Psoriasiform eruption induced by infliximab

Pathophysiology and Treatment of Psoriasis: From Clinical Practice to Basic Research

Psoriasis, a chronic inflammatory dermatosis, represents a significant clinical challenge due to its complex pathogenesis and the limitations of existing therapeutic strategies. Current psoriasis diagnoses are primarily clinician-dependent, with instrumental diagnostics serving as adjuncts. Ongoing research is progressively deciphering its molecular underpinnings; the future of psoriasis diagnostics may involve genetic and immunological profiling to pinpoint biomarkers, enabling more accurate and timely interventions. The administration of psoriasis medications, whether oral, injectable, or topical, is associated with a range of side effects and compliance issues. Topical medications, despite their advantages in patient compliance and reduced systemic side effects, are hindered by the altered skin barrier in psoriasis, which impedes effective drug penetration and retention. In recent years, the development of novel transdermal drug delivery systems represents a promising frontier in psoriasis management. Nanotechnology-, microneedle- and dressing-based systems have demonstrated the potential for improved skin penetration, enhanced bioavailability, or extended retention time. Here, we will focus on the latest insights into the etiology, diagnostic methodologies, and therapeutic approaches for psoriasis, with a particular emphasis on the evolution and challenges of novel transdermal drug delivery systems.

Paradoxical Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha (TNF-α) Inhibitor-Induced Psoriasis: A Systematic Review of Pathogenesis, Clinical Presentation, and Treatment

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors have been shown to be well tolerated among patients with rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, and psoriasis. Meanwhile, more recently, clinical practice and research efforts have uncovered increasing cases of psoriatic lesion development tied to initiating treatment with a TNF-α inhibitor. The underlying mechanisms associated with this occurrence have yet to be fully elucidated. A review and analysis of cases of paradoxical psoriasis currently published in the literature is warranted. In addition, exploring possible mechanisms of action and potential treatment options associated with favorable outcomes is much needed. A systematic literature review was performed utilizing PubMed and Google Scholar databases (1992-present), in which 106 cases of paradoxical psoriasis were reviewed. The most common morphology developed was plaque psoriasis vulgaris. There was a female predominance (61.3%), and the most common underlying autoimmune disease was rheumatoid arthritis (45.3%). In addition, the most commonly associated drug with the onset of psoriatic lesions was infliximab (62.3%). Furthermore, the findings suggest that the most well-supported mechanism of action involves the uncontrolled release of interferon-alpha (IFN-α) from plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) after TNF-α inhibition. While TNF-α inhibitors have been shown to have great benefits to patients with rheumatologic diseases, cases of paradoxical psoriasis demonstrate the importance of close monitoring of patients on TNF-α inhibitors to allow for early recognition, treatment, and potentially change to a different mechanism of action of the medication used to prevent further progression of the inflammatory lesions.

Pathogenesis of Paradoxical Reactions Associated with Targeted Biologic Agents for Inflammatory Skin Diseases

Targeted biologic agents have dramatically changed the therapeutic landscape for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, particularly in rheumatology and dermatology. Their introduction has resulted in a paradigm shift, i.e., they produce significant clinical improvements in most patients with such diseases. Nevertheless, a variety of adverse reactions associated with these agents have been observed, including so-called paradoxical reactions (PRs), which are a new class of adverse events. PRs involve the de novo development or worsening of immune-mediated inflammatory disease during treatment with a targeted biologic agent that is commonly used to treat the idiopathic counterpart of the drug-induced reaction. In addition, the efficacy of biologic agents targeting individual cytokines and the existence of PRs to them have provided proof that cytokines are key drivers of various immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and helped researchers elucidate the molecular pathways underlying the pathophysiology of these diseases. Here, a comprehensive review of the targeted biologic agents used to treat immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, particularly psoriasis and atopic dermatitis, is provided, with a specific focus on biologic agents that inhibit cytokine signaling involving tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin (IL)-12/23 (p40), IL-17A (and the IL-17 receptor [R]), IL-23 (p19), and the IL-4Rα, and their associated PRs. The characteristic clinical manifestations and potential immunological mechanisms of the PRs induced by these biologic agents are also reviewed.

Recalcitrant paradoxical pustular psoriasis induced by infliximab: Two case reports

BACKGROUND

Paradoxical psoriasis induced by tumor necrosis factor alpha antagonists is a rare side effect of those drugs and has similarities with and differences from classical psoriasis in clinical and pathological characteristics. Treating severe paradoxical psoriasis is challenging because the reported cases are rare, with treatment experience being only anecdotal.

CASE SUMMARY

We report 2 cases of paradoxical psoriasis caused by infliximab. Both cases manifested with a significant number of pustular lesions and had protracted and complicated clinical courses. In case 1, secukinumab alone could not control the eruptions, but colchicine supplementation markedly decreased disease activity. In case 2 miscellaneous medications were administered, including the systemic drug acitretin, the immunosuppressive drug cyclosporine, and the biologic agent ustekinumab. However, multiple applications of those medications failed to prevent new lesions from occurring. Both cases showed moderate-to-high anti-nuclear antibody titers.

CONCLUSION

Based on these cases, moderate-to-high anti-nuclear antibody titer seems to be a risk factor for paradoxical psoriasis. In addition, extensive pustular presentation may be a negative prognostic indicator and may portend a protracted clinical course refractory to therapy.

Current clinical issue of skin lesions in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with a number of extraintestinal complications, including skin lesions. Most reports have shown that skin lesions are found in 10-15% of IBD cases, although this depends on the definition of skin lesions. The representative skin lesions in patients with IBD are erythema nodosum, pyoderma gangrenosum, Sweet's syndrome, and so on. These lesions are often associated with IBD progression, and intestinal lesions in particular require appropriate treatment. Recently, another clinical issue regarding skin lesions in patients with IBD, a so-called paradoxical reaction, during the treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents has emerged. These reactions are termed paradoxical reactions because the skin lesions sometimes resemble psoriasis, although the anti-TNF-α agents have been historically used to treat psoriasis. Paradoxical reactions are reportedly found in approximately 5-10% of patients using anti-TNF-α agents and are no longer rare. Now that the use of biologics is at its culmination, reports regarding paradoxical reactions are predicted to increase in number; thus, we must recognize skin lesions with IBD patients including this type of adverse events and manage them appropriately while consulting with dermatologists.

