Surgery performed by supervised registrars does not adversely affect medium-term functional outcomes after total knee replacement

Impact of Resident Involvement on 30-Day Postoperative Outcomes in Orthopedic Shoulder Surgery

The literature concerning resident involvement in shoulder surgery is limited. The purpose of this study was to examine whether resident involvement across all orthopedic shoulder surgeries is associated with adverse 30-day outcomes. Utilizing the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, patients who underwent shoulder surgery with or without a resident present were analyzed. Independent t-test and chi-square or Fischer's exact test were used appropriately. A logistic regression model was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios. This study examined 5,648 patients: 3,455 patients in the "Attending alone" group and 2,193 in the "Attending and resident in the operating room" group. Resident presence in the operating room was not associated with increased complications, except for bleeding transfusions (OR 1.71, CI 1.32-2.21, P ≤ 0.001). This study demonstrates that resident involvement in orthopedic shoulder surgery does not present an increased risk for 30-day complications when compared to surgeries performed with the attending surgeon alone.

The impact of surgical trainee involvement in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of surgical efficacy, patient safety, and outcomes

PURPOSE

Trainee involvement in patient care has raised concerns about the potential risk of adverse outcomes and harming patients. We sought to analyze the impact and potential consequence of surgical trainee involvement in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures in terms of surgical efficacy, patient safety, and functional outcomes.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane library, and Scopus databases in April 2021. Eligible studies reported on the impact of trainee participation in TKA procedures performed with and without such involvement.

RESULTS

Twenty-three publications met our eligibility criteria and were included in our study. These studies reported on 132,624 surgeries completed on 132,416 patients. Specifically, 23,988 and 108,636 TKAs were performed with and without trainee involvement, respectively. The mean operative times for procedures with (n = 19,573) and without (n = 94,581) trainee involvement were 99.77 and 85.05 min, respectively. Both studies that reported data on cost of TKAs indicated a significant increase (p < 0.001) associated with procedures completed by teaching hospitals compared to private practices. Mean overall complication rates were 7.20% and 7.36% for TKAs performed with (n = 9,386) and without (n = 31,406) trainees. Lastly, the mean Knee Society Scale (KSS) knee scores for TKAs with (n = 478) and without (n = 806) trainee involvement were similar; 82.81 and 82.71, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our systematic review concurred with previous studies that reported trainee involvement during TKAs increases the mean operative time. However, the overall complication rates and functional outcomes were similar. Larger studies with a better methodology and higher level of evidence are still needed for a resolute conclusion.

A retrospective observational study of patient analgesia outcomes when regional anaesthesia procedures are performed by consultants versus supervised trainees

At teaching hospitals, consultants must provide effective supervision, including appropriate selection of teaching cases, such that the outcomes achieved by trainees are similar to that of consultants. Numerous studies in the surgical literature have compared patient outcomes when surgery is performed by consultant surgeons or surgical trainees but, to our knowledge, none exist in the field of anaesthesia. We aimed to compare analgesia outcomes of regional anaesthesia when performed by supervised trainees versus consultants. We designed a retrospective observational study using registry data. The primary outcome was inadequate analgesia, defined as a numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain >5 reported at any time in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU). Secondary outcomes included the maximum pain NRS, pain experienced in the PACU, and the requirement for systemic opioid analgesia in the PACU. Of the 1814 patients analysed, the primary proceduralist was a consultant for 514 (28.3%) patients and a trainee for 1300 (71.7%) patients. All trainees were supervised by an on-site consultant. There were no statistically significant differences between consultants and supervised trainees in terms of the primary outcome (NRS >5 in 24.9% and 24.5% of patients, respectively; P = 0.84) and secondary outcomes. Compared to trainees, consultants had a slightly higher rate of patients with a body mass index >30 kg/m², an American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification of 3 or 4, nerve blocks performed under general anaesthesia, paravertebral/neuraxial blocks and blocks with perineural catheter placement. Regional anaesthesia performed by supervised trainees can achieve similar analgesia outcomes to consultant-performed procedures.

Clinical Course of Pain and Function Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is widely considered a successful intervention for osteoarthritis and other degenerative knee diseases. This study addresses the need for a high-quality meta-analysis that outlines the clinical course of pain and function post-TKA.

METHODS

The review included prospective cohort studies assessing pain or function of patients undergoing primary TKA at baseline (preoperatively) and at least 2 additional time points including one at least 12 months postoperatively. Two reviewers independently screened references, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. The time course of recovery of pain and function was modeled using fractional polynomial meta-regression.

