An unusual place to find a lost needle in laparoscopic surgery

Fantastic Needles and Where to Find Them During a Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication: Review of Safety Measures to Avoid Needle Loss During Minimally Invasive Surgery

BACKGROUND

Losing a needle during laparoscopic surgery may be a dramatic moment for the surgeon and potentially have clinical and medico-legal consequences. This case report aims to describe an unusual case of needle loss that occurred during laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and how to prevent its further occurrence.

METHODS

The patient is an 11-year-old boy with a body mass index of 32.4 kg/m 2 . He suffered from severe gastroesophageal reflux disease not responding to medical therapy and hiatal hernia. A laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication was performed.

RESULTS

At the closure of the Nissen wrap, CO 2 leakage through the umbilical trocar caused the needle lost during the introduction of the thread. We attempted to find the needle by exploring the entire abdominal cavity without success. Therefore, we decided to complete the surgical procedure. Another 2/0 nonresorbable thread was inserted in the same way as before. But this suture also disappeared. Hence, we manually straightened the needle and introduced it under vision. The operation was accomplished successfully. An intraoperative x-ray was obtained, showing the 2 needles at the level of the 12th rib, near the working port used for the liver retractor. A peritoneal window was created using a monopolar hook, allowing to finally extract the 2 hidden needles.

CONCLUSION

The loss of needles, although a rare event, can occur during laparoscopic surgery. Based on our experience, we suggest that needle insertion during laparoscopic operations should be performed under direct vision, especially in obese patients, to reduce the likelihood of such complications.

Identifying a list of healthcare 'never events' to effect system change: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

BACKGROUND

Never events (NEs) are patient safety incidents that are preventable and so serious they should never happen. To reduce NEs, several frameworks have been introduced over the past two decades; however, NEs and their harms continue to occur. These frameworks have varying events, terminology and preventability, which hinders collaboration. This systematic review aims to identify the most serious and preventable events for targeted improvement efforts by answering the following questions: Which patient safety events are most frequently classified as never events? Which ones are most commonly described as entirely preventable?

METHODS

For this narrative synthesis systematic review we searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central and CINAHL for articles published from 1 January 2001 to 27 October 2021. We included papers of any study design or article type (excluding press releases/announcements) that listed NEs or an existing NE framework.

RESULTS

Our analyses included 367 reports identifying 125 unique NEs. Those most frequently reported were surgery on the wrong body part, wrong surgical procedure, unintentionally retained foreign objects and surgery on the wrong patient. Researchers classified 19.4% of NEs as 'wholly preventable'. Those most included in this category were surgery on the wrong body part or patient, wrong surgical procedure, improper administration of a potassium-containing solution and wrong-route administration of medication (excluding chemotherapy).

CONCLUSIONS

To improve collaboration and facilitate learning from errors, we need a single list that focuses on the most preventable and serious NEs. Our review shows that surgery on the wrong body part or patient, or the wrong surgical procedure best meet these criteria.

Needle in a haystack: lost in transition

A lost needle during minimally invasive surgery is a cause of undue anxiety to the entire surgical team and also causes prolongation of surgical time. There is no literature reporting follow-up of any patient with needle left behind as they are considered as a 'never event' during a surgical procedure. Preventing such events needs vigilance on part of the surgeon and assistant. Here, we report a case of lost needle during performance of a robot-assisted nephron sparing surgery. The robot needed to be de-docked and converted to laparoscopy. After a thorough search, the needle was found to be lodged at an unusual place. A brief review of available literature is also provided alongside.