Etravirine has no effect on QT and corrected QT interval in HIV-negative volunteers

Mechanisms of Arrhythmia and Sudden Cardiac Death in Patients With HIV Infection

Long-term survival of HIV-infected patients has significantly improved with the use of antiretroviral therapy (ART). As a consequence, cardiovascular diseases are now emerging as an important clinical problem in this population. Sudden cardiac death is the third leading cause of mortality in HIV patients. Twenty percent of patients with HIV who died of sudden cardiac death had previous cardiac arrhythmias including ventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, and other unspecified rhythm disorders. This review presents a summary of HIV-related arrhythmias, associated risk factors specific to the HIV population, and underlying mechanisms. Compared with the general population, patients with HIV have several cardiac conditions and electrophysiological abnormalities. As a result, they have an increased risk of developing severe arrhythmias, that can lead to sudden cardiac death. Possible explanations may be related to non-ART polypharmacy, electrolyte imbalances, and use of substances observed in HIV-infected patients; many of these conditions are associated with alterations in cardiac electrical activity, increasing the risk of arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death. However, clinical and experimental evidence has also revealed that cardiac arrhythmias occur in HIV-infected patients, even in the absence of drugs. This indicates that HIV itself can change the electrophysiological properties of the heart profoundly and cause cardiac arrhythmias and related sudden cardiac death. The current knowledge of the underlying mechanisms, as well as the emerging role of inflammation in these arrhythmias, are discussed here.

Design and analysis considerations for thorough QT studies employing conventional (10 s, 12-lead) ECG recordings

The QT interval from the ECG cannot be measured precisely. The relationship of the QT interval to the RR interval within individuals across time and different RR values, and across individuals eludes complete understanding. Intrinsic beat-to-beat variability in QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc interval) is not trivial. Therefore, it is difficult to determine a valid and reliable estimate of the time for ventricular repolarization based on the QTc interval. Yet, it must be demonstrated that a drug does not result in an increase in the QTc interval that exceeds 5 ms with some reasonable degree of certainty to be quite confident that the drug does not convey some risk of ventricular tachydysrhythmia due to delayed ventricular repolarization. This demonstration can be a Herculean task due to the magnitude of variability in the QTc interval. Design features and analytical methods that might be used in the thorough QT study to improve the chances of demonstrating the true relationship between a drug and QTc interval are reviewed.

Etravirine for the treatment of HIV/AIDS

INTRODUCTION

Etravirine (TMC125) is an orally administered second-generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) that is approved in treatment-experienced patients as addition to an optimized background therapy (OBT).

AREAS COVERED

A Medline search was conducted of Phase II - IV clinical trials, as well as a review of abstracts from major HIV and infectious disease conferences from 2010 - 2013, involving etravirine.

EXPERT OPINION

Etravirine is a well-tolerated NNRTI with a good safety profile and a higher genetic barrier for resistance compared to first-generation NNRTIs. Rash is a potential side effect but remains mostly mild to moderate. The necessity of taking it twice daily with food (200 mg bid.), potential pharmacokinetic interactions and low concentrations in the central nervous system (CNS) represent limitations. The efficacy of once daily etravirine (400 mg qid.) and the use in treatment modification/simplification strategies requires further research. Despite its favorable profile, etravirine is currently not sufficiently investigated nor approved for use in treatment-naïve patients which should be balanced against its potential as a backup NNRTI and the broad cross-resistance conferred by etravirine failure to other NNRTIs. Etravirine should be avoided following treatment failure with regimens containing rilpivirine, another second-generation NNRTI.

Adverse events in healthy individuals and MDR-TB contacts treated with anti-tuberculosis drugs potentially effective for preventing development of MDR-TB: a systematic review

A recent systematic review concluded that there is insufficient evidence on the effectiveness to support or reject preventive therapy for treatment of contacts of patients with multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). Whether preventive therapy is favorable depends both on the effectiveness and the adverse events of the drugs used. We performed a systematic review to assess adverse events in healthy individuals and MDR-TB contacts treated with anti-tuberculosis drugs potentially effective for preventing development of MDR-TB. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and other databases (August 2011). Record selection, data extraction, and study quality assessment were done in duplicate. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Of 6,901 identified references, 20 studies were eligible. Among the 16 studies in healthy volunteers (a total of 87 persons on either levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, ofloxacin, or rifabutin, mostly for 1 week), serious adverse events and treatment discontinuation due to adverse events were rare (<1 and <5%, respectively), but mild adverse events frequently occurred. Due to small sample sizes of the levofloxacin and ofloxacin studies an increased frequency of mild adverse events compared to placebo could not be demonstrated or excluded. For moxifloxacin the comparative results were inconsistent. In four studies describing preventive therapy of MDR-TB contacts, therapy was stopped for 58–100% of the included persons because of the occurrence of adverse events ranging from mild adverse events such as nausea and dizziness to serious events requiring treatment. The quality of the evidence was very low. Although the number of publications and quality of evidence are low, the available evidence suggests that shortly after starting treatment the occurrence of serious adverse events is rare. Mild adverse events occur more frequently and may be of importance because these may provoke treatment interruption.

