Efficacy and safety of darunavir/ritonavir plus etravirine dual regimen in antiretroviral therapy-experienced patients: a multicenter clinical experience

Long-term outcomes of highly experienced people with HIV undergoing salvage therapy with raltegravir

Raltegravir and other third-line drugs have shown promise in improving outcomes in treatment-experienced patients. However, the efficacy and tolerability of these agents vary. This study assessed real-life virologic success, long-term survival, and adverse events in patients receiving raltegravir or other third-line drugs as salvage regimens. This retrospective cohort study included adults who experienced treatment failure (human immunodeficiency syndrome-1 RNA plasma viral load >1000 copies/mL) and subsequently initiated raltegravir or other third-line drugs (darunavir/ritonavir, maraviroc, or etravirine). Propensity score matching methods were employed to account for differences at the time of switching from failing antiretroviral therapy regimens. The matched subset was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Generalized Wilcoxon tests to evaluate the probability of achieving virologic suppression (plasma viral load <50 copies/mL). Mortality rates, toxicity, treatment interruption, virologic failure, and loss to follow-up were determined using Poisson regression. One hundred and sixty-eight patients initiating salvage regimens were included, with 123 receiving raltegravir and 45 other third-line drugs. Propensity score matching resulted in a subset of 90 patients, 45 in each group. During the follow-up period, there were no significant differences observed between the groups in terms of virologic suppression (77.8% vs 82.2%, P = .73), mortality rates (4.04 vs 6.18 persons per 100 person-years [p-y]; P = .67), drug toxicity (0.00 vs 2.06 persons per 100 p-y; P = .49), treatment interruption (8.07 vs 0.00 persons per 100 p-y; P = .06), virologic failure (2.02 vs 4.12 persons per 100 p-y; P = .61), and loss of follow-up (6.05 vs 4.12 persons per 100 p-y; P = .70). Our findings indicate comparable survival and virological success rates between raltegravir and other drugs used in salvage regimens. Similar rates of drug toxicity, treatment interruption, virologic failure, and loss of follow-up were also observed. These results suggest that raltegravir may be a viable option for salvage therapy, demonstrating outcomes comparable to other third-line drugs in real life.

Pharmacokinetics of darunavir/cobicistat and etravirine alone and co-administered in HIV-infected patients

Objectives

To determine the effect of etravirine on the pharmacokinetics of darunavir/cobicistat and vice versa. Safety and tolerability of this combination were also evaluated.

Methods

Open-label, fixed-sequence trial in two cohorts of HIV-infected patients on therapy with darunavir/cobicistat 800/150 mg once daily (DRV cohort; n = 15) or etravirine 400 mg once daily (ETR cohort; n = 15). Etravirine or darunavir/cobicistat were added on days 1-14 and 1-7 in participants in the DRV or ETR cohort, respectively. Full pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained on days 0 and 14 in the DRV cohort, and on days 0 and 7 in the ETR cohort. Darunavir, cobicistat and etravirine pharmacokinetic parameters [AUC0-24, Cmax and trough concentrations in plasma (C24)] were calculated for each individual by non-compartmental analysis and were compared using linear mixed-effects models. Adverse events and HIV-1 RNA in plasma were monitored.

Results

Etravirine co-administration decreased cobicistat AUC0-24, Cmax and C24 by 30%, 14% and 66%, respectively. Although darunavir AUC0-24 and Cmax were unchanged by etravirine, darunavir C24 was 56% lower for darunavir/cobicistat co-administered with etravirine relative to darunavir/cobicistat alone. Etravirine pharmacokinetics were unchanged by darunavir/cobicistat. Treatments were well tolerated, and HIV-1 RNA remained undetectable in all participants.

Conclusions

Although etravirine pharmacokinetics was unchanged by darunavir/cobicistat, there was a significant decrease in cobicistat exposure and in darunavir C24 when darunavir/cobicistat was co-administered with etravirine. Boosting darunavir with ritonavir instead of with cobicistat may be preferred if darunavir is to be combined with etravirine in clinical practice.

Effectiveness of Once/Day Dolutegravir Plus Boosted Darunavir as a Switch Strategy in Heavily Treated Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Dual therapy with once/day dolutegravir (DTG) plus boosted darunavir (DRV/b) may be a suitable and effective strategy with a high genetic barrier to resistance in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of DTG plus DRV/b (DTG+DRV/b) as a switch strategy in HIV-infected patients, irrespective of their history of virologic failure (VF).

