A method for determining the rate of major limb amputations in battle casualties: experiences of a British Field Hospital in Iraq, 2003

Common factors and outcome in late upper extremity amputations after military injury

OBJECTIVES

Much attention has been given to lower extremity amputations that occur more than 90 days after injury, but little focus has been given to analogous upper extremity amputations. The purpose of this study was to determine the reason(s) for desired amputation and the common complications after amputation for those combat-wounded service members who underwent late upper extremity amputation.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

Tertiary trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

All US service members who sustained major extremity amputations from September 2001 to July 2011 were analyzed.

INTERVENTION

Late (>90 days after injury) upper extremity amputations.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Amputation level(s), time to amputation, age, number of operations, pre/postoperative complications, reason(s) for desiring amputation, and disability outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Seven of 218 (3.2%) upper extremity amputees had a late upper extremity amputation (>90 days from injury to amputation). The mean and median number of days from injury to amputation was 689 and 678, respectively. The most common preamputation complications were loss of wrist or finger motion (7, 100%), neurogenic pain (4, 57%), and heterotopic ossification (4, 57%). Three (43%) patients (2 persistent and 1 new onset) had neurogenic pain and 2 (29%) had heterotopic ossification after amputation. Only 57% (4 of 7) of amputees used their prostheses regularly.

CONCLUSIONS

Service members undergoing late upper extremity amputation seem to have different pre- and postoperative complications than those patients undergoing late lower extremity amputations. It was common for the amputee to not wear their prostheses and to experience similar complications after amputation, albeit in a less severe form.

The outcome of British combat amputees in relation to military service

BACKGROUND

The study aim was to determine the outcome, in relation to military service in UK military combat amputees.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Casualties were assessed at mean 2.4 years after injury and graded by a Functional Activity Assessment (FAA) ranging from 1 (fully fit) to 5 (unfit all duties) to score vocational functional outcome. ISS were calculated and the patients were categorised as having unilateral or multiple amputations. The Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) was completed.

RESULTS

Of the 52, 8 patients had left the forces by medical discharge, with 44 continuing to serve. 33 of the 44 had returned to work. 50 patients had FAA grades and were at least 7.6 months post-injury. No patients were graded as FAA1, 8 as FAA2, 18 as FAA3, 19 as FAA4 and 5 as FAA5. There was a trend for the FAA score to increase with injury severity, as measured by ISS i.e. vocational functional outcome was worse with more severe injuries, although this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.095). Multiple amputee patients had significantly higher FAA grades (p<0.001) and were all FAA 4 or 5. Of the 33 patients who had returned to work, 8 were FAA2, 12 FAA3 and 12 FAA4. The mean SF-36 scores for Physical Component Summary (PCS) increased significantly from 36.4 to 43.4 (p=0.001) with rehabilitation, while Mental Component Summary (MCS) was 53.0 and remained similar at 53.6 (p=0.987). MCS scores were similar in these patients to the normal population, 50 (SD 10).

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to report the outcomes, with regards to return to work, of the UK military amputees injured in Afghanistan and Iraq Soldiers are surviving more severe and complex injuries than before and the majority are able to return successfully to military work. SF-36 PCS scores improve significantly with rehabilitation, and while MCS scores remain constant, the initial assessments are comparable with a normal population.

Traumatic amputation — a contemporary approach

The management of patients with loss or near loss of a limb secondary to high-energy trauma is particularly challenging. Management consists of an acute phase of resuscitation and initial surgery, followed by a longer chronic phase, consisting of rehabilitation, fitting of a prosthesis and stump care. Acute assessment by the full trauma team along standard 〈C〉ABCDE guidelines should not conflict with early stemming of on-going stump or limb haemorrhage as required. Patients with traumatic limb loss are likely to be shocked and have traumatic coagulopathy; initial and on-going resuscitation should satisfy the need to replace blood with packed cells and plasma in a 1 : 1 ratio consistent with the concept of `Damage Control Resuscitation'. The surgical goal is to tailor surgery to the patients' physiological state, removing dead and unviable tissue, restoring perfusion to live tissue, stabilising fractured bone and addressing the loss of soft tissues. The imperative to preserve length should not outweigh the need to leave the patient with a stump that will heal in a timely fashion. Lifelong prosthetic preventive maintenance is paramount as residual limbs change in volume with muscle atrophy and changes inpatient weight. Replacement may also be indicated as improved designs appear from time to time. Early rehabilitation and prosthetic fitting also improves routine prosthetic use, which has been found to positively affect return to work.

Kriegschirurgische Verletzungsmuster

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological analysis of injury patterns and mechanisms help in identifying the expertise that military surgeons need in a combat setting and also in adjusting training requirements accordingly. This paper attempts to assess the surgical specialties and skills of particular importance in the management of casualties in crisis areas.

METHODS

MEDLINE (1949-2007) and Google search were used. Causes of death among casualties in Afghanistan and the Iraq war were analyzed.

RESULTS

The leading causes of injury were explosive devices, gunshot wounds, aircraft crashes, and terrorist attacks. Of the casualties, 55% died in hostile action and 45% in nonhostile incidents. Chest or abdominal injuries (40%) and brain injuries (35%) were the main causes of death for soldiers killed in action. The case fatality rate in Iraq was approximately half as high as in the Vietnam War. In contrast, the amputation rate was twice as high. Approximately 8-15% of the deaths appeared to be preventable.

CONCLUSIONS

Military surgeons must have excellent skills in the fields of thoracic, visceral, and vascular surgery as well as practical skills in neurosurgery and oral and maxillofacial surgery. It also is of vital importance to ensure the availability of sufficient medical evacuation capabilities. Furthermore, there is a need for a standardized registration system for all injuries similar to the German Trauma Registry.