Antidepressants Are Effective in Decreasing Neuropathic Pain After SCI: A Meta-Analysis

Management of Central Poststroke Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Central poststroke pain (CPSP) is a neuropathic pain condition prevalent in 8 to 35% of stroke patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to provide insight into the effectiveness of available pharmacological, physical, psychological, and neuromodulation interventions in reducing pain in CPSP patients (PROSPERO Registration: CRD42022371835). Secondary outcomes included mood, sleep, global impression of change, and physical responses. Data extraction included participant demographics, stroke etiology, pain characteristics, pain reduction scores, and secondary outcome metrics. Forty-two original studies were included, with a total of 1,451 participants. No studies providing psychological therapy to CPSP patients were identified. Twelve studies met requirements for a random-effects meta-analyses that found pharmacological therapy to have a small effect on mean pain score (SMD = -.36, 96.0% confidence interval [-.68, -.03]), physical interventions did not show a significant effect (SMD = -.55 [-1.28, .18]), and neuromodulation treatments had a moderate effect (SMD = -.64 [-1.08, -.19]). Fourteen studies were included in proportional meta-analysis with pharmacological studies having a moderate effect (58.3% mean pain reduction [-36.51, -80.15]) and neuromodulation studies a small effect (31.1% mean pain reduction [-43.45, -18.76]). Sixteen studies were included in the narrative review, the findings from which largely supported meta-analysis results. Duloxetine, amitriptyline, and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation had the most robust evidence for their effectiveness in alleviating CPSP-induced pain. Further multicenter placebo-controlled research is needed to ascertain the effectiveness of physical therapies, such as acupuncture and virtual reality, and invasive and noninvasive neuromodulation treatments. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents a top-down and bottom-up overview of evidence for the effectiveness of different pharmacological, physical, and neuromodulation treatments of CPSP. This review could provide clinicians with a comprehensive understanding of the effectiveness and tolerability of different treatment types.

Potentially harmful drug-drug interactions in the therapeutic regimens of persons with spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVES

Individuals with spinal cord injury deal with multiple health complications that require them to use many medications. The purpose of this paper was to find the most common potentially harmful drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in therapeutic regimens of persons with spinal cord injury, and the risk factors associated with it. We further highlight the relevance of each of the DDIs specific to spinal cord injury population.

DESIGN

Observational design and cross-sectional analysis.

SETTING

Community; Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

Individuals with spinal cord injury (n = 108).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES/ANALYSIS

The main outcome was the presence of one or more potential DDIs that can lead to an adverse outcome. All the reported drugs were classified as per the World Health Organization's Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification system. Twenty potential DDIs were selected for the analysis based on the most common medications prescribed to people with spinal cord injury and severity of clinical consequences. The medication lists of study participants were analyzed for selected DDIs.

RESULTS

Among the 20 potential DDIs analyzed in our sample, the top 3 prevalent DDIs were Opioids + Skeletal Muscle Relaxants, Opioids + Gabapentinoids, and Benzodiazepines + ≥ 2 other central nervous system (CNS)-active drugs. Of the total sample of 108 respondents, 31 participants (29%) were identified with having at least one potential DDI. The risk of having a potential DDI was highly associated with polypharmacy, though no associations were found between the presence of a drug interaction and age, sex, level of injury, time since injury, or cause of injury among the study sample.

CONCLUSION

Almost three out of ten individuals with spinal cord injury were at risk of having a potentially harmful drug interaction. Clinical and communication tools are needed that facilitate identification and elimination of harmful drug combinations in the therapeutic regimens of patients with spinal cord injury.

Serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors in managing neuropathic pain following spinal and non-spinal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

While serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) offer promise in managing Post-surgical neuropathic pain (PSNP), uncertainties remain. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and adverse events of SNRIs in managing PSNP.

METHODS

Systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to January 1st 2023 identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SNRIs to placebo for PSNP. The primary outcome measures were pain at rest and adverse events post-surgery. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on surgical type and specific SNRIs.

