformities (I, III, IV and VI) became smaller. While in straight legs (II, IV), the CPAK was restored in more than 70%-75%, in varus groups (I, IV) in 40%-50% and in valgus (III and VI) in 5%-18%. The joint line obliquity remained the same in the majority of knees (straight >75%; varus 63%-80%; valgus VI 95%), with the exception of CPAK III (40%). The phenotype analysis showed for straight legs a phenotype restoration of 85%, for varus 94% and for valgus 37%. Joint line convergence angle was reduced significantly in all groups from 1.8°-4.3° preoperatively to 0.6°-1.2° postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

PSA restores bony phenotypes and joint line obliquity in the majority of straight and varus knees, while most of the valgus and extreme varus knees are normalised.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Outcomes of different perioperative management strategies of patients on chronic anticoagulation in elective total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

There are currently different management guidelines for patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) that are on long-term anticoagulation. The timing of discontinuation and restarting the anticoagulation is challenging during the postoperative care, which often involves general practitioners and physiotherapists.

METHODS

The systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines and included 3 databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science Core Collection. It was registered in the International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PROSPERO) under the registration number: CRD42023408906. The risk of bias assessment was performed using the Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) criteria.

RESULTS

Six retrospective studies involving 727 patients with therapeutic anticoagulation (1,540 controls) for elective THA, TKA and revision arthroplasty have been included. The follow-up ranged from 30 days to 1 year postoperatively. All studies evaluated outcomes of warfarin therapeutic anticoagulation versus prophylactic dosages of one or more of the following: warfarin, aspirin, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and unfractionated low-dose heparin (UFH). One study did not discontinue therapeutic anticoagulation. Two studies reported no significant differences in complications between groups, whilst 3 studies had significantly higher rates of superficial wound infections, revision surgeries, postoperative haematomas, and prosthetic joint infections (PJI).

CONCLUSION

Different anticoagulation-related perioperative management strategies achieve different outcomes following elective arthroplasty in patients with therapeutic chronic anticoagulation. There is contradictory evidence regarding the need for the discontinuation of therapeutic warfarin. Retrospective data showed that individual risk stratification with multi-modal prophylaxis resulted in minimal complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic Review of Level III studies.

Kinematic Alignment Technique Outperforms Mechanical Alignment in Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical results of kinematic alignment (KA) with those of mechanical alignment (MA) in single-stage bilateral total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

In this double-blinded randomized controlled trial, 65 patients who had bilateral knee osteoarthritis underwent simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty. One knee was randomly selected to be operated on with the calipered-KA technique and the other with MA. The participants were assessed via the Oxford Knee Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index questionnaire, and visual analog scale before the surgery and the same plus the Forgotten Joint Score at their last follow-up visit, 2 years postoperatively. Maximum knee flexion and the time reaching maximum knee flexion, named the recovery time, were also recorded. Hip-knee-ankle angle, medial proximal tibial angle, and lateral distal femoral angle were measured before and after the surgery using 3-joint-view radiographs.

RESULTS

At 2 years, there were significant differences between the KA and MA techniques in terms of duration of surgery, recovery time, and final Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Forgotten Joint Score, and maximum flexion range in favor of KA (P < .05), but no significant difference in visual analog scale score or Oxford Knee Score. In patients who have a preferred knee, the KA knee was preferred over the MA knee by most patients. No prosthetic failure or revision was reported in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

The KA technique yields acceptable functional outcomes compared to the MA technique. The KA technique was associated with a shorter surgery time, a faster recovery time, and higher patient satisfaction in 2-year follow-ups. Larger multicenter studies with longer follow-ups are warranted to confirm these findings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Preoperative Arithmetic Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle as a Predictor of Postoperative Leg Alignment in Medial Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Introduction This study aimed to evaluate whether the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) can be used to predict the postoperative HKA. Methods This study included 248 knees in 166 patients who underwent Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) between February 2021 and November 2022. Through preoperative and postoperative long-leg radiography, the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and the lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) were expressed as the deviation from the perpendicular line to the mechanical axes, and the mechanical HKA (mHKA) was defined as the angle between the femoral and tibial mechanical axes. Using the MPTA and LDFA, the arithmetic HKA (aHKA; MPTA + LDFA) and the joint line obliquity (JLO; MPTA - LDFA) were calculated, and the preoperative and postoperative values were compared. Results The preoperative aHKA and the postoperative mHKA values were similar (-0.38° ± 2.96°) and significantly smaller than the difference between the preoperative and postoperative mHKAs (4.58° ± 3.60°, P < 0.05). Meanwhile, the MPTA tended to be varus, and the LDFA tended to be valgus. Eventually, the JLO inclined more medially from -6.33° ± 3.42° preoperatively to -8.97° ± 3.92° postoperatively, representing a significant difference (P < 0.05). Conclusion The preoperative aHKA was similar to the postoperative mHKA. Therefore, it can be regarded as a predictor of postoperative leg alignment after Oxford UKA. Meanwhile, there was a medial incline of the joint line. Further investigation is required to evaluate the effect of such a joint line alteration.

