The use of urological hospital services by nonagenarians

Urological hospitalization reasons and outcomes of octogenarians and nonagenarians: does age really matter?

PURPOSE

Since some urological diseases are age-dependent, these patients are admitted to urology wards for treatment more frequently as an inevitable result of aging. In this study, the urological hospitalization reasons and outcomes patients in octogenarian and nonagenarian age groups were evaluated in comparison with younger adult patients.

METHODS

After examining a total of 5615 urology ward admissions of individuals aged 18-99 years, we included 443 (7.7%) patients aged 80-89 years in the octogenarian group and 32 (0.6%) patients in the nonagenarian group. Ten percent of the remaining 5150 adults were randomly selected to form the control group.

RESULTS

The mean ages of the control, octogenarian, and nonagenarian groups were 55.4 ± 16, 83.3 ± 2.6, and 91.9 ± 1.8 years, respectively. The most frequent reasons for the hospitalization were a history of or active bladder tumors in the octogenarian and nonagenarian groups [117 (38.5%) and 3 (21.4%), respectively]. The incidences of any complication in the control, octogenarian, and nonagenarian groups were 61 (12.2%), 63 (15.7%), and 12 (42.9%), respectively. Mortality was seen in five (1%) patients in the control group, 11 (2.5%) in the octogenarians, and five (15.6%) in the nonagenarians. The complication and mortality rates of the nonagenarian group were statistically significantly higher than the remaining two groups (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Due to additional problems that increase with aging, the urology hospitalizations of octogenarian and nonagenarian patients result in more complications. Mortality rates also increase with age. It is aimed to contribute to the literature by revealing the needs and outcomes of octogenarian and nonagenarian patients in the urology clinic.

Thirty-day morbidity and mortality of elective urological surgery in patients aged 80 years and over in a UK district general hospital

Purpose:

An ageing population has led to many people aged 80 and over requiring urological surgery. There are concerns that operating on octogenarians may be fraught with higher morbidity and mortality risk. Therefore, the purpose was to study postoperative outcomes in people aged 80 years and over undergoing elective urological surgery.

Materials and methods:

We retrospectively reviewed the 30-day readmissions and deaths in patients aged 80 years and over who had elective urological surgery over a seven and half year period from February 2011 to July 2018 in a district general hospital. Surgeries were stratified into minor, intermediate and major. Our data did not include supra-major surgeries like radical cystectomy as these are done in tertiary centres. We used logistic regression to examine factors associated with readmissions and death.

Results:

A total of 1239 patients had 2201 operations. The median age was 84.1 years. Procedures on the bladder were the most common, followed by prostate surgery. A 17.9% of operations resulted in an adverse outcome (death or readmission attributable to surgery) within 30 days. There were 21 deaths, equating to 1% of all surgeries undertaken. There was a significant difference in both readmissions and deaths by American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade. The median time to readmission from surgery was 18 (IQR 13–23) days. The highest number of readmissions occurred in the third week after surgery. A 94% of the readmissions were for a minor complication (grade I Clavien Dindo), with haematuria and urinary retention being most common.

Conclusions:

This study informs hospitals, surgeons, patient advocacy groups and insurance, that the morbidity and mortality risks of non-supra major elective urological surgery in patients aged 80 and over are not disproportionately high.

The future of urology: nonagenarians admitted to a urological ward

PURPOSE

To analyze the outcome of nonagenarians with urological conditions. As demographic changes will lead to a substantial rise of geriatric patients in need of health care services and as little is known on the outcome of these patients, we retrospectively analyzed a consecutive series of nonagenarians admitted to our urological ward.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a retrospective study we analyzed all nonagenarians admitted to our urological ward between 2014 and 2018. Patients were followed for 12 months and predictors for mortality were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 152 patients with a mean age of 92 years entered this study. The most frequent indications for admission were macrohematuria, bladder dysfunction, urinary tract infection, hydronephrosis and urinary retention. A history of bladder cancer was present in 18% and of renal cell cancer in 5% of patients. Prostate cancer was present in 21%. The most frequent invasive interventions were the insertion of an irrigation catheter, cystoscopy, bladder tumor resection and insertion of a DJ-catheter. The mean length of hospitalization was 6.5 days. In-house mortality was 9% and the 12 months mortality rate 45%. The strongest predictor for a 12 months mortality was the CSHA-Frailty Scale.

CONCLUSION

Urogerontology is one of the biggest challenges in our field. The cohort of nonagenarians studied herein demonstrates a high rate of invasive interventions, an acceptable length of hospitalization and an in-house mortality in the range of 9%. The 12 months mortality rate is almost 50% and predictors thereof, as elaborated, might aid in the disease management of this ever-increasing cohort.