RESULTS

A total of 19 RCTs, encompassing 1440 participants (719 in the SNRI group vs 721 in the placebo group), met the inclusion criteria and were included. The pooled results demonstrated that pain scores were significantly lower in patients treated with SNRIs at 2 hours (MD:-0.26; 95%CI: -0.47 to -0.04; p=0.02), 6 hours (MD:-0.68; 95%CI: -1.01 to -0.34; p<0.0001), 24 hours (MD:-0.54; 95%CI: -0.99 to -0.09; p=0.02), and 48 hours (MD:-0.66; 95%CI: -1.23 to -0.10; p=0.02) post-surgery. In terms of adverse events, dizziness (OR:2.53; 95%CI: 1.34-4.78; p=0.004) and dry mouth (OR:2.21; 95%CI: 1.25-3.92; p=0.007) were significantly higher in the SNRIs group. Subgroup analysis showed that SNRI was found to significantly lower the 24-hour pain score after spinal surgery (MD:-0.45; 95%CI: -0.84 to -0.05; p=0.03). Duloxetine (MD:-0.63; 95%CI: -1.15 to -0.11; p=0.02) had a significant effect in lowering the 24-hour pain score at rest compared to placebo, whereas venlafaxine did not.

CONCLUSIONS

SNRIs yielded considerable pain score reductions across multiple post-surgical intervals, although accompanied by an increased incidence of dizziness and dry mouth.

Drug Repurposing for Spinal Cord Injury: Progress Towards Therapeutic Intervention for Primary Factors and Secondary Complications

Spinal cord injury (SCI) encompasses a plethora of complex mechanisms like the involvement of major cell death pathways, neurodegeneration of spinal cord neurons, overexpression of glutaminergic transmission and inflammation cascade, along with different co-morbidities like neuropathic pain, urinary and sexual dysfunction, respiratory and cardiac failures, making it one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality globally. Corticosteroids such as methylprednisolone and dexamethasone, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs such as naproxen, aspirin and ibuprofen are the first-line treatment options for SCI, inhibiting primary and secondary progression by preventing inflammation and action of reactive oxygen species. However, they are constrained by a short effective drug administration window and their pharmacological action being limited to symptomatic relief of the secondary effects related to spinal cord injury only. Although post-injury rehabilitation treatments may enable functional recovery, they take a long time to show results. Drug repurposing might be an innovative method for expanding therapy alternatives, utilising drugs that are already approved by various esteemed federal agencies throughout the world. Reutilising a drug molecule to treat SCI can eliminate the need for expensive and lengthy drug discovery processes and pave the way for new therapeutic approaches in SCI. This review summarises marketed drugs that could be repurposed based on their safety and efficacy data. We also discuss their mechanisms of action and provide a list of repurposed drugs under clinical trials for SCI therapy.

Prescriptions pour les complications courantes des lésions de la moelle épinière

Objectif

Décrire les modèles de prescriptions dans le cas de 3 complications communes associées à une lésion de la moelle épinière (LME) et proposer aux médecins de famille des stratégies pour optimiser les soins aux patients atteints d’une LME.

Sources de l’information

Les résultats d’une enquête nationale sur l’utilisation des médicaments d’ordonnance par des personnes atteintes d’une LME au Canada et d’une étude longitudinale des complications secondaires liées aux LME.

Message principal

Les fonctions neurologiques et cardiométaboliques altérées chez les patients atteints d’une LME compliquent le choix des régimes pharmacologiques optimaux chez de tels patients. Trois problèmes courants observés en soins primaires chez des patients atteints d’une LME exigent une pharmacothérapie, soit la douleur (traitée chez 57 % des répondants à l’enquête), les spasmes musculaires (54 %) et les infections des voies urinaires récurrentes (43 %). Le contrôle de la douleur peut nécessiter plusieurs médicaments, selon la source ou la nature de la douleur. Certains médicaments d’ordonnance recommandés pour le traitement de la douleur pourraient être sous-utilisés dans cette population, comme l’amitriptyline, tandis que d’autres pourraient être surutilisés chez de tels patients, comme les antibiotiques pour les infections des voies urinaires. La spasticité est souvent liée à un problème sous-jacent, comme la douleur, et le traitement des problèmes concomitants peut donc aussi réduire la spasticité. Il a été observé que des benzodiazépines à courte durée d’action ont été prescrites pour la spasticité à des taux étonnamment élevés, même si elles ne font pas partie du paradigme thérapeutique recommandé. L’étude longitudinale sur les complications secondaires associées aux LME a mené à l’élaboration de pépites exploitables, un outil novateur de transmission des connaissances à l’intention des professionnels des soins primaires.