A Review of Drugs that Induce or Exacerbate Psoriasis

Background

Psoriasis is a common disorder of the skin, immune system, and joints that is influenced by genetic and environmental factors. It can be aggravated or induced by drugs.

Objectives

To identify the major drugs implicated in inducing or exacerbating psoriasis and to discuss their characteristics.

Methods

We performed a PubMed literature search for reviews and case reports on drugs that exacerbate or induce psoriasis. Articles were screened by title and abstract and then examined for their findings and references.

Results

Drugs most often reported to exacerbate or induce psoriasis were β-blockers, lithium, synthetic antimalarials, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, interferons, tetracyclines, tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors, and steroid withdrawal.

Conclusions

Characterizing drugs that induce or exacerbate psoriasis by latency and type of psoriatic eruption can help guide clinical reasoning. Although a relatively uncommon occurrence, psoriatic lesions can be caused by drugs, allowing astute physicians to recognize and change their management plans accordingly.

Psoriasis and inflammatory bowel disease: links and risks

Psoriasis and the spectrum of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are chronic, inflammatory, organotropic conditions. The epidemiologic coexistence of these diseases is corroborated by findings at the level of disease, biogeography, and intrafamilial and intrapatient coincidence. The identification of shared susceptibility loci and DNA polymorphisms has confirmed this correlation at a genetic level. The pathogenesis of both diseases implicates the innate and adaptive segments of the immune system. Increased permeability of the epidermal barrier in skin and intestine underlies the augmented interaction of allergens and pathogens with inflammatory receptors of immune cells. The immune response between psoriasis and IBD is similar and comprises phagocytic, dendritic, and natural killer cell, along with a milieu of cytokines and antimicrobial peptides that stimulate T-cells. The interplay between dendritic cells and Th17 cells appears to be the core dysregulated immune pathway in all these conditions. The distinct similarities in the pathogenesis are also reflected in the wide overlapping of their therapeutic approaches. Small-molecule pharmacologic immunomodulators have been applied, and more recently, biologic treatments that target proinflammatory interleukins have been introduced or are currently being evaluated. However, the fact that some treatments are quite selective for either skin or gut conditions also highlights their crucial pathophysiologic differences. In the present review, a comprehensive comparison of risk factors, pathogenesis links, and therapeutic strategies for psoriasis and IBD is presented. Specific emphasis is placed on the role of the immune cell species and inflammatory mediators participating in the pathogenesis of these diseases.

Paradoxical psoriasiform reactions to anti-TNFα drugs are associated with genetic polymorphisms in patients with psoriasis

Paradoxical psoriasiform reactions to anti-tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) agents have been described. We aimed to study the association between these reactions and polymorphisms in genes previously associated with psoriasis or other autoimmune diseases. A total of 161 patients with plaque-type psoriasis treated with anti-TNFα drugs were genotyped for 173 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using the Illumina Veracode genotyping platform. Among the 161 patients, 25 patients developed a paradoxical psoriasiform reaction consisting of a change in morphology, mostly to guttate psoriasis (88%). These lesions developed 9.20±13.52 months after initiating treatment, mainly with etanercept (72%). Psoriasis type and a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 response to treatment were not associated with lesions. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that five SNPs (rs11209026 in IL23R, rs10782001 in FBXL19, rs3087243 in CTLA4, rs651630 in SLC12A8 and rs1800453 in TAP1) were associated with paradoxical reactions. This is the first study to show an association between genetic polymorphisms and paradoxical reactions in patients with psoriasis treated with anti-TNFα drugs.The Pharmacogenomics Journal advance online publication, 21 July 2015; doi:10.1038/tpj.2015.53.

Biologics in dermatology: adverse effects

Biologics are a group of drugs that precisely affect certain specific steps in the immune response and are an extremely useful group when used in an appropriate setting. However, their use can often be a double-edged sword. Careful patient selection and thorough knowledge of adverse effects is a key to their successful use in various disorders. The initial enthusiasm has gradually given way to a more cautious approach wherein a balance is sought between clinical usefulness and expected side effects. The adverse effects of the biologics most commonly used in dermatology have been carefully listed for ready reference. The plausible causes of the adverse reactions are succinctly outlined along with their incriminating factor(s). Besides, in brief, the attention has been focused on their management. The content should provide an essential didactic content for educating the practitioner.

Dermatological adverse reactions during anti-TNF treatments: focus on inflammatory bowel disease

The clinical introduction of tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors has deeply changed the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). It has demonstrated impressive efficacy as compared to alternative treatments, allowing for the chance to achieve near-remission and long-term improvement in function and quality of life and to alter the natural history of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). As a consequence of longer follow-up periods the number of side effects which may be attributed to treatment with biologics is growing significantly. Cutaneous reactions are among the most common adverse reactions. These complications include injection site reactions, cutaneous infections, immune-mediated complications such as psoriasis and lupus-like syndrome and rarely skin cancers. We review the recent literature and draw attention to dermatological side effects of anti-TNF therapy of inflammatory bowel disease.

Review article: dermatological complications of immunosuppressive and anti-TNF therapy in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

With the expanding list of medications available to treat patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), it is important to recognise adverse events, including those involving the skin. Dermatological adverse events may be confused with extra-intestinal manifestations of IBD.

AIM

To review drug-related dermatological manifestations associated with immunosuppressive and anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy.

METHODS

The literature was searched on PubMed for dermatological adverse events in IBD.

