Deep infection after hip hemiarthroplasty: risk factors for infection and outcome of treatments

Diagnostic Test Performances for Identifying Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Hip Hemiarthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication of hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA) that is not well-represented in the literature. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate diagnostic markers for identifying PJI in patients after HHA and compare them with the most recent 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection criteria.

METHODS

A total of 98 patients (64 PJIs, 65.3%) were analyzed. Patients were identified by relevant Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases-9/10 codes from 2000 to 2021 across a single healthcare system. Preoperative or intraoperative synovial fluid nucleated cell (NC) count, synovial polymorphonuclear (PMN) percentage, serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), serum C-reactive protein (CRP), and serum white blood cell count were compared with Student t -test between aseptic and septic cohorts. Diagnostic utility and laboratory cutoff values were determined using receiver-operating characteristic curves and Youden index, respectively.

RESULTS

Mean values were significantly higher in the septic cohort for synovial NC count (120,992.2 versus 1,498.0 cells/μL, P < 0.001), synovial PMN percentage (91.3% versus 56.2%, P < 0.001), serum ESR (75.6 versus 36.3 mm/hr, P < 0.001), serum CRP (20.2 versus 125.8 mg/L, P < 0.001), and serum white blood cell count (8.5 versus 11.5 cells/μL, P < 0.001). Synovial NC count, synovial PMN percentage, and serum CRP had excellent PJI discriminatory ability with an area under the curve of 0.99, 0.90, and 0.93, respectively. Optimal cutoffs were 2,700 cells/μL for synovial NC count (100% sensitivity and 94% specificity), 81.0% for synovial PMN percentage (96% sensitivity and 89% specificity), 52.0 mm/hr for serum ESR (75% sensitivity and 80% specificity), and 40.0 mg/L for serum CRP (85% sensitivity and 92% specificity).

CONCLUSION

Our findings support the continued use of routine serum and synovial fluid tests for diagnosing PJI in HHA patients. Optimal cutoff values for both synovial fluid biomarkers were very close in alignment with the 2018 International Consensus Meeting criteria.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Risk factors of periprosthetic joint infection after hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture in the elderly: Analysis of 1619 cases in the multicenter database

PURPOSE

This multicenter retrospective study focuses on understanding the incidence, causative bacteria, and risk factors for Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) following hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures (FNF).

METHODS

From 2016 to 2020, 1,619 patients were diagnosed with displaced FNFs and treated surgically across 11 centers. After exclusions, 1,438 patients (399 men and 1,039 women) were included in the study, averaging 82.1 years in age and 20.2 kg/m² in BMI, observed over 25.7 months on average. Data on demographics, medical history, surgical details, and complications were described.

RESULTS

PJI occurred in 20 of the 1438 patients (1.4%). The causative organism was methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in 6 patients and methicillin-resistant S. aureus in 6 patients. In patients' backgrounds, the average age was slightly higher in the non-PJI group (82.1 years) compared to the PJI group (80.4 years). There was a higher percentage of males in the PJI group (45%) than in the non-PJI group (27.5%). Drug history showed that the prevalence of anticoagulant use in the PJI group was 25%. Peripheral vascular disease and diabetes mellitus were more prevalent in the PJI group. Most patients in both groups were independent in daily activities. The blood transfusion rate was significantly higher in the PJI group (50%) than in the non-PJI group (23.8%). Notably, the incidence of hematoma was higher in the PJI group (40%).

CONCLUSION

This multicenter retrospective study demonstrates a low incidence (1.4%) of PJI in elderly patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty for FNF, primarily due to Staphylococcus aureus. Increased usage of antiplatelets and anticoagulants, as well as comorbidities related to atherosclerosis, like peripheral vascular disease and diabetes mellitus, were observed in patients with PJI. Additionally, these patients experienced higher rates of blood transfusion and postoperative hematomas, highlighting the need for careful management. It should be noted, however, that this finding is a conclusion limited by study design issues, including the retrospective design, small PJI sample size, and variability in treatment approaches.

Risk Factors for 30-Days Mortality After Proximal Femoral Fracture Surgery, a Cohort Study

Purpose

The primary objective of this study was to identify new risk factors and to confirm previously reported risk factors associated with 30-day mortality after hip fracture surgery.