Conclusion

Dans le but de prodiguer un traitement optimal des patients souffrant d’une LME, les médecins de famille sont encouragés à entamer des communications franches au sujet des médicaments d’ordonnance, y compris sur les aspects liés aux coûts, à la polypharmacie et aux substituts thérapeutiques. Les médecins de famille devraient aussi explorer l’établissement d’une collaboration interprofessionnelle avec des spécialistes des LME et d’autres professionnels de la santé afin d’offrir aux patients des stratégies non pharmacologiques adaptées à leur degré d’activité et à leurs besoins nutritionnels. L’application mobile des pépites exploitables fournit aux médecins de famille des renseignements concis, pratiques et fondés sur des données probantes portant sur les 20 principales préoccupations liées à la santé causées par une LME.

Prescribing for common complications of spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVE

To describe prescribing patterns for 3 common complications associated with spinal cord injury (SCI) and to provide family doctors with strategies for optimizing the care of patients with SCI.

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

Results of a nationwide survey of prescription medication use among people with SCI in Canada and a longitudinal study of secondary complications associated with SCI.

MAIN MESSAGE

Altered neurologic and cardiometabolic function in patients with SCI make it difficult for family physicians to predict optimal medication regimens for these patients. Three common problems seen in primary care among patients with SCI that require pharmacologic treatment are pain (treated in 57% of survey respondents), muscle spasms (54%), and recurrent urinary tract infections (43%). Pain management may require multiple medications, depending on the source or nature of the pain. Some prescription medications recommended for treating pain may be underused in this population, such as amitriptyline, while others may be overused in this population, such as antibiotics for urinary tract infections. Spasticity is often related to an underlying problem such as pain, and treatment of concomitant conditions may also reduce spasticity. Short-acting benzodiazepines were found to have been prescribed for spasticity outside the recommended treatment paradigm at a surprisingly high rate. The longitudinal study of secondary complications associated with SCI led to the development of Actionable Nuggets, an innovative knowledge translation tool for primary care providers.

CONCLUSION

To provide optimal treatment to patients with SCI, family doctors are encouraged to engage in open communication with them about prescription medications, including aspects of cost, polypharmacy, and therapeutic substitutions. Family physicians should also explore interprofessional collaboration with SCI specialists and allied health providers to provide patients with nonpharmacologic strategies tailored to their activity levels and nutritional needs. The Actionable Nuggets mobile app provides family doctors with brief, actionable, evidence-based information on the top 20 health concerns associated with SCI.

For what indications are antidepressants being used in adults in Colombia?

INTRODUCTION

Antidepressants are useful in the pharmacological treatment of different depressive and anxiety disorders, as well as being potentially useful in other indications. The aim of the study was to determine the indications for which antidepressants are being prescribed in patients over 18 years of age registered with the Colombian Health System.

METHODS

Retrospective study with data from patients over 18 years old, of either sex, registered with the Colombian Health System, who are prescribed antidepressants. Medical records were reviewed, looking for indications approved and not approved by regulatory agencies. Patients were identified randomly, as well as the sociodemographic, clinical and pharmacological variables that could be associated with prescriptions for unapproved indications.

RESULTS

351 patients were evaluated, with a mean age of 60.4 ± 15.3 years, of whom 72.6% were women. They were attended in 34 cities, with prescriptions mainly by general practitioners (n = 276; 78.6%), and psychiatrists (n = 42; 12.0%). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were the most widely prescribed antidepressants (n = 204; 58.1%), followed by atypicals (n = 76; 21.7%). The most frequent indications were for depression (n = 169; 48.1%), anxiety (n = 48; 13.7%), pain (n = 22; 6.3%) and sleep disorders (n = 17; 4.8%). A total of 188 prescriptions (53.6%) were made for approved indications, and the remaining 163 (46.4%) were classified as unapproved.

CONCLUSIONS

Antidepressants are being prescribed for the treatment of depression, anxiety, pain and sleep disorders, especially in older adult women, but almost half of the formulations were for unapproved indications.

