HepPar-1 expression in primary lung adenocarcinoma

Lung cancer presenting with central nervous system metastasis: Clinicopathological and molecular analysis of 171 cases

A subset of lung carcinoma presents initially with brain metastasis. Precise subtyping is mandatory for optimized treatment of these advanced aggressive carcinomas. We herein analyzed surgical biopsies from 171 Patients (99 males and 72 females aged 48-96; mean, 72), who presented with brain metastasis of lung cancer. In addition to conventional subtyping, we applied an extended immunohistochemistry (IHC) panel and performed several molecular tests looking for potential therapeutic targets other than EGFR mutations. Non-small cell carcinoma (NSCLC) comprised 157 (91.8 %) of cases: 109 (63.7 %) adenocarcinomas, 27 (15.8 %) squamous cell (SCC), 18 (10.5 %) large cell undifferentiated, 1 (0.6 %) adenosquamous and 2 (1.2 %) unclassified carcinomas. Of the adenocarcinomas, 81.7 % were TTF1+. Notably, 45 % of those TTF1-negative cases expressed HepPar1. SMARCA4 and SMARCA2 loss was observed in 13/171 (7.6 %) and 32/163 (19.6 %) cases, respectively; mainly TTF1- (40.0 %) and HepPar1+ (38.1 %) adenocarcinomas were affected by SMARCA2/4 loss. Loss of at least one mismatch repair (MMR) protein was observed in 3/156 (1.9 %) cases (2 adenocarcinomas and 1 large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma/LCNEC). Limited available data on mutation testing showed a frequency of EGFR mutations of 4.3% and of KRAS mutations of 57%. HER2 expression (2+/3+) was found in 45/166 (27.1 %) of cases with amplification verified by CISH in 18/38 (47.4 % of immunopositive cases and 10.5 % of the whole cohort); all but one were adenocarcinomas. Other genetic abnormalities detected included EML4::ALK rearrangements in 3 (1.8 %; 2 TTF1+ adenocarcinomas and 1 LCNEC) and RET rearrangements in one SCNEC. Variable subsets of tumors revealed amplifications of several potentially therapeutically targetable genes including MYC (30.0 %), MET (10.1 %), HER2 (10 %), FGFR1 (9.6 %), FGFR3 (4.6 %), and FGFR2 (3.4 %). This study highlights a highly heterogeneous molecular background in lung cancer presenting with CNS metastases. These findings highlight the need for individualized tumor testing strategies looking for potential therapeutic targets for this aggressive disease.

[Acrometastasis revealing a pulmonary adenocarcinoma: Report of a case with unusual histopathological findings]

Acrometastasis are rare and can be exceptionally indicative of an occult carcinoma. The prognosis is generally poor. The radiological and immunohistochemical findings can be of great value to determine the primary and to guide treatment. We report a case of a 56-years-old man with acrometastasis at the fourth finger of the left hand revealing a pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Histopathological analysis showed a cribriform adenocarcinoma with an unusual cytoplasmic co-expression of TTF1 and Hepar-1 upon immunohistochemical analysis. There was no nuclear TTF1 immunostaining. Imaging explorations showed a 6-cm mass of the left superior pulmonary lobe. The patient received immunochemotherapy. Upon follow-up, there was evidence of disease progression on chest computed tomography scan.

Optimizing small liver biopsy specimens: a combined cytopathology and surgical pathology perspective

Both fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and core needle biopsy (CNB) are widely used to obtain liver biopsy specimens, particularly from mass lesions. However, the advantages and disadvantages of FNA versus CNB in terms of appropriate use, diagnostic yield, complications, and whether or not specimens should be handled by cytopathologists, surgical pathologists, or both remain subjects of controversy. This review addresses the issues of sample adequacy, appropriate use of each technique and complications, and challenges regarding the diagnosis of both hepatic tumors and non-neoplastic liver disease.

Arginase-1 and HepPar-1 expression in fine-needle aspiration specimens of primary lung adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Arginase-1 is a novel immunohistochemical (IHC) marker for hepatocellular differentiation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the expression of Arginase-1 and HepPar-1 in lung adenocarcinoma to assess the potential value of these markers for diagnosing metastatic lung tumors, especially to the liver in fine-needle aspiration specimens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-four cytology specimens of lung adenocarcinoma, obtained by endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration were retrospectively reviewed. IHC stains for Arginase-1 and HepPar-1 were performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded cell blocks. Tissue from confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma was used as the positive control. TTF-1 IHC stain was performed in all cases.

RESULTS

All 44 lung adenocarcinoma cases (100%) were negative for Arginase-1, whereas HepPar-1 expression was detected in 3 (7%) of lung adenocarcinomas and negative in 41 (93%). The 3 HepPar-1-positive lung adenocarcinoma cases demonstrated positive TTF-1 IHC stain performed on the same cell block. Although both Arginase-1 and HepPar-1 are useful diagnostic IHC markers to differentiate metastatic lung adenocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma, Arginase-1 IHC stain shows better specificity than HepPar-1 does (Arginase-1 specificity 100% and HepPar-1 specificity 93%).

CONCLUSIONS

Arginase-1 IHC can be used in combination with other markers in the workup of metastatic lung adenocarcinoma, especially to the liver.