Patients and methods

A prospective hip fracture database was used to obtain data. In total, 3523 patients who underwent hip fracture surgery between 2011 and 2021 were included. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was used to screen and identify candidate risk factors. Twenty-seven baseline factors and 16 peri-operative factors were included in the univariable analysis and 28 of those factors were included in multivariable analysis.

Results

8.6% of the patients who underwent hip fracture surgery died within 30 days after surgery. Prognostic factors associated with 30-day mortality after hip fracture surgery were as follows: age 90-100 years (OR = 4.7, 95% CI: 1.07-19.98, p = 0.041) and above 100 years (OR = 11.3, 95% CI: 1.28-100.26, p = 0.029), male gender (OR = 2.6, 95% CI: 1.97-3.33, p < 0.001), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 3 and ASA 4 (OR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.44-3.14, p < 0.001), medical history of dementia (OR = 1.7, 95% CI: 1.25-2.36, p = 0.001), decreased albumin level (OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.92-0.97, p < 0.001), decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.98-0.99, p < 0.001), residential status of nursing home (OR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.44-2.87, p < 0.001), higher Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (KATZ-ADL) score (OR = 1.1, 95% CI: 1.01-1.16, p=0.018) and postoperative pneumonia (OR = 2.4, 95% CI: 1.72-3.38, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

A high mortality rate in patients after acute hip fracture surgery is known. Factors that are associated with an increased mortality are age above 90 years, male gender, ASA 3 and ASA 4, medical history of dementia, decreased albumin, decreased GFR, residential status of nursing home, higher KATZ-ADL score and postoperative pneumonia.

[Acute postoperative infections after dual head arthroplasty in geriatric patients]

Acute periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) after dual head arthroplasty represent a major challenge with a 1-year mortality rate up to 50% in the mostly multimorbid geriatric patient collective. Due to the limited possibilities of preoperative patient optimization, infection rates of up to 9% have been reported, which is significantly higher than in elective arthroplasty. A therapeutic gold standard has not yet been established due to the heterogeneous study situation and the lack of prospective randomized studies. The most promising therapeutic option currently appears to be a single-stage stem replacement in combination with implantation of a cup component (conversion to total hip arthroplasty, infection eradication in up to 100%). An approach of débridement, antibiotics, implant retention (DAIR) alone shows significantly poorer success rates (16-82%). Surgical treatment should always be followed by antibiotic treatment with a total duration of 12 weeks. In addition to the established perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, the use of antibiotic-loaded bone cement seems to be superior to cementless stem fixation in preventing PJI in dual head arthroplasty.

Risk factors for prosthetic joint infections after hemiarthroplasty of the hip following a femoral neck fracture

PURPOSE

The primary aim of this study was to identify risk factors and validate earlier reported risk factors for Prosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) after hemiarthroplasty. The secondary aim was to assess peri‑operative clinical outcomes, adverse events and mortality rates in PJI patients after hemiarthroplasty.

METHODS

A prospective hip fracture database was used to obtain data for this observational cohort study. Patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty between 2011 and 2021 were included. A PJI was diagnosed by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify factors highly associated with a PJI.

RESULTS

In total, 2044 patients were analysed of which 72 patients (3.5 %) developed PJI. The multivariable analysis showed that Body Mass Index (BMI) >30 (OR2.84, P = 0.020), operating time of <45 min (OR=2.80, P = 0.002), occurrence of haematoma (OR=6.24, P<0.001), decreasing level of hemoglobin (OR=1.62, P = 0.001) and re-operation for luxation (OR=9.25, P<0.001) were significant independent prognostic risk factors for development of PJI after hemiarthroplasty. Diabetes Mellitus (OR=0.34, P = 0.018) and >20 hemiarthroplasties performed by the surgeon in the previous year (OR=0.33, P = 0.019) were prognostic protective factors. In patients with PJI, 40 % (n = 29) died within one year after surgery, compared with 27 % (n = 538) in patients without PJI (OR=1.80, P = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

Independent significant prognostic factors highly associated with PJI after hemiarthroplasty were BMI >30, operating time of <45, decreasing level of hemoglobin, occurrence of haematoma and re-operation for luxation. Diabetes Mellitus and >20 hemiarthroplasties performed by the surgeon in the previous year were prognostic protective factors for the development of PJI. PJI was associated with significantly higher 1-year all-cause mortality.