Non-opioid pharmacologic treatment of chronic spinal cord injury-related pain

Purpose: Spinal cord injury-related pain is often a severe debilitating condition that adversely affects the patient's physical health, psychological wellbeing and quality of life. Opioid medications have historically been prescribed to this population with great frequency. As opioid abuse disorder becomes an ever-worsening public health issue, more attention must be placed upon non-opioid options. This paper reviews non-opioid medications to be considered when treating spinal cord injury-related pain. The pertinent literature is reviewed, and the advantages and pitfalls of various medication options are discussed in the complicated context of the individual with a spinal cord injury.Methods: Peer-reviewed journal articles and medication package insert data are reviewed.Results:. The non-opioid medications with the greatest evidence for efficacy in the treatment of chronic spinal cord injury-related pain are drawn from the antiepileptic drug and antidepressant categories though the specific selection must be nuanced to the particular individual patient. More research is required to understand the role of calcitonin, lithium, and marijuana in treating spinal cord injury-related pain.Conclusions: The complex clinical situation of each individual patient must be weighed against the risks and benefits of each medication, as reviewed in this paper, to determine the ideal treatment strategy for chronic spinal cord injury-related pain.

The CanPain SCI clinical practice guidelines for rehabilitation management of neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: 2021 update

STUDY DESIGN

Clinical practice guidelines.

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to update the 2016 version of the Canadian clinical practice guidelines for the management of neuropathic pain in people with spinal cord injury (SCI).

SETTING

The guidelines are relevant for inpatient, outpatient and community SCI rehabilitation settings in Canada.

METHODS

The guidelines were updated in accordance with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II tool. A Steering Committee and Working Group reviewed the relevant evidence on neuropathic pain management (encompassing screening and diagnosis, treatment and models of care) after SCI. The quality of evidence was scored using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). A consensus process was followed to achieve agreement on recommendations and clinical considerations.

RESULTS

The working group identified and reviewed 46 additional relevant articles published since the last version of the guidelines. The panel agreed on 3 new screening and diagnosis recommendations and 8 new treatment recommendations. Two key changes to these treatment recommendations included the introduction of general treatment principles and a new treatment recommendation classification system. No new recommendations to model of care were made.

CONCLUSIONS

The CanPainSCI recommendations for the management of neuropathic pain after SCI should be used to inform practice.

Interrelationship of Neurogenic Obesity and Chronic Neuropathic Pain in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury

The prevalence of obesity and of neuropathic pain are both estimated at above 50% in the population of people with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). These secondary consequences of SCI have significant negative impact on physical functioning, activities of daily living, and quality of life. Investigations of relationships between weight or body composition and chronic neuropathic pain in people with SCI are lacking, but investigations in non-SCI cohorts suggest an association between obesity and the presence and severity of neuropathic pain conditions. In the present article, we present a review of the literature linking obesity and neuropathic pain and summarize findings suggesting that metabolic syndrome and chronic, systemic inflammation due to excess adiposity increase the risk for neuropathic pain after an SCI.

For What Indications are Antidepressants Being Used in Adults in Colombia?

INTRODUCTION

Antidepressants are useful in the pharmacological treatment of different depressive and anxiety disorders, as well as being potentially useful in other indications. The aim of the study was to determine the indications for which antidepressants are being prescribed in patients over 18 years of age registered with the Colombian Health System.

METHODS

Retrospective study with data from patients over 18 years old, of either sex, registered with the Colombian Health System, who are prescribed antidepressants. Medical records were reviewed, looking for indications approved and not approved by regulatory agencies. Patients were identified randomly, as well as the sociodemographic, clinical and pharmacological variables that could be associated with prescriptions for unapproved indications.

RESULTS

351 patients were evaluated, with a mean age of 60.4±15.3 years, of whom 72.6% were women. They were attended in 34 cities, with prescriptions mainly by general practitioners (n=276; 78.6%), and psychiatrists (n=42; 12.0%). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were the most widely prescribed antidepressants (n=204; 58.1%), followed by atypicals (n=76; 21.7%). The most frequent indications were for depression (n=169; 48.1%), anxiety (n=48; 13.7%), pain (n=22; 6.3%) and sleep disorders (n=17; 4.8%). A total of 188 prescriptions (53.6%) were made for approved indications, and the remaining 163 (46.4%) were classified as unapproved.