Levofloxacin can be used effectively as a positive control in thorough QT/QTc studies in healthy volunteers

AIMS

To characterize the effects of levofloxacin on QT interval in healthy subjects and the most appropriate oral positive control treatments for International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) E14 QT/QTc studies.

METHODS

Healthy subjects received a single dose of levofloxacin (1000 or 1500 mg), moxifloxacin (400 mg) or placebo in a four-period crossover design. Digital 12-lead ECGs were recorded in triplicate. Measurement of QT interval was performed automatically with subsequent manual onscreen over-reading using electronic callipers. Blood samples were taken for determination of levofloxacin and moxifloxacin concentrations.

RESULTS

Mean QTcI (QT interval corrected for heart rate using a correction factor that is applicable to each individual) was prolonged in subjects receiving moxifloxacin 400 mg compared with placebo. The largest time-matched difference in QTcI for moxifloxacin compared with placebo was observed to be 13.19 ms (95% confidence interval 11.21, 15.17) at 3.5 h post dose. Prolonged mean QTcI was also observed in subjects receiving levofloxacin 1000 mg and 1500 mg compared with placebo. The largest time-matched difference in QTcI compared with placebo was observed at 3.5 h post dose for both 1000 mg and 1500 mg of levofloxacin [mean (95%) 4.42 ms (2.44, 6.39) in 1000 mg and 7.44 ms (5.47, 9.42) in 1500 mg]. A small increase in heart rate was observed with levofloxacin during the course of the study. However, moxifloxacin showed a greater increase compared with levofloxacin.

CONCLUSIONS

Both levofloxacin and moxifloxacin can fulfil the criteria for a positive comparator. The ICH E14 guidelines recommend a threshold of around 5 ms for a positive QT/QTc study. The largest time-matched difference in QTc for levofloxacin suggests the potential for use in more rigorous QT/QTc studies. This study has demonstrated the utility of levofloxacin on the assay in measuring mean QTc changes around 5 ms.

A single supratherapeutic dose of vorinostat does not prolong the QTc interval in patients with advanced cancer

PURPOSE

This dedicated QTc phase I study, conducted in advanced-stage cancer patients, assessed the effect of a single supratherapeutic dose (800 mg) of vorinostat on the QTc interval.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A randomized, partially blind, placebo-controlled, two-period, crossover study was conducted. Patients (n = 25) received single doses of 800 mg vorinostat and placebo in the fasted state. Holter electrocardiogram monitoring was done before each treatment and for 24 h postdose. Blood samples for vorinostat concentration were collected through 24 h postdose following vorinostat treatment only. Prescribed electrocardiogram and blood sampling times were designed to capture the expected C(max) of vorinostat.

RESULTS

Twenty-four of the 25 patients enrolled in the study were included in the QTc analysis. The upper bound of the two-sided 90% confidence interval for the QTcF interval for the placebo-adjusted mean change from baseline of vorinostat was <10 ms at every time point. No patient had a QTcF change from baseline value >30 ms. One patient had QTcF values >450 ms (seen after both vorinostat and placebo administration) and none had values >480 ms. Mean AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) values attained were on the order of approximately 1.93- and approximately 1.41-fold higher, respectively, compared with the 400 mg clinical dose. Based on assessment of clinical and laboratory adverse experiences, single doses of 800 mg vorinostat were generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of a single supratherapeutic dose of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat is not associated with prolongation of the QTc interval. A dedicated QTc study in advanced cancer patients is a robust means for assessing risk for ventricular repolarization prolongation.

