Safe splinting in hand surgery

Management of Acute Wounds - Expert Panel Consensus Statement

SIGNIFICANCE

The Wound Healing Foundation recognized the need for consensus-based unbiased recommendations for the treatment of wounds. As a first step, a consensus on the treatment of chronic wounds was developed and published in 2022.(1) The current publication on acute wounds represents the second step in this process. Acute wounds may result from any number of conditions, including burns, military and combat operations, and trauma to specific areas of the body. The management of acute wounds requires timely and evidence-driven intervention to achieve optimal clinical outcomes. This consensus statement provides the clinician with the necessary foundational approaches to the causes, diagnosis and therapeutic management of acute wounds. Presented in a structured format, this is a useful guide for clinicians and learners in all patient care settings.

RECENT ADVANCES

Recent advances in the management of acute wounds have centered on stabilization and treatment in the military and combat environment, Specifically advancements in hemostasis, resuscitation, and the mitigation of infection risk through timely initiation of antibiotics and avoidance of high pressure irrigation in contaminated soft tissue injury. .

CRITICAL ISSUES

Critical issues include infection control, pain management and the unique considerations for the management of acute wounds in pediatric patients.

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Future directions include new approaches to preventing the progression and conversion of burns through the use of the microcapillary gel, a topical gel embedded with the anti-inflammatory drug infliximab.(38) Additionally, the use of three-dimensional bioprinting and photo-modulation for skin reconstruction following burns is a promising area for continued discovery.

Principles of management of hand fractures

The optimal management of hand fractures requires a multidisciplinary approach. Initial assessment should include a thorough medical history and clinical examination, followed by appropriate radiological imaging. These are crucial in determining the appropriate management. Following joint stabilisation to allow fractures to unite, early mobilisation is needed to maximise the functional restoration of the hand. In this review, the principles of operative and non-operative management of these injuries are discussed.

Revisiting the dogma of the Edinburgh position for safe immobilization

Since the concept was first described 50 years ago in Edinburgh by J. I. P. James, the term 'Edinburgh position' has been synonymous with the position of safe immobilization for the hand. Widely employed for the management of injured hands, the position is associated with splinting the metacarpophalangeal joints at 90° and the proximal interphalangeal joints completely straight, namely, 'the intrinsic-plus position', to help reduce the long-term consequences of a stiff hand. Over the decades, the strict joint angles of the Edinburgh position have been debated due to changes in patterns of injury, treatment and rehabilitation. This article challenges the dogma that surrounds the use of the Edinburgh position in clinical practice. The history of the position was explored, and the results of a survey about current practice of hand immobilization from two study centres in Edinburgh is presented.Level of evidence: IV.

Hand infections

The hand is an extremely versatile organ adapted for fine tasks with various clinicoanatomical compartments. This article reviews the types of common hand infections that present to the emergency department and/or hand surgeon, with relevant investigations and strategies for diagnosis and treatment, with the emphasis on distinguishing between superficial and more serious infections.

Acute hand injury splinting - the good, the bad and the ugly

Injuries to the hand comprise 20% of all emergency department attendances, with an estimated annual treatment cost of over £100 million in the UK. The initial assessment and management of hand injuries is usually undertaken by junior staff, many of whom have little or no training or experience in splinting hand fractures. In the Department of Orthopaedic Hand Surgery, Morriston Hospital, we regularly observe patients presenting to the specialist hand fracture clinics having had initial management that shows no appreciation for the treatment objectives or the safe positions for splinting. This article aims to provide guidance for frontline staff on the management of hand fractures, with particular emphasis on the appropriate nonoperative care to avoid any unnecessary morbidity.