Restoring Tibial Slope and Sagittal Alignment of the Femoral Component in Unrestricted Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Conventional versus Patient-Specific Instrumentation

Restoring sagittal alignment in kinematically aligned (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is crucial to avoid patellofemoral joint instability or overstuffing and to restore an adequate range of motion. This prospective study compared the accuracy of conventional instrumentation (CI) versus patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) in restoring sagittal alignment of KA TKA measured by the tibial slope and degree of flexion of the femoral component to the sagittal femoral axis. One hundred patients were randomized to receive either CI (n = 50) or PSI (n = 50) for KA TKA. Two observers measured pre- and postoperative X-rays to assess restoration of the tibial slope and sagittal flexion. Inter- and intraclass correlations were calculated, and postoperative tibial and femoral components were compared with preoperative anatomy. In 50 CI patients, 86% (n = 43) had the tibial slope restored exactly, and no deviation more than 1 degree was found. Deviations of 0 to 1 degree were detected in 14% (n = 7). In 50 patients of the PSI group, 56% (n = 28) achieved an exact anatomic tibial slope restoration and 20% (n = 10) showed a deviation more than 2 degrees compared with the preoperative measurement. Deviations ranging between 0 to 1 and 1 to 2 degrees were found in 22% (n = 11) and 2% (n = 1) of cases, respectively. Sagittal alignment of the femoral component showed in both groups no deviation exceeding 1 degree. The restoration of sagittal alignment in KA TKA was statistically significantly differently distributed between CI and PSI (p = < 0.001) without clinical relevance. We found that PSI increased the odds for deviations >2 degrees in tibial slope reconstructions from 0 to 0.20 ([95% confidence interval: 0.09-0.31]; p = 0.001). Both CI and PSI revealed adequate results with respect to restoring sagittal alignment of the tibial and femoral components in KA TKA. The conventional technique requires adequate adjustment of the intramedullary rod to avoid hyperflexion of the femoral component and attention must be paid when restoring the tibial slope using PSI. This is a prospective Level II study.

Quadriceps tendon malalignment is an independent anatomical deformity which is the primary abnormality associated with lateral facet patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study are to, firstly, develop techniques to accurately identify extensor mechanism malalignment by measuring the alignment of the quadriceps tendon (QTA) with computerized tomography (CT) scans. Secondly, to investigate correlations between QTA and lower limb bony anatomical variations within a representative normal population. Lastly, to evaluate the clinical significance of QTA by establishing its potential connection with lateral facet patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis (LFPFJOA).

METHOD

CT scans were orientated to a mechanical axis reference frame and three techniques developed to measure the alignment of the quadriceps tendon. Multiple measurement of bony alignment from the hip to the ankle were performed on each scan. A series of 110 cadaveric CT scans were measured to determine normal values, reproducibility, and correlations with bony anatomy. Secondly, a comparison between 2 groups of 25 patients, 1 group with LFPFJOA and 1 group with isolated medial OA and no LFPFJOA.

RESULTS

From the cadaveric study, it was determined that the alignment of the quadriceps tendon is on average 4.3° (SD 3.9) varus and the apex of the tendon is 9.1 mm (SD 7.7 mm) lateral to the trochlear groove and externally rotated 1.9° (SD 12.4°) from the centre of the femoral shaft. There was no association between the quadriceps tendon alignment and any other bony measurements including tibial tubercle trochlear groove distance (TTTG), coronal alignment, trochlear groove alignment and femoral neck anteversion. A lateralized QTA was significantly associated with LFPFJOA. QTA in the LFPFJOA group was 9.6° varus (SD 2.8°), 21.3 mm (SD 6.6) lateralised and 17.3° ER (SD 11°) compared to 5.5° (SD 2.3°), 10.7 mm (SD 4.9) and 3.3° (SD 7.2°), respectively, in the control group (p < 0.001). A significant association with LFPFJOA was also found for TTTG (17.2 mm (SD 5.7) vs 12.1 mm (SD 4.3), p < 0.01). Logistic regression analysis confirmed the QTA as having the stronger association with LFPFJOA than TTTG (AUC 0.87 to 0.92 for QTA vs 0.79 for TTTG).

CONCLUSION

These studies have confirmed the ability to accurately determine QTA on CT scans. The normal values indicate that the QTA is highly variable and unrelated to bony anatomy. The comparative study has determined that QTA is clinically relevant and a lateralised QTA is the dominant predictor of severe LFPFJOA. This deformity should be considered when assessing patella maltracking associated with patella osteoarthritis, patella instability and arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III (retrospective cohort study).

A comparison of robotic-assisted and manual techniques in restricted kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty: coronal alignment improvement with no significant clinical differences

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare radiographic and clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted and conventional manual techniques in restricted kinematically aligned TKA.

METHODS

Patients who underwent either manual or robotic-assisted restricted kinematically aligned TKA between 2019 and 2020 were included in this retrospective comparative study. Radiographic outcomes comprised coronal plane measurements performed through standing full-length anteroposterior radiographs. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Oxford score, Visual Analog Scale pain and satisfaction score, and Forgotten Joint Score were used to determine the clinical outcome. The continuous data were compared by Student's t test according to the Kolmogorov‒Smirnov normality test.

RESULTS

The manual group consisted of 46 patients (38 females, eight males) with a mean age of 68.1 years, and the robotic group consisted of 70 patients (58 females, 12 males) with a mean age of 65.7 years (n.s.). Preoperatively, no significant difference was observed between groups concerning demographic characteristics, radiographic measurements, and clinical scores except for the symptom and pain domains of the KOOS score, which was significantly worse in the manual group (p = 0.011 and 0.035, respectively). At the postoperative 2-year follow-up, we observed significant differences between groups with respect to the mean HKA angle, mMPTA, and mLDFA (p = 0.034, 0.041, and 0.005, respectively). A comparison of clinical scores at the postoperative 2-year follow-up demonstrated no significant differences between groups.

