Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy of the spine: improved breach detection with angulated fibers

A handheld fiber-optic tissue sensing device for spine surgery

The demographic shift has increased the demand for surgical interventions to address age-related degenerative diseases, such as spinal fusion. Accurate placement of pedicle screws, crucial for successful spinal fusion, varies widely with physician experience. Integrating tissue sensing into spine surgical instruments allows intraoperative examination of tissue properties, providing surgeons with additional information to prevent screw misplacement. This paper introduces a handheld fiber-optic tissue sensing device for real-time bone tissue differentiation during spine surgery using Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy (DRS). Our prototype employs laser diodes at two distinct wavelengths for tissue illumination, eliminating the need for a spectrometer and enabling direct light collection with a photodiode. The device includes a printed circuit board (PCB) with driver circuits that are adjustable for varying laser diode output power, and signal amplification to convert the photodiode current to a measurable voltage signal. Controlled by a microcontroller, the device computes a reflectance ratio from both laser diode signals to provide real-time audio feedback to surgeons across various healthcare settings. Despite challenges in coupling efficiencies from manual fiber-coupling of the diodes, our prototype is able to emit and collect light to distinguish bone tissues with DRS, demonstrating feasibility. It is compact, made of low-cost and readily available components, and offers fast, real-time feedback, thus serving as a successful proof-of-concept for enhancing surgical accuracy during spinal fusion procedures.

Fiber-Optic Pedicle Probes to Advance Spine Surgery through Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy

Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy (DRS) can provide tissue feedback for pedicle screw placement in spine surgery, yet the integration of fiber optics into the tip of the pedicle probe, a device used to pierce through bone, is challenging, since the optical probing depth and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) are affected negatively compared to those of a blunt DRS probe. Through Monte Carlo simulations and optical phantom experiments, we show how differences in the shape of the instrument tip influence the acquired spectrum. Our findings demonstrate that a single bevel with an angle of 30∘ offers a solution to anticipate cortical breaches during pedicle screw placement. Compared to a blunt probe, the optical probing depth and SNR of a cone tip are reduced by 50%. The single bevel tip excels with 75% of the optical probing depth and a SNR remaining at approximately ⅔, facilitating the construction of a surgical instrument with integrated DRS.

Usefulness of a drill stopper to prevent iatrogenic soft tissue injury in orthopedic surgery

Objective

This study introduces a novel technique utilizing a drill stopper to limit drill penetration depth and to prevent iatