γ-Glutamyl Transferase Testing, Change of Its Designation on the Laboratory Request Form, and Resulting Ratio of Inappropriate to Appropriate Use

Dealing with redundant gamma glutamyl transpeptidase in primary care, when requested along with alkaline phosphatase

The use of gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) levels as screening test for liver function is controversial. The GGT main utility is in cases in which alkaline phosphatase (ALP) is elevated. We aimed to investigate the request over time for alanine amino transferase (ALT), ALP and GGT, study the effect of a new demand management (DM) intervention for optimal GGT measurement in primary care. Our descriptive study was conducted from January 2010 to December 2020. The intervention was established in November 2019 and consisted of the laboratory information system would automatically remove GGT, if the test had been ordered simultaneously with ALP and there was no prior pathological result on record. We counted the absolute number of measured ALT, ALP and GGT, and calculated the ratios for each of the three markers related to creatinine, and GGT related to ALT in a monthly basis. The number of measured GGT increased slightly and progressively along the study until October 2019, when a decrease was observed. The ALT and ALP request from primary care also increased slightly along years. However, the GGT/ALT ratio never reached the 0.2 goal. Out of the 57,614 GGT requested in primary care patients, 38,167 (66.2%) were not measured. 7633.4€ were saved in reagent. The DM intervention to reduce the measurement of GGT when requested redundantly with ALP in primary care was successful, and the results have been maintained over time as observed by monitoring the GGT/CREA and GGT/ALT indicator results.

Reducing Test Utilization in Hospital Settings: A Narrative Review

Background

Studies addressing the appropriateness of laboratory testing have revealed approximately 20% overutilization. We conducted a narrative review to (1) describe current interventions aimed at reducing unnecessary laboratory testing, specifically in hospital settings, and (2) provide estimates of their efficacy in reducing test order volume and improving patient-related clinical outcomes.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health-Health Technology Assessment databases were searched for studies describing the effects of interventions aimed at reducing unnecessary laboratory tests. Data on test order volume and clinical outcomes were extracted by one reviewer, while uncertainties were discussed with two other reviewers. Because of the heterogeneity of interventions and outcomes, no meta-analysis was performed.

Results

Eighty-four studies were included. Interventions were categorized into educational, (computerized) provider order entry [(C)POE], audit and feedback, or other interventions. Nearly all studies reported a reduction in test order volume. Only 15 assessed sustainability up to two years. Patient-related clinical outcomes were reported in 45 studies, two of which found negative effects.

Conclusions

Interventions from all categories have the potential to reduce unnecessary laboratory testing, although long-term sustainability is questionable. Owing to the heterogeneity of the interventions studied, it is difficult to conclude which approach was most successful, and for which tests. Most studies had methodological limitations, such as the absence of a control arm. Therefore, well-designed, controlled trials using clearly described interventions and relevant clinical outcomes are needed.