Validity and Reliability of the Videoconference-Based Berg Balance Scale in Stroke Survivors: The Tele-Berg Balance Scale

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Telerehabilitation represents an alternative for individuals who have difficulty accessing services to receive care. Therefore, telerehabilitation measures must be studied for their reliability and validity. This study evaluated the validity and reliability of the videoconference-based Berg Balance Scale assessment in stroke survivors.

METHODS

Thirty-one stroke survivors were assessed. Rater A conducted in-person and remote assessments via videoconferencing at 2 different times (test-retest), and rater B conducted an assessment using the second recording made remotely. The validity and agreement between the in-person and remote assessments were analyzed using the Pearson's correlation coefficient and the Bland-Altman plots limits of agreement (LoA), respectively. Test-retest and inter-rater reliability were analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI), and individual item reliability was assessed by weighted Kappa. The standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change were computed. Cronbach's alpha was used for the analysis of internal consistency, and the ceiling effect was investigated.

RESULTS

In-person and remote assessments showed a strong positive correlation ( r = 0.96) and less than a 1-point difference between the 2 assessments. Both the test-retest (ICC = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.98) and inter-rater (ICC = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87-0.97) reliability were excellent. The standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change were 1.8 and 5.1 points, respectively. Results showed adequate internal consistency and no ceiling effect.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

The Tele-Berg demonstrated validity, excellent test-retest and inter-rater reliability, low measurement error, adequate internal consistency, and lack of ceiling effect. These findings suggest that the Tele-Berg is comparable to in-person Berg Balance Scale in stroke survivors.

Video abstract available for more insights from the authors (see Supplemental Digital Content, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A509 ).

Assessment of the psychometric properties of the Frailty and Injuries: Cooperative Studies of Intervention Techniques - 4 in people with stroke

BACKGROUND

The Frailty and Injuries: Cooperative Studies of Intervention Techniques - 4 (FICSIT-4) is a measure that assesses standing balance ability. However, the psychometric properties of the FICSIT-4 have not been examined in people with stroke.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the psychometric properties of the FICSIT-4, including its internal consistency, test - retest reliability, concurrent validity, and known-group validity, and identify the cutoff score on the FICSIT-4 that discriminates people with stroke from healthy older people.

METHODS

Sixty-two participants with stroke and 49 age-matched healthy controls were recruited. The FICSIT-4 was administered twice, on days 1 and 2, with a 1-week interval, to the participants with stroke to examine test - retest reliability. Various health-related measures were also administered to the stroke participants on day 1. The FICISIT-4 was only administered once, on day 1, to the healthy participants.

RESULTS

The FICIST-4 was found to exhibit fair internal consistency, good test - retest reliability and significant correlations with various health-related outcome measures. It also demonstrated known-group validity, and a score of 25 was found to distinguish people with stroke from healthy older people.

CONCLUSION

The FICISIT-4 is a reliable and valid measure for assessing the standing balance ability of people with stroke.

Computerized Adaptive Testing for the Berg Balance Scale Improves Measurement Efficiency Without Compromising Precision in People With Stroke

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were to confirm the Berg Balance Scale's (BBS) measurement properties and unidimensionality with an item response theory analysis in persons with subacute and chronic stroke and to examine the precision and efficiency of computerized adaptive testing (CAT).

METHODS

Data were obtained from 519 ambulatory persons with subacute and chronic stroke in 2 retrospective databases. A principal component analysis (PCA) of residuals was used to evaluate unidimensionality. BBS fit to a rating scale model versus a partial credit model was examined, and item parameters were generated for CAT calibration. Person measures from all 14 items were defined as actual balance ability. BBS CAT simulations were used to examine changes in measurement precision with increasing number of items administered and a precision-based stopping rule (0.5 logit standard error [SE] threshold).

RESULTS

A PCA of residuals supports the BBS unidimensionality and Rasch analysis supports using the rating scale model for measurement. Maximum precision for BBS CAT was SE = 0.40 logits when administering all items. BBS CAT estimated balance ability was highly correlated with actual ability when 4 or more items were administered (r > 0.9). Precision was within 0.5 logits when 5 or more items were administered (SE < 0.48 logits). BBS CAT estimated balance ability was highly correlated with actual ability (r = 0.952) using a precision-based stopping rule. The average number of items administered with the precision-based stopping rule was 5.43.

