Prevalence and Predicting Factors of Complex Sleep Apnea in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome

Are We Underestimating the Central Components of the Mixed Apneas?-A Hypothesis for Revised Scoring

PURPOSE

Apneas are classified in three categories, as obstructive, central, and mixed types. Mixed apneas are calculated together with the obstructive events in diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (SAS). The clinical significance of mixed apneas needs to be specified.

METHODS

Patients with obstructive SAS having an index of mixed apneas ≥5/hour were evaluated. A new approach was developed to score the mixed apneas, and calculated them together with either obstructive or central type of events, depending on their obstructive and central components. The relationship between the development of complex SAS and the indices of abnormal respiratory events per standard and revised scoring was evaluated.

RESULTS

Ten of 56 patients (17.9%) developed complex SAS at titration polysomnography. The mean index of mixed apneas per standard scoring was significantly higher in patients who did not develop complex SAS ( P = 0.006). The use of newly developed method in scoring mixed apneas resulted that three patients (5.4%) fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for the central SAS at first-night polysomnography ( P < 0.001), and all of them had developed complex SAS at titration night requiring other modes of positive airway pressure therapy than the continuous mode ( P = 0.004). Curve estimation models showed that the change from mixed apneas to central apneas was highly significant in patients developing complex SAS ( r2 = 0.501; P = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that the summation of mixed apneas with the obstructive events conventionally underestimates the central components and the diagnosis of central SAS, which are fundamental in the risk stratification of complex SAS.

Clinical, polysomnographic, and CPAP titration features of obstructive sleep apnea: Mixed versus purely obstructive type

PURPOSE

To determine whether obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) patients with mixed sleep apnea (MSA) have different clinical, polysomnographic, and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration findings compared to OSAS patients without MSA.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of OSAS patients who had undergone CPAP titration and categorized them into pure-OSA and mixed-OSA groups. Demographic features, daytime sleepiness, and apnea severity were compared between the two groups using univariate and multivariate analyses. CPAP titration findings were also compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

One hundred and ninety-five subjects (n=126 pure-OSA; n=69 mixed-OSA) were included in the analysis. Compared to the pure-OSA group, the mixed-OSA group had a higher percentage of males (p=0.003) and a higher body mass index (p=0.044), Epworth Sleepiness Scale score (p=0.028), and apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) (p<0.001). In logistic regression analysis, older age, male sex, and higher body mass index were independently associated with mixed-OSA before PSG study. When using AHI as a covariable, the higher AHI with older age, male sex, and daytime sleepiness was independently related to mixed-OSA. The mixed-OSA group had a higher percentage of patients with complex sleep apnea, a lower percentage of patients with optimal titration, and a higher titrated pressure than the pure-OSA group.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe OSA, older age, male sex, obesity, and daytime sleepiness were related to mixed-OSA. Complex sleep apnea, less optimal titration, and a higher titrated CPAP were also associated with MSA in OSAS patients.