Insights into patient preferences for elective surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic

The impact of COVID-19 on hip and knee arthroplasty surgical volume in China

PURPOSE

The reduction of hip and knee arthroplasty surgical volume has been reported in many countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. In China, there is no national joint registry system and the impact of COVID-19 towards surgical volume remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the hip and knee arthroplasty surgical volume in China during the pandemic and evaluate its change trends.

METHODS

Annual sale numbers of prostheses used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), total hip arthroplasty (THA), and femoral head replacement (FHR) from 2011 to 2021 was collected from providers registered in National Medical Products Administration (NMPA). Annual surgical volume of TKA, THA, FHR, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), and revision of hip/knee arthroplasty (RJA) was collected from member hospitals of Beijing Joint Society (BJS). We used linear regression to estimate the loss of surgical volume. Annual surgical volume obtained from Britain and Australian joint registries were used to make comparison.

RESULTS

In China, the surgical volume of THA/FHR, TKA, and UKA in 2020 all decreased compared to the predicted value, with a reduction of 82,525 cases (13.46%), 165,178 cases (33.50%), and 151 cases (0.65%), respectively. All the three procedures showed significant recovery in 2021. The surgical volumes of THA/FHR and UKA were 68,813 and 9402 cases higher than predicted levels, respectively, while TKA volume remained slightly below the predicted level. The regional statistics in Beijing showed similar change mode. In 2020, the surgical volume of THA/FHR, TKA, FHR, and UKA all decreased compared to the predicted value, with a reduction of 5031 cases (43.37%), 5290 cases (40.69%), 620 cases (29.18%), and 925 cases (39.11%), respectively. In 2021, with the exception of FHR, the number of these procedures increased compared to 2020, but remained below the predicted value. Compared with the data from Britain and Australia, China experienced less reduction and faster recovery in the proportions of elderly people (> 65 years old) who undergo hip and knee arthroplasty during the COVID-19 pandemic.

CONCLUSION

During the COVID-19 pandemic, although hip and knee arthroplasty surgical volume in China showed a similar "restoration-recovery" change pattern with other countries, China took fewer losses in this field.

Significant deterioration in quality of life and increased frailty in patients waiting more than six months for total hip or knee arthroplasty

Aims

The primary aim of this study was to assess whether patients waiting six months or more for a total hip (THA) or knee (KA) arthroplasty had a deterioration in their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Secondary aims were to assess changes in frailty and the number of patients living in a state considered to be worse than death (WTD), and factors associated with changes in HRQoL and frailty.

Methods

This cross-sectional study included 326 patients, 150 males (46.0%) and 176 females (54.0%), with a mean age of 68.6 years (SD 9.8) who were randomly selected from waiting lists at four centres and had been waiting for six months or more (median 13 months, interquartile range 10 to 21) for a primary THA (n = 161) or KA (n = 165). The EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) and visual analogue scores (EQ-VAS), Rockwood Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), and 36-Item Short Form Survey subjective change in HRQoL were assessed at the time and recalled for six months earlier. A state that was WTD was defined as an EQ-5D of less than zero.

Results

There were significant deteriorations in the EQ-5D (mean 0.175, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.145 to 0.204; p < 0.001), EQ-VAS (mean 8.6, 95% CI 7.0 to 10.4; < 0.001), and CFS (from 3 “managing well” to 4 “vulnerable”; p < 0.001), and a significant increase in the number of those in a state that was WTD (n = 48; p < 0.001) during the previous six months for the whole cohort. A total of 110 patients (33.7%) stated that their health was much worse and 107 (32.8%) felt it was somewhat worse compared with six months previously. A significantly greater EQ-5D (-0.14, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.28; p = 0.038) and a state that was not WTD (-0.14, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.26; p = 0.031) were associated with a deterioration in the EQ-5D. THA (0.21, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.34; p = 0.002) or a lower (better) CFS (0.14, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.20; p < 0.001) were independently significantly associated with a deterioration in the CFS.

Conclusion

Patients waiting more than six months for THA or KA had a significant deterioration in their HRQoL and increased frailty, with two-thirds of patients feeling that their health had worsened. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(11):1215–1224.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on orthognathic patients: What have we learned?

