Daptomycin Use After Vancomycin-Induced Neutropenia in a Patient with Left-Sided Endocarditis

Hematological adverse events associated with anti-MRSA agents: a real-world analysis based on FAERS

This study investigated the patterns of hematological adverse events related to daptomycin (DAP), tigecycline (TIG), vancomycin (VAN) and linezolid (LIN) in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Adverse event associations were analyzed through calculating reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), multiple gamma Poisson shrinkage (MGPS), and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN). A comprehensive descriptive analysis was also conducted considering factors such as age, gender, daily dose, cumulative dose, and time to onset. The leading hematologic adverse events were eosinophilia for daptomycin, coagulation abnormalities and thrombocytopenia for tigecycline, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and anemia for linezolid, and thrombocytopenia, eosinophilia, and neutropenia for vancomycin. Most of the affected patients were over 55 years old. Daily doses for the tigecycline and daptomycin groups exceeded the standard daily dose. The times to onset were 14.00 days for daptomycin (interquartile range [IQR], 4.00-21.00), 6.00 days for tigecycline (IQR, 2.00-9.00), 10.00 days for linezolid (IQR, 4.00-16.5), and 10.00 days for vancomycin (IQR,5.00-20.00). It is essential to intensify early monitoring and identification of these adverse events, especially in the context of off-label dosages and for elderly patients and individuals taking medication for over one week.

Daptomycin for Gram-positive Infections in Patients with Neutropenia: Clinical Experience from a European Outcomes Registry

Introduction

The aim of this analysis was to describe in real-world settings the clinical outcomes and safety associated with daptomycin treatment in patients with neutropenia and Gram-positive infections.

Methods

Patients with an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≤1000 cells/mm³ who received at least one dose of daptomycin between 2006 and 2012 were selected from a non-interventional, multicenter, retrospective registry (European Cubicin^® Outcome Registry and Experience; EU-CORE^SM).

Results

Of the 6075 patients enrolled in EU-CORE, 446 (7.3%) had an ANC ≤ 1000 cells/mm³ at baseline or during daptomycin therapy; they were all included in efficacy and safety populations. Half of the patients had severe neutropenia (ANC ≤ 100 cells/mm³). Most patients had hematologic malignancy (60.5%), an immunosuppressed state (39.7%) or had undergone a transplant (27.8%). The most common primary infections were bacteremia (42.2%) and complicated skin and soft tissue infection (13.9%). Cultures were positive for 68.6% (254/370) of patients with available culture results; coagulase-negative staphylococci (43.7%; 111/254) and Staphylococcus aureus (18.9%; 48/254) were the most commonly isolated primary pathogens. Median duration of daptomycin therapy was 10.0 (range 1–98) days. Most patients (82.8%) received antibiotics concomitantly with daptomycin; the most common were carbapenems (51.2%), penicillins (42.1%), and aminoglycosides (19.9%). The overall clinical success rate (cured or improved) associated with daptomycin was 77.1%. Adverse events possibly related to daptomycin treatment were reported in seven (1.6%) patients and led to drug discontinuation in 27 (6.1%) patients.

Conclusion

The study results suggest that daptomycin is an effective therapeutic option for the treatment of a broad range of Gram-positive infections in patients with neutropenia, and has a good safety profile.

Funding

This study was funded by Novartis Pharma AG.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12325-015-0231-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A pilot study of the efficacy and safety of empiric daptomycin therapy in oncology patients with fever and severe neutropenia

OBJECTIVES

Patients with extended periods of time spent with low or absent absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs) are at risk for bacterial infections. Febrile neutropenia is a complication in this patient population, requiring administration of antibiotics. The use of daptomycin in treating patients with febrile neutropenia is not well described. Our objective was to describe the clinical course of febrile neutropenic patients that received daptomycin therapy.

METHODS

This was an open-labeled, pilot study of 30 patients with documented febrile neutropenia treated with empiric daptomycin. Eligible patients received daptomycin 6 mg/kg/day, in addition to concomitant broad-spectrum antimicrobials. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the median days to reach an afebrile state and negative bacterial cultures.

RESULTS

A total of 30 febrile neutropenic patients were enrolled and received daptomycin as part of an empiric antimicrobial regimen. All patients had severe neutropenia with ANC <100 cells/mm(3). Two patients were removed from study due to the development of pneumonia. Clinically, 87% patients improved on daptomycin in combination with Gram-negative coverage, with 73% of patients succeeding therapy. A total of 18 of 19 (95%) subjects with positive blood cultures had microbiological eradication, with the median time to reach an afebrile state of 4.3 days (range 1-13). Four patients were discontinued from daptomycin due to a suspected related adverse event or to clinical failure.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study supports future evaluation of the use of empiric daptomycin therapy in combination with Gram-negative coverage compared with vancomycin in patients with neutropenic fever in a large, randomized controlled trial.

A retrospective study of daptomycin use in a Paris teaching-hospital

OBJECTIVE

We retrospectively studied daptomycin use during 2010 at the Bichat-Claude-Bernard teaching-hospital (Paris) to observe the evolution of daptomycin prescriptions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients were included and several parameters were documented: site of infection, bacterial species involved, reason for daptomycin use, dose and clinical outcome.

RESULTS

Ninety-five percent of daptomycin prescritions were off-label and most did not comply with local guidelines. Fifteen of the 21 patients were cured (71%), including 9 patients of the 12 with off-label and off-local recommendation prescriptions (75%). Osteitis and Enterococcus spp endocarditis were the new indications. Daptomycin was increasingly used at higher doses: 52% of our patients were given doses above 6mg/kg. Staphylococcus spp. was the most frequent pathogen responsible for infection is our patients, followed by Enterococcus spp.