RESULTS

Present thiopurine exposure was associated with a 5.9-fold [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.1-16.4] increased risk of developing non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC). The peak incidence is highest in Caucasians over the age of 65 years with crude incidence rates of 4.0 and 5.7/1000 patient-years for present and previous use. In anti-TNF-exposed subjects, drug-induced lupus was reported in 1% of the cases and a psoriatic rash in up to 3% of the cases. Anti-TNF monotherapy increases the risk of NMSC ~2-fold to a rate of 0.5 cases per 1000 person-years. Cutaneous lymphomas have been rarely reported in subjects on thiopurine or anti-TNF drug monotherapy. Combination therapy seems to have an additive effect on the risk of developing NMSC and lymphoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians need to be aware of the wide spectrum of dermatological complications of immunosuppressive and anti-TNF therapy in IBD, especially psoriasis and non-melanoma skin cancer. Vigilance and regular screening for non-melanoma skin cancer is recommended. Case discussions between gastroenterologists and dermatologists should be undertaken to best manage dermatological adverse events.

Induction or exacerbation of psoriatic lesions during anti-TNF-α therapy for inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic literature review based on 222 cases

BACKGROUND

Paradoxical cases of psoriatic lesions induced or exacerbated by anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α therapy have been reported more frequently in recent years, but data related to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are rare. A systematic literature review was performed to provide information about this adverse effect in patients with IBD who receive anti-TNF therapy.

METHODS

Published studies were identified by a search of Medline, Embase, Cochrane, SciELO, and LILACS databases.

RESULTS

A total of 47 studies (222 patients) fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were selected for analysis. Clinical and therapeutic aspects varied considerably among these reports. Of the 222 patients, 78.38% were diagnosed with Crohn's disease, and 48.20% were female. The mean patient age was 26.50 years, and 70.72% of patients had no history of psoriasis. Patients developed psoriasiform lesions (55.86%) more often than other types of psoriatic lesions, and infliximab was the anti-TNF-α therapy that caused the cutaneous reaction in most patients (69.37%). Complete remission of cutaneous lesions was observed in 63.96% of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that psoriatic lesions occurred predominantly in adult patients with Crohn's disease who received infliximab and had no previous history of psoriasis. Most patients can be managed conservatively without discontinuing anti-TNF-α therapy.

Skin side effects of inflammatory bowel disease therapy

Skin manifestations are common in patients suffering from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and can be associated with the disease itself, with nutritional deficiencies, or with therapy. All drugs currently used for treating IBD have the potential to cause dermatologic manifestations that can have a wide range of clinical presentations, from mild drug eruptions to potentially life-threatening immune-mediated reactions. The wider use of thiopurines and anti-tumor necrosis factor in the past years has led to the recognition of 2 more skin complications of IBD therapy: the potentially disfiguring non-melanoma skin cancer associated with the current or past use of thiopurines and the paradoxical new onset or exacerbation of anti-tumor necrosis factor-associated psoriasis. Despite being rare, these complications can be severe and lead to therapy discontinuation, and therefore, gastroenterologists need to become familiar with their epidemiology, diagnosis, and management. Herein, we reviewed the skin side effects of IBD therapy, specially focusing in thiopurines and anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy and in the recently described skin cancer and psoriasis, and we tried to advance some practical algorithms that can provide some help to the clinicians dealing with these complications in their day-by-day practice.

Paradoxical inflammation induced by anti-TNF agents in patients with IBD

Anti-TNF antibodies have acquired a prominent place in the management of IBD (including Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis), rheumatologic conditions (such as rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis) and psoriasis. They have a good safety profile, especially when contraindications such as demyelinating disease, active infections and/or abscesses are ruled out, and when necessary precautions to prevent reactivation of tuberculosis are taken. However, with increasing use of these agents, paradoxical adverse events have been reported. Some of these features are shared with the underlying disease for which these drugs are given, making management of these conditions challenging. For example, anti-TNF therapy is used for the treatment of psoriasis, but psoriasiform lesions are sometimes observed in patients receiving therapy. Similarly, anti-TNF therapy is used for the treatment of rheumatologic diseases, but arthralgias and arthritis are sometimes observed in patients receiving anti-TNF agents. We review the paradoxical inflammation induced by anti-TNF agents in patients with IBD, provide hypotheses for the occurrence of this paradoxical inflammation and give practical advice on how to manage these patients.

Broad range of adverse cutaneous eruptions in patients on TNF-alpha antagonists

Biologic therapies targeting tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha have become a mainstay in the management of a number of autoimmune diseases. We report a series of adverse skin eruptions in six patients (four females, two males, age: 21-58 years, mean: 39) receiving 4 months to 10 years (mean 3.1 years) of anti-TNF-alpha therapies (infliximab, n = 4; adalimumab, n = 1 or etanercept, n = 1). The following drug-associated diagnoses were made in eight skin biopsies performed at Massachusetts General Hospital between 3/2007 and 10/2010: pustular folliculitis, psoriasis, interface dermatitis, neutrophilic eccrine hidradenitis, Sweet's syndrome, lupus, vasculitis and palmoplantar pustulosis. The descriptions of neutrophilic eccrine hidradenitis-like and Sweet's-like hypersensitivity eruptions induced by anti-TNF-alpha therapies are the first such cases described in the literature. Each cutaneous eruption improved or resolved with switching to a different TNF-alpha inhibitor, discontinuation of the anti-TNF-alpha agent, and/or topical or systemic steroids. There was a clear chronologic relationship with, and clinical remission upon withdrawal or steroid suppression of the anti-TNF-alpha agents. The mechanism for such diverse cutaneous eruptions among this class of medications remains poorly understood. The cutaneous adverse reaction profile of TNF-alpha inhibitors is broad and should be considered in the histopathologic differential in this clinical setting.

Infliximab-induced psoriasis during therapy for Crohn's disease

Although therapy with tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (anti-TNF) provides beneficial effects in different immune inflammatory disorders, paradoxical cases of anti-TNF-induced psoriasis have increasingly been reported, mostly in the setting of rheumatologic diseases. To date, less than 50 cases of infliximab-induced psoriasis in inflammatory bowel disease patients have been described. The present report was aimed at describing two new cases of infliximab-induced psoriasis during therapy for Crohn's disease and at carrying out a review on this intriguing phenomenon.

The onset of psoriasis during the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases with infliximab: should biological therapy be suspended?

CONTEXT

Several paradoxical cases of infliximab-induced or-exacerbated psoriatic lesions have been described in the recent years. There is disagreement regarding the need to discontinue infliximab in order to achieve the resolution of these adverse cutaneous reactions specifically in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the literature to collect information on IBD patients that showed this adverse cutaneous reaction, focusing mainly on the therapeutic approach.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed utilizing Medline, Embase, SciELO and Lilacs databases. Published studies were identified, reviewed and the data were extracted.

RESULTS

Thirty-four studies (69 IBD patients) met inclusion criteria for review. There was inconsistency in reporting of some clinical and therapeutic aspects. Most patients included had Crohn's disease (89.86%), was female (47.83%), had an average age of 27.11 years, and no reported history of psoriasis (84.05%). The patients developed primarily plaque-type psoriasis (40.58%). There was complete remission of psoriatic lesions in 86.96% of IBD patients, existing differences in the therapeutic approaches; cessation of infliximab therapy led to resolution in 47.83% of cases and 43.48% of patients were able to continue infliximab therapy.

CONCLUSION

As increasing numbers of IBD patients with psoriasis induced or exacerbated by infliximab, physicians should be aware of its clinical manifestations so that appropriate diagnosis and treatment are properly established. The decision whether to continue or discontinue infliximab should be individualized.

Worsening of Vitiligo and Onset of New Psoriasiform Dermatitis following Treatment with Infliximab

Background:

Vitiligo is a depigmentation disorder caused by melanocyte destruction that possibly results from an autoimmune mechanism. Psoriasis is an immune-mediated, chronic, inflammatory dermatosis. Although tumor necrosis factor α antagonists (anti-TNF-α), such as infliximab, are effective in treating psoriasis, many cases reported in the literature indicate that psoriasis might also be induced by treatment with infliximab. Some studies also suggest that TNF-α antagonists might be an effective treatment for vitiligo because the disorder is characterized by increased levels of TNF-α, indicating that it might play a role in the pathogenesis of this disease.

Objective:

We report a case of psoriasiform dermatitis with vacuolar interface reaction that occurred after infliximab therapy in a patient with vitiligo.

Method:

A 17-year-old male patient with vitiligo vulgaris was treated with an intravenous infusion of 5 mg/kg of infliximab at 0, 2, and 6 weeks and then once every 6 weeks over a span of 6 months. The patient was monitored both clinically and with laboratory investigations. He had no personal or family history of psoriasis. He tolerated the treatment well, without side effects. However, he developed a biopsy-proven psoriasiform lesion for the first time 4 months after he completed his sixth dose of infliximab. His vitiligo also worsened.

Conclusion:

This case report shows that infliximab given for vitiligo did not improve the disorder and that the vitiligo actually progressed. Moreover, psoriasiform lesions developed after this therapy. Further studies are needed to identify the effects of infliximab in patients with vitiligo.

Infliximab and adalimumab-induced psoriasis in Crohn's disease: a paradoxical side effect

Treatment with antitumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF-α) offers a significant improvement in several immune-based diseases, including Crohn's disease (CD) and psoriasis. Different cutaneous side effects have been described for anti-TNF-α therapy such as psoriasis. Previous reports showed that inhibition of TNF-α can induce over expression of cutaneous IFN-α, which in turn caused a predisposition to psoriasis. We report a 31-year-old woman with extensive CD and perianal lesions, without response to conventional treatment. She paradoxically developed a cutaneous eruption with psoriasiform morphology and distribution during treatment with both anti-TNF-α approved in Europe for CD, infliximab and adalimumab. These lesions cleared after topical application of corticosteroids and cessation of the anti-TNF-α treatment. Due to uneffectiveness of pharmacological treatment on disease, the patient had to undergo surgery. TNF-induced psoriasis in patients with CD is rare and has been previously documented with infliximab or adalimumab. The reason for this apparently paradoxical effect of the therapy is still unclear. This is the first case of psoriasis induced first by infliximab and later by adalimumab in the same CD patient. We would like to review and to draw attention about psoriasis as a cutaneous side effect with anti-TNF-α treatments.

A decade of infliximab: The Austrian evidence based consensus on the safe use of infliximab in inflammatory bowel disease

Infliximab (IFX) has tremendously enriched the therapy of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) and other immune mediated diseases. Although the efficacy of IFX was undoubtedly proven during the last decade numerous publications have also caused various safety concerns. To summarize the immense information concerning adverse events and safety issues the Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology launched this evidence based consensus on the safe use of IFX which covers the following topics: infusion reactions and immunogenicity, skin reactions, opportunistic infections (including tuberculosis), non-opportunistic infections (bacterial and viral), vaccination, neurological complications, hepatotoxicity, congestive heart failure, haematological side effects, intestinal strictures, stenosis and bowel obstruction (SSO), concomitant medication, malignancy and lymphoma, IFX in the elderly and the young, mortality, fertility, pregnancy and breast feeding. To make the vast amount of information practicable for routine application the consensus was finally condensed into a checklist for a safe use of IFX which consists of two parts: issues to be addressed prior to anti-TNF therapy and issues to be addressed during maintenance. Both parts are further divided into obligatory and facultative items.

Innovative management of severe hand dermatitis

The successful treatment of hand dermatitis (HD) depends less on the selection of the proper topical steroid or a particular systemic agent than on addressing any underlying cause or perpetuating factor. Thus, innovative treatment is based on comprehensively addressing the patient's problem. Aggressive approaches may be required for the most severe forms of HD.

Infliximab-Induced Lichen Planopilaris

Objective:

To report a case of lichen planopilaris in a patient treated with infliximab for longstanding refractory psoriasis.

Case Summary:

A 37-year-old man with recalcitrant plaque psoriasis was being treated with infliximab at a dosage of 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks, with good response. However, 11 months later the patient developed follicular keratotic papulo-pustules, perifollicular erythema, and scaling, with progressive hair toss of the frontal and parietal regions of the scalp and eyebrows. A skin biopsy from a representative lesion was consistent with the diagnosis of lichen planopilaris.

Discussion:

Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents have been associated with numerous cutaneous adverse events. Lichenoid reactions are uncommon but are an emerging cutaneous adverse effect. At least 13 cases of these eruptions have been recently described. Although lichenoid reactions in patients treated with TNF-α inhibitors may be clinically very diverse, we have found no previously reported cases of lichen planopilaris induced by these agents. An objective causality assessment revealed that the adverse event was probable.