CONCLUSION

The BBS is sufficiently unidimensional, and the rating scale model can be used for measurement. BBS CAT is efficient and replicates the full instrument's reliability when measuring balance ability in ambulatory persons with subacute and chronic stroke. Future work should aim to enhance the interpretability of measures to facilitate clinical decision-making.

IMPACT

BBS CAT provides an efficient way of measuring balance ability for individuals in stroke rehabilitation giving clinicians more time with patients.

Item distribution of the Berg Balance Scale in older adults with Hip fracture: a Rasch analysis

INTRODUCTION

Balance impairment occurs after a hip fracture, but the characteristics of the impairment are not clear.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the uni-dimensionality, fit statistics, and item difficulty of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) in older adults with hip fracture by conducting a Rasch analysis.

METHODS

This was an observational cross-sectional study. The 254 participants were all ≥ 65 years old and had been hospitalized for rehabilitation after a unilateral hip fracture incurred during a fall. We collected their BBS scores at the time of hospital discharge and conducted a Rasch analysis to examine the uni-dimensionality, fit statistics, and item difficulty.

RESULTS

The principal component analysis (PCA) of the Rasch model demonstrated that the BBS is uni-dimensional. The information-weighted mean square (MnSq) fit statistic was within the range of fit criteria for all items. The underfit item of the outlier-sensitive MnSq fit statistics was "Standing unsupported eyes closed" with the MnSq of 2.06. The difficult items were in order of logits: "Standing on one leg" (logits = 4.01); "Step tool" (logits = 2.74); and "Turn 360°" (logits = 2.61).

CONCLUSION

The BBS is uni-dimensional and conforms with the Rasch model. The BBS most difficult items for older adults with a hip fracture required one-legged support and dynamic balance.

The Functional Balance Ability Measure: A Measure of Balance Across the Spectrum of Functional Mobility in Persons Post-Stroke

Objective

To determine whether the measurement properties of an instrument that combines items from the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and the Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) called the Functional Balance Ability Measure (FBAM) supports measuring balance across the functional mobility spectrum.

Design

Retrospective cohort.

Setting

Item-level data were from an archival research database.

Participants

Ambulatory individuals (N=93, BBS=50 [29-56], FGA=16 [0-30], Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Lower Extremities=27 [14-34], self-selected walking speed=0.4±0.2 m/s, mean age ± SD, 61.7±11.3y; 30.1% female) with chronic stroke (≥6 months).

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Unidimensionality was evaluated with a principal components analysis (PCA) of residuals. FBAM rating-scale characteristics, item hierarchy, item and person fit, and person separation were investigated using the Andrich Rating Scale Model.

Results

PCA findings indicate the FBAM is sufficiently unidimensional. Rating scale structure was appropriate without modifying the original BBS and FGA scoring systems. Item hierarchy aligned with clinical and theoretical predictions (hardest item: FGA-gait with narrow base of support, easiest item: BBS-sitting unsupported). One item (BBS-standing on 1 foot) misfit, however, removal marginally affected person measures and model statistics. The FBAM demonstrated high person reliability (0.9) and 6 people (∼6%) misfit the expected response pattern. The FBAM separated participants into 4 statistically distinct strata, without a floor or ceiling effect.

Conclusions

The FBAM is a unidimensional measure for balance ability across a continuum of functional tasks. Rating-scale characteristics, item hierarchy, item and person fit, and person separation support the FBAM's measurement properties in persons with chronic stroke. Future work should investigate measurement with fewer items and whether the FBAM addresses barriers to adoption of standardized balance measures in clinical practice.

When 'good' is not good enough: a retrospective Rasch analysis study of the Berg Balance Scale for persons with Multiple Sclerosis

Background

The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) is one of the most used tools to quantify balance in Persons with Multiple Sclerosis, a population at high risk of falling.

Aim

To evaluate the measurement characteristics of the BBS in Multiple Sclerosis through Rasch analysis.

Design

Retrospective study.

Setting

Outpatients in three Italian Rehabilitation centers.

Population

Eight hundred and fourteen persons with Multiple Sclerosis able to stand independently for more than 3 s.

Methods

The sample (N = 1,220) was split into one validating (B1) and three confirmatory subsamples. Following the Rasch analysis performed on B1, the item estimates were exported and anchored to the three confirmatory subsamples. After obtaining the same final solution across all samples, we studied the convergent and discriminant validity of the final BBS-MS using the EDSS, the ABC scale, and the number of falls.