Unipolar Hip Hemiarthroplasty in Geriatric Patients: A Prospective Study and Analysis of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes

Introduction

Femoral neck fractures (FNF) in the geriatric population are commonly treated with hip replacement procedures, such as total hip arthroplasty, unipolar hip hemiarthroplasty (UHA), and bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty (BHA). The optimal treatment remains controversial, considering outcomes and cost-effectiveness, with UHA often being cheaper. This prospective observational study aims to evaluate UHA's clinical and radiological outcomes, safety, and survivorship compared to existing literature.

Methods

We followed 90 elderly patients who underwent UHA following FNF. We assessed patients using the Parker score before and after surgery, as well as Harris Hip Score (HHS), and Postel-Merle d'Aubigné (PMA) scores postoperatively. All complications, acetabular erosions and heterotopic ossifications (HO), were documented.

Results

One year post-surgery, 26.7% of patients had passed away, mostly due to declining general health status. Systemic complications occurred in 14.4% of cases, with a 1.1% rate of deep surgical site infections. A single dislocation resulted from excessive stem anteversion. UHA implant survival rate was 97.8% after 4 years. The Parker score remained stable, and HHS at 6 and 12 months was 71.5 ± 12.9 and 70.9 ± 11.8, respectively, while PMA score was 14.3 ± 2.4 and 14.5 ± 2.1, respectively. Five hips showed Baker I acetabular wear. HO were noted as Brooker I in 12 patients, II in 4 patients, and IV in 1 patient.

Discussion

UHA exhibited comparable systemic complication rates, implant survivorship, and dislocation rates to those in the literature for both UHA and BHA. The deep surgical site infection rate was lower than reported for BHA. Patients' functional and mental abilities did not decline based on clinical scores. Acetabular wear in UHA was similar to its bipolar counterpart, while HO were only minor findings with no clinical implications.

Conclusion

In elderly patients, UHA demonstrated clinical and radiological outcomes similar to BHA in existing literature. UHA may represent a cost-effective alternative for patients with limited life expectancy.

Social determinants of health in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty: are they associated with medical complications, healthcare utilization, and payments for care?

INTRODUCTION

Social determinants of health (SDOH) have previously been shown to impact orthopedic surgery outcomes. This study assessed whether greater socioeconomic disadvantage in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty following femoral neck fracture was associated with differences in (1) medical complications, (2) emergency department (ED) utilization, (3) readmission rates, and (4) payments for care.

METHODS

A US nationwide database was queried for hemiarthroplasties performed between 2010 and 2020. Area Deprivation Index (ADI), a validated measure of socioeconomic disadvantage reported on a scale of 0-100, was used to compare two cohorts of greater and lesser deprivation. Patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty from high ADI (95% +) were 1:1 propensity score matched to a comparison group of lower ADI (0-94%) while controlling for age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. This yielded 75,650 patients evenly distributed between the two cohorts. Outcomes studied were 90-day medical complications, ED utilizations, readmissions, and payments for care. Multivariate logistic regression models were utilized to calculate odds ratios (ORs) of the relationship between ADI and outcomes. p Values < 0.05 were significant.

RESULTS

Patients of high ADI developed greater medical complications (46.74% vs. 44.97%; OR 1.05, p = 0.002), including surgical site infections (1.19% vs. 1.00%; OR 1.20, p = 0.011), cerebrovascular accidents (1.64% vs. 1.41%; OR 1.16, p = 0.012), and respiratory failures (2.27% vs. 2.02%; OR 1.13, p = 0.017) compared to patients from lower ADIs. Although comparable rates of ED visits (2.92% vs. 2.86%; OR 1.02, p = 0.579), patients from higher ADI were readmitted at diminished rates (10.57% vs. 11.06%; OR 0.95, p = 0.027). Payments were significantly higher on the day of surgery ($7,570 vs. $5,974, p < 0.0001), as well as within 90 days after surgery ($12,700 vs. $10,462, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Socioeconomically disadvantaged patients experience increased 90-day medical complications and payments, similar ED utilizations, and decreased readmissions. These findings can be used to inform healthcare providers to minimize disparities in care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) following hip and knee arthroplasty: results and findings of a multidisciplinary approach from a non-specialist prosthetic infection centre

INTRODUCTION

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a catastrophic complication following arthroplasty surgery. Recently a debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) procedure has gained popularity for PJI where a thorough debridement, irrigation and modular component exchange is undertaken.