CONCLUSION

Daptomycin use is likely to evolve because of its effectiveness in the treatment of osteitis, left-sided and Enterococcus spp. infective endocarditis. It is generally used at higher doses, which are well tolerated. However, therapeutic monitoring needs to be developed. The antibiotic commission of our hospital gave new recommendations for daptomycin use in 2011.

Current use of daptomycin in cardiac surgery and postoperative intensive care

Infections due to multidrug-resistant pathogens have an increasing impact on patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Preoperative infections, such as endocarditis, and postoperative infections, including wound and device infection, influence patient outcomes. Special interest needs to be taken in patients admitted to cardiac surgical intensive care units, as these patients are at high risk for infections, particularly nosocomial pneumonia, catheter-related and wound infections. The increasing numbers of infections due to Gram-positive multidrug-resistant pathogens underline the necessity for newer antibiotics with bactericidal effects and a more favorable profile of side effects. Daptomycin, a lipopeptide antimicrobial agent with bactericide activity against Gram-positive organisms, has been successfully used in the treatment of complicated infections due to Gram-positive multidrug-resistant pathogens, especially regarding endocarditis, wound infections, device and catheter-related infections in intensive care units. In this review, the authors will summarize therapeutic potential of daptomycin in cardiac surgery and postoperative intensive care.

Indications for daptomycin use in endocarditis and pacemaker lead infection and outcomes in Leeds, UK

Infective endocarditis now comprises an increasingly complex mixture of endocardial infections, with staphylococci as the predominant cause. Although vancomycin has been an important therapeutic option for several decades, reduced susceptibility is emerging. Daptomycin is a relatively new antimicrobial agent, approved for right-sided endocarditis, but the data for other forms of endocarditis are limited. Here we report clinical data from the Leeds Endocarditis Service (Leeds, UK) for 19 patients treated with daptomycin between January 2007 and December 2009. The majority of cases were caused by staphylococci. All patients were treated with 6 mg/kg with a median treatment duration of 29 days. In total, 53% of patients were cured with antimicrobial regimens, which included daptomycin. Four patients (21%) died during therapy or within 30 days of stopping treatment. The current series is representative of everyday clinical practice and reflects the current difficulties in managing endocarditis.

[Daptomycin in Gram-positive bacterial infections in oncohematological patients and transplant recipients]

Gram-positive infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in oncohematological patients and transplant recipients. The most frequently isolated Gram-positive organisms are the coagulase-negative staphylococci, Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus spp., and viridans group streptococci. Antibiotic resistance in these organisms is increasing and poses a challenge to clinicians. Daptomycin is rapidly bactericidal against a broad spectrum of gram-positive bacteria, including strains resistant to other drugs. The present article reviews some aspects of Gram-positive infections in these immunocompromised patients and provides a detailed analysis of experience with daptomycin in the treatment of these infections.

Vancomycin-induced neutropenia: is it dose- or duration-related?

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate the literature to determine whether vancomycin-induced neutropenia is dose- or duration-related and provide clinicians with feasible treatment alternatives.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search of PubMed (1949-November 2010), MEDLINE (1950-November 2010), EMBASE (1980-November 2010), and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-November 2010) was performed using the terms vancomycin, neutropenia, and leukopenia. Citations from publications were reviewed for additional references.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Studies and case reports were included if they reported neutropenia with vancomycin administration and excluded if they did not describe vancomycin dosages and/or concentrations, or if neutropenia resolved while the patient was still receiving vancomycin. Cases with significant confounders and those in which authors provided minimal information about patients were also excluded.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Seven retrospective chart reviews (ie, case series) and 33 case reports were identified. Of these, 3 retrospective reviews and 26 case reports met inclusion criteria. To our knowledge, no prospective studies have assessed this clinical complication. Data suggest that vancomycin-induced neutropenia may not be completely related to daily dosages, total cumulative dosage, or supratherapeutic vancomycin concentrations. Furthermore, evidence suggests that neutropenia is more likely associated with therapy longer than 7 days, with the majority of episodes occurring beyond 20 days of therapy. Given these findings, a practical approach is to monitor white blood cell (WBC) count with a differential (including absolute neutrophil count) once a week in patients who are receiving vancomycin for more than 7 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Vancomycin-induced neutropenia is most likely associated with prolonged vancomycin exposure. Patients receiving vancomycin for longer than 7 days should have WBC count, differential, monitored weekly. Vancomycin should be discontinued if there is a high clinical suspicion of it causing neutropenia, and an alternative agent should be initiated. Prospective case-controlled studies are needed to better characterize this adverse event.

Daptomycin in endocarditis and bacteraemia: a British perspective

Assessment of the place of daptomycin in the treatment of endocarditis and bacteraemia requires assimilation of data from one open-label randomized comparative clinical trial sized for equivalence, from registry data and from case reports. Selected relevant animal models and in vitro data are also considered in an effort to produce an integrated assessment of the current place of daptomycin in treatment. The evidence for the use of daptomycin is best in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia and endocarditis, but also includes some data on infections due to Enterococcus spp., especially if vancomycin-resistant. The emergence of resistance in a minority of patients on current dose regimens may mean that trials have to be repeated with higher doses, or the drug used in a combined therapy where rifampicin may be the best choice. In general, equivalence to comparator antibiotic regimens and a correlation for in vitro and in vivo findings have been demonstrated, but there are important gaps in the clinical data including a comparative equivalence trial in streptococcal and enterococcal endocarditis. Clinical benefit might be anticipated, but has not been proved, over aminoglycoside-containing regimens, and economic assessments are critical in the decision as to when and how daptomycin is deployed.