Subtherapeutic linezolid concentrations in a patient with morbid obesity and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia: case report and review of the literature

Linezolid pharmacokinetics: a systematic review for the best clinical practice

OBJECTIVES

To summarize the pharmacokinetics of linezolid to optimize the dosing regimen in special populations.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in three largest medical databases, including Embase, Scopus, and PubMed. The main applied keywords were linezolid and pharmacokinetics. Of 3663 retrieved publications in the English language, 35 original research articles, clinical studies, and case reports about linezolid pharmacokinetics in different populations such as pregnant women, pediatrics, elderly subjects, obese people, individuals with organ dysfunction, and critically ill patients were included. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Dose adjustment is not currently recommended for linezolid in patients with mild to moderate renal or hepatic impairment, older adults, and pregnant women. Although dose adjustment is not recommended in patients with severe renal or hepatic impairment, it should be considered that these patients are more vulnerable to linezolid adverse effects and drug interactions. In pediatrics, reducing the linezolid dosing interval to 8 h is suggested. Despite the lack of sufficient information in obese individuals, dosing based on body weight or use of higher dose seems to be justifiable to prevent sub-therapeutic concentrations. Although dose adjustment of linezolid is not recommended in critically ill patients, administration of linezolid as continuous intravenous infusion is suggested in this population. Blood level monitoring should be considered in populations that are vulnerable to linezolid underexposure (such as critically ill patients with augmented renal clearance, pediatrics, overweight, and obese patients) or overexposure (such as elderly, patients with hepatic and renal impairment). To assess the efficacy and safety of linezolid, the area under the concentration-time curve over 24 h to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC0-24 h/MIC) equal to 80-120, percentage of time above the MIC ≥ 85%, and serum trough concentration between 2 and 7 mg/L are suggested.

Evaluation of Linezolid Pharmacokinetics in Critically Ill Obese Patients with Severe Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

Linezolid standard dosing is fixed at 600 mg every 12 h (q12h) for adults. Literature suggests critically ill, obese patients require higher doses. The study aim is 2-fold: (i) to describe linezolid pharmacokinetics (PK), and (ii) to evaluate if PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) target attainment is achieved with standard dosing in critically ill, obese patients with severe skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs). Adult patients with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥30 kg/m² and receiving intravenous (i.v.) linezolid from August 2018 to April 2019 were eligible for consent in this prospective study. Severe SSTIs were defined as necrotizing fasciitis, myonecrosis, or SSTI with sepsis syndrome. Four blood samples were collected at steady state at 1, 3, 5 h postinfusion and as a trough. Target attainment was defined as achieving area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h to MIC (AUC_0-24h/MIC) of ≥100 h*mg/liter. Monte Carlo simulations were used to determine the probability of target attainment (PTA). Eleven patients were included in the study. The median BMI was 45.7 kg/m², and median total body weight (TBW) was 136.0 kg. Seven patients received standard linezolid doses, and four received 600 mg q8h. A one-compartment model described linezolid PK. Based on AUC_0-24h/MIC targets, for noncirrhotic patients at 140 kg, the PTA with standard linezolid doses was 100%, 98.8%, 34.1%, and 0% for MICs of 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 mg/liter, respectively. In conclusion, target attainment of ≥90% is not achieved with standard linezolid doses for noncirrhotic patients ≥140 kg with MICs of ≥2 mg/liter. This study adds to accumulating evidence that standard linezolid doses may not be adequate for all patients.

Does the conventional dosage of linezolid necessitate therapeutic drug monitoring?-Experience from a prospective observational study

Background

The objectives of the present prospective observational study conducted in patients receiving conventional dosage of linezolid was to define the pharmacodynamic range of linezolid exposure, to assess the inter-individual variability in linezolid concentrations, and to define if therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of linezolid may be necessary for Chinese population.