Update on the evaluation of a new drug for effects on cardiac repolarization in humans: issues in early drug development

Following reports of death from cardiac arrhythmias with drugs like terfenadine and cisapride, the International Conference for Harmonization formulated a guidance (E14) document. This specifies that all new drugs must undergo a 'thorough QT/QTc' (TQT) study to detect drug-induced QT prolongation, a surrogate marker of ventricular tachycardia, especially torsades de pointes (TdPs). With better understanding of data from several completed TQT studies, regulatory requirements have undergone some changes since the E14 guidance was implemented in October 2005. This article reviews the implications of the E14 guidance and the changes in its interpretation including choice of baseline QT, demonstration of assay sensitivity, statistical analysis of the effect of new drug and positive control, and PK-PD modelling. Some issues like use of automated QT measurements remain unresolved. Pharmaceutical companies too are modifying Phase 1 studies to detect QTc liability early in order to save time and resources. After the E14 guidance, development of several drugs that prolong QTc by >5 ms is being abandoned by sponsors. However, all drugs that prolong the QT interval do not increase risk of TdP. Researchers in regulatory agencies, academia and industry are working to find better biomarkers of drug-induced TdP which could prevent many useful drugs from being prematurely abandoned. Drug-induced TdP is a rare occurrence. With fewer drugs that prolong QT interval reaching the licensing stage, knowing which of these drugs are torsadogenic is proving to be elusive. Thus, paradoxically, the effectiveness of the E14 guidance itself has made prospective validation of new biomarkers difficult.

Absence of QTc prolongation in a thorough QT study with subcutaneous liraglutide, a once-daily human GLP-1 analog for treatment of type 2 diabetes

The objective of this study was to establish effects of liraglutide on the QTc interval. In this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study, 51 healthy participants were administered placebo, 0.6, 1.2, and 1.8 mg liraglutide once daily for 7 days each. Electrocardiograms were recorded periodically over 24 hours at the end of placebo and highest dosing periods. Four different models for QT correction were used: QTci, as the primary endpoint, and QTciL, QTcF, and QTcB as secondary endpoints. The upper bound of the 1-sided 95% confidence interval for time-matched, baseline-corrected, placebo-subtracted QTc intervals was <10 ms for all 4 correction methods. Moxifloxacin (400 mg) increased QTc intervals by 10.6 to 12.3 ms at 2 hours. There was no concentration-exposure dependency on QTc interval changes by liraglutide and no QTc thresholds above 500 ms or QTc increases >60 ms. The authors conclude that liraglutide caused no clinically relevant increases in the QTc interval.

Effect of steady-state etravirine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ethinylestradiol and norethindrone

BACKGROUND

Etravirine, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) active against NNRTI-resistant HIV, is an inducer of CYP3A4 and an inhibitor of CYP2C9/19.

STUDY DESIGN

The effect of etravirine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ethinylestradiol and norethindrone was assessed in 30 HIV-negative females. Following a run-in cycle with ethinylestradiol/norethindrone, the pharmacokinetics of ethinylestradiol and norethindrone was assessed on Day 15 of Cycle 2. Etravirine 200 mg bid was coadministered on Day 1 to Day 15 of Cycle 3, with pharmacokinetic assessments of ethinylestradiol, norethindrone and etravirine on Day 15.

RESULTS

When combined with etravirine, the least-squares means (LSM) ratios (90% confidence interval) for ethinylestradiol AUC(24h), C(max) and C(min) were 1.22 (1.13-1.31), 1.33 (1.21-1.46) and 1.09 (1.01-1.18), respectively, compared to administration alone. LSM ratios for norethindrone parameters were 0.95 (0.90-0.99), 1.05 (0.98-1.12) and 0.78 (0.68-0.90), respectively.

CONCLUSION

These changes are not considered clinically relevant. No loss in contraceptive efficacy is expected when coadministered with etravirine.

Etravirine

Etravirine is a next-generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) that demonstrates potent in vitro activity against wild-type strains of HIV type 1 (HIV-1), as well as against numerous strains resistant to available NNRTIs. Furthermore, the potential for resistance to etravirine developing appears to be lower than for first-generation NNRTIs. In treatment-experienced patients infected with HIV-1 with NNRTI resistance, HIV-1 RNA levels of <50 copies/mL (primary endpoint) and <400 copies/mL were achieved by a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving etravirine 200 mg twice daily plus background therapy (BT) than placebo plus BT, according to the planned pooled and individual 24-week analyses of two large, well designed, continuing phase III trials (DUET-1 and DUET-2). In the pooled 24-week analysis, patients receiving etravirine plus BT achieved a significantly greater mean reduction in viral load from baseline and a significantly greater mean increase in CD4+ cell counts from baseline than patients receiving placebo plus BT. The pooled and individual findings of the DUET studies at 48 weeks indicate that the efficacy of etravirine is maintained with regard to these endpoints. In the DUET studies, etravirine was generally well tolerated in treatment-experienced patients infected with HIV-1, with a tolerability profile generally similar to that of placebo. Adverse events were mostly of mild or moderate severity.