Conclusions:

Since anti-TNF agents are being used for a rapidly expanding number of rheumatic, digestive, and dermatologie diseases, it is expected that lichenoid eruptions and other skin toxicities are likely to be seen with increasing frequency in clinical practice.

Psoriatic skin lesions induced by tumor necrosis factor antagonist therapy: clinical features and possible immunopathogenesis

OBJECTIVE

The induction or exacerbation of psoriasis in patients treated with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists is a well-established phenomenon. The goals of this comprehensive literature analysis were to update currently available data regarding this adverse event, to identify any clinical patterns in the cohort of reported patients, and to review the possible immunopathogenesis.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed utilizing PubMed and Medline databases (1996 to August 2009) searching the index terms "tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor," "TNF," "infliximab," "etanercept," "adalimumab," combined with the terms "psoriasis," "pustular," "skin," "rash," "palmoplantar," and "paradoxical." All relevant articles were reviewed. Patients who did not appear to meet accepted classification criteria for their treated disease, who had a more probable explanation or other likely diagnosis for their skin findings or known possible triggering factor for the skin eruption, including infection, were excluded from this analysis.

RESULTS

Two hundred seven cases met inclusion criteria for review. Of these, 43% were diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, 26% with seronegative spondyloarthropathy, and 20% with inflammatory bowel disease. Mean patient age was 45 years and 65% were female. Fifty-nine percent were being treated with infliximab, 22% with adalimumab, and 19% with etanercept. Lesion morphology included pustular psoriasis in 56%, plaque psoriasis in 50%, and guttate lesions in 12%; 15% experienced lesions of more than 1 type. No statistically significant predisposing factors for the development of new-onset psoriasis were found. Sixty-six percent of patients were able to continue TNF antagonist therapy with psoriasis treatments. The pathogenesis appears to involve disruption of the cytokine milieu with production of unopposed interferon-α production by plasmacytoid dendritic cells in genetically predisposed individuals. Genetic polymorphisms may play a role in this paradoxical reaction to TNF blockade.

CONCLUSIONS

TNF antagonist induced psoriasis is a well-described adverse event without any known predisposing risk factors. Most patients can be managed conservatively without drug withdrawal. Registry data reporting is necessary to define the true incidence and prevalence of this condition. Genomic studies of affected patients may assist with identification of predisposed patients and elucidation of the molecular trigger of this perplexing response.

TNF receptor 2 pathway: drug target for autoimmune diseases

Although drug development has advanced for autoimmune diseases, many current therapies are hampered by adverse effects and the frequent destruction or inactivation of healthy cells in addition to pathological cells. Targeted autoimmune therapies capable of eradicating the rare autoreactive immune cells that are responsible for the attack on the body's own cells are yet to be identified. This Review presents a new emerging approach aimed at selectively destroying autoreactive immune cells by specific activation of tumour necrosis factor receptor 2 (TNFR2), which is found on autoreactive and normal T lymphocytes, with the potential of avoiding or reducing the toxicity observed with existing therapies.

Rash induced by anti-tumor necrosis factor agents in an adolescent with Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

A 17-year-old white male with Crohn's disease who was receiving maintenance infusions of the anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agent, infliximab, presented with a new-onset psoriasiform skin rash. The rash was not responsive to topical or oral corticosteroids and worsened after infliximab infusions and after subsequent administration of a second anti-TNF drug, adalimumab.

INVESTIGATIONS

Full medical history and physical examination, including assessment of the morphology of rash and the temporal correlation with administration of anti-TNF agents.

DIAGNOSIS

Anti-TNF-agent induced psoriasiform skin rash.

MANAGEMENT

Discontinuation of anti-TNF therapy. The patient opted to have his gastrointestinal symptoms treated with oral mesalazine and metronidazole.

Psoriasis induced by infliximab in a patient suffering from Crohn's disease

We describe the case of a 30-year-old female with no family history of psoriasis and suffering from Crohn's disease successfully treated with infliximab at the dosage of 5 mg/kg. On the 15th week from the start of therapy, the patient developed a palmoplantar pustular psoriasis, which spread to the arms, trunk and scalp with erythematosquamous plaques. Deeming the dermatitis onset due to the anti-TNF-alpha, we decided to discontinue infliximab, while starting with a topical therapy with emollients and corticosteroids and a systemic therapy with cyclosporine. These treatments achieved a clear improvement of psoriasis after 2 months and a complete regression of skin lesions after 4 months. Several cases have been reported of psoriasis induced by anti-TNF-alpha, which have shown to exert an effective therapeutic action on this disease. The pathogenic mechanism of such a paradoxical effect has not yet been explained, though a number of hypotheses were proposed, among which one of the most intriguing is that the rapid and strong blockade of TNF-alpha could result in an enhancement of INF-alpha activity with consequent induction of psoriasis.

Learning the lessons of antitumour necrosis factor therapy-associated psoriasis

Psoriasis or psoriasiform skin lesions, as an adverse effect of treatment with antitumor necrosis factor antibody therapy, have been described relatively recently. Patients with these lesions have no personal or family history of psoriasis. In a small number of cases, an association with Chlamydia has been suggested. The skin lesions may disappear on discontinuation of therapy or, in the majority of cases, even if antitumor necrosis factor antibody therapy is continued. Therefore, withdrawal of therapy is generally not required for this adverse effect but referral to a dermatologist may be desirable for confirmation of diagnosis and treatment.

Lichen planus-like eruptions: an emerging side effect of tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonists

As tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha inhibitors gain wider use in clinical practice, it is becoming increasingly evident that these potent immunosuppressants can also induce inflammatory reactions. We present two cases of lichen planus-like eruptions after infliximab and adalimumab therapy for psoriasis, and review the literature on this phenomenon. Eleven cases of lichen planus or lichenoid drug eruptions have been previously reported in patients taking TNF-alpha inhibitors, in addition to several cases of psoriasiform eruptions with a lichenoid histology. Because TNF-alpha has been implicated in the pathogenesis of lichen planus, induction of lichenoid reactions by TNF-alpha inhibition is somewhat unexpected. We consider potential immunologic mechanisms, and suggest that TNF-alpha inhibition may precipitate lichenoid reactions through disruption of a delicate balance between TNF-alpha and interferon-alpha in susceptible patients.