Methods

Patients included in this study underwent linezolid TDM trough concentration (C_min) during treatment with a standard regimen in the period between January 2019 and October 2019. Linezolid C_min was analyzed with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method. Logistic regression was used to define the desired range of linezolid C_min. Linear regression and univariate logistic regression analysis were carried out to investigate variables associated with inappropriate linezolid plasma exposure.

Results

A total of 84 patients who had 153 linezolid C_min assessed were included in the study. Median linezolid C_min was 3.43 mg/L (IQR 1.59–5.93). The estimated probability of thrombocytopenia was 50% in the presence of C_min of 7.85 mg/L. Approximately 57.52% (88/153) of the samples fell within the desired range of linezolid C_min (2–8 mg/L) while 31.37% (48/153) experienced underexposure, and overexposure occurred in 11.11% (17/153) of the patients. No significant linear relationships between either body weight or estimated creatinine clearance (CrCL) and C_min were detected. Estimated CrCL ≥100 mL/min was significantly associated with linezolid underexposure (OR 4.121; 95% CI, 1.945–8.731; P<0.001). Estimated CrCL ≤40 mL/min was significantly associated with linezolid overexposure (OR 3.761; 95% CI, 1.324–10.681; P=0.013).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that the pharmacodynamic range of linezolid C_min can be defined as 2–8 mg/L for the Chinese population. Renal function partially accounts for the inter-interindividual variability of exposure. The application of TDM might be especially valuable in optimizing linezolid exposure in the majority of patients to avoid therapeutic failure and/or dose-dependent adverse reactions.

Linezolid Inhibited Synthesis of ATP in Mitochondria: Based on GC-MS Metabolomics and HPLC Method

Linezolid has been widely used in serious infections for its effective inhibiting effect against multidrug-resistant gram-positive pathogens. However, linezolid caused severe adverse reactions, such as thrombocytopenia, anaemia, optic neuropathy, and near-fatal serotonin syndrome. In order to investigate the toxicity of linezolid, twenty-four Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into: control group (n=7), low-group (n=8), and high-group (n=9). The rats of low-group and high-group were given by gavage with linezolid 60 and 120 mg/kg/day for 7 days, respectively. The serum concentration of linezolid was determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC); blood metabolic change was analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometer (GC-MS). Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) concentration in HepG2-C3A after being cultured with linezolid was determined by HPLC. The results showed that there were six metabolites and nine metabolites had statistical differences in low-group and high-group (P<0.05). The trimethyl phosphate was the most significant indicator in those changed metabolites. Except for d-glucose which was slightly increased in low-group, octadecanoic acid, cholest-5-ene, hexadecanoic acid, α-linolenic acid, eicosapentaenoic acid, 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid, and docosahexaenoic acid were all decreased in low-group and high-group. ATP concentration was decreased in HepG2-C3A after cultured with linezolid. In conclusion, the toxicity of linezolid is related to its serum concentration. Linezolid may inhibit the synthesis of ATP and fatty acid.

Pharmacokinetic considerations and dosing strategies of antibiotics in the critically ill patient

The treatment of sepsis remains a significant challenge and is the cause of high mortality and morbidity. The pathophysiological alterations that are associated with sepsis can complicate drug dosing. Critical care patients often have capillary leak, increased cardiac output and altered protein levels which can have profound effects on the volume of distribution (Vd) and clearance (Cl) of antibacterial agents, both of which may affect the pharmacokinetics (PK) / pharmacodynamics (PD) of the drug. Along with antibacterial factors such as the hydrophilicity and its kill characteristics and the susceptibility and site of action of the microorganism, different dosing and administration strategies may be needed for the different drug classes. In conclusion, developing dosing and administration regimes of antibacterials that adhere to PK/PD principles increase antibacterial exposure. Tailoring therapy to the individual patient combined with TDM may contribute to improved clinical efficacy and contain the spread of resistance.