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic orthognathic surgery was suspended in the UK. The effect this had on patients, to date, is unknown. A multi-centre, cross-sectional survey was conducted in the UK to investigate the health-related impact on patients on the orthognathic surgery pathway, including those on the waiting list for surgery. A structured questionnaire was designed to explore the impact of the pandemic on patients whose orthognathic treatment was temporarily cancelled. Ninety-five questionnaires were returned giving a response rate of 65%. When asked if the delay due to the pandemic had caused emotional distress, 63% (51/81) agreed. During the pandemic respondents experienced more distress in relation to dental appearance (60%, 51/83), self-confidence (52% 50/83), facial appearance (53%, 44/83), and ability to eat and chew (59%, 50/83). One hundred percent of patients would have appliances fitted or their appliances adjusted during the pandemic, and 93% stated that they would attend for surgery if they were offered this during the pandemic. In conclusion, patients appear to have experienced emotional distress in relation to the delay with their orthognathic treatment. They should be given greater priority during the remobilisation of elective surgery and should have access to ongoing psychological support when delays affect their treatment. The 'surgery-first' approach may be considered for suitable patients to minimise the duration of the treatment journey.

Resuming elective orthopaedic services during the COVID-19 pandemic : our experience

Aims

The aim of this study was to surveil whether the standard operating procedure created for the NHS Golden Jubilee sufficiently managed COVID-19 risk to allow safe resumption of elective orthopaedic surgery.

Methods

This was a prospective study of all elective orthopaedic patients within an elective unit running a green pathway at a COVID-19 light site. Rates of preoperative and 30-day postoperative COVID-19 symptoms or infection were examined for a period of 40 weeks. The unit resumed elective orthopaedic services on 29 June 2020 at a reduced capacity for a limited number of day-case procedures with strict patient selection criteria, increasing to full service on 29 August 2020 with no patient selection criteria.

Results

A total of 2,373 cases were planned in the 40-week study period. Surgery was cancelled in 59 cases, six (10.2%) of which were due to having a positive preoperative COVID-19 screening test result. Of the remaining 2,314, 996 (43%) were male and 1,318 (57%) were female. The median age was 67 years (interquartile range 59.2 to 74.6). The median American Society of Anesthesiologists grade was 2. Hip and knee arthroplasties accounted for the majority of the operations (76%). Six patients tested positive for COVID-19 preoperatively (0.25%) and 39 patients were tested for COVID-19 within 30 days after discharge, with only five patients testing positive (0.22%).

Conclusion

Through strict application of a COVID-19 green pathway, elective orthopaedic surgery could be safely delivered to a large number of patients with no selection criteria.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(11):951–957.

Restarting elective orthopaedic surgery as COVID-19 lockdown restrictions are reduced : have patient perceptions towards surgery changed?

Aims

The COVID-19 pandemic drastically affected elective orthopaedic services globally as routine orthopaedic activity was largely halted to combat this global threat. Our institution (University College London Hospital, UK) previously showed that during the first peak, a large proportion of patients were hesitant to be listed for their elective lower limb procedure. The aim of this study is to assess if there is a patient perception change towards having elective surgery now that we have passed the peak of the second wave of the pandemic.

Methods

This is a prospective study of 100 patients who were on the waiting list of a single surgeon for an elective hip or knee procedure. Baseline characteristics including age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, COVID-19 risk, procedure type, and admission type were recorded. The primary outcome was patient consent to continue with their scheduled surgical procedure. Subgroup analysis was also conducted to define if any specific patient factors influenced decision to continue with surgery

Results

Overall, 88 patients (88%) were happy to continue with their scheduled procedure at the earliest opportunity. Patients with an ASA grade I were most likely to agree to surgery, followed by patients with ASA grades II, then those with grade III (93.3%, 88.7%, and 78.6% willingness, respectively). Patients waitlisted for an injection were least likely to consent to surgery, with just 73.7% agreeing. In all, there was a large increase in the proportion of patient willingness to continue with surgery compared to our initial study during the first wave of the pandemic.

Conclusion

As COVID-19 lockdown restrictions are lifted after the second peak of the pandemic, we are seeing greater willingness to continue with scheduled orthopaedic surgery, reinforcing a change in patient perception towards having elective surgery. However, we must continue with strict COVID-19 precautions in order to minimize viral transmission as we increase our elective orthopaedic services going forward.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(10):865–870.