Use of 4-mg/kg/24-hour empiric aminoglycoside dosing in preoperative neonates with congenital heart disease

Therapeutic Potential of Mesenchymal Stem Cells versus Omega n − 3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids on Gentamicin-Induced Cardiac Degeneration

This study compared the cardioprotective action of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and PUFAs in a rat model of gentamicin (GM)-induced cardiac degeneration. Male Wistar albino rats were randomized into four groups of eight rats each: group I (control group), group II (gentamicin-treated rats receiving gentamicin intraperitoneally (IP) at dose of 100 mg/kg/day for 10 consecutive days), group III (gentamicin and PUFA group receiving gentamicin IP at dose of 100 mg/kg/day for 10 consecutive days followed by PUFAs at a dose of 100 mg/kg/day for 4 weeks), and group IV (gentamicin and MSC group receiving gentamicin IP at dose of 100 mg/kg/day followed by a single dose of MSCs (1 × 10⁶)/rat IP). Cardiac histopathology was evaluated via light and electron microscopy. Immunohistochemical detection of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), caspase-3 (apoptosis), Bcl2, and Bax expression was performed. Moreover, cardiac malonaldehyde (MDA) content, catalase activity, and oxidative stress parameters were biochemically evaluated. Light and electron microscopy showed that both MSCs and PUFAs had ameliorative effects. Their actions were mediated by upregulating PCNA expression, downregulating caspase-3 expression, mitigating cardiac MDA content, catalase activity, and oxidative stress parameters. MSCs and PUFAs had ameliorative effects against gentamicin-induced cardiac degeneration, with MSCs showing higher efficacy compared to PUFAs.

Comparison of Amikacin Pharmacokinetics in Neonates With and Without Congenital Heart Disease

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to compare the volume of distribution (Vd), clearance (CL), elimination rate (K_e), and half-life (t½) of amikacin in neonates with cyanotic defects, acyanotic defects, and controls, adjusted for gestational and postnatal age. Secondary objectives were to compare the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) between controls and the congenital heart disease (CHD) group and to identify potential risk factors.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included neonates receiving amikacin from January 1, 2013 to August 31, 2016. Patients were excluded if concentrations were not appropriately obtained or if AKI or renal anomalies were identified prior to amikacin initiation. Congenital heart disease was classified as acyanotic or cyanotic. Patients with CHD were matched 1:1 with non-CHD controls according to postmenstrual age. Bivariate analyses were performed using Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, Pearson χ² tests, or Fisher exact as appropriate with a p value <0.05. Regression analyses included logistic and analysis of covariance.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients with CHD were matched with 54 controls. Median (IQR) postnatal age (days) at amikacin initiation significantly differed between CHD and controls, 3.0 (1.0-16.0) versus 1.0 (1.0-3.0), p = 0.016. After adjusting for gestational and postnatal age, there was no difference in the mean (95% CI) Vd (L/kg) and CL (L/kg/hr) between CHD and controls, 0.47 (0.44-0.50) versus 0.46 (0.43-0.49), p = 0.548 and 0.05 (0.05-0.05) versus 0.05 (0.05-0.05), p = 0.481, respectively. There was no difference in K_e or t½ between groups. There was no difference in AKI between the CHD and controls, 18.5% versus 9.3%, p = 0.16.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should consider using standard amikacin dosing for neonates with CHD and monitor renal function, since they may have greater AKI risk factors.

Comparison of Amikacin Pharmacokinetics in Neonates Following Implementation of a New Dosage Protocol

OBJECTIVES

The primary aim was to compare attainment of goal serum amikacin concentrations using two dosage regimens in patients admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit. Secondary objectives included comparison of percentages of supratherapeutic trough concentrations, and subtherapeutic and supratherapeutic peak concentrations.

METHODS

This was an Institutional Review Board-approved, retrospective study of neonates receiving amikacin during January-December 2013 (group 1) and January-December 2014 (group 2). Group 1 received amikacin dosage consistent with published recommendations, whereas group 2 was dosed using a modified protocol that was based on postmenstrual and postnatal age. Goal serum amikacin peak concentration was defined as 20 to 35 mg/L; hence, subtherapeutic and supratherapeutic peak concentrations were defined as <20 mg/L and >35 mg/L, respectively. Supratherapeutic trough concentrations were >8 mg/L. Between-group analysis was performed using Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, Student t-test or χ², or Fisher exact analysis as appropriate with a p value <0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 278 neonates were included (group 1: n = 144; group 2: n = 134). Most patients were male (60%) and were admitted for prematurity or respiratory distress (77%). The median gestational age in group 1 was 34.4 weeks (range, 30.0-37.9 weeks) versus group 2 at 36.9 weeks (range, 31.4-38.9 weeks), whereas the postnatal age was similar between both groups at 4 days. There was a significant increase in attaining goal peak amikacin concentrations between groups 1 and 2, 34% versus 84%, p < 0.001, and decrease in supratherapeutic peak concentrations, 65% versus 12%, p < 0.001. There was no significant difference in subtherapeutic peak or supratherapeutic trough concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

A modified neonatal amikacin dosage protocol resulted in increased peak amikacin serum concentration compared with published dosage recommendations. Future research should focus on determination of the optimal dosage regimen in neonates.

Clinical Pharmacology Studies in Critically Ill Children

Developmental and physiological changes in children contribute to variation in drug disposition with age. Additionally, critically ill children suffer from various life-threatening conditions that can lead to pathophysiological alterations that further affect pharmacokinetics (PK). Some factors that can alter PK in this patient population include variability in tissue distribution caused by protein binding changes and fluid shifts, altered drug elimination due to organ dysfunction, and use of medical interventions that can affect drug disposition (e.g., extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and continuous renal replacement therapy). Performing clinical studies in critically ill children is challenging because there is large inter-subject variability in the severity and time course of organ dysfunction; some critical illnesses are rare, which can affect subject enrollment; and critically ill children usually have multiple organ failure, necessitating careful selection of a study design. As a result, drug dosing in critically ill children is often based on extrapolations from adults or non-critically ill children. Dedicated clinical studies in critically ill children are urgently needed to identify optimal dosing of drugs in this vulnerable population. This review will summarize the effect of critical illness on pediatric PK, the challenges associated with performing studies in this vulnerable subpopulation, and the clinical PK studies performed to date for commonly used drugs.