Cutaneous side effects of anti-tumor necrosis factor biologic therapy: a clinical review

BACKGROUND

Anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) biologic agents have been associated with a number of adverse events.

OBJECTIVE

To review the cutaneous reactions that have been reported in patients receiving anti-TNF therapy.

METHODS

We performed a systematic MEDLINE search of relevant publications, including case reports and case series.

RESULTS

Reported cutaneous events included infusion and injection site reactions, psoriasiform eruptions, lupus-like disorders, vasculitis, granulomatous reactions, cutaneous infections, and cutaneous neoplasms. Infusion reactions and injection site reactions were definitely associated with anti-TNF administration, whereas all other events had a varying strength of association and severity, not necessarily requiring drug discontinuation.

LIMITATIONS

Most information was derived from spontaneous case reports, where ascertainment biases and frequency of reporting may impair detection methodology and causal relationships.

CONCLUSIONS

As anti-TNF biologic agents are progressively being used in clinical practice, cutaneous adverse events will be encountered more frequently. Until more data are accumulated with respect to their pathogenesis and potential association with anti-TNF therapy, dermatologists should become more familiar with the clinical presentation and management of such events.

Induction and exacerbation of psoriasis with TNF-blockade therapy: a review and analysis of 127 cases

BACKGROUND

There are reports of rare adverse effects of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, including infections, malignancies, and induction of autoimmune conditions. Intriguing, are cases of induction or exacerbation of psoriasis in conjunction with TNF inhibitor therapy, given that they are approved for treatment of the same condition.

OBJECTIVE

Published cases of psoriasis occurring during anti-TNF therapy were analyzed, including overviews of proposed etiologies and treatment recommendations.

METHODS

A literature search using Ovid MEDLINE and PubMed was performed for articles published between January 1990 and September 2007 to collect reported cases of psoriasis in patients receiving therapy with TNF blocking agents.

RESULTS

A total of 127 cases were identified: 70 in patients on infliximab (55.1%), 35 with etanercept (27.6%), and 22 with adalimumab (17.3%). Females comprised 58% of cases; mean age of reported patients was 45.8 years, and the time from initiation of treatment to onset of lesions averaged 10.5 months. These patients suffered from a number of primary conditions, with rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and Crohn's disease accounting for the vast majority. Palmoplantar pustular psoriasis was observed in 40.5% of the cases, with plaque-type psoriasis in 33.1%, and other types comprising the remainder. Topical corticosteroids were the most commonly employed treatment modality but led to resolution in only 26.8% of cases in which they were employed solely. Switching to a different anti-TNF agent led to resolution in 15.4% of cases. Cessation of anti-TNF therapy with systemic therapy led to resolution in 64.3% of cases.

CONCLUSION

More information and cases are needed. Biopsies of TNF-blockade-induced lesions may reveal what cytokines and cell types drive the development of these lesions. Additionally, there is a need to develop an algorithm to treat this paradoxical side effect of therapy with TNF-blockers.

A comprehensive review and evaluation of the side effects of the tumor necrosis factor alpha blockers etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab

For more than 5 years, infliximab and etanercept have been utilized to treat rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn's disease. There is therefore much post-approval data on their side effects. A variety of Medline searches were done at the beginning of June 2004 using the terms 'etanercept', 'infliximab' and 'adalimumab' and the words 'lymphoma', 'infection', 'congestive heart failure', 'demyelinating disease', 'lupus', 'antibodies', 'injection site reaction', 'systemic', 'side effects' and 'skin'. Approximately 150 articles were so identified. In addition, FDA and manufacturers' data obtained by internet searches using Google were reviewed. The important side effects that have been most extensively related to TNFalpha blockers include: lymphoma, infections, congestive heart failure, demyelinating disease, a lupus-like syndrome, induction of auto-antibodies, injection site reactions, and systemic side effects. The risk of these side effects is very low. Nevertheless, it is important for clinicians to be aware of these side effects when prescribing therapy.

Review article: anti TNF-alpha induced psoriasis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Anti TNF-alpha agents are used successfully for several autoimmune diseases, including IBD and psoriasis. An emerging challenge is the increasing incidence of anti TNF-alpha induced psoriasis. A total of 120 cases have been currently reported, of whom 18 patients were treated with biological agents for IBD.

OBJECTIVES

To analyse all cases of anti TNF-alpha induced psoriasis in patients with IBD in the literature and to investigate potential mechanisms of action.

METHODS

A literature review was performed in the PubMed, Medline, Cochrane and EMBASE databases, with simple analysis of demographic data, drug administration and psoriasis onset. Risk and incidence patient/year/duration (pyd) was calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 18 patients with IBD treated by anti TNF-alpha agents developed drug-induced psoriasis of which, 17 patients developed with infliximab, one with adalimumab. The most frequent time of onset is between 3rd and 4th infusion of infliximab. Withdrawal of infliximab led to regression of lesions in 16 patients. In six patients, infliximab was reintroduced with no further recurrence of psoriasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Although anti TNF-alpha induced psoriasis is extremely rare, understanding the mechanism will be a key step towards better realizing the role played by TNF-alpha and its pharmacological inhibitors in immune-mediated diseases.

The changing face of spondyloarthropathies under TNF α blockade

OBJECTIVES

Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α ) therapy has been implicated in the development of autoimmune diseases. Our aim was to describe three patients with spondyloarthropathies who responded to infliximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody specific for TNF-α but developed new symptoms of spondyloarthropathies. In parallel, a review of the literature on psoriasis induced by TNF-α blockers was undertaken.