Results

The base analysis on the B1 subsample failed the monotonicity, local independence, and unidimensionality requirements and did not fit the Rasch model. After grouping locally dependent items, the BBS-MS fitted the model (χ²₈ = 23.8; p = 0.003) and satisfied all requirements for adequate internal construct validity (ICV). However, it was mistargeted to the sample, given the striking prevalence of higher scores (targeting index 1.922) with a distribution-independent Person Separation Index sufficient for individual measurements (0.962). The B1 item estimates were anchored to the confirmatory samples with confirmation of adequate fit (χ² = [19.0, 22.8], value of ps = [0.015, 0.004]) and satisfaction of all ICV requirements for all subsamples. The final BBS-MS directly correlated with the ABC scale (rho = 0.523) and inversely with EDSS (rho = -0.573). The BBS-MS estimates significantly differed across groups according to the pre-specified hypotheses (between the three EDSS groups, between the ABC cut-offs, distinguishing 'fallers' vs. 'non-fallers', and between the 'low' vs. 'moderate' vs. 'high' levels of physical functioning; and, finally, between 'no falls' vs. 'one or more falls').

Conclusion

This study supports the internal construct validity and reliability of the BBS-MS in an Italian multicentre sample of persons with Multiple Sclerosis. However, as the scale is slightly mistargeted to the sample, it represents a candidate tool to assess balance, mainly in more disabled people with an advanced walking disability.

Shoulder-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Use in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: An Assessment of Reliability, Construct Validity, and Overall Appropriateness of Test Score Interpretation Using Rasch Analysis

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate the construct validity and overall appropriateness of test score interpretation of 4 shoulder-related patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures for use in a population of patients with head and neck cancer using Rasch analysis.

METHODS

One hundred eighty-two individuals who had received a neck dissection procedure within the past 2 weeks to 18 months were recruited for this cross-sectional psychometric study. Rasch methodologies were used to investigate scale dimensionality, scale hierarchy, response scale structure, and reliability of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), QuickDASH, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII).

RESULTS

DASH did not meet criteria for unidimensionality and was deemed inappropriate for use in this sample. The QuickDASH, SPADI, and NDII were all determined to be unidimensional. All scales had varying issues with person and item misfit, differential item functioning, coverage of ability levels, and optimal rating scale requirements. The NDII met most requirements. All measures were found to meet thresholds for person and item separation as well as reliability statistics.

CONCLUSIONS

Rasch analysis indicates the NDII is the most appropriate measure studied for this population. The QuickDASH and SPADI are recommended with reservation, whereas the DASH is not recommended.

IMPACT

This study demonstrates the use of objective methodologies, using Rasch analysis, to validate PRO recommendations provided by clinical experts in forums such as the Evaluation Database to Guide Effectiveness (EDGE) TaskForce, which are based upon a comprehensive literature review, consideration of published psychometric properties, and expert consensus. Use of Rasch methodologies demonstrates weaknesses in this model and provides opportunities to strengthen recommendations for clinicians.

Applying the Knowledge-to-Action Framework to Implement Gait and Balance Assessments in Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation

OBJECTIVES

The overall objectives of this project were to implement and sustain use of a gait assessment battery (GAB) that included the Berg Balance Scale, 10-meter walk test, and 6-minute walk test during inpatient stroke rehabilitation. The study objective was to assess the effect of the study intervention on clinician adherence to the recommendations and its effect on clinician perceptions and the organization.

DESIGN

Pre- and post-training intervention study.

SETTING

Subacute inpatient rehabilitation facility.

PARTICIPANTS

Physical therapists (N=6) and physical therapist assistants (N=2).

INTERVENTION

The intervention comprised a bundle of activities, including codeveloping and executing the plan with clinicians and leaders. The multicomponent implementation plan was based on the Knowledge-to-Action Framework and included implementation facilitation, implementation leadership, and a bundle of knowledge translation interventions that targeted barriers. Implementation was an iterative process in which results from one implementation phase informed planning of the next phase.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinician administration adherence, surveys of perceptions, and organizational outcomes.