RESULTS

In total, 191 studies with 59,667 patients were included, most with low risk of bias. The variance-weighted mean pain score (/100, 0 = no pain) was 64.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 60.2-67.7) preoperatively, 24.1 (95% CI 20.3-27.9) at 3 months, 20.4 (95% CI 16.7-24.0) at 6 months, and 16.9 (95%CI 13.6-20.3) at 12 months, and remained low (10.1; 95% CI 4.8-15.4) at 10 years postoperatively. The variance-weighted mean function score (/100, 0 = worst function) was 47.1 (95% CI 45.7-48.4) preoperatively, 72.8 (95% CI 71.3-74.4) at 3 months, 76.3 (95% CI 74.7-77.8) at 6 months, and 78.1 (95%CI 76.4-79.7) at 12 months. Function scores were good (79.7; 95% CI 77.9-81.5) at 10 years postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing primary TKA can expect a large and rapid but incomplete recovery of pain and function in the first postoperative year. At 10 years, the gains in pain scores may still remain while there is an improvement in function.

The opportunity cost of arthroplasty training in orthopaedic surgery

INTRODUCTION

Training the next generation of surgeons is a crucial role fulfilled by consultant orthopaedic surgeons. However we are increasingly constrained by limited time and resources. We sought to compare operative time and length of stay (LOS) for total hip and total knee arthroplasties (THA, TKA) performed by a consultant orthopaedic surgeon with those performed by supervised trainees.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective database of arthroplasty procedures performed from 2015 to 2018 was collated. Primary surgeon grade was recorded. Patient demographics, ASA grade, LOS and operative time were recorded. For THA both cemented and uncemented arthroplasties were used. SPSS version 23 was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

394 arthroplasty procedures were carried out during the study period. Trainee surgeons performed a high proportion of both THA (53.2%, n = 123) and TKA (44.8%, n = 73) surgeries. Trainees performed 57% of cemented THA procedures. LOS did not differ between consultant and trainee surgeons for THA (5.9 ± 4.8 days) or TKA (5.6 ± 4.1 days). Age had a significant effect on LOS (p < 0.001). For THA the mean operative time for trainees was 90.3 ± 19.23 min, 18.2 min longer than the consultant group. For TKA the mean operative time was 89.06 ± 18.87 min for trainees, 24.4 min longer than the consultant group.

DISCUSSION

At our institution trainee surgeons can be expected to take between 18 and 24 min longer to perform arthroplasty procedures. This should be factored into resource planning, as the training of orthopaedic surgeons is crucial to sustaining and improving health service provision.

Association between surgeon grade and implant survival following hip and knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between surgeon grade (trainee vs consultant) and implant survival following primary hip and knee replacement.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE and Embase from inception to 6 October 2021.

SETTING

Units performing primary hip and/or knee replacements since 1990.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients undergoing either a primary hip or knee replacement, predominantly for osteoarthritis.

INTERVENTION

Whether the surgeon recorded as performing the procedure was a trainee or not.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was net implant survival reported as a Kaplan-Meier survival estimate. The secondary outcome was crude revision rate. Both outcomes were reported according to surgeon grade.

RESULTS

Nine cohort studies capturing 4066 total hip replacements (THRs), 936 total knee replacements (TKRs) and 1357 unicompartmental knee replacements (UKRs) were included (5 THR studies, 2 TKR studies and 2 UKR studies). The pooled net implant survival estimates for THRs at 5 years were 97.9% (95% CI 96.6% to 99.2%) for trainees and 98.1% (95% CI 97.1% to 99.2%) for consultants. The relative risk of revision of THRs at 5 and 10 years was 0.88 (95% CI 0.46 to 1.70) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.37 to 1.26), respectively. For TKRs, the net implant survival estimates at 10 years were 96.2% (95% CI 94.0% to 98.4%) for trainees and 95.1% (95% CI 93.0% to 97.2%) for consultants. We report a narrative summary of UKR outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no strong evidence in the existing literature that trainee surgeons have worse outcomes compared with consultants, in terms of the net survival or crude revision rate of hip and knee replacements at 5-10 years follow-up. These findings are limited by the quality of the existing published data and are applicable to countries with established orthopaedic training programmes.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019150494.