CONCLUSIONS

Antidepressants are being prescribed for the treatment of depression, anxiety, pain and sleep disorders, especially in older adult women, but almost half of the formulations were for unapproved indications.

French recommendations for the management of patients with spinal cord injury or at risk of spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVES

To update the French guidelines on the management of trauma patients with spinal cord injury or suspected spinal cord injury.

DESIGN

A consensus committee of 27 experts was formed. A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the outset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industrial funding (i.e. pharmaceutical, medical devices). The authors were advised to follow the rules of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasised.

METHODS

The committee studied twelve questions: (1) What are the indications and arrangements for spinal immobilisation? (2) What are the arrangements for pre-hospital orotracheal intubation? (3) What are the objectives of haemodynamic resuscitation during the lesion assessment, and during the first few days in hospital? (4) What is the best way to manage these patients to improve their long-term prognosis? (5) What is the place of corticosteroid therapy in the initial phase? (6) What are the indications for magnetic resonance imaging in the lesion assessment phase? (7) What is the optimal time for surgical management? (8) What are the best arrangements for orotracheal intubation in the hospital environment? (9) What are the specific conditions for weaning these patients from mechanical ventilation for? (10) What are the procedures for analgesic treatment of these patients? (11) What are the specific arrangements for installing and mobilising these patients? (12) What is the place of early intermittent bladder sampling in these patients? Each question was formulated in a PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) format and the evidence profiles were produced. The literature review and recommendations were made according to the GRADE® Methodology.

RESULTS

The experts' work synthesis and the application of the GRADE method resulted in 19 recommendations. Among the recommendations formalised, 2 have a high level of evidence (GRADE 1+/-) and 12 have a low level of evidence (GRADE 2+/-). For 5 recommendations, the GRADE method could not be applied, resulting in expert advice. After two rounds of scoring and one amendment, strong agreement was reached on all the recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

There was significant agreement among experts on strong recommendations to improve practices for the management of patients with spinal cord injury.

Using Inferred Mobility Status to Estimate the Time to Major Depressive Disorder Diagnosis Post-Spinal Cord Injury

OBJECTIVE

Estimate (1) prevalence of major depressive disorder (MDD) diagnosis; (2) risk factors associated with MDD diagnosis; (3) time at which MDD is diagnosed post-spinal cord injury (SCI); and (4) interaction of inferred mobility status (IMS) in a commercially insured population over 3 years.

DESIGN

Retrospective longitudinal cohort design.

SETTING

A commercial insurance claims database from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2013.

PARTICIPANTS

Individuals with an index cervical or thoracic SCI in 2011 or 2012, without history of MDD ≤30 days pre-SCI (N=1409).

INTERVENTION

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Prevalence of, risk factors associated with, and time to MDD diagnosis post-SCI. A stratified survival analysis using IMS, based upon durable medical equipment (DME) claims, was also completed.

RESULTS

Post-SCI, 294 out of 1409 (20.87%) were diagnosed with new-onset MDD. Significant (P<.05) risk factors included: employment, length of index hospitalization, discharge from index hospitalization with healthcare services, rehabilitation services post-SCI, and 2 of 5 IMS comparisons. Median time to MDD was 86 days. Survival analysis demonstrated a significant difference between 6 of 10 IMS comparisons. Regarding new-onset or recurring MDD, 432 out of 1409 (30.66%) were diagnosed post-SCI. Significant risk factors included: female, employment, length of index hospitalization, discharge from index hospitalization with healthcare services, rehabilitation services post-SCI, MDD>30 days pre-SCI, catheter claims, and 2 of 5 IMS comparisons. Median time to MDD was 74 days. Survival analysis demonstrated a significant difference between 4 of 10 IMS comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of MDD post-SCI is greater than the general population. Stratification by IMS illustrated that individuals with greater inferred reliance on DME are at a greater risk for MDD and have shorter time to MDD diagnosis post-SCI.

Analysis of primary outpatient data for off-label use of medicines in neurology

Introduction: The off-label use of medicines is a common practice that covers a wide range of therapeutic areas in both, adults and children. So far, the extent of off-label use among neurology patients in Bulgaria has not been studied. The aim of this study is to provide data on the off-label use in neurology patients in Bulgaria and to contribute to planning actions by the European Commission and EMA to provide a harmonized guideline and to regulate the off-label use of medicines within the European Union.