DESIGN

Multicenter retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Human immunodeficiency outpatient treatment clinics at three university hospitals in Spain.

PATIENTS

Fifty HIV-infected adults who had a stable antiretroviral treatment (ART) regimen and an undetectable viral load for at least 6 months, and whose ART was switched to once/day DTG+DRV/b between January 2015 and January 2018 were included in the analysis. Historical genotype at the time of VF was available in 44 patients.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Patients were followed until VF or treatment discontinuation for any reason. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with a viral load of 50 copies/mL or lower at the last follow-up visit. Secondary outcomes included changes in CD4⁺ cell count, lipid profile, and renal function. Of the 50 patients included, median time of viral suppression was 52 months (interquartile range [IQR] 18-103 mo) and nadir CD4⁺ 89 cells/mm³ (IQR 37-241 cells/mm³ ). Patients had a history of a median of 8 ART combinations (IQR 4-11 combinations) and 3 VFs (IQR 2-8 VFs). The historical genotypes from 44 patients showed 41 patients (93.2%) with nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) resistance-associated mutations (RAMs), 32 (72.7%) with nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) RAMs, and 12 (27.3%) with primary protease inhibitor (PI) RAMs; 7 (15.9%) had darunavir RAMs, and no patients had baseline integrase strand transfer inhibitor RAMs. Thirty-seven patients (84.1%) had resistance to at least two antiretroviral classes. After a median of 25 months (IQR 17-28 mo) of follow-up, 49 patients (98%) maintained a viral load of 50 copies/mL or lower, and 1 patient (2%) had VF. No new RAMs emerged at VF. At week 4, serum creatinine concentration increased a median of 0.12 mg/dl (0.03-0.23 mg/dl). At last visit, total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels increased by a median of 9 mg/dl (IQR -18 to 40 mg/dl) and 16 mg/dl (IQR -9 to 40 mg/dl), respectively, whereas CD4⁺ cell count remained stable (median +13 cell/mm³ ).

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of heavily treated HIV-infected patients with virologic suppression, switching to the combination of DTG+DRV/b was a convenient regimen that was highly effective and had good tolerability.

Effectiveness and safety of dual therapy with rilpivirine and boosted darunavir in treatment-experienced patients with advanced HIV infection: a preliminary 24 week analysis (RIDAR study)

Background

The objective was to analyze the effectiveness and safety of dual therapy with rilpivirine plus boosted-darunavir (RPV + bDRV) in real-life patients.

Methods

Observational, retrospective, multi-center study in HIV+ patients who had received RPV + bDRV for 24 weeks to optimize/simplify their previous antiretroviral treatment. We determined the percentage of patients without virologic failure (2 consecutive viral loads > 50 copies/mL) at 24 weeks of treatment.

Results

The study included 161 patients from 15 hospitals with median age of 49 years; 29.3% had previous AIDS stage and median CD4+ lymphocyte nadir of 170 cells/uL. They had been diagnosed with HIV for a median of 17 years and had received 14 years of ART, with five previous treatment combinations, and 36.6% had a history of virological failure. The reasons for the switch were simplification/optimization (49.7%), toxicity/intolerance (17.4%), or inadequate effectiveness of previous ART (10.6%).

Baseline VL of 50–1000 copies/mL was recorded in 25.5% of the patients. In the“intention-to-treat” analysis at 24 weeks, 87.6% of 161 patients continued the study treatment without virologic failure criteria.

In the “on treatment” analysis (excluding patients who discontinued treatment with dual therapy for any reason other than virologic failure) the efficacy was 94.6% (141/149 patients).

Conclusions

Dual therapy with RPV + DRVb proved to be effective and safe in patients with advanced HIV infection, long exposure to ART, low CD4 nadir, previous virologic failure, and/or history of ineffective ART.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients receiving darunavir-based salvage regimens: A case series

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) constitutes a compelling approach for the optimization of antiretroviral therapy in treatment-experienced HIV-1 patients. While various inhibitory indices have been proposed to predict virologic outcome, there is a lack of consensus on the clinical value of TDM. Here, we report the comparative results of TDM in 14 HIV-1-infected patients who had previously received at least two different PI-based regimens and who initiated darunavir (DRV)-based salvage therapy. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) parameters were calculated for each subject. Seventy-nine percent of subjects had a viral load <50 copies/mL at 48 weeks. The only subject with two consecutive viral loads >50 copies/mL at the end of the study period was the patient with the lowest instantaneous inhibitory potential (IIP). The sample size was insufficient to show an association between any of the PK/PD parameters and virologic response. Based on our observations, we suggest that the utility of IIP for antiretroviral combinations for the prediction of virologic outcome in HIV-1 drug-experienced patients should be studied further.