Surgery Performed by Supervised Trainees Does not Affect Outcome in First Metatarsophalangeal Joint (MTPJ) Arthrodesis

First metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthrodesis is an index procedure for orthopedic trainees in the United Kingdom. There is an absence of evidence as to the outcome of surgery when performed by supervised trainees. The aim of this study is to compare the incidence of fusion, complication rate and radiographic outcomes in first MTPJ arthrodesis performed by supervised orthopedic trainees with consultants. This is a retrospective cohort study of 117 patients undergoing first MTPJ arthrodesis from August 2015 to December 2017 in our institute for hallux valgus (HV) deformity with first MPTJ arthrosis or for hallux rigidus. Patients were followed to a minimum of 1-year postsurgery and were given an open appointment thereafter. In the hallux rigidus group, there was no significant difference between the complication rate (p = .477), incidence of fusion (p = .663), postoperatively HVA (p = .763), and postoperative intermetatarsal angle (p = .539) between trainees and consultants. There was a significant difference in mean tourniquet time (p = .563) between trainees and consultants. In the hallux valgus group, there was no significant difference in the complication rate (p = .519), incidence of fusion (p = .786), tourniquet time (p = .075), postoperative HVA (p = .423), and postoperative intermetatarsal angle (p = .143) between the trainees and consultants. This is the first MTPJ fusion series that demonstrates good results can be achieved by supervised trainees performing the procedure. This would suggest that first MTPJ arthrodesis remains an opportunity for trainees to continue learning to perform under supervision whilst ensuring no change in outcome for the patient.

Trainee performed total knee arthroplasty is safe and effective: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcomes between trainees and consultants

BACKGROUND

There are concerns that trainee performed knee arthroplasty (KA) may adversely affect patient outcomes. Demand for KA is projected to increase, and trainees must therefore be competent to perform it.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed identifying articles comparing outcomes following trainee versus consultant surgeon performed primary KA. Outcomes included rate of revision surgery, rate of infection, operation time, length of stay and functional outcomes. A meta-analysis was conducted using Odds ratios (ORs) and weighted mean differences (WMD). A quality assessment of studies and qualitative analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The analysis included 9 studies of 92,309 arthroplasties, 80,655 were performed by consultants, 11,654 by trainees. The mean age was 69.2. There was no significant difference between the two groups' rate of revision (OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.61-1.02; p = 0.07. Trainees were associated with a lower rate of infection (5 studies; OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.58-0.97; p = 0.03). There was no difference in the rate of neurological deficit, transfusion rate or thrombosis. There was no difference in operation time (5 studies; WMD 3.50; 95% CI -3.9-10.89; p = 0.35). The trainee group had less favourable functional outcome scores (7 studies; WMD -1.26; 95% CI -1.44--1.07; p < 0.01). However, this difference was not clinically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The study suggests that supervised trainees can achieve similar outcomes to consultant surgeons andin selected cases, trainee performed supervised KA is therefore safe and effective.

Residents' Learning Curve of Total Knee Arthroplasty Based on Radiological Outcome Parameters: A Retrospective Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to plot the impact of a learning curve for a resident's first 103 total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) based on radiological deviations and incision to closure time (ICT), and to compare it to 103 matched TKAs performed by a senior surgeon.

METHODS

This is a retrospective comparative study comprising a total of 206 TKAs and evaluated the results based on radiographic outcome and ICT. Radiological evaluation was performed according to a predefined implemented radiological grading system (RGS). t-Tests compared ICT and RGS; data of mechanical axis were observed with Man-Whitey U-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank-tests.

RESULTS

The study included 206 patients (mean age 73 years, mean body mass index of 30). Determining all the deviation points (DP) with the RGS, the deviation ratio for resident vs senior surgeon was 0.96:0.5 DP (P = .0002). The learning curve based on DP showed a decrease over time with statistical significance in the first (26 DP, P = .0001), second (21 DP, P = .0059), and fourth (20 DP, P = .0187) quintiles of implanted cases. The ICT of the resident showed a decrease within the quintiles from 79.45 minutes (first quintile) to 65.17 minutes (fifth quintile), for an improvement of 14.28 minutes. When the quintiles are viewed in relation to the mean operation time of the senior surgeon (mean ICT 66.04 minutes), the mean values of the first and the second quintiles remain statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Supervised TKA showed statistical significance in the learning curves according to deviations documented with a predefined radiological outcome assessment system as well as to ICTs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

In pursuit of enhanced recovery after total joint replacement: a narrative review of drivers of length of stay

A continual increase in the prevalence of osteoarthritis drives growing demand for total joint arthroplasty. So far, a decrease in length of stay has been the target for health professionals globally. However, a consensus pathway of achieving this has not yet been reached. This article reviews recent advances in pre-operative and perioperative factors impacting length of stay.