Materials and methods: The data on prescriptions of 360 neurology outpatients, treated in a 1 – year period, were recorded and provided for analyses. The Summaries of Product Characteristics, were used as reference documents for assessment of prescriptions.

Results: The results from this study show that most neurology patients (63%) were exposed to off-label use. Most of the medicines prescribed off-label (90%), were used for a therapeutic indication, other than the one listed in the authorized product information. Meloxicam is found to be the most commonly prescribed off-label medicine. Other medicines, like trasadone, pentoxyfylline and fupentixol / melitracen were prescribed less frequently, but deserve special attention, as they were found to be used off-label to a very large extent, some of them in 100% of prescriptions. Half of the top 10 medications, most commonly used off-label in neurology, were found to be non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Conclusion: The results reveal a big gap between the authorized medicines and the real medical needs. Further studies based on a larger number of medical centers are needed to establish more accurate data on off-label prescribing in neurology patients on a national level.

Management of pain in individuals with spinal cord injury: Guideline of the German-Speaking Medical Society for Spinal Cord Injury

Introduction: Pain is a prominent complication in spinal cord injury (SCI). It can either occur as a direct or as an indirect consequence of SCI and it often heavily influences the quality of life of affected individuals. In SCI, nociceptive and neuropathic pain can equally emerge at the same time above or below the level of injury. Thus, classification and grading of pain is frequently difficult. Effective treatment of SCI-related pain in general and of neuropathic pain in particular is challenging. Current treatment options are sparse and their evidence is considered to be limited. Considering these aspects, a clinical practice guideline was developed as basis for an optimized, comprehensive and standardized pain management in SCI-related pain.

Methods: The German-Speaking Medical Society for Spinal Cord Injury (Deutschsprachige Medizinische Gesellschaft für Paraplegiologie – DMGP) developed a clinical practice guideline that received consensus from seven further German-speaking medical societies and one patient organization. The evidence base from clinical trials and meta-analyses was summarized and subjected to a structured consensus-process in accordance with the regulations of the Association of Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) and the methodological requirements of the “German instrument for methodological guideline appraisal”.

Results: This consensus-based guideline (S2k classification according to the AWMF guidance manual and rules) resulted in seven on-topic statements and 17 specific recommendations relevant to the classification, assessment and therapy of pain directly or indirectly caused by SCI. Recommended therapeutic approaches comprise pharmacological (e.g. nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or anticonvulsants) and non-pharmacological (e.g. physical activity or psychotherapeutic techniques) strategies for both nociceptive and neuropathic pain.

Discussion: Assessment of SCI-related pain is standardized and respective methods in terms of examination, classification and grading of pain are already in use and validated in German language. In contrast, valid, evidence-based and efficient therapeutic options are limited and ask for further clinical studies, ideally randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses.

Utilization of medicinal cannabis for pain by individuals with spinal cord injury

Study design

A cross-sectional multi-center study using an on-line survey addressing utilization, knowledge, and perceptions of medicinal cannabis (MC) by people with spinal cord injury (SCI).

Objective

To characterize differences between current (CU), past (PU), and never users (NU) of MC with SCI; to determine why people with SCI use MC; to examine reports of MCs' efficacy and tolerability by individuals with SCI.

Setting

Three academic medical centers in the United States.

Methods

Comparison of demographic and attitudinal differences between CU, PU, and NU and differences in the groups' reports of pain, health, and quality of life (QOL). Evaluation of utilization patterns and perceived efficacy of MC among CU and PU and reports of side effects of MC versus prescription medications. Data were analyzed using either Chi Square, distribution-free exact statistics, or t-tests for continuous data.

Results

Among a nationwide sample (n = 353) of individuals with SCI, NU were less likely than CU and PU to believe that cannabis ought to be legalized and more likely to endorse risks of use. Current users and PU reported greater pain interference in daily life than did NU, but there were no between group differences in QOL or physical or emotional health. Current users and PU took MC to address pain (65.30%), spasms (63.30%), sleeplessness (32.70%), and anxiety (24.00%), and 63.30% reported it offered "great relief" from symptoms. Participants reported that MC is more effective and carries fewer side effects than prescription medications.

