Symptomatic malunion after midshaft clavicle fracture in an adolescent patient: a case report of surgical deformity correction using a 3D printed model

Virtual surgical planning and mirrored, 3-dimensionally printed guides for corrective clavicle osteotomies in clavicle malunions and nonunions

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to retrospectively review clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients who underwent corrective osteotomies for clavicle malunion and internal fixation for nonunion using a combination of virtual surgical planning, patient-specific 3-dimensional (3D)-printed clavicles, and 3D-printed cutting guides manufactured at the point of care.

METHODS

Between 2015 and 2021, 18 patients underwent corrective osteotomy for a clavicle malunion (7 shoulders) or internal fixation for a clavicle nonunion (11 shoulders). There were 11 male and 7 female individuals with an average patient age of 43.9 (range 19-76) years. All patients underwent computed tomography evaluation of both clavicles. The DICOM files were manually segmented, virtual surgical planning was performed selectively using commercially available software, and a mirrored version of the normal clavicle was 3D printed along with a 3D-printed replica of the affected clavicle. Three-dimensionally printed mirrored clavicles were used in all cases to ensure adequate restoration of the shape and length of the clavicle and to precontour fixation plates. Virtual surgical planning and 3D-printed cutting guides for osteotomy were used in 4 of 18 (22%) patients. Either cancellous or structural intercalary bone grafting was used in 15 of 18 (83%) cases. Patients were contacted postoperatively to determine clinical outcome scores. Preoperative, early postoperative, and late postoperative radiographs were reviewed to assess for union and complications. The average follow-up time was 24.9 months.

RESULTS

Radiographic evaluation at the most recent follow-up demonstrated adequate restoration of length and successful union for all shoulders. There were no complications or reoperations. Postoperative patient-reported outcomes could be obtained in 16 of 18 (88.9%) patients. At the most recent follow-up, the mean visual analog scale for pain was 2.38 points (range, 1-7), the mean shoulder American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 73.2 points (range, 25-100), and the mean Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Upper Extremity score was 26 points (range, 7-35). All (100%) the patients were satisfied with their outcome (9 very satisfied, 7 satisfied), and their mean subjective shoulder value was 73% (range, 10%-100%). However, 2 patients complained of hardware-related symptoms, and 1 patient had return of preoperative symptoms after an interim 2 years of pain relief.

CONCLUSION

The use of mirrored 3D-printed clavicles combined with virtual surgical planning and patient-specific 3D guides provides a reliable technique for restoring native anatomy when performing corrective osteotomies for clavicle malunion or internal fixation for clavicle nonunion, with a high rate of satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes.

The effect of three-dimensional (3D) printing on quantitative and qualitative outcomes in paediatric orthopaedic osteotomies: a systematic review

Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology is increasingly being utilized in various surgical specialities. In paediatric orthopaedics it has been applied in the pre-operative and intra-operative stages, allowing complex deformities to be replicated and patient-specific instrumentation to be used. This systematic review analyses the literature on the effect of 3D printing on paediatric orthopaedic osteotomy outcomes.A systematic review of several databases was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies evaluating the use of 3D printing technology in orthopaedic osteotomy procedures in children (aged ≤ 16 years) were included. Spinal and bone tumour surgery were excluded. Data extracted included demographics, disease pathology, target bone, type of technology, imaging modality used, qualitative/quantitative outcomes and follow-up. Articles were further categorized as either 'pre-operative' or 'intra-operative' applications of the technology.Twenty-two articles fitting the inclusion criteria were included. The reported studies included 212 patients. There were five articles of level of evidence 3 and 17 level 4.A large variety of outcomes were reported with the most commonly used being operating time, fluoroscopic exposure and intra-operative blood loss.A significant difference in operative time, fluoroscopic exposure, blood loss and angular correction was found in the 'intra-operative' application group. No significant difference was found in the 'pre-operative' category.Despite a relatively low evidence base pool of studies, our aggregate data demonstrate a benefit of 3D printing technology in various deformity correction applications, especially when used in the 'intra-operative' setting. Further research including paediatric-specific core outcomes is required to determine the potential benefit of this novel addition. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:130-138. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200092.