1
|
Wang W, Xu X, Zhou Z, Dong X, Tian T. A joint method to assess pollution status and source-specific human health risks of potential toxic elements in soils. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT 2022; 194:685. [PMID: 35982329 DOI: 10.1007/s10661-022-10353-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Potential toxic elements (PTEs) in soils follow various exposure pathways (e.g., ingestion, dermal contact, and inhalation) when migrating to the human body, and can threaten human health. The objective of this study was to quantitatively evaluate the pollution status and human health risk for different age groups (i.e., children and adults) caused by source-specific PTEs in the soil. A total of 425 topsoil samples (0-20 cm) were collected in the Zhangqiu District of China, and contents of eight PTEs (As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb, and Zn) were analyzed simultaneously. The PTE sources were identified using a geostatistical method, and positive matrix factorization was used to apportion the contribution rate of each PTE source for human health risk of different age groups based on a health risk assessment model. Results showed that: (1) As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb, and Zn contents all exceeded the background values in soil, indicating that there had been a slight enrichment of soil PTEs over time; (2) Cr and Ni were derived from natural sources, while Cd, Cu, and Zn were derived from transportation sources; industrial emissions and coal burning intensified pollution from Hg, Pb, and As in soils, as shown in the average contribution percentages of natural sources (24.36%), transportation sources (33.79%), and industrial sources (41.85%); (3) the non-carcinogenic risk caused by soil PTEs did not endanger human health, but the carcinogenic risk was close to the risk threshold, and should be given attention; the largest carcinogenic risk (36.53%) and non-carcinogenic risk (36.01%) for children were attributed to industrial sources, while the largest carcinogenic risk (34.98%) and non-carcinogenic risk (37.06%) for adults were attributed to transportation sources. The results presented in this study provide support for effectively preventing PTE health risks in different age groups from source-specific PTE pollution of the soil.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Wang
- College of Tourism, Resources and Environment, Zaozhuang University, Zaozhuang, China
| | - Xibo Xu
- College of Tourism, Resources and Environment, Zaozhuang University, Zaozhuang, China.
| | - Zhongke Zhou
- College of Tourism, Resources and Environment, Zaozhuang University, Zaozhuang, China
| | - Xiao Dong
- College of Tourism, Resources and Environment, Zaozhuang University, Zaozhuang, China
| | - Tong Tian
- School of Journalism and Communication, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xiao L, Zhou Y, Huang H, Liu YJ, Li K, Li MY, Tian Y, Wu F. Application of Geostatistical Analysis and Random Forest for Source Analysis and Human Health Risk Assessment of Potentially Toxic Elements (PTEs) in Arable Land Soil. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17249296. [PMID: 33322666 PMCID: PMC7763655 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17249296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2020] [Revised: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Arable land soil is one of the most precious natural resources of Earth, it provides the fundamental material and numerous resources essential for the development of human society. To determine the pollution of potential toxic factors in the surface soil of cultivated land and its risks to human health, concentrations of five different potentially toxic elements (PTEs) were detected in 1109 soil samples collected in Xiangzhou, China, in 2019. In this study, health risk assessment was used to judge the degree of pollution in the study area, the result of Geographic Information System (GIS) was as used to research the spatial distribution characteristics of PTEs, and random forest (RF) was used to assess the natural and man-made influencing factors. We investigated the sources of PTEs through quantifying the indicators, which gave further insights. The main results are: (1) In arable land soil, the average content of PTEs is 0.14 mg/kg cadmium (Cd), 0.05 mg/kg mercury (Hg), 12.89 mg/kg arsenic (As), 29.23 mg/kg lead (Pb), and 78.58 mg/kg chromium (Cr), respectively. The content of As and Pb outpaced the background value of Hubei soil. (2) The human health risk assessment in Xiangzhou indicates that the most important exposure pathway is soil ingestion, occupied about 99% to health risks of PTEs; non-carcinogenic risk from exposure to As, Pb and Cr in soil was higher than the limit (overall potential risk index, HI > 1) for both children and adults. Moreover, carcinogenic risk postured by Cd, Cr, and As was higher than the limit (10-4) through soil exposure for both children and adults, indicating that Cd, As, Pb and Cr in soil have significant effect on people's health through exposure. (3) We found that the increased PTEs in the arable land soil mainly originated from potential water sources, air and soil pollution sources, breeding farms, and mining areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yong Zhou
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +86-1380-716-1786
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tian S, Wang S, Bai X, Zhou D, Luo G, Yang Y, Hu Z, Li C, Deng Y, Lu Q. Ecological security and health risk assessment of soil heavy metals on a village-level scale, based on different land use types. ENVIRONMENTAL GEOCHEMISTRY AND HEALTH 2020; 42:3393-3413. [PMID: 32342264 DOI: 10.1007/s10653-020-00583-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2019] [Accepted: 04/17/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Land use affects the accumulation of heavy metals in soil, which will endanger ecological safety and human health. Taking the village as an administrative unit, the ecological safety and health risks of heavy metals, namely, Cr, Cu, Zn, and Pb in soils in the Houzhai River Watershed of Guizhou Province, China, were evaluated based on land use types by the Hakanson potential ecological risk methods and human health risk model. Results showed that the spatial heterogeneity of Cu and Zn was greatly affected by primary structural factors, and Cr and Pb were interfered by both structural factors and human activities. The geo-accumulation index of the heavy metals showed a light pollution in the study area. The comprehensive potential ecological risk of heavy metal in the area was divided into three levels: slight, moderate, and intense, and it is spatially high in the northwest and low in the southeast. Both non-carcinogenic risk and carcinogenic risk of the heavy metals to the human body are not significant and are acceptable. The risks of children are higher than adults, and direct intake is the primary route of exposure in the area. The potential ecological risk and human health risk of soil heavy metals are relatively obviously affected by digital elevation data and normalized vegetation index. The study has certain reference value for the prevention and control of regional soil heavy metal risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiqi Tian
- State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang, 550081, Guizhou Province, China
- School of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, 550001, China
- Puding Karst Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Puding, 562100, Guizhou Province, China
| | - Shijie Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang, 550081, Guizhou Province, China
- Puding Karst Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Puding, 562100, Guizhou Province, China
| | - Xiaoyong Bai
- State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang, 550081, Guizhou Province, China.
- CAS Center for Excellence in Quaternary Science and Global Change, Xi'an, 710061, Shanxi Province, China.
- Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory of Geographic State Monitoring of Watershed, Guizhou Education University, Guiyang, 550018, China.
| | - Dequan Zhou
- School of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, 550001, China
| | - Guangjie Luo
- Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory of Geographic State Monitoring of Watershed, Guizhou Education University, Guiyang, 550018, China
| | - Yujie Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang, 550081, Guizhou Province, China
- School of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, 550001, China
- Puding Karst Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Puding, 562100, Guizhou Province, China
| | - Zeyin Hu
- State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang, 550081, Guizhou Province, China
- Puding Karst Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Puding, 562100, Guizhou Province, China
| | - Chaojun Li
- State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang, 550081, Guizhou Province, China
- School of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, 550001, China
- Puding Karst Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Puding, 562100, Guizhou Province, China
| | - Yuanhong Deng
- State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang, 550081, Guizhou Province, China
- Puding Karst Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Puding, 562100, Guizhou Province, China
| | - Qian Lu
- State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang, 550081, Guizhou Province, China
- Puding Karst Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Puding, 562100, Guizhou Province, China
| |
Collapse
|