Effects of the reduction of surgical residents' work hours and implications for surgical residency programs: a narrative review

BACKGROUND

The widespread implementation of resident work hour restrictions has led to significant alterations in surgical training and the postgraduate educational experience. We evaluated the experience of surgical residency programs as reflected in the literature from 2008 onward in order to summarize current challenges and identify key areas in need of further research.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for English-language articles published from January 2008 to December 2011 related to work hour restrictions in surgical residency programs, including those pertaining to personal well-being, education and training, patient care, and faculty experiences.

RESULTS

We retrieved 240 unique abstracts and included 24 studies in the current review. Of the 10 studies examining effects on operating room experience, 4 reported negative or mixed outcomes and 6 reported neutral outcomes, although non-compliance was demonstrated in 2 of these studies. Effects on surgical faculty perceptions were consistently reported as negative, while the effect on patient outcomes and professionalism were found to be neutral and unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies are needed to characterize operative experience at varying levels of training, particularly in the context of strict adherence to new work hours. Research that examines the effect of the work hour limitations on professionalism and non-operative educational activities, such as reading and simulation-based training, as well as sign-over practices, would also be of benefit.

Surgical training: the impact of changes in curriculum and experience

INTRODUCTION

Craft specialties, such as surgery, rely on practice to acquire skill. Yet recent changes in training in the United Kingdom have decreased experience and altered the balance of curriculum content. Most recently, the European Working Time Directive has led to a reduction in working hours and expansion in the number of trainees. The impact that these changes have had on operative experience, patient management, communication, and teaching skills is unclear. This study aims to assess the effects of the changing curriculum and work patterns on the experience of trainees at senior house officer (SHO, equivalent to junior resident) level in general surgery.

METHODS

A structured questionnaire was sent to general surgery trainees at the SHO (n = 52) and specialist registrar (SpR, n = 69) levels (equivalent to senior resident) in the Severn Deanery, United Kingdom.

RESULTS

In all, 70% of both SHOs and SpRs responded. SpRs had spent a mean of 50 months (21 months in general surgery) at the SHO level, compared with 24 months (9 months in general surgery) for current SHOs. A total of 90% of SpRs could perform an open appendectomy unsupervised by the end of their SHO training, compared with 28% of current SHOs. In all, 63% of SpRs and 8% of SHOs could undertake inguinal hernia repair unsupervised at SHO level. In addition, 90% of SpRs and 84% of SHOs felt operative skills have declined, whereas communication and teaching skills were deemed the same or better. Of the respondents, 88% of SpRs and 76% of SHOs thought surgical training was getting worse.

DISCUSSION

Trainees are spending less time in surgery at the SHO level, and this is reflected in reported operative ability. The introduction of communication and teaching skills into the curriculum has had a perceived benefit. The reduction in working hours must be offset by implementing measures to maximize limited training opportunities. The potential implications of these changes in training and experience on patient outcomes remain to be determined.

Influence of targeted basic surgical training lists on SHO operative experience in the EWTD era

Presented at the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, Edinburgh, May 2006.