Outcomes and component-positioning in total knee arthroplasty may be comparable between supervised trained surgeons and their supervisor

PURPOSE

There are concerns that malalignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) occurs with less experienced surgeons. This study investigates the influence of surgical experience on TKA outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nineteen patients (38 knees) who underwent bilateral TKA between 2011 and 2015 were included. A supervisor performed knee replacements associated with lower Knee Society Scores (KSS); trainee surgeons operated on the other knee. Knees were categorized into two groups: operations by the supervisor (group S) versus operations by trainee surgeons (group T). Range of motion (ROM), KSS, operative time, hip-knee-ankle angle, and femoral and tibial component angle were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean operative time was 92.5 min in group S and 124.2 min in group T (p < 0.01). The mean postoperative maximal flexion was 113.2° in group S and 114.2° in group T (not significant). The mean postoperative KSS was 92.9 in group S and 93.9 in group T (not significant). No significant differences between groups in terms of proportion of inliers for the hip-knee-ankle angle, femoral component angle, or tibial component angle were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Although operative time was significantly longer for trainee surgeons versus the supervisor, no significant differences in ROM, KSS, or component positioning between supervisor and trainee surgeons were observed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV (retrospective case series design).

The Impact of Surgeon Volume and Training Status on Implant Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Implant malalignment may predispose patients to prosthetic failure following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A more thorough understanding of the surgeon-specific factors that contribute to implant malalignment following TKA may uncover actionable strategies for improving implant survival. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of surgeon volume and training status on malalignment.

METHODS

In this retrospective multicenter study, we performed a radiographic analysis of 1,570 primary TKAs performed at 4 private academic and state-funded centers in the U.S. and U.K. Surgeons were categorized as high-volume (≥50 TKAs/year) or low-volume (<50 TKAs/year), and as a trainee (fellow/resident under the supervision of an attending surgeon) or a non-trainee (attending surgeon). On the basis of these designations, 3 groups were defined: high-volume non-trainee, low-volume non-trainee, and trainee. The postoperative medial distal femoral angle (DFA), medial proximal tibial angle (PTA), and posterior tibial slope angle (PSA) were radiographically measured. Outlier measurements were defined as follows: DFA, outside of 5° ± 3° of valgus; PTA, >±3° deviation from the neutral axis; and PSA, <0° or >7° of flexion for cruciate-retaining or <0° or >5° of flexion for posterior-stabilized TKAs. "Far outliers" were defined as measurements falling >± 2° outside of these ranges. The proportions of outliers were compared between the groups using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

When comparing the high and low-volume non-trainee groups using univariate analysis, the proportions of knees with outlier measurements for the PTA (5.3% versus 17.4%) and PSA (17.4% versus 28.3%) and the proportion of total outliers (11.8% versus 20.7%) were significantly lower in the high-volume group (all p < 0.001). The proportions of DFA (1.9% versus 6.5%), PTA (1.8% versus 5.7%), PSA (5.5% versus 12.6%), and total far outliers (3.1% versus 8.3%) were also significantly lower in the high-volume non-trainee group (all p < 0.001). Compared with the trainee group, the high-volume non-trainee group had significantly lower proportions of DFA (12.6% versus 21.6%), PTA (5.3% versus 12.0%), PSA (17.4% versus 33.3%), and total outliers (11.8% versus 22.3%) (all p < 0.001) as well as DFA (1.9% versus 3.9%; p = 0.027), PSA (5.5% versus 12.6%; p < 0.001), and total far outliers (3.1% versus 6.4%; p = 0.004). No significant differences were identified when comparing the low-volume non-trainee group and the trainee group, with the exception of PTA outliers (17.4% versus 12.0%; p = 0.041) and PTA far outliers (5.7% versus 2.6%; p = 0.033). Findings from multivariate analysis accounting for the effects of patient age, body mass index, and individual surgeon demonstrated similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

Low surgical volume and trainee status were risk factors for outlier and far-outlier malalignment in primary TKA, even when accounting for differences in individual surgeon and patient characteristics. Trainee surgeons performed similarly, and certainly not inferiorly, to low-volume non-trainee surgeons. Even among high-volume non-trainees, the best-performing cohort in our study, the proportion of TKA alignment outliers was still high.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The presence of residents during orthopedic operation exerts no negative influence on outcome

BACKGROUND

Operative procedural training is a key component of orthopedic surgery residency. It is unclear how and whether residents participation in orthopedic surgical procedures impacts on post-operative outcomes.

SOURCES OF DATA

A systematic search was performed to identify articles in which the presence of a resident in the operating room was certified, and was compared with interventions without the presence of residents.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

There is a likely beneficial role of residents in the operating room, and there is only a weak association between the presence of a resident and a worse outcome for orthopedic surgical patients.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

Most of the studies were undertaken in USA, and this represents a limit from the point of view of comparison with other academic and clinical realities.

GROWING POINT

The data provide support for continued and perhaps increased involvement of resident in orthopedic surgery.

AREAS OF RESEARCH

To clarify the role of residents on clinically relevant outcomes in orthopedic patients, appropriately powered randomized control trials should be planned.