METHOD

We present the outcome for DAIR, data collected prospectively, in a busy orthopaedic unit but not one specialising in PJI. All patients with PJI were included without loss of data or patients from 2012 to 2018 with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.

RESULTS

Four total knee replacements, 17 total hip replacements, one revision total hip replacement and three hip hemiarthroplasties are included with an average duration from onset of symptoms to the DAIR procedure of 11 days (range 1-22 days). Staphylococcus aureus (24%) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (32%) were the most common causative organisms, and the most common antibiotic regimens included intravenous teicoplanin and flucloxacillin. Average follow-up was 67 months (range 9-104 months). Only four patients went on to require revision surgery. An analysis of midterm patient outcome measures for 6 of the total hip replacement (THR) DAIR patients were compared with a database of 792 THRs (with a minimum two-year follow-up) carried out by the same surgeon revealed no significant difference in Oxford hip scores at one-year post-surgery (OHS DAIR 36.2 vs 39 for control group).

CONCLUSION

This study includes 25 consecutive patients treated with DAIR with only one reinfection, with a mean follow-up period of 5 years. Using a strict protocol, DAIR appears to offer a successful treatment strategy for the management of early PJI.

Patients undergoing hip hemiarthroplasty who require early return to theatre have early increased mortality and worse functional outcomes at short term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Re-operation following hip hemiarthroplasty is potentially devastating due to a frail, co-morbid surgical cohort. We aimed to assess the outcomes of patients who required early return to theatre (RTT) within 30 days of index operation in a high-volume hip fracture unit.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was undertaken. All hip hemiarthroplasties performed between 1st January 2010 and 31st December 2019 was included. Demographic details, complications including reason for return to theatre, length of stay, discharge destination, functional outcome and mortality were collected and reviewed.

RESULTS

4340 hip hemiarthroplasty procedures were performed, of which 64 patients (1.47%) required early RTT within 30 days of index procedure and 4276 patients did not require early-RTT. The most common reasons for RTT were infection (n = 47) and dislocation (n = 15). There were no cases of peri‑prosthetic fracture requiring RTT within 30 days. Patients requiring early RTT had a significantly increased rate of mortality within 120 days; 32.8% (21 of the 64 patients) versus 13.6% (580 out of the 4276) not requiring early RTT (p < 0.001). The median length of acute inpatient admission for patients who required early RTT was significantly longer at 31 days (range 6-185 days) compared to 10 days (range 3-171 days, p < 0.001) for those without early RTT. Early RTT was associated with a poorer functional mobility outcome at 120 days post-operatively, with a significantly greater reduction in Barthel score compared to the non-RTT cohort (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients requiring early RTT following hip hemiarthroplasty had a significantly increased length of stay, mortality and worse functional outcome compared to patients who did not require early RTT within 30 days.

Urinary tract infection is associated with 2.4-fold increased risk of surgical site infection in hip fracture surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus regarding whether urinary tract infection (UTI) should be screened for or treated in hip fracture patients.

AIM

To assess the relationship between perioperative UTI and surgical site infection (SSI) in hip fracture patients, and the relationship between urinary catheterization and SSI in these patients.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane Library were searched to identify studies that evaluated the relationship between perioperative UTI and SSI and/or between urinary catheterization and SSI. Articles were included if they used the term UTI or specified UTI as symptomatic bacteriuria.

