Adjuvant ketamine analgesia for the management of cancer pain

Ketamine, as adjuvant analgesics for patients with refractory cancer pain, does affect IL-2/IFN-γ expression of T cells in vitro?: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study

BACKGROUND

Ketamine has been used as an analgesic adjuvant with morphine in the treatment of refractory cancer pain recently. But both morphine and ketamine have been reported to produce a number of immunomodulatory effects. The current study was performed to assess whether the concentration of ketamine, as adjuvant analgesics for patient with refractory cancer pain, was related to its effect on T cells interleukin-2 (IL-2)/interferon-γ (IFN-γ) expression in vitro.

METHODS

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from venous blood of patients with refractory cancer pain over a Ficoll-Hypaque density gradient. T cells were isolated from by positive selection using anti-CD3 beads. T cells were then treated with vehicle (C group), morphine (200 ng/mL, M group), morphine (200 ng/mL), and different dose of ketamine (100, 200, 1000 ng/mL; MK1, MK5, MK10 group) for 24 hours before stimulation with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28. Then supernatant IL-2 and IFN-γ protein analysis, quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for IL-2 and IFN-γ were done.

RESULTS

There were no significant difference of supernatant IL-2 and IFN-γ among C group, M group, and MK1 group, but the mRNA of M group and MK1 group were decreased compared with C group (P < .05). Compared with C group, both of the supernatant protein and the mRNA of MK5 group and MK10 group were all significantly decreased (P < .01). Compared with M group, both of the supernatant protein and the mRNA of MK5 group and MK10 group were all decreased (P < .05), while supernatant IL-2 and the mRNA of MK10 group were significantly decreased (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, we confirmed that just as morphine, ketamine dose-dependently suppressed IL-2 and IFN-γ of activated T lymphocyte of patients with refractory cancer pain in vitro, but the inhibitory action of low dose ketamine could be neglected.

Efficacy and safety of oral ketamine for the relief of intractable chronic pain: A retrospective 5-year study of 51 patients

BACKGROUND

This work summarizes the efficiency, failures and adverse effects of oral administration of ketamine at home for intractable pain.

METHODS

This 5-year retrospective study involved testing ketamine by intravenous in-hospital administration, then a conversion to an oral route, or oral treatment directly administered at home. The daily intravenous dose was increased by steps of 0.5 mg/kg to attain an effective daily dose of 1.5-3.0 mg/kg. Pain was evaluated on a numeric scale from 0 to 10, and evidence of adverse effects was collected every day. The effective daily dose was delivered orally (three to four intakes). If effective, ketamine was continued for 3 months. Short infusions or direct oral treatment began with a 0.5-mg/kg dose, then the daily ketamine dose was increased in 15- to 20-mg increments.

RESULTS

Among 55 cases (51 patients, neuropathic pain 60%), the mean effective oral dose was 2 mg/kg. Ketamine was effective in 24 patients (44%, mean pain reduction 67 ± 17%), partially effective in 20% (mean pain reduction 30 ± 11%), with a mean opioid sparing of 63 ± 32%, and failure in 22%. Half of the patients experienced adverse effects, but only eight had to stop treatment. For patients with opioid therapy, failure of ketamine was less frequent (7% vs. 36%; p < 0.02), with fewer adverse effects (33% vs. 68%; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Pain was reduced or abolished in two-thirds of patients under ketamine therapy; ketamine was effective for patients taking opioids and resulted in few adverse effects.