RESULTS

Initial adherence to the GAB was 46% and increased to more than 85% after 6 months. These adherence levels remained consistent 48 months after implementation. Clinician perceptions of measure use were initially high (>63%), with significant improvements in knowledge and use of one measure after implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

We successfully implemented the assessment battery with high levels of adherence to recommendations, likely because of using the bundle of knowledge translation activities, facilitation, and use of a framework to codevelop the plan. These changes in practice were sustainable, as determined by a 4-year follow-up.

Efficacy of the Nintendo Wii combination with Conventional Exercises in the rehabilitation of individuals with Parkinson's disease: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Studies have demonstrated that the combination of Nintendo Wii (NW) with Conventional Exercises (CE) was effective in the rehabilitation of patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD), but there are no studies comparing the effects of this combination on both techniques isolated.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate if the effects of the combination of NW to CE are superior to isolated techniques in the rehabilitation of balance, gait, functional mobility and improvement of the quality of life of individuals with PD.

METHODS

45 patients with PD were divided into three groups, NW alone, CE alone and NW plus EC. The sessions occurred for 50 minutes, twice a week and evaluations administered before and after the 2-month intervention.

RESULTS

Significant differences were found in the pre and post intervention analyzes of all the outcomes in the three groups, but there was no difference between the groups. The effect size was evaluated, in which the NW plus CE group had a greater magnitude of the therapeutic effect.

CONCLUSION

The NW plus CE was statistically as effective as each intervention alone in the rehabilitation of patients with PD, however, the use of this combination provided a magnitude of the therapeutic effect superior to the other groups.

Post-stroke Visual Gait Measure for Developing Countries: A Reliability and Validity Study

Background

Visual gait assessment is a cost-effective clinical method to assess post-stroke gait deviations. The Rivermead Visual Gait Assessment (RVGA) is a one such measure that assesses the kinematic aspect of the gait deviations in stroke. However, the available information on psycho-clinocometric properties of the measure is not adequate.

Objective

To establish reliability and validity of RVGA using walking-videos of the post-stroke subjects.

Methods

Design: Observational study.

Setting

A rehabilitation institute Participants: A convenience sample of 40 chronic stroke patients.

Outcome Measures

RVGA, Fugl-Meyer assessment (lower extremity), 10-m walk test, Time up and go test, and Berg balance scale (BBS).

Procedure

Walking was video-taped from the anterior aspect, posterior aspect, affected side, and less-affected side. After coding the tapes, a research staff member provided them to four different raters in a random order. Each rater scored the coded video on the RVGA data collection sheet twice: one at the baseline and another after 1 month to eliminate any recollection of the initial assessment.

Results

The findings exhibit that there was good-to-excellent agreement between the scores of the raters and also between the assessments (correlation coefficient = 0.94 to 0.95; P < 0.001). The measure also exhibits acceptable validity when correlated with scores of BBS (r = 0.4; P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Video-based RVGA is a reliable and valid tool to assess gait-related impairment in post-stroke hemiparesis. This cost-effective measure may be incorporated in the clinical and research practice to discern and quantify complex phenomenon of the gait deviation. RVGA may be considered as a useful tool, especially in developing countries where expensive gait analyzer is usually not available.

Structural validity of Balance Evaluation Systems Test assessed using factor and Rasch analyses in patients with stroke

[Purpose] The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) is a comprehensive assessment tool, although it is not confined for use in stroke patients. This study aimed to determine the structural validity of the BESTest in self-ambulatory patients with stroke using both factor and Rasch analyses. [Participants and Methods] This retrospective study included 140 self-ambulatory patients with stroke. The structural validity of the BESTest was analyzed according to principal component, exploratory factor, Rasch, confirmatory factor, and correlation analyses. [Results] The analytical results supported a four-factor model comprising 25 items. The four factors included dynamic postural control with gait, static postural control, stepping reaction, and stability limits in sitting. Evidence of high structural validity and reliable internal consistency suggested that the 25-item BESTest is valid and reliable. Each factor was significantly correlated with lower extremity motor function and walking ability. [Conclusion] Eleven items in the BESTest were poorly correlated, and the remaining 25 items were grouped into four factors that demonstrated good structural validity for patients with stroke. Further studies should validate the applicability of the 25-item BESTest four-factor model in a larger sample of patients with stroke in a clinical setting.

