Development and Feasibility of Health Mechanics: A Self-Management Program for Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury

Approaches to self-management integration and influencing factors in everyday life after spinal cord injury: A qualitative narrative analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study explores how individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) integrate self-management (SM) into their everyday lives post-discharge from initial rehabilitation. It focuses on identifying the approaches they employ in balancing health tasks with personal and societal roles and the influencing factors.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews with 32 participants, recruited from four rehabilitation centers across Switzerland, three months post-rehabilitation. Data collection spanned from November 2022 to May 2024. We used thematic analysis to identify the challenges and strategies associated with SM integration.

RESULTS

Three factors were found to influence SM integration: mind and body dynamics, encompassing physical and emotional aspects; environmental and informational dynamics, including external support, accessible facilities, and availability of information; and society and perception dynamics, including social stigma and misconceptions. These factors shaped the different approaches individuals adopted to integrate SM: The compartmentalizing approach, where individuals focused on one aspect at a time; The mixing approach, where both health and other tasks were prioritized but adjusted; and The embedding approach, where there was equal prioritization with no adjustment on either side.

CONCLUSIONS

This study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of how to balance both medical and role management in SCI post-discharge. Self-management integration is achieved through different approaches and influenced by a wide range of factors, internal and external ones. Further research should longitudinally explore whether the approach one individual employs changes with the time and what aspects reinforce one or the other.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Our findings highlight the need for flexible, personalized SM interventions that are contextually grounded but also adaptive and resilient. Rehabilitation settings should assess different SM integration approaches, using feedback to guide individuals in refining their strategies. Communication guidelines and tailored education sessions are recommended to help align SM practices with patients' evolving goals, including family, social, and leisure priorities.

Evaluating a pilot community-based self-management program for adults with spinal cord injury

Objective: To evaluate outcomes and perceptions of participating in a pilot spinal cord injury (SCI) specific community-based self-management program.Design: A program evaluation conducted through the review of retrospective data.Setting: An outpatient vocational rehabilitation service in Singapore.Participants: Adults with SCI who completed a self-management intervention.Intervention: A self-management educational program was delivered by healthcare professionals with involvement of peer mentors. Up to six self-selected topics were covered using a multi-modal teaching approach.Outcome Measures: Retrospective data collected at baseline, post-intervention, and three-month follow-up were analyzed. Outcome measures included the University of Washington Self-Efficacy scale (UW-SES), SCI Secondary Conditions Scale (SCI-SCS), Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ), and employment. Post-program survey findings were also reviewed.Results: Data from fifteen participants revealed positive changes over time for the UW-SES (η² = .27), SCI-SCS (η² = .21), and CIQ (η² = .23). Self-efficacy scores increased from baseline to post-intervention with a large effect size (Hedge's g = 0.89), and from baseline to follow-up with a medium effect size (Hedge's g = 0.50). Participants reported overall perceived benefit and satisfaction with the program's design and relevance. They valued access to useful information, effective instructional methods, program customization, and participant empowerment and affirmation. Suggestions for program refinement included: more peer support, psycho-emotional support, and continued program adaptability and accessibility.Conclusion: A SCI-specific community-based self-management program was associated with short-term improvements in self-efficacy and was well-received. Further research is required to determine its effectiveness, essential program features that promote successful outcomes, and cost-effectiveness of program implementation.

The Spinal Cord Injury Self-Management Program: A Pilot

People with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) experience a higher rate of secondary health conditions (SHCs) which affect their health and well-being. Self-management (SM) is a proven intervention approach, but formal programs may need to be tailored for the SCI population to reflect their needs and values. We sought to examine the feasibility and acceptability of the Spinal Cord Injury Self-Management (SCISM) Program and estimate its effect. A total of 32 individuals with SCI participated in the program. The primary outcomes were feasibility, acceptability, SHCs, and goal attainment. Participants were assessed at baseline, postintervention, and 3-month follow-up. Findings indicated that the SCISM Program was feasible and acceptable for use with moderate positive effects on SHCs and large positive effects in goal attainment. People with chronic SCI want to continue improving SM skills. The SCISM Program is feasible, acceptable, and should be examined further to reduce SHCs following SCI.