CONCLUSION

The current study demonstrated that using robotic-assisted technique for restricted kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) resulted in significantly better outcomes compared to the conventional manual technique in achieving normal ranges of lower extremity coronal alignment measurements. While the robotic-assisted group demonstrated better clinical scores, there was no statistically significant difference in clinical outcomes between the robotic-assisted group and the control group at the two-year follow-up. Concerning clinical relevance, the restoration of original anatomy and coronal alignment, a crucial concern in restricted kinematically aligned TKA, may be better achieved by the robotic-assisted technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III (Retrospective cohort study).

Popliteal tendon impingement as a cause of pain following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Popliteal tendon impingement (PTI) is an under-recognized cause of persistent pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of the systematic review was to summarize and outline successful strategies in the diagnosis and management of PTI.

METHODS

A systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines was performed for four databases: MEDLINE (Pubmed), Ovid EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database. It was registered in the International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PROSPERO) under the registration number: CRD42023398723. The risk of bias assessment was performed using the criteria of the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS).

RESULTS

A total of 8 studies were included. There were 2 retrospective case series and 6 case reports. The follow-up ranged from 6 to 30 months. Two studies described PTI as an intraoperative phenomenon during TKA with "snapping"; whilst 6 studies described indications and outcomes for arthroscopic tenotomy for PTI following TKA. In making the diagnosis, there was concurrence that the posterolateral pain should be focal and that dynamic ultrasonography and diagnostic injection play an important role. Two specific clinical tests have been described. There was no consistency regarding the need for imaging. There were no reports of instability following popliteal tendon tenotomy or other complications.

CONCLUSION

PTI should be suspected as a cause for persistent focal pain at the posterolateral knee following TKA. The diagnosis can be suspected on imaging and should be confirmed with dynamic ultrasonography and an ultrasound-guided diagnostic injection. An arthroscopic complete tenotomy of the tendon can reliably alleviate pain and relies on correct diagnosis. There is no evidence for clinically relevant negative biomechanical consequences following tenotomy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic Review of Level IV and V studies.

Patellofemoral knee pain following total knee arthroplasty. Comparison between adjusted mechanical and inverse restricted kinematic alignment

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the functional, radiological, and clinical outcomes of patellofemoral joint in patients who had total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without patellar resurfacing for end-stage osteoarthritis using inverse restricted kinematic alignment (irKA) compared to a control group using adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA), both executed with the same implant at the same Institution. The hypothesis was that patients undergoing TKA without patellar resurfacing for end-stage osteoarthritis using irKA would have superior outcomes related to the patellofemoral joint in comparison to a control group using aMA.

Methods

A retrospective examination of registries' prospectively obtained from patients who underwent primary TKA at our Institution between 2016 and 2020 was performed. 40 consecutive patients who underwent TKA implant using irKA were compared to a control group of 80 who had undergone adjusted mechanically-aligned TKA. Groups were matched for age and body mass index. Clinical assessment included Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Society Score (KSS), and Kujala Knee Score. Standard weight-bearing anteroposterior and lateral view x-rays were used for radiographic evaluation. Patellar height was assessed using Caton-Deschamps (C-D) and Insall index on lateral view films.

Results

In comparison to pre-operative status, both groups had postoperative improvements in VAS, KOOS, KSS, and Kujala ratings (p<0.001). Regarding Kujala score, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups (p = 0.68). Insall index and C-D index results were not statistically different across groups (p = 0.02 and 0.74 respectively).

Conclusion

Improvements in post-operative clinical and functional outcomes following TKA were associated with either irKA or aMA. There were no discernible changes between the two groups in terms of postoperative patellofemoral discomfort or variations in patellar height.

Restoring tibial obliquity for kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty: conventional versus patient-specific instrumentation

INTRODUCTION

In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), tibial obliquity-restoration using kinematic alignment (KA) poses a major difference to conventional mechanical alignment. This study aimed at analysing the accuracy of conventional instrumentation (CI) versus patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) to restore anatomic tibial obliquity measured by the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) on conventional X-rays.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One-hundred patients were randomized to receive CI (n = 50) or PSI (n = 50) for TKA. Further 100 patients received CI without randomisation, resulting in 200 patients in total (127 women, mean age: 70.7 (range: 48-90 years). Pre- and postoperative X-rays were measured twice by two observers with a 2-week break in-between. Inter- and intraclass correlations were calculated and postoperative tibial obliquity compared to preoperative anatomy.

RESULTS

In 150 patients with CI, no case with tibial obliquity-deviation greater than 2° was found, whilst 21.3% (n = 32) and 0.7% (n = 1) of cases and had a deviation of 0°-1°, and 1°-2°, respectively. In the remaining 78.0% (n = 117), tibial obliquity was restored. In 50 patients with PSI, no single case with a deviation greater than 1° was found. Sixty percent (n = 30) had a deviation of 0°-1°. In the remaining 40.0% (n = 20), no deviation from preoperative measurements was found. Consequently, CI resulted in a significantly smaller change in tibial obliquity from preoperative to postoperative than PSI (p < 0.001). Inter- and intra-class correlations showed a substantial agreement (any ICC > 0.90).

CONCLUSION

Both conventional and patient-specific instrumentation revealed adequate results with respect to restoring tibial obliquity in kinematically aligned TKA, with conventional instrumentation achieving superior results.