Linezolid plasma and intrapulmonary concentrations in critically ill obese patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia: intermittent vs continuous administration

PURPOSE

Clinical application of an antibiotic's pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) properties may improve the outcome of severe infections. No data are available on the use of linezolid (LNZ) continuous infusion in critically ill obese patients affected by ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

METHODS

We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial to compare LNZ concentrations in plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF), when administered by intermittent and continuous infusion (II, CI), in obese critically ill patients affected by VAP.

RESULTS

Twenty-two critically ill obese patients were enrolled. At the steady state, in the II group, mean ± SD total and unbound maximum-minimum concentrations (C max/C max,u - C min/Cmin,u) were 10 ± 3.7/6.8 ± 2.6 mg/L and 1.7 ± 1.1/1.2 ± 0.8 mg/L, respectively. In the CI group, the mean ± SD total and unbound plasma concentrations (C ss and C ss,u) were 6.2 ± 2.3 and 4.3 ± 1.6 mg/L, respectively. Within a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) range of 1-4 mg/L, the median (IQR) time LNZ plasma concentration persisted above MIC (% T > MIC) was significantly higher in the CI than the II group [100 (100-100) vs 100 (89-100), p = 0.05; 100 (100-100) vs 82 (54.8-98.8), p = 0.009; 100 (74.2-100) vs 33 (30.2-78.5), p = 0.005; respectively]. Pulmonary penetration (%) was higher in the CI group, as confirmed by a Monte Carlo simulation [98.8 (IQR 93.8-104.3) vs 87.1 (IQR 78.7-95.4); p < 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

In critically ill obese patients affected by VAP, LNZ CI may overcome the limits of standard administration but these advantages are less evident with difficult to treat pathogens (MIC = 4 mg/L). These data support the usefulness of LNZ continuous infusion, combined with therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), in selected critically ill populations.

Antibiotic dosing in obesity: the search for optimum dosing strategies

Global obesity has nearly doubled and is now a common occurrence in high-income and developing countries. The World Health Organization estimates that more than 1.4 billion adults are obese. Although the prevalence of obesity is increasing over the last decades, pharmacokinetic evaluations are still conducted in individuals with a body weight of approximately 70 kg. Morbid obesity is associated with several pathophysiological changes that can profoundly affect drug distribution and clearance. There are currently no specific dosing recommendations for antibiotics in obese patients, making dosing suggestions primarily based on pharmacokinetic characteristics of the medications and dosing recommendations in other disease states. Understanding of the pharmacokinetic alterations and maximum doses of antibiotics safely used is paramount to appropriate treatment in the obese population.

Treatment options for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection: Where are we now?

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection continues to be a substantial global problem with significant associated morbidity and mortality. This review summarises the discussions that took place at the 4th MRSA Consensus Conference in relation to the current treatment options for serious MRSA infections and how to optimise whichever therapy is embarked upon. It highlights the many challenges faced by both the laboratory and clinicians in the diagnosis and treatment of MRSA infections.

Clinical implications of antibiotic pharmacokinetic principles in the critically ill

Successful antibiotic therapy in the critically ill requires sufficient drug concentrations at the site of infection that kill or suppress bacterial growth. The relationship between antibiotic exposure and achieving the above effects is referred to as pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD). The associated indices therefore provide logical targets for optimal antibiotic therapy. While dosing regimens to achieve such targets have largely been established from studies in animals and non-critically ill patients, they are often poorly validated in the ICU. Endothelial dysfunction, capillary leak, altered major organ blood flow, deranged plasma protein concentrations, extremes of body habitus, the application of extracorporeal support modalities, and a higher prevalence of intermediate susceptibility, independently, and in combination, significantly confound successful antibiotic treatment in this setting. As such, the prescription of standard doses are likely to result in sub-therapeutic concentrations, which in turn may promote treatment failure or the selection of resistant pathogens. This review article considers these issues in detail, summarizing the key changes in antibiotic PK/PD in the critically ill, and suggesting alternative dosing strategies that may improve antibiotic therapy in these challenging patients.