Mindfulness for health and wellbeing in adults with spinal cord injury: A scoping review

CONTEXT

Individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) require resources to prevent or self-manage complications in order to maintain optimum functioning and well-being. Rehabilitation literature suggests that mindfulness as an internal psychological resource can play a crucial role in promoting self-management and improving health and well-being.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to identify and synthesize existing evidence on the role of mindfulness and mindfulness-based interventions in health and well-being outcomes among adults with SCI.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review, searching evidence across four electronic databases, CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science, for articles published between 2000 and 2023. Additional articles were searched from the reference list of identified articles.

RESULTS

Of 354 articles identified in the search, 20 were included in the scoping review. Thirteen studies were interventional in design, while the other seven included cross-sectional and qualitative designs. Some interventional studies examined mindfulness as the major component of the interventions, whereas other studies integrated mindfulness as one component of the intervention program. Overall, mindfulness and mindfulness-based interventions were associated with a range of health and well-being outcomes among individuals with SCI.

CONCLUSIONS

Mindfulness and mindfulness-based interventions appear to positively impact health and well-being in adults with SCI. However, mindfulness interventions were inconsistent in terms of content, delivery frequency, and duration. It is essential to develop multifaceted, tailored mindfulness interventions utilizing a consumer-based approach and established theories of mindfulness and mindfulness-based practices for adults with SCI.

Self-management of pain and depression in adults with spinal cord injury: A scoping review

Context: Pain and depression are two prevalent secondary complications associated with spinal cord injury (SCI) that negatively impact health and well-being. Self-management strategies are growing in popularity for helping people with SCI to cope with their pain and depression. However, there is still a lack of research on which approaches are best suited for this population.Objective: The aim of this scoping review was to determine what is known about the self-management of pain and depression through the use of pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies in adults with SCI.Methods: Seven electronic databases were searched for articles published between January 1, 1990 and June 13, 2017. Grey literature was searched and additional articles were identified by manually searching the reference lists of included articles.Results: Overall, forty-two articles met the inclusion criteria; with the majority reporting on the self-management of pain, rather than on depression or on both complications. Non-pharmacological interventions were more likely to include self-management strategies than pharmacological interventions. A limited number of studies included all of the core self-management tasks and skills.Conclusions: There are significant knowledge gaps on effective self-management interventions for pain and depression post-SCI. There is a need to develop interventions that are multi-faceted, which include both pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies to address multimorbidity.

A Scoping Review of Self-Management Interventions Following Spinal Cord Injury

Objective: To conduct a scoping review to identify what components of self-management are embedded in self-management interventions for spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods: In accordance with the approach and stages outlined by Arksey and O'Malley (2005), a comprehensive literature search was conducted using five databases. Study characteristics were extracted from included articles, and intervention descriptions were coded using Practical Reviews in Self-Management Support (PRISMS) (Pearce et al, 2016), Barlow et al (2002), and Lorig and Holman's (2003) taxonomy. Results: A total of 112 studies were included representing 102 unique self-management programs. The majority of the programs took an individual approach (52.0%) as opposed to a group (27.4%) or mixed approach (17.6%). While most of the programs covered general information, some provided specific symptom management. Peers were the most common tutor delivering the program material. The most common Barlow components included symptom management (n = 44; 43.1%), information about condition/treatment (n = 34; 33.3%), and coping (n = 33; 32.4%). The most common PRISMS components were information about condition and management (n = 85; 83.3%), training/rehearsal for psychological strategies (n = 52; 51.0%), and lifestyle advice and support (n = 52; 51.0%). The most common Lorig components were taking action (n = 62; 60.8%), resource utilization (n = 57; 55.9%), and self-tailoring (n = 55; 53.9%). Conclusion: Applying self-management concepts to complex conditions such as SCI is only in the earliest stages of development. Despite having studied the topic from a broad perspective, this review reflects an ongoing program of research that links to an initiative to continue refining and testing self-management interventions in SCI.