A review of the Masquelet technique in the treatment of lower limb critical-size bone defects

Locally Delivered Antibiotics in Fracture-Related Infection

The prevention and treatment of fracture-related infections (FRIs) pose significant challenges in orthopaedic trauma care, with current practices predominantly relying on systemic antibiotic administration. However, locally delivered antibiotics achieve substantially higher tissue concentrations and minimise systemic side effects. Whilst extensively researched in periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs), the use of local delivery methods is increasingly prevalent in FRI prevention and treatment. Various local delivery methods such as powders, aqueous injections and carriers such as cement, bone graft, bioceramics, polymers and hydrogels have been explored. Biodegradable antibiotic carriers offer a promising alternative to non-absorbable carriers (i.e., cement), which necessitate surgical removal. There is good evidence for the use of local antibiotics in preventing and treating FRI, particularly in high-risk fractures or in treating more severe, resistant infections. Despite theoretical concerns, reports of adverse events in human studies are rare. To enhance our understanding of the safety and efficacy of these methods across various fracture patterns, further prospective randomised controlled trials are warranted. This article describes the current strategies and methodologies for FRI prevention and treatment and reviews the existing evidence base.

Applying 3D-printed prostheses to reconstruct critical-sized bone defects of tibial diaphysis (> 10 cm) caused by osteomyelitis and aseptic non-union

BACKGROUND

Clinical repair of critical-sized bone defects (CBDs) in the tibial diaphysis presents numerous challenges, including inadequate soft tissue coverage, limited blood supply, high load-bearing demands, and potential deformities. This study aimed to investigate the clinical feasibility and efficacy of employing 3D-printed prostheses for repairing CBDs exceeding 10 cm in the tibial diaphysis.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 14 patients (11 males and 3 females) with an average age of 46.0 years. The etiologies of CBDs comprised chronic osteomyelitis (10 cases) and aseptic non-union (4 cases), with an average defect length of 16.9 cm. All patients underwent a two-stage surgical approach: (1) debridement, osteotomy, and cement spacer implantation; and (2) insertion of 3D-printed prostheses. The interval between the two stages ranged from 8 to 12 weeks, during which the 3D-printed prostheses and induced membranes were meticulously prepared. Subsequent to surgery, patients engaged in weight-bearing and functional exercises under specialized supervision. Follow-up assessments, including gross observation, imaging examinations, and administration of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), were conducted at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, followed by annual evaluations thereafter.

RESULTS

The mean postoperative follow-up duration was 28.4 months, with an average waiting period between prosthesis implantation and weight-bearing of 10.4 days. At the latest follow-up, all patients demonstrated autonomous ambulation without assistance, and their LEFS scores exhibited a significant improvement compared to preoperative values (30.7 vs. 53.1, P < 0.001). Imaging assessments revealed progressive bone regeneration at the defect site, with new bone formation extending along the prosthesis. Complications included interlocking screw breakage in two patients, interlocking screw loosening in one patient, and nail breakage in another.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilization of 3D-printed prostheses facilitates prompt restoration of CBDs in the tibial diaphysis, enabling early initiation of weight-bearing activities and recovery of ambulatory function. This efficacious surgical approach holds promise for practical application.

Current Management of Acute and Posttraumatic Critical Bone Defects

SUMMARY

Limb reconstruction in patients with critical-sized bone defects remains a challenge due to the availability of various technically demanding treatment options and a lack of standardized decision algorithms. Although no consensus exists, it is apparent from the literature that the combination of patient, surgeon, and institutional collaborations is effective in providing the most efficient care pathway for these patients. Success relies on choosing a particular surgical approach that manages infection, soft tissue defects, stability, and alignment. Recent systematic reviews demonstrate high success rates with the following management options: Ilizarov bone transport, Masquelet (induced membrane) technique, cancellous bone grafting, and vascularized bone grafts.