Optimizing smart pump technology by increasing critical safety alerts and reducing clinically insignificant alerts

The Impact of Smart Pump Technology in the Healthcare System: A Scope Review

Smart infusion pump technology prevents errors caused by parenteral therapy. This paper aims to review the recent literature about smart pump uses, cases and adverse events, and strategies to minimize these disadvantages. Literature was explored from January 2000 to November 2021 using Google Scholar, PubMed, and ScienceDirect. There were assessments of the advantages and adverse effects of using smart pumps and strategies to overcome the adverse effects of smart pumps. The advantage of using smart pumps is that they decrease errors like incorrect rate and dose. Other benefits include a decrease in medication event rates and the ability to connect smart pumps to home health providers. However, compliance rates were negatively influenced by improper smart pumps and the overriding of soft alerts, which can cause alert fatigue and drug library update delays. Recent studies have tried to address the negative issues by improving drug library compliance and decreasing alerts to avoid alert desensitization. The investigations revealed that the smart pumps reduced errors but would only prevent some programming errors. Compliance with utilizing smart pump technology is critical in stopping medication errors. Opportunities for future improvement are broad, including integrating a smart pump infusion with the hospital system, implementing auto programming, and designing smart pump devices to be lighter, smaller, and more portable instead of the heavy, large smart pump used by most hospitals today.

Unintended Patient Safety Risks Due to Wireless Smart Infusion Pump Library Update Delays

OBJECTIVE

Our previous study showed that the issue of drug library update delays on wireless intravenous (IV) infusion pumps of one major vendor was widespread and significant. However, the impact of such a delay was unclear. The objective of this study was to quantify the impact of pump library update delays on patient safety in terms of missed and false infusion programming alerts.

METHODS

The study data sets included infusion logs and drug libraries from three hospitals of one health system from January 2015 to December 2016. We identified limit setting changes of any two consecutive drug library versions. We quantified the impact of using outdated drug limit settings by missed and false infusion programming alerts.

RESULTS

Twenty-five updates of the drug library were released within the health system during the 2-year period with an average interval of 28.8 days. After a new library version was issued, it took at least 6 days for 50% of all pumps to become up-to-date and 15 days or more to reach 80%. All three hospitals had at least 16% of all IV infusions programmed with outdated libraries. This resulted in 18%, 24.4%, and 27% of false alerts in the three hospitals, respectively. We identified two cases of missed alert infusions of high-risk medications, propofol, and potassium chloride, which could have negatively impacted patient safety.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support our assumption that potential serious harm can happen when IV infusions are administered with outdated drug limit settings due to delays in drug library updates on the pump.

Development of a standardized, citywide process for managing smart-pump drug libraries

PURPOSE

Development and implementation of an interprofessional consensus-driven process for review and optimization of smart-pump drug libraries and dosing limits are described.

SUMMARY

The Indianapolis Coalition for Patient Safety (ICPS), which represents 6 Indianapolis-area health systems, identified an opportunity to reduce clinically insignificant alerts that smart infusion pumps present to end users. Through a consensus-driven process, ICPS aimed to identify best practices to implement at individual hospitals in order to establish specific action items for smart-pump drug library optimization. A work group of pharmacists, nurses, and industrial engineers met to evaluate variability within and lack of scrutiny of smart-pump drug libraries. The work group used Lean Six Sigma methodologies to generate a list of key needs and barriers to be addressed in process standardization. The group reviewed targets for smart-pump drug library optimization, including dosing limits, types of alerts reviewed, policies, and safety best practices. The work group also analyzed existing processes at each site to develop a final consensus statement outlining a model process for reviewing alerts and managing smart-pump data. Analysis of the total number of alerts per device across ICPS-affiliated health systems over a 4-year period indicated a 50% decrease (from 7.2 to 3.6 alerts per device per month) after implementation of the model by ICPS member organizations.

CONCLUSION

Through implementation of a standardized, consensus-driven process for smart-pump drug library optimization, ICPS member health systems reduced clinically insignificant smart-pump alerts.

Influence of technique used to attach the infusion set to peristaltic finger smart-pumps on dispensing time: an experimental study

Background

Infusion sets designed for peristaltic finger smart pumps (PFSPs) are necessary for the pumps’ accurate handling. We previously found that medication dispensing is occasionally incomplete following the calculated infusion time when using certain combinations of PFSPs and infusion sets at a Japanese hospital. Thus, in this study, we investigated the cause of this observed delay by determining the effect of infusion set attachment technique on dispensing time using a combination of three kinds of PFSPs and five kinds of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and polybutadiene (PB) infusion sets.

Methods

PFSPs with their exclusive infusion sets were used. The PVC and PB infusion sets were either not stretched or stretched to 1–3 cm and attached to the PFSP’s liquid delivery system. PFSP dispensing rates were set at 25–400 mL/h. The primary outcome was the time required to dispense 100 mL of saline in a volumetric flask.

Results

The complete dispensing time correlated with the input time for all equipment combinations when the infusion sets were not stretched before attachment to the PFSP (R² = 0.9998–1.0000). When stretched, the complete dispensing time was longer than the input time (P < 0.01–0.05, analysis of variance with Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons). The maximum dispensing time extension ratio for the PVC and PB infusion sets was 141.8% and 113.0%, respectively.

Conclusion

Certain attachment techniques for infusion sets can adversely prolong drug dispensing time. As such, pharmacists should provide medical staff with information about the devices used to administer drugs, as well as about the drugs themselves.