RESULTS

The first patient had been suffering from ankylosing spondylitis (AS) for more than 12 years. Infliximab induced a remission of AS, but he developed overt Crohn's disease two years after starting treatment. The second patient had AS for more than 20 years. Infliximab had an excellent effect on his AS, but he developed palmo-plantar psoriasis a few months after initiating therapy with the drug. The third patient, whose long-term and severe psoriasis had responded to infliximab developed peripheral arthritis. A review of the literature revealed 63 cases of psoriasis induced by TNF-α blockers (33 on Infliximab, 16 on Etanercept and 14 on Adalimumab). The underlying diseases were variable, including all the spectrum of conditions for which TNF-α blockers are indicated. Patients developed psoriasis after a mean duration of treatment of 11 months. Interstingly, a substantial proportion of patients continued treatment with TNF α blockers, the psoriasis improving in a majorityof cases under topical treatment only.

CONCLUSION

While Infliximab may change the course of spondyloarthropathy, depressing the original symptoms it may uncover other occult aspects of these diseases.

Psoriatic skin lesions induced by tumor necrosis factor antagonist therapy: a literature review and potential mechanisms of action

OBJECTIVE

Numerous reports of the induction or worsening of psoriasis in patients treated with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists indicate that this is not a rare phenomenon. The etiology of this paradoxical clinical response remains unclear. The aim of this study was to describe similar cases, conduct a comprehensive analysis of the literature, explore possible immunologic mechanisms of action of this perplexing reaction, and recommend management options.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed using the PubMed and Medline databases (1996 to September 2007) searching the index terms "infliximab," "etanercept," "adalimumab," "tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor," and "TNF inhibitor," combined with the terms "psoriasis," "pustular," "skin," "rash," and "palmoplantar." All relevant articles in English were reviewed. Pertinent secondary references were also analyzed.

RESULTS

According to the literature, new-onset psoriasis may occur any time after initiation of TNF antagonist therapy, is often of an uncommon morphology, may respond to psoriasis treatments, and usually resolves with TNF discontinuation. The pathogenesis of this response appears to involve a disruption in cytokine balance following TNF inhibition, resulting in the up-regulation of plasmacytoid dendritic cells and the subsequent production of unopposed interferon-alpha, following a triggering event in predisposed individuals.

CONCLUSION

TNF antagonist-induced psoriasis is a newly recognized adverse effect of these medications that typically does not require therapy cessation. We recommend aggressive treatment of the skin disease and consideration of a change in the TNF antagonist if the lesions are unresponsive to conventional psoriasis treatment.

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor-induced psoriasis or psoriasiform exanthemata: first 120 cases from the literature including a series of six new patients

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha) inhibition is effective in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. We report on 120 patients from the literature including six new patients (three women and three men) who developed pustular lesions during treatment with TNFalpha inhibitors. We identified 72 women and 36 men (several papers did not specify the gender of patients) with an age range of 13-78 years (mean 42.3 years). The primary diagnoses were rheumatoid arthritis (n = 61), ankylosing spondylitis (n = 21), psoriasis (n = 10), Crohn disease (n = 8), SAPHO (synovitis acne pustulosis hyperostosis osteitis) syndrome (n = 3), psoriatic arthritis (n = 2), and other diagnoses (n = 15). Psoriasis (except palmoplantar pustular type) was the most common adverse effect during anti-TNFalpha treatment (n = 73), followed by palmoplantar pustular psoriasis (n = 37) and psoriasis of the nail (n = 6), sometimes combined in the same patient. Palmoplantar pustulosis and psoriasiform exanthema was the diagnosis in ten patients each. A positive personal history of psoriasis was recorded in 25 patients. A positive family history was noted in eight patients. No data about personal (n = 7) or family history (n = 46) were available in a number of patients. Newly induced psoriasis was diagnosed in 74 patients whereas an exacerbation or aggravation of a pre-existing psoriasis was noted in another 25 patients. All three TNFalpha inhibitors available on the market were involved: infliximab (63 patients), etanercept (37 patients), and adalimumab (26 patients). Several patients were treated with more than a single TFNalpha inhibitor. The timing of cutaneous adverse effects (psoriasis and psoriasiform rash) varied considerably among patients, ranging from after a single application to a delayed response of up to 63 months after initiation of treatment. The mean time to appearance of the cutaneous adverse effect for all TNFalpha inhibitors was 9.5 months. Cessation of the responsible TNFalpha inhibitor was carried out in 47 patients either alone or in association with adjuvant anti-psoriatic therapy (mostly topical). This resulted in complete remission in 21 patients, partial remission in 20 patients, and stable disease in another three patients; in the other three patients, the outcome was not reported. TNFalpha inhibition was continued in 47 patients but anti-psoriatic adjuvant therapy was introduced. The outcome in this group was complete remission in 22 patients, partial remission in 25 patients, and stable disease in 2 patients. The response rate (complete remission plus partial remission) was 93.2% and 95.9%, respectively, in each group. In six patients, switching from one TNFalpha inhibitor to another one immediately after cutaneous adverse effects occurred resulted in an improvement in five patients. In nine patients, a second TNFalpha inhibitor was initiated after a break in TNFalpha inhibition. The response to a second or third drug in these patients was mixed. The underlying pathomechanisms of induction of psoriasis or psoriasiform exanthemata by TNFalpha inhibitors remain elusive but there is reason to assume that induction of such adverse events has more than one pathophysiology.

The Enigmatic Development of Psoriasis and Psoriasiform Lesions During Anti-TNF Therapy: A Review

OBJECTIVES

The paradoxical observation that antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents are capable of inducing psoriasis and psoriasiform skin lesions while also being therapy for psoriasis gained substantial support following the description of this condition by several authors. Our aim was to review the literature of this subject.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the literature was performed using the Medline database between 2005 and February 2007.

RESULTS

Since the first publication by our group in April 2005 to the present, 50 cases of this type of dermatitis have been described. More than half of the cases were associated with the use of infliximab. Different presentations of psoriasis were reported, plaque form being the most prevalent. A number of clinical and immunological observations suggest a cytokine disequilibrium in patients receiving chronic anti-TNF therapy leading to this condition. Treatment for the skin disease includes changing the anti-TNF agent or discontinuing the medication.

CONCLUSIONS

The appearance of psoriasis and psoriasiform lesions during chronic anti-TNF therapy is dependent on the presence of known and unknown interrelated factors. Enhanced clinician awareness of this drug complication and further investigation of its mechanisms are warranted.