Does preoperative 3D CT planning helps in predicting the component size determination and alignment in automatic robotic total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA)

PURPOSE

Image-based Robotic Total knee Arthroplasty (RA-TKA)was developed with the purpose of enhancing the accuracy in determining the component sizes preoperatively and helping surgeons in minimizing errors and improve patient outcomes. The research aims to find the reliability of robotic-assisted TKR based on images in determining the correct component sizes using preoperative three-dimensional (3D) computer tomography.

METHOD

After ethical approval, we conducted a prospective study from March 2022 to December 2022. A total of 100 knees underwent image-based RA-TKA having grade 4 Osteoarthritis knee (Kellegren Lawrence classification). A single senior surgeon performed on all patients. Postoperative implant sizes and fit were assessed by five radiographic markers by an independent observer.

RESULTS

In our study, we found the mean age was (64.96 ± 7.3) years, with female to male ratio of 43:22. The preoperative 3D CT accuracy is 100% for femoral component sizing and 97% for the tibial component. There was a statistically significant improvement in varus deformity from preoperative 7.370 ± 3.70° to 1.24 0 ± 0.910° after surgery., p = 0.001. Improvement in flexion deformity correction was from preoperative 6.50 ± 6.30 to postoperative 1.640 ± 1.770, p = 0.001.

CONCLUSION

Our study concludes that the use of pre-operative 3D CT helps in predicting the component sizes, minimizes surgical time, and enhances implant position accuracy, as well as improves postoperative limb alignment in the coronal and sagittal planes.

Mechanical complications after total knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

With the increasing demand for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and the burden of revision TKA on the healthcare system, as well as the quality of life implications for patients, it is extremely important for surgeons to be able to anticipate and prevent TKA mechanical complications. Surgeons must be familiar with the different causes and mechanisms of TKA complications so that they can properly treat patients with failed TKAs and better avoid these complications.

AREAS COVERED

This review addresses TKA mechanical complications and provides context for the topic. A detailed review of surgical factors, implant factors, and patient factors that contribute to mechanical complications after TKA is provided. All of the literature cited in this review was gathered from the PubMed online database using different keywords based on the section of the manuscript.

EXPERT OPINION

As surgeons and engineers solve certain issues in TKA, new challenges will inevitably arise. We must continue to push forward and innovate from both a surgical technique and implant design perspective.

Fixed Flexion Contracture Can Successfully Be Addressed with Exact Preservation of the Femoral Joint Line and Only Minimal Increase of Tibia Resection in the Concept of Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty

The aims of this study were to evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing kinematic alignment (KA) robot-assisted (RA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with and without preoperative fixed flexion contracture (FFC) and address whether additional resection of the proximal tibia is required to address FFC. A retrospective review from 147 consecutive patients who received an RA-TKA with KA and a minimum one-year follow-up was performed. Preop and postop clinical and surgical data were collected. Groups were set based on preoperative extension deficits: group 1 (0-4°) (n = 64), group 2 (5-10°) (n = 64) and group 3 (>11°) (n = 27). There were no differences in patient demographics among the three groups. In group 3, the mean tibia resection was 0.85 mm thicker than group 1 (p < 0.05) and the preoperative extension deficit was improved from -17.22° (SD 3.49) preop to -2.41° (SD 4.47) postop (p < 0.05). Our results demonstrate that FFC can successfully be addressed in the RA-TKA with KA and rKA and that no additional femoral bone resection is needed to achieve full extension in patients with preoperative FFC when compared with patients without FFC. Only a slight increase in the amount of tibial resection was observed, but this was less than one millimetre.

Computer Navigation Assisted Restricted Kinematic Alignment Improves Short-Term Outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Ambispective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Mechanical alignment (MA)-total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been challenged due to the excessive soft tissue release and the evidence of the clinical outcomes of computer assisted navigation is still limited. The aim of this ambispective cohort study was to: (i) investigate whether computer assisted navigation is capable to achieve restricted kinematic alignment (rKA)-TKA; and (ii) compare the short-term outcomes between rKA-TKA and MA-TKA.

METHODS

We retrospectively included 41 patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis who received MA-TKA between April 2019 and January 2021 and 43 patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis who received rKA-TKA were included in the prospective cohort from January 2021 to September 2021. Demographical, peri-operative, and radiological data were collected and compared. Unpaired two-sample t-test for continuous variables and χ2 test for categorical variables were used to compare various measurements in two groups. The patient-reported outcome measures at baseline, 10 days (T1), and 6 months (T6) after surgery were statistically analyzed by generalized estimating equation (GEE) models.

RESULTS

Fourty-one patients (45 knees) and 43 patients (48 knees) were included in the MA and the rKA group respectively. Three constitutional knee phenotypes (II, I, IV) were the commonest in our population. Navigation improved the surgical accuracy (1.5° vs 3.5°, p < 0.001) and precision (interquartile range 4.0 vs 2.0, p < 0.001) in the rKA group than the MA group. The changes in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score 12 (KOOS12), EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ5D) from baseline to T1 and T6 for patients with on-target rKA were larger than on-target MA counterparts (26.053 vs 18.607, P < 0.001(KOOS12, T1) , 0.457 vs 0.367 p < 0.001(EQ5D, T1) ; 51.017 vs 46.896, P = 0.023(KOOS12, T6) , 0.606 vs 0.565, P = 0.01(EQ5D, T6) ). Patients with on-target rKA had better Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) at T1 (54.126 vs 40.965, P = 0.002) compared with on-target MA counterparts.