Conclusions

Medicinal cannabis is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for a number of SCI-related symptoms.

Survey on current treatments for pain after spinal cord damage

Study design

An online questionnaire.

Objectives

To assess the international spinal cord medicine and rehabilitation community's utilization of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for spinal cord damage (SCD)-related pain and to determine whether approaches to SCD-related pain differ between developed and less developed nations.

Setting

An international collaboration of authors.

Methods

An on-line survey querying availability and utilization of a number of approaches to SCD-related pain was developed, distributed, and made available for 6 months. Responses were analyzed for the entire cohort and according to participants' descriptions of their home nations' economies.

Results

A total of 153 responses were submitted, mostly from developed nations. Nearly three quarters of subjects reported offering their patients with SCD narcotics; only 13% reported offering their patients with SCD medical cannabis. Subjects from developing countries were more likely than those from developed countries to prescribe buprenorphine (20.0% vs 15.6%; p = 0.001) and less likely to prescribe medical cannabis (0% vs 15.6%; p = 0.001) and acupuncture (4.0% vs 23.4%; p = 0.02).

Conclusions

Most spinal cord medicine clinicians employ a multimodal approach to pain. There are significant differences in utilization of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic approach to SCD-related pain between clinicians from more and less developed countries.

Pain inhibition through transplantation of fetal neuronal progenitors into the injured spinal cord in rats

Neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury (SCI) is a complex condition that responds poorly to usual treatments. Cell transplantation represents a promising therapy; nevertheless, the ideal cell type in terms of neurogenic potential and effectiveness against pain remains largely controversial. Here, we evaluated the ability of fetal neural stem cells (fNSC) to relieve chronic pain and, secondarily, their effects on motor recovery. Adult Wistar rats with traumatic SCI were treated, 10 days after injury, with intra-spinal injections of culture medium (sham) or fNSCs extracted from telencephalic vesicles (TV group) or the ventral medulla (VM group) of E/14 embryos. Sensory (von Frey filaments and hot plate) and motor (the Basso, Beattie, Bresnahan locomotor rating scale and inclined plane test) assessments were performed during 8 weeks. Thereafter, spinal cords were processed for immunofluorescence and transplanted cells were quantified by stereology. The results showed improvement of thermal hyperalgesia in the TV and VM groups at 4 and 5 weeks after transplantation, respectively. Moreover, mechanical allodynia improved in both the TV and VM groups at 8 weeks. No significant motor recovery was observed in the TV or VM groups compared with sham. Stereological analyses showed that ~70% of TV and VM cells differentiated into NeuN⁺ neurons, with a high proportion of enkephalinergic and GABAergic cells in the TV group and enkephalinergic and serotoninergic cells in the VM group. Our study suggests that neuronal precursors from TV and VM, once implanted into the injured spinal cord, maturate into different neuronal subtypes, mainly GABAergic, serotoninergic, and enkephalinergic, and all subtypes alleviate pain, despite no significant motor recovery. The study was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Medical School of the University of São Paulo (protocol number 033/14) on March 4, 2016.

Dronabinol Is a Safe Long-Term Treatment Option for Neuropathic Pain Patients

Treatment of neuropathic pain (NP) symptoms associated with multiple sclerosis (MS) is frequently insufficient. Yet, cannabis is still rarely offered for treatment of pain. This clinical trial aimed at showing the positive benefit-risk ratio of dronabinol. Two hundred forty MS patients with central NP entered a 16-weeks placebo-controlled phase-III study followed by a 32-weeks open-label period. One hundred patients continued therapy for overall up to 119 weeks. Primary endpoint was change of pain intensity on the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale over a 16-weeks treatment period. Safety was assessed on the basis of adverse reactions (ARs), signs of dependency and abuse. Pain intensity during 16-weeks dronabinol and placebo treatment was reduced by 1.92 and 1.81 points without significant difference in between (p = 0.676). Although the proportion of patients with ARs was higher under dronabinol compared to placebo (50.0 vs. 25.9%), it decreased during long-term use of dronabinol (26%). No signs of drug abuse and only one possible case of dependency occurred. The trial results demonstrate that dronabinol is a safe long-term treatment option.