Ketamine for treatment-resistant unipolar depression: current evidence

Currently available drugs for unipolar major depressive disorder (MDD), which target monoaminergic systems, have a delayed onset of action and significant limitations in efficacy. Antidepressants with primary pharmacological targets outside the monoamine system may offer the potential for more rapid activity with improved therapeutic benefit. The glutamate system has been scrutinized as a target for antidepressant drug discovery. The purpose of this article is to review emerging literature on the potential rapid-onset antidepressant properties of the glutamate NMDA receptor antagonist ketamine, an established anaesthetic agent. The pharmacology of ketamine and its enantiomer S-ketamine is reviewed, followed by examples of its clinical application in chronic, refractory pain conditions, which are commonly co-morbid with depression. The first generation of studies in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) reported the safety and acute efficacy of a single subanaesthetic dose (0.5 mg/kg) of intravenous ketamine. A second generation of ketamine studies is focused on testing alternate routes of drug delivery, identifying methods to prevent relapse following resolution of depressive symptoms and understanding the neural basis for the putative antidepressant actions of ketamine. In addition to traditional depression rating endpoints, ongoing research is examining the impact of ketamine on neurocognition. Although the first clinical report in MDD was published in 2000, there is a paucity of adequately controlled double-blind trials, and limited clinical experience outside of research settings. Given the potential risks of ketamine, safety considerations will ultimately determine whether this old drug is successfully repositioned as a new therapy for TRD.

Intra- and postoperative very low dose intravenous ketamine infusion does not increase pain relief after major spine surgery in patients with preoperative narcotic analgesic intake

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to demonstrate the analgesic efficacy and opioid-sparing effect of low dose ketamine in patients with preoperative narcotic intake undergoing major spine surgery.

DESIGN

The study used a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, and placebo-controlled clinical trial.

SETTINGS AND PATIENTS

We evaluated the analgesic efficacy and safety of low dose IV ketamine infusion after major spine surgery in patients with preoperative narcotic analgesic intake. Ketamine group received IV ketamine infusion (2 µg/kg/min) and saline group received saline intraoperatively and the first 24 hours postoperatively. In addition, all patients received IV patient-controlled hydromorphone and epidural bupivacaine.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Pain scores, narcotic requirement, and side effects were compared between the groups for 48 hours postoperatively.

RESULTS

Thirty patients completed the study (N = 15 in each group). No difference in pain scores at rest and movement was noted between the groups (P > 0.05). Patients in ketamine group received 40.42 ± 32.86 mg IV hydromorphone at 48 hours compared with 38.24 ± 26.19 mg in saline group (P = 0.84). Central nervous system side effects were observed in five (33%) ketamine group patients compared with nine (60%) in saline group (P = 0.29).

CONCLUSION

The addition of IV very low dose ketamine infusion regimen did not improve postoperative analgesia. Side effects were not increased with low dose ketamine.

Review article: palliative care in gynecologic oncology

Patients with advanced gynecologic malignancies have a multitude of symptoms; pain, nausea, and vomiting, constipation, anorexia, diarrhea, dyspnea, as well as symptoms resulting from intestinal obstruction, hypercalcemia, ascites, and/or ureteral obstruction. Pain is best addressed through a multimodal approach. The optimum palliative management of end-stage malignant intestinal obstruction remains controversial, with no clear guidelines governing the choice of surgical versus medical management. Patient selection for palliative surgery, therefore, should be highly individualized because only carefully selected candidates may derive real benefit from such surgeries. There remains a real need for more emphasis on palliative care education in training programs.

Pharmacological evaluation of morphine and non-opioid analgesic adjuvants in a mouse model of skin cancer pain

Using a mouse model of advanced skin cancer which has mixed nociceptive-neuropathic pain, we evaluated the analgesic effects of morphine and analgesic adjuvants. Morphine hydrochloride (10--30 mg/kg, oral) and mexiletine hydrochloride (10--30 mg/kg, intraperitoneal) dose-dependently inhibited thermal hyperalgesia. Baclofen (10 mg/kg, subcutaneous) suppressed thermal hyperalgesia, without effects at lower doses of 1 and 5 mg/kg. Ketamine hydrochloride (50 mg/kg, oral) was without effect. Analgesic tolerance was observed after 6th administration of morphine, and it was not developed until at least 7th administration of mexiletine and baclofen. This mouse model of skin cancer may be useful for the pharmacological evaluation of the effects of opioids and analgesic adjuvants on mixed nociceptive-neuropathic pain of advanced cancer.