Effect of Leg Selection on the Berg Balance Scale Scores of Hemiparetic Stroke Survivors: A Cross-Sectional Study

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether selection of the nonparetic or paretic leg as the weight-bearing leg in item 13 (standing unsupported one foot in front) and item 14 (standing on one leg) of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) influences the item scores, and thus the total score.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

University-based rehabilitation laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

Community-dwelling people (N=63, aged ≥50y) with chronic stroke.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

BBS.

RESULTS

The 4 BBS total scores ranged from 48.4 to 50.7. The total score was significantly lower when a participant was asked to step forward with the nonparetic leg in item 13, and stand on the paretic leg in item 14. Fewer participants received a maximum score with the BBS1 formulation than the others. In addition, the correlations with walking speed and Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale scores were greatest with the BBS1 score.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that BBS1 was the most challenging formulation for our participants; this might serve to minimize the ceiling effect of the BBS. These findings provide a rationale for amending the BBS administration guidelines with the BBS1 formulation.

Effects of dynamic stepping training on nonlocomotor tasks in individuals poststroke

BACKGROUND

During the physical rehabilitation of individuals poststroke, therapists are challenged to provide sufficient amounts of task-specific practice in order to maximize outcomes of multiple functional skills within limited visits. Basic and applied studies have suggested that training of one motor task may affect performance of biomechanically separate tasks that utilize overlapping neural circuits. However, few studies have explicitly investigated the impact of training one functional task on separate, nonpracticed tasks.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this preliminary study was to investigate the potential gains in specific nonlocomotor assessments in individuals poststroke following only stepping training of variable, challenging tasks at high aerobic intensities.

METHODS

Individuals with locomotor deficits following subacute and chronic stroke (n=22) completed a locomotor training paradigm using a repeated-measures design. Practice of multiple stepping tasks was provided in variable environments or contexts at high aerobic intensities for ≥40 sessions over 10 weeks. The primary outcome was timed Five-Times Sit-to-Stand Test (5XSTS) performance, with secondary measures of sit-to-stand kinematics and kinetics, clinical assessment of balance, and isometric lower limb strength.

RESULTS

Participants improved their timed 5XSTS performance following stepping training, with changes in selected biomechanical measures. Statistical and clinically meaningful improvements in balance were observed, with more modest changes in paretic leg strength.

CONCLUSIONS

The present data suggest that significant gains in selected nonlocomotor tasks can be achieved with high-intensity, variable stepping training. Improvements in nonpracticed tasks may minimize the need to practice multiple tasks within and across treatment sessions.

Group fitness activities for the elderly: an innovative approach to reduce falls and injuries

AIM

The aim of this study was to examine the opportunity to adopt, for the elderly, already validated function ability tests to better understand how to prevent falls and injuries and to better plan group fitness activities like ballroom dance classes (e.g., Valzer, Polka, Mazurka).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted. The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and the Barthel Index (BI) were administered and the occurrence of falls during the previous 2 years was evaluated by anamnesis. One hundred and twenty-two elderly subjects living in Palermo city participated to the study. According to the anamnesis, subjects were divided into two groups: experimental group (EG) and control group (CG). The EG consisted of 75 subjects attending classes of ballroom dancing (73.0 ± 5.6 years 26.1 ± 3.9 BMI), while the CG included 47 volunteers (74.3 ± 5.4 years, 26.8 ± 4.4 BMI). A threshold of 70 % for both scales (BBS-70 and BI-70 %) was set, according to the aims of the study. STATISTICA software was adopted to perform an unpaired t test. A P value lower than 0.05 was considered to be statistically relevant.

RESULTS

The BI and BBS of CG were 76.7 ± 33.08 and 30.9 ± 14.9, respectively, while the BI and BBS of EG were 98.1 ± 6.9 and 50.5 ± 54. In EG the BBS-70 % showed 96.0 % of cases compared to 27.6 % of the CG. The BI showed a similar trend to BBS. In EG the BI-70 % showed 98.6 % of cases, while the BI-70 % of CG showed 70.2 % of cases. Moreover, only 36.0 % of EG reported falls previously, while CG reported 53.2 % of falls during the same period of time.

CONCLUSION

The BBS seems to be a valid and reliable tool able to be adopted also by professionals of the ballroom dancing sector (e.g., Valzer, Polka and Mazurka classes). Instructors may evaluate the functional ability of their attendees through BBS to easily obtain more information and better plan ballroom dance classes. Moreover, we highlight that these conclusions need to be supported by other studies with different cohorts and a larger population scale.