FINDINGS

A total of 4139 records were identified, with eight studies included. Meta-analysis of seven studies which evaluated perioperative UTI and SSI showed an SSI rate of 7.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 3.8-13.2) among 1217 patients with UTI vs 2.4% (95% CI: 1.0-5.7) in 36,514 patients without UTI (OR: 2.41; 95% CI: 1.67-3.46; P < 0.001). In three studies which specifically defined UTI as symptomatic bacteriuria, the SSI rate among UTI patients was 5.7% (95% CI: 4.0-8.1) vs 1.1% (95% CI: 0.2-5.2) in those without UTI (OR: 3.00; 95% CI: 0.55-16.26; P = 0.20). One study evaluated urinary catheterization and SSI.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative UTI is associated with a higher risk of SSI among hip fracture patients but the evidence is limited by the heterogeneity in the definition of UTI. We recommend considering the possibility of perioperative UTI in hip fracture patients, with treatment administered as necessary to reduce SSI rates.

Long-term implant survival following hemiarthroplasty for fractured neck of femur

Aims

Several different designs of hemiarthroplasty are used to treat intracapsular fractures of the proximal femur, with large variations in costs. No clinical benefit of modular over monoblock designs has been reported in the literature. Long-term data are lacking. The aim of this study was to report the ten-year implant survival of commonly used designs of hemiarthroplasty.

Methods

Patients recorded by the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) between 1 September 1999 and 31 December 2020 who underwent hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of a hip fracture with the following implants were included: a cemented monoblock Exeter Trauma Stem (ETS), cemented Exeter V40 with a bipolar head, a monoblock Thompsons prosthesis (Cobalt/Chromium or Titanium), and an Exeter V40 with a Unitrax head. Overall and age-defined cumulative revision rates were compared over the ten years following surgery.

Results

A total of 41,949 hemiarthroplasties were included. Exeter V40 with a Unitrax head was the most commonly used (n = 20,707, 49.4%). The overall rate of revision was small. A total of 28,201 patients (67.2%) were aged > 80 years. There were no significant differences in revision rates across all designs of hemiarthroplasty in patients of this age at any time. The revision rates for all designs were < 3.5%, three years postoperatively. At subsequent times the ETS and Exeter V40 with a bipolar head performed well in all age groups. The unadjusted ten-year mortality rate for the whole cohort was 82.2%.

Conclusion

There was no difference in implant survival between all the designs of hemiarthroplasty in the first three years following surgery, supporting the selection of a cost-effective design of hemiarthroplasty for most patients with an intracapsular fracture of the hip, as determined by local availability and costs. Beyond this, the ETS and Exeter bipolar designs performed well in all age groups.

Infection after intracapsular femoral neck fracture - does antibiotic-loaded bone cement reduce infection risk after hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty?

Aims

The aim of this investigation was to compare risk of infection in both cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty (HA) as well as in total hip arthroplasty (THA) following femoral neck fracture.

Methods

Data collection was performed using the German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD). In HA and THA following femoral neck fracture, fixation method was divided into cemented and uncemented prostheses and paired according to age, sex, BMI, and the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index using Mahalanobis distance matching.

Results

Overall in 13,612 cases of intracapsular femoral neck fracture, 9,110 (66.9%) HAs and 4,502 (33.1%) THAs were analyzed. Infection rate in HA was significantly reduced in cases with use of antibiotic-loaded cement compared with uncemented fixated prosthesis (p = 0.013). In patients with THA no statistical difference between cemented and uncemented prosthesis was registered, however after one year 2.4% of infections were detected in uncemented and 2.1% in cemented THA. In the subpopulation of HA after one year, 1.9% of infections were registered in cemented and 2.8% in uncemented HA. BMI (p = 0.001) and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (p < 0.003) were identified as risk factors of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), while in THA cemented prosthesis also demonstrated an increased risk within the first 30 days (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.73; p = 0.010).

Conclusion

The rate of infection after intracapsular femoral neck fracture was statistically significantly reduced in patients treated by antibiotic-loaded cemented HA. Particularly for patients with multiple risk factors for the development of a PJI, the usage of antibiotic-loaded bone cement seems to be a reasonable procedure for prevention of infection.