Switching to boosted protease inhibitor plus a second antiretroviral drug (dual therapy) for treatment simplification: a multicenter observational study

BACKGROUND

Aim of the study was to assess predictors of discontinuation/toxicity of boosted PI-based (PI/r) dual therapy (DT).

METHODS

Observational, retrospective switch study in patients successfully treated with triple drugs regimen. Patients switched to PI/r based DT [darunavir (DRV/r), lopinavir (LPV/r) or atazanavir (ATV/r)] plus a second drug: [raltegravir (RAL), maraviroc (MVC) etravirine (ETR), lamivudine (3TC) or tenofovir (TDF)] between 2009 and 2014 were included. The effect of each drug as well as other clinical and virological cofactors over treatment discontinuation (TD) was assessed using survival analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 376 patients were included with mean follow-up of 73 weeks. The most commonly used drugs in DT were DRV/r (63.0 %) and RAL (53.7 %). TD was observed in 77 (20,4 %) patients: 38 (10,1 %) virological failure, 35 (9,3 %) toxicity/intolerance (4 deaths) and 4 (1 %) interruptions for patients decision. At Cox Model, adjusted by demographic and laboratory variables, DRV/r and ATV/r significantly reduced the likelihood of TD and longer treatment was associated with lower risk, while low CD4 count at baseline and number of previous regimens with a higher risk. Moreover, RAL and 3TC use were significantly associated with lower TD by toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

In our clinical practice experience, switching virologically suppressed patients to PI/r based DT showed adequate safety and efficacy, so that it may be used in selected patients with specific medical needs.

Long-term efficacy and safety of etravirine-containing regimens in a real-life cohort of treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients

OBJECTIVES

Etravirine (ETR) was approved in France in September 2008 and is used in combination with a boosted protease inhibitor (bPI) and other anti-retrovirals (ART) in HIV-infected pre-treated patients. This study aimed to report in a real-life setting the efficacy and tolerability of ETR-based regimens and factors associated with virological response.

METHODS

The study population included all treatment-experienced patients who initiated an ETR-based regimen between September 2008 and July 2013 from the French Dat'AIDS cohort. Analyses were performed in ART-experienced patients starting ETR after virological failure (VF) or as a maintenance therapy (MT), with or without bPI.

RESULTS

A total of 2006 patients (VF, n = 1014 (51%); MT, n = 992 (49%)) were included. At M12, the proportion of patients with HIV RNA < 50 copies/ml was 71.7% (72.0% and 71.1% with or without bPI) in the VF group and 90.5% (85.0% and 92.3% with or without bPI) in the MT group, without significant differences regarding the use of bPI. ETR was discontinued in 8.8% of patients for adverse events in 23.9% of cases (21.5% in VF, 29.5% in MT), treatment failure in 15.2% (16.2% in VF, 7.4% in MT) or simplification in 5.4% (4.6% in VF, 7.4% in MT). In the VF group, factors associated with virological response were a longer duration of HIV infection (OR = 2.7; p < 0.001) and baseline HIV RNA < 5 log10 copies/mL (OR = 2.1; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that in ART-experienced patients ETR is well tolerated with a high efficacy when combined with other active drugs, even when the regimen does not include a bPI.

Use of new antiretroviral drugs and classes in Bahia, Brazil: a real life experience on salvage therapy of AIDS patients

Antiretroviral therapy has significantly evolved in the last decade, with an increasing number of new drugs and classes. Currently, even heavily experienced patients can be successfully treated with new regimens. In Brazil, the recent incorporation of some new antiretroviral drugs made it possible to suppress HIV plasma viremia in most treated patients, with significant benefits in terms of quality of life and survival. However, little has been published on outcomes of patients under new drugs-based regimens. We reviewed the safety and efficacy of antiretroviral regimens using recently introduced drugs in Bahia. Our results confirm that patients using darunavir, raltegravir, enfuvirtide, or etravirine presented with a high rate of virological suppression without significant adverse events, after one year of follow-up.