CONCLUSIONS

Computer assisted navigation achieved the level of accuracy required by rKA-TKA. rKA-TKA offered significantly better short-term outcomes than MA-TKA.

Trends in Computer-Assisted Surgery for Total Knee Arthroplasty in Germany: An Analysis Based on the Operative Procedure Classification System between 2010 to 2021

Alignment strategies for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have changed significantly over time with a shift towards a more individualized alignment goal. At the same time, computer-assisted surgery (CAS) has gained interest for intraoperative control and accuracy in implant positioning and limb alignment. Despite the often discussed benefits and drawbacks of robotics and navigation for TKA, the routine use of these new devices on a day-to-day basis remains obscure. Therefore, nationwide hospital billing data based on the Operation Procedure Classification System (OPS) were retrieved from the Federal Statistical Office of Germany for the period from 2010 to 2021. OPS codes for primary total knee arthroplasty (OPS code: 5-822*) were further analyzed regarding the usage of computer navigation (additional OPS code: 5-988) or robotic devices (additional OPS code: 5-987). Gender and age at the time of surgery were also assessed. The results show a total of 2,226,559 primary TKAs were implanted between 2010 and 2021, of which 2,044,914 were performed conventionally (91.84% of all TKAs). A total of 170,276 TKAs were performed using navigation technique (7.65% of all TKAs) and another 11,369 TKAs were performed using robotics (0.51% of all TKAs). For the period from 2018 to 2021, a substantial increase in robot-assisted TKA (R-TKA) was observed, with an average increase rate of 84.74% per year, while the number of navigated TKAs declined (-3.67% per year). Computer-assisted surgery, and particularly robotics for TKA, are seeing growing popularity and stepwise translation into routine clinical use in Germany, with a steep increase rate of more than 80% per year since 2018. Nevertheless, the majority of TKAs are still performed using manual instrumentation, rendering conventional TKA the currently unchanged gold standard.

Kinematic alignment results in clinically similar outcomes to mechanical alignment: Systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

It is unclear whether a difference in functional outcome exists between kinematically aligned (KA) and mechanically aligned (MA) knee replacements. The aim of this study is to perform a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the available level I-IV evidence.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies comparing patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), range of motion (ROM), gait analysis and complications in TKA with KA and MA was performed. Quality assessment was performed for each study using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools.

RESULTS

Twelve randomised controlled trials and fourteen observational studies published between 2014 and 2022 were included in the final analysis. Meta-analysis revealed KA to have significantly better Oxford Knee Score (OKS) (p = 0.02), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) (p = 0.006), Knee Society Score (KSS) Objective Knee (p = 0.03) and KSS Functional Activity (p = 0.008) scores. However, these improvements did not exceed the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) values reported in the literature. Subgroup analysis showed robotic assisted KA-TKA to have a clinically superior FJS (p = 0.0002) and trend towards KSS Objective Knee score (p = 0.10), compared to PSI. Gait and plantar pressure distribution of KA cohorts more closely represented healthy cohorts, and KA showed a weak association of a decreased knee adduction moment (KAM) compared to MA. Differences in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), range of motion and complications were not significant between groups.

CONCLUSION

Although KA results in several improved functional outcomes, these do not reach clinical significance. Further standardised large-scale randomised studies are required to improve the quality of evidence. As it stands, it is difficult to recommend one philosophy over the other.

Outcomes of cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis with severe varus deformity

BACKGROUND

Varus deformity is common in osteoarthritic knee. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiographic outcomes after cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for severely varus osteoarthritic knees and compare them to those of mildly to moderately deformed osteoarthritic knees.

METHODS

Eight hundred ninety-four subjects were undergone CR TKA, 137 had severe varus deformity (group 1), and 757 had mild-to-moderate deformity (group 2) of the lower limb preoperatively. Pre- and postoperative outcomes were compared between two groups clinically and radiographically.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up period was 54.7 ± 28.9 months. Mean age was 77.8 ± 6.7 years in group 1 and 74.5 ± 7.4 years in group 2 (p < 0.001). Preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA) was - 17.7°±2.9° in group 1 and - 6.3° ± 5.1° in group 2 (p < 0.001). Preoperative range of motion (ROM) was 127.7° ± 15.2° in group 1 and 130.8 °± 9.6° in group 2 (p = 0.019). Preoperative Knee Society scores and WOMAC score were not significantly different between two groups. Postoperative HKAA was - 0.4° ± 2.3° in group 1 and 0.6 ° ± 2.0° in group 2 (p < 0.001). Postoperative ROM, Knee Society scores, and WOMAC score were not significantly different between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

CR TKA showed results in subjects with severe varus deformities comparable to those without severe varus deformities. Whether the degree of preoperative varus deformity of the lower limb should be considered when deciding to perform CR-type or PS-type TKA requires further discussion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective comparative study, Level III.

No consistent association between patient-reported outcome measures and coronal alignment following total knee arthroplasty: a narrative review

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty is a common procedure for treating knee conditions; however, significant proportions of patients report dissatisfaction post-operatively. Recent data suggests accurate coronal alignment may not be essential for optimizing prosthesis functionality and survivorship. This narrative review utilized a systematic approach to analyse the literature comparing post-operative coronal alignment and PROMs following knee replacement.

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE was utilized to identify publications that directly compare the relationship between coronal alignment and PROMs.

RESULTS

Thirty-one eligible publications were identified. Variability in both study design and findings were observed, with no studies being without risk of bias.