A radio- and fluorescently labelled tracer for imaging and quantification of bacterial infection on orthopaedic prostheses : a proof of principle study

AIMS

Arthroplasty surgery of the knee and hip is performed in two to three million patients annually. Periprosthetic joint infections occur in 4% of these patients. Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) surgery aimed at cleaning the infected prosthesis often fails, subsequently requiring invasive revision of the complete prosthetic reconstruction. Infection-specific imaging may help to guide DAIR. In this study, we evaluated a bacteria-specific hybrid tracer (^99mTc-UBI_29-41-Cy5) and its ability to visualize the bacterial load on femoral implants using clinical-grade image guidance methods.

METHODS

^99mTc-UBI_29-41-Cy5 specificity for Stapylococcus aureus was assessed in vitro using fluorescence confocal imaging. Topical administration was used to highlight the location of S. aureus cultured on femoral prostheses using fluorescence imaging and freehand single photon emission CT (fhSPECT) scans. Gamma counting and fhSPECT were used to quantify the bacterial load and monitor cleaning with chlorhexidine. Microbiological culturing helped to relate the imaging findings with the number of (remaining) bacteria.

RESULTS

Bacteria could be effectively stained in vitro and on prostheses, irrespective of the presence of biofilm. Infected prostheses revealed bacterial presence on the transition zone between the head and neck, and in the screw hole. Qualitative 2D fluorescence images could be complemented with quantitative 3D fhSPECT scans. Despite thorough chlorhexidine treatments, 28% to 44% of the signal remained present in the locations of the infection that were identified using imaging, which included 500 to 2,000 viable bacteria.

CONCLUSION

The hybrid tracer ^99mTc-UBI_29-41-Cy5 allowed effective bacterial staining. Qualitative real-time fluorescence guidance could be effectively combined with nuclear imaging that enables quantitative monitoring of the effectiveness of cleaning strategies.Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(1):72-79.

Periprosthetic joint infection following hip hemiarthroplasty : factors associated with infection and treatment outcome

AIMS

The aims of this study were to determine the incidence and factors for developing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following hemiarthroplasty (HA) for hip fracture, and to evaluate treatment outcome and identify factors associated with treatment outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of consecutive patients treated for HA PJI at a tertiary referral centre with a mean 4.5 years' follow-up (1.6 weeks to 12.9 years). Surgeries performed included debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) and single-stage revision. The effect of different factors on developing infection and treatment outcome was determined.

RESULTS

A total of 1,984 HAs were performed during the study period, and 44 sustained a PJI (2.2%). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that a higher CCI score (odds ratio (OR) 1.56 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.117 to 2.187); p = 0.003), peripheral vascular disease (OR 11.34 (95% CI 1.897 to 67.810); p = 0.008), cerebrovascular disease (OR 65.32 (95% CI 22.783 to 187.278); p < 0.001), diabetes (OR 4.82 (95% CI 1.903 to 12.218); p < 0.001), moderate-to-severe renal disease (OR 5.84 (95% CI 1.116 to 30.589); p = 0.037), cancer without metastasis (OR 6.42 (95% CI 1.643 to 25.006); p = 0.007), and metastatic solid tumour (OR 15.64 (95% CI 1.499 to 163.087); p = 0.022) were associated with increasing PJI risk. Upon final follow-up, 17 patients (38.6%) failed initial treatment and required further surgery for HA PJI. One-year mortality was 22.7%. Factors associated with treatment outcome included lower preoperative Hgb level (97.9 g/l (SD 11.4) vs 107.0 g/l (SD 16.1); p = 0.009), elevated CRP level (99.1 mg/l (SD 63.4) vs 56.6 mg/l (SD 47.1); p = 0.030), and type of surgery. There was lower chance of success with DAIR (42.3%) compared to revision HA (66.7%) or revision with conversion to total hip arthroplasty (100%). Early-onset PJI (≤ six weeks) was associated with a higher likelihood of treatment failure (OR 3.5 (95% CI 1.2 to 10.6); p = 0.007) along with patients treated by a non-arthroplasty surgeon (OR 2.5 (95% CI 1.2 to 5.3); p = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

HA PJI initially treated with DAIR is associated with poor chances of success and its value is limited. We strongly recommend consideration of a single-stage revision arthroplasty with cemented components.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(12):924-932.