Angelchik prosthesis with oesophageal adenocarcinoma: our surgical approach

Atypical dysphagia with end-stage oesophageal disease 30 years post Angelchik device placement in a 72-year-old man

Here we describe an atypical presentation of progressive dysphagia in a 72-year-old man leading to frequent regurgitations over the course of 30 years. Investigations revealed a foreign body ring surrounding the proximal stomach and dilation of the oesophagus proximal to the gastro-oesophageal junction. An Angelchik device was extracted; however, the patient’s rapid deterioration prior to surgery, in addition to his severely dysfunctional oesophagus, required placement of a jejunostomy feeding tube. Device removal was complicated by prior abdominal surgery, necessitating a thoracic approach. This case offers guidance on the management of patients with Angelchik prostheses who develop similar complications, while drawing attention to the importance and difficulties of early, definitive diagnosis in oesophageal pathology such as achalasia and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Esophageal Penetration of the Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device: History Repeats Itself

BACKGROUND

An alternative approach to the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has recently been introduced in clinical practice, involving the implantation of a magnetic sphincter augmentation device (MSAD). This "magnetic ring" is implanted laparoscopically around the lower esophageal sphincter to improve its barrier function. The literature is still limited on the midterm results achieved in controlling reflux because the MSAD is a very new procedure. So far, only a few cases of the MSAD causing erosion of the esophagus have been reported.

METHODS

We report on two cases of progressive and severe dysphagia after the implantation of an MSAD elsewhere. In both cases, the symptoms were caused by the migration of the device into the esophagus.

RESULTS

The devices were removed endoscopically in a single step in both cases, using the Olympus cutter. After 3 months, the first patient had a laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication without any complications and with a good final reflux control. The second only underwent removal of the device, using the same endoscopic approach and again without any complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Judging from the literature, MSAD implantation may be an effective way to control GERD, but the method can carry major complications, such as migration of the device into the esophagus (as in the two cases reported here). Endoscopic removal of a device possibly penetrating inside the esophagus is feasible and safe, and may later be followed up with a laparoscopic antireflux procedure without any particular difficulty.