CONCLUSION

Given this variability and lack of consensus among the reported publications, current literature is ill-equipped to describe the exact nature of the relationship between coronal alignment and PROMs following TKA. Further research would ideally utilize both validated generic, and knee-specific PROMs, make use of pre-operative outcome data, and standardized follow-up to develop reliable assessments of coronal alignment and its impact upon both functionality and quality of life.

Restricted kinematic alignment achieves similar relative lateral laxity and greater joint line obliquity compared to gap balancing TKA

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare ligament balance and laxity profiles achieved throughout flexion in restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) and gap balancing (GB). rKA and GB both aim to improve soft tissue balance and reduce ligament releases in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

One surgeon performed 68 rKA, another performed 73 GB TKAs using the same CR implant and robotic system. rKA limited femoral valgus and tibial varus to 6°, with tibial recuts performed to achieve balance. GB limited tibial varus and femoral valgus to 2°, with femoral resections adjusted to achieve mediolateral balance throughout flexion using predictive-gap planning software. Final joint laxity was measured using a robotic ligament tensioner. Statistical analyses were performed to compare differences in mediolateral balance and joint laxity throughout flexion. Further analyses compared alignment, joint line elevation and orientation (JLO), and frequency of ligament releases and bone recuts.

RESULTS

Both techniques reported greater lateral laxity throughout flexion, with GB reporting improved mediolateral balance from 10° to 45° flexion. GB resected 1.7 mm more distal femur (p ≤ 0.001) and had greater overall laxity than rKA throughout flexion (p ≤ 0.01). rKA increased JLO by 2.5° and 3° on the femur and tibia (p ≤ 0.001). Pre-operative and post-operative coronal alignment were similar across both techniques. rKA had a higher tibial recut rate: 26.5% vs 1.4%, p < 0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

rKA and GB both report lateral laxity but with different JLO and elevation. Use of a predictive-gap GB workflow resulted in greater mediolateral gap symmetry with fewer recuts.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective cohort study.

Excessive Sagittal Slope of the Tibia Component during Kinematic Alignment-Safety and Functionality at a Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up

The aim of this study was to assess the safety and functional outcomes of excessive sagittal alignment in the unrestricted kinematic alignment technique for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A retrospective, single-center study was conducted between 2018 and 2020, including patients undergoing primary TKA with a minimum 2-year follow-up. EOS imaging conducted before and after surgery was reviewed for overall alignment, and a number of measurements were taken, including sagittal tibial slope and other tibia and femur component positioning. Patients were interviewed and asked to fill out several questionnaires including a visual analog scale, the Oxford Knee Score, and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Overall, 225 patients (66.7%) had a sagittal tibial slope angle above 5° (excessive) and 112 (33.3%) patients had an angle under 5° (moderate). A significant improvement in pain and function scores was observed in both groups following the surgery (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the moderate and excessive groups in the average VAS, OKS or the various subtypes of the KOOS score. However, there was a slight but significant difference in the number of patients achieving MCID in KOOS symptoms. There were no cases of early failure or loosening. Unrestricted KA and the excessive sagittal alignment of the tibial component seem to be reliable and safe in terms of restoring daily function and alleviating pain after a minimum of 2 years following the surgery.

Minimum 2-Year Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Unrestricted Kinematic Alignment Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with Excessive Varus of the Tibia Component

Kinematic alignment (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has gained much attention in recent years. However, debate remains on whether restrictions should be made on the tibia cut. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and functional outcomes of excessive varus cuts. A single-center, retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing TKA between 2018 and 2020 who had a minimum 2-year follow-up was conducted. EOS™ imaging conducted before and after surgery was analyzed for overall alignment, as well as for tibia and femur component positioning on the coronal planes. Patients were interviewed and asked to fill several questionnaires, including the visual analog score, Oxford knee score, and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score. Overall, 243 patients (71.9%) had a coronal tibial plate angle under 5° (moderate) and 95 patients (28.1%) had an angle above 5° (excessive). There were no significant differences between the moderate and excessive groups in patient-reported outcomes, nor were there differences in the number of patients achieving the minimal clinical difference. There were no cases of catastrophic failure or loosening. Unrestricted KA and excessive varus of the tibial component appears to be safe and efficient in relieving pain and restoring function for a minimum of 2 years following surgery.

Current concept of kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty and its derivatives

The kinematic alignment (KA) approach to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has recently increased in popularity. Accordingly, a number of derivatives have arisen and have caused confusion. Clarification is therefore needed for a better understanding of KA-TKA. Calipered (or true, pure) KA is performed by cutting the bone parallel to the articular surface, compensating for cartilage wear. In soft-tissue respecting KA, the tibial cutting surface is decided parallel to the femoral cutting surface (or trial component) with in-line traction. These approaches are categorized as unrestricted KA because there is no consideration of leg alignment or component orientation. Restricted KA is an approach where the periarthritic joint surface is replicated within a safe range, due to concerns about extreme alignments that have been considered ‘alignment outliers’ in the neutral mechanical alignment approach. More recently, functional alignment and inverse kinematic alignment have been advocated, where bone cuts are made following intraoperative planning, using intraoperative measurements acquired with computer assistance to fulfill good coordination of soft-tissue balance and alignment. The KA-TKA approach aims to restore the patients’ own harmony of three knee elements (morphology, soft-tissue balance, and alignment) and eventually the patients’ own kinematics. The respective approaches start from different points corresponding to one of the elements, yet each aim for the same goal, although the existing implants and techniques have not yet perfectly fulfilled that goal.