Cutaneous manifestations in inflammatory bowel diseases: eight cases of psoriasis induced by anti-tumor-necrosis-factor antibody therapy

BACKGROUND

Ulcerous rectocolitis and Crohn's disease are the best known forms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Skin manifestations are not uncommon in IBD and may be divided into specific cutaneous signs, aspecific cutaneous signs, and cutaneous signs caused by drugs used for IBD therapy. The specific signs (fistulas, rhagades and ulcers) are the result of the diffusion of the intestinal inflammatory process into the skin. Aspecific cutaneous signs (stomatic aphthosis, erythema nodosum, pyoderma gangrenosum, Sweet's syndrome, vasculitis, bullous diseases) are quite frequently found in those suffering from IBD, but also in apparently healthy subjects, and may sometimes be the first sign of the intestinal disease. Cutaneous manifestations due to drugs vary in clinical aspect and are the direct consequence of the therapies adopted, which in IBD patients can be quite numerous: steroids, immunosuppressants, 5-aminosalicylic acid, biological agents, antibiotics.

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS

Due to the frequent finding of cutaneous manifestations in patients affected by IBD, a collaboration was set up between the Dermatological Clinic of the University of Bologna and the Center for the Study of IBD of the same university hospital. The aim was to diagnose the cutaneous signs appearing during IBD and to establish their etiopathogenesis in order to assess whether they were the result of epiphenomena of the IBD or side effects of the therapies adopted.

RESULTS

The cutaneous manifestations we observed can be divided into three distinct groups: signs that were specific to the basic disease, aspecific signs and finally signs attributable to the drugs used for therapy. Particular attention was given to the aspecific signs and those consequential to therapy. The aspecific cutaneous signs seen in our clinic generally reflect those reported in the literature. The cutaneous manifestations due to drugs were further divided into three groups: rosacea, acneiform dermatitis and psoriasis-like dermatitis. The most notable aspect of our series is the high number of patients presenting psoriasiform-type dermatitides with a generally widespread diffusion.

CONCLUSION

We would like to draw attention to the fact that all patients with psoriasis had been undergoing treatment with drugs inhibiting tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) as part of IBD therapy. In all cases, the cutaneous reaction started after the third or fourth infusion of the biological drug. Anti-TNF-alpha agents have also been successfully used to treat psoriasis in the last few years. The reason for this apparently paradoxical effect of the therapy is still unclear.

Psoriasiform and pustular eruption induced by infliximab

Although antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF)-alpha therapy provides beneficial effects on various chronic inflammatory skin diseases including psoriasis, cutaneous side-effects have also been reported. We describe four patients who showed psoriasiform eruption following anti-TNF-alpha therapy (infliximab) for Crohn's disease. In all patients, Crohn's disease had responded well to infliximab. Three patients developed plaque-type psoriasiform eruption on the trunk and four extremities, while one patient showed pustular eruption on the palms and soles accompanied with plaque-type psoriasis. In all these patients, skin lesions subsided with topical application of corticosteroid ointment or psoralen plus ultraviolet A treatment.

Manifestations cutanées observées au cours d’un traitement par anti-TNF alpha : 11 observations

BACKGROUND

TNFalpha blockers have recently extended the therapeutic arsenal available in dermatology. However, dermatologists must be informed of their potential adverse dermatological effects. While the chief adverse effect of TNFalpha blockers is risk of infection, cutaneous adverse effects have not yet been clearly elucidated and publications on this topic are few and far between. The aim of our study is to report various dermatological problems noted during treatment with TNFalpha blockers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patient files. The study population comprised patients receiving TNFalpha blockers and presenting cutaneous reaction, and seen in the dermatology department between August 2001 and December 2004.

RESULTS

Eleven patients were included. The following cutaneous reactions were seen: delayed skin rash (1 case), lupus syndrome (1 case), cutaneous vasculitis (2 cases), palmoplantar pustulosis (2 cases), psoriasis vulgaris (1 case), atopic dermatitis (1 case), lichenoid rash (1 case), purpuric capillaritis (1 case) and melanoma (1 case).

DISCUSSION

The cutaneous manifestations seen represented a wide range of different clinical pictures. Dermatologists must be aware of these potential adverse effects. Future improvement of knowledge of the physiopathological mechanisms as well as the institution of prospective cohort studies should provide clearer guidance on the management of such symptoms.

Survenue d’un psoriasis au cours d’un traitement par infliximab pour fasciite de Shulman

BACKGROUND

Anti-TNFalpha drugs are used in certain rheumatologic and gastrointestinal inflammatory diseases and are also effective in cutaneous psoriasis. Several case reports have recently been published concerning induction of paradoxical psoriasis during the course of anti-TNF therapy. We report a new case involving infliximab used to treat Shulman fasciitis.

CASE REPORT

A 39-year-old woman was treated with infliximab for corticoid-dependent Shulman fasciitis. No personal or familial cutaneous psoriasis was noted in her history. Two months after the third infusion, she developed psoriasis vulgaris and pustular palmoplantar psoriasis which improved under topical corticosteroids. Her psoriatic lesions worsened one month after the first maintenance infusion. Since the Shulman fasciitis was not under control, infliximab was withdrawn and replaced with azathioprine. Six months later, her psoriasis was in remission and the Shulman fasciitis was under control.

DISCUSSION

TNFalpha plays an important role in the physiopathology of psoriasis through its action on inflammatory infiltrate, angiogenesis and keratinocyte proliferation. Several studies have reported the efficiency of TNFalpha inhibitors in moderate to severe cutaneous psoriasis. However, fourteen cases of induction or worsening of psoriasis have been reported with these drugs, suggesting a class effect. We report a new case of cutaneous psoriasis induced by infliximab in a patient presenting corticoid-dependent Shulman fasciitis, and we discuss the possible immunological mechanisms responsible for this paradoxical side effect. Other cutaneous lesions have been reported during treatment with TNFalpha inhibitors. The benefits of this treatment on the underlying inflammatory disease must be balanced against the potential cutaneous side effects when deciding whether to continue with anti-TNFalpha treatment.