Beneficial Effect of Low-Dose Ketamine Addition to Epidural Administration of Morphine–Bupivacaine Mixture for Cancer Pain in Two Cases

Two patients experiencing cancer pain with neuropathic components were treated with epidural administration of a mixture of ketamine (1 mg/mL) + morphine (1 mg/mL) + bupivacaine (1 mg/mL) injected daily by epidural port. No serious adverse effect was observed throughout the therapy. The patients were mostly pain-free and have gotten better quality of life during 110- and 48-day follow-up when the therapy was given by epidural route. Low doses of epidural ketamine added to morphine and bupivacaine increase the mean duration of satisfactory analgesia without severe adverse effects and restore quality of life when traditional therapy fails.

Long-term intrathecal S(+)-ketamine in a patient with cancer-related neuropathic pain

Neuropathic pain sometimes needs invasive pain therapy. We present the case of a patient with cancer-related neuropathic pain untreatable with conventional pain therapy after tumour-embolization. The patient was treated successfully with intrathecal (i.t.) administration of S(+)-ketamine, in addition to morphine. Plasma concentrations of S(+)-ketamine were measured regularly throughout the treatment. Continuous i.t. administration of S(+)-ketamine over a period of 3 months demonstrated low plasma levels and no unwanted side-effects.

Pain management in the wilderness and operational setting

The wilderness and operational setting places unique constraints on one's ability to treat pain. In this article we will discuss methods for treating pain both in the wilderness and operational setting. By operational we mean the austere deployed military setting, to include both noncombat and combat operations. The authors combined experience with wartime trauma pain management consists of experience in Operation "Just Cause" (Panama Invasion), Operation "Desert Storm" (Persian Gulf War), Operation "Uphold Democracy" (Haiti liberation), Operation "Enduring Freedom" (Afghanistan conflict), and Operation "Iraqi Freedom" (Iraq conflict).

Therapie extremer Tumorschmerzen mit Morphin und (S)-Ketamin

We are reporting on the case of an 11-year old girl with a malignant tumour. The extreme pain throughout the body could not be treated by conventional methods. By intravenous application of a morphine and s-ketamine mixture we were able to achieve a very effective analgesic result. Apart from the opiate effect of the morphine the decisive factor was the NMDA-antagonism of the s-ketamine. The latter suppresses central sensitisation and chronic pain and reduces or even prevents the development of opioid tolerance. It was possible to use smaller opiate doses more effectively, thus reducing the side effects of the pain therapy. Under associated whole-body thermochemotherapy the girl experienced general pain relief and we were able to return to conventional therapy with a fentanyl plaster.

Ketamine as Adjuvant Analgesic to Opioids: A Quantitative and Qualitative Systematic Review

Animal studies on ketamine and opioid tolerance have shown promising results. Clinical trials have been contradictory. We performed a systematic review of randomized, double-blind clinical trials of ketamine added to opioid analgesia. Thirty-seven trials with 51 treatment arms and 2385 patients were included. Studies were divided into 5 subgroups: IV ketamine as single dose (n = 11), continuous infusion (n = 11), patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) (n = 6), epidural ketamine with opioids (n = 8), and studies in children (n = 4). Outcome measures included pain scores, time to first request for analgesia, supplemental analgesics, and adverse events. Efficacy was estimated by statistical significance (P < 0.05) of outcome measures as reported in studies and also by calculation of weighted mean difference for pain scores during the first 24 h after surgery. As compared to morphine alone, IV PCA with ketamine and morphine did not improve analgesia. Intravenous infusion of ketamine decreased IV and epidural opioid requirements in 6 of 11 studies. A single bolus dose of ketamine decreased opioid requirements in 7 of 11 studies. Five of 8 trials with epidural ketamine showed beneficial effects. Adverse effects were not increased with small dose ketamine. We conclude that small dose ketamine is a safe and useful adjuvant to standard practice opioid-analgesia.