Distribution of Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee Classification in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis in Japan

Coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) has recently been proposed as a simple and universal classification system to determine the suitability of a particular phenotype of the knee to a specific alignment strategy for knee replacement surgery. Although racial differences may affect knee alignment, there are no reports on the racial distribution of this classification system. We aimed to clarify the distribution of CPAK classification in patients with osteoarthritis who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in Japan. Consecutive patients who underwent primary TKA were analyzed retrospectively. The knees were categorized according to the CPAK classification system which comprised of two independent variables (arithmetic hip-knee-ankle [aHKA] angle and joint-line obliquity [JLO]) with three respective subgroups to create the following nine phenotypes of the knee: type I (varus aHKA and apex distal JLO), type II (neutral aHKA and apex distal JLO), type III (valgus aHKA and apex distal JLO), type IV (varus aHKA and neutral JLO), type V (neutral aHKA and neutral JLO), and type VI (valgus aHKA and neutral JLO), type VII (varus aHKA and apex proximal), type VIII (neutral aHKA and apex proximal), and type IX (valgus aHKA and apex proximal). The distribution of the phenotypes in the Japanese population was investigated as a primary outcome. To accurately compare the results with previous studies conducted on non-Japanese patients, a sex-matched distribution was investigated as a secondary outcome. A total of 570 knees were investigated of which 500 knees were examined after exclusions. The most common distribution was type I (53.8%), followed by type II (25.4%), type III (8.2%), type IV (7.2%), type V (4.4%), and type VI (1.0%). Types VII, VIII, and IX were not distributed. The sex-matched distribution was nearly identical to the overall distribution in Japan. The majority of patients with knee osteoarthritis in Japan had medially tilted joints with constitutional varus alignment.

Restricted kinematic alignment leads to uncompromised osseointegration of cementless total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

While kinematic alignment (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with cemented implants has been shown to provide equivalent or better results than mechanical alignment, its combination with cementless fixation has not yet been documented. The purpose of this study is to report (1) revision rate and causes, (2) clinical results based on patient report outcome measures (PROMs), and (3) radiological signs of implant dysfunction in patients with an uncemented TKA implanted with restricted KA (rKA), after a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

METHODS

This study included the first 100 consecutive uncemented cruciate retaining TKAs implanted between November 2015 and February 2018 by a single surgeon following rKA principles. At last follow-up, all adverse events and PROMs assessed by WOMAC, KOOS, and FJS scores were documented. Radiographic evaluation was performed to identify signs of implant loosening.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 49 months (32, 60), no implant revision was performed for aseptic loosening. Three revisions were performed: one for malalignment, one for a deep infection, and one for instability. The mean WOMAC score was 20.1 (0-79, 21.3), the mean KOOS score was 71.5 (19.0-96.6, 19.8), and the mean FJS score was 65.9 (0-100, 29.6). No radiological evidence of implant aseptic loosening or osteolysis was identified.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that in 99% of our cases, rKA combined with the tested cementless TKA implant allowed for adequate secondary fixation and good functional outcomes in the short term. Favourable mid- to long-term implant survivorship is anticipated.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

A randomized controlled trial comparing functional outcomes for navigated kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty versus navigated mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty : the MaKKRO trial

Aims

Nearly 99,000 total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) are performed in UK annually. Despite plenty of research, the satisfaction rate of this surgery is around 80%. One of the important intraoperative factors affecting the outcome is alignment. The relationship between joint obliquity and functional outcomes is not well understood. Therefore, a study is required to investigate and compare the effects of two types of alignment (mechanical and kinematic) on functional outcomes and range of motion.

Methods

The aim of the study is to compare navigated kinematically aligned TKAs (KA TKAs) with navigated mechanically aligned TKA (MA TKA) in terms of function and ROM. We aim to recruit a total of 96 patients in the trial. The patients will be recruited from clinics of various consultants working in the trust after screening them for eligibility criteria and obtaining their informed consent to participate in this study. Randomization will be done prior to surgery by a software. The primary outcome measure will be the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score The secondary outcome measures include Oxford Knee Score, ROM, EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire, EuroQol visual analogue scale, 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12), and Forgotten Joint Score. The scores will be calculated preoperatively and then at six weeks, six months, and one year after surgery. The scores will undergo a statistical analysis.

Discussion

There is no clear evidence on the best alignment for a knee arthroplasty. This randomized controlled trial will test the null hypothesis that navigated KA TKAs do not perform better than navigated MA TKAs.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(11):945–950.

Specific case consideration for implanting TKA with the Kinematic Alignment technique

The Kinematic Alignment (KA) technique for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an alternative surgical technique aiming to resurface knee articular surfaces.The restricted KA (rKA) technique for TKA applies boundaries to the KA technique in order to avoid reproducing extreme constitutional limb/knee anatomies.The vast majority of TKA cases are straightforward and can be performed with KA in a standard (unrestricted) fashion.There are some specific situations where performing KA TKA may be more challenging (complex KA TKA cases) and surgical technique adaptations should be included.To secure good clinical outcomes, complex KA TKA cases must be preoperatively recognized, and planned accordingly.The proposed classification system describes six specific issues that must be considered when aiming for a KA TKA implantation.Specific recommendations for each situation type should improve the reliability of the prosthetic implantation to the benefit of the patient.The proposed classification system could contribute to the adoption of a common language within our orthopaedic community that would ease inter-surgeon communication and could benefit the teaching of the KA technique. This proposed classification system is not exhaustive and will certainly be improved over time. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:881-891. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210042.

True Kinematic Alignment Is Applicable in 44% of Patients Applying Restrictive Indication Criteria-A Retrospective Analysis of 111 TKA Using Robotic Assistance

Introduction: Image-based robotic assistance appears to be a promising tool for individualizing alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The patient-specific model of the knee enables a preoperative 3D planning of component position. Adjustments to the individual soft-tissue situation can be done intraoperatively. Based on this, we have established a standardized workflow to implement the idea of kinematic alignment (KA) for robotic-assisted TKA. In addition, we have defined limits for its use. If these limits are reached, we switch to a restricted KA (rKA). The aim of the study was to evaluate (1) in what percentage of patients a true KA or an rKA is applicable, (2) whether there were differences regarding knee phenotypes, and (3) what the differences of philosophies in terms of component position, joint stability, and early patient outcome were. Methods: The study included a retrospective analysis of 111 robotic-assisted primary TKAs. Based on preoperative long leg standing radiographs, the patients were categorized into a varus, valgus, or neutral subgroup. Initially, all patients were planned for KA TKA. When the defined safe zone had been exceeded, adjustments to an rKA were made. Intraoperatively, the alignment of the components and joint gaps were recorded by robotic software. Results and conclusion: With our indication for TKA and the defined boundaries, “only” 44% of the patients were suitable for a true KA with no adjustments or soft tissue releases. In the varus group, it was about 70%, whereas it was 0% in the valgus group and 25% in the neutral alignment group. Thus, significant differences with regard to knee morphotypes were evident. In the KA group, a more physiological knee balance reconstructing the trapezoidal flexion gap (+2 mm on average laterally) was seen as well as a closer reconstruction of the surface anatomy and joint line in all dimensions compared to rKA. This resulted in a higher improvement in the collected outcome scores in favor of KA in the very early postoperative phase.

Patient satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty using restricted kinematic alignment

AIMS

Alternative alignment concepts, including kinematic and restricted kinematic, have been introduced to help improve clinical outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical results, along with patient satisfaction, following TKA using the concept of restricted kinematic alignment.

METHODS

A total of 121 consecutive TKAs performed between 11 February 2018 to 11 June 2019 with preoperative varus deformity were reviewed at minimum one-year follow-up. Three knees were excluded due to severe preoperative varus deformity greater than 15°, and a further three due to requiring revision surgery, leaving 109 patients and 115 knees to undergo primary TKA using the concept of restricted kinematic alignment with advanced technology. Patients were stratified into three groups based on the preoperative limb varus deformity: Group A with 1° to 5° varus (43 knees); Group B between 6° and 10° varus (56 knees); and Group C with varus greater than 10° (16 knees). This study group was compared with a matched cohort of 115 TKAs and 115 patients using a neutral mechanical alignment target with manual instruments performed from 24 October 2016 to 14 January 2019.

RESULTS

Mean overall patient satisfaction for the entire cohort was 4.7 (SE 0.1) on a 5-point Likert scale, with 93% being either very satisfied or satisfied compared with a Likert of 4.3 and patient satisfaction of 81% in the mechanical alignment group (p < 0.001 and p < 0.006 respectively). At mean follow-up of 17 months (11 to 27), the mean overall Likert, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Forgotten Joint Score, and Knee Society Knee and Function Scores were significantly better in the kinematic group than in the neutral mechanical alignment group. The most common complication in both groups was contracture requiring manipulation under anaesthesia, involving seven knees (6.1%) in the kinematic group and nine knees (7.8%) in the mechanical alignment group.

CONCLUSION

With the advent of advanced technology, and the ability to obtain accurate bone cuts, the target limb alignment, and soft-tissue balance within millimetres, using a restricted kinematic alignment concept demonstrated excellent patient satisfaction following primary TKA. Longer-term analysis is required as to the durability of this method. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):59-66.

Contemporary knee arthroplasty: one fits all or time for diversity?

INTRODUCTION

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has historically been the preferred solution for any type of knee osteoarthritis, independently of the number of compartments involved. In these days of patient-specific medicine, mono-compartmental disease could also be approached with a more individualized treatment, such as partial knee arthroplasty (PKA). Off-the-shelf (OTS) implants are often the compromise of averages and means of a limited series of anatomical parameters retrieved from patients and the pressure of cost control by limited inventory. Personalized medicine requires respect and interest for the individual shape and alignment of each patient.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A Pubmed and Google Scholar search were performed with the following terms: "patient-specific knee" and "arthroplasty" and "custom implant" and "total knee replacement" and "partial knee replacement" and "patellofemoral knee replacement" and "bicompartmental knee replacement". The full text of 90 articles was used to write this narrative review.

RESULTS

Unicondylar, patellofemoral and bicompartmental knee arthroplasty are successful treatment options, which can be considered over TKA for their bone and ligament sparing character and the superior functional outcome that can be obtained with resurfacing procedures. For TKA, where compromises dominate our choices, especially in patients with individual variations of their personal anatomy outside of the standard, a customized implant could be a preferable solution.

CONCLUSION

TKA might not be the only solution for every patient with knee osteoarthritis, if personalized medicine wants to be offered. Patient-specific mono-compartmental resurfacing solutions, such as partial knee arthroplasty, can be part of the treatment options proposed by the expert surgeon. Customized implants and personalized alignment options have the potential to further improve clinical outcome by identifying the individual morphotype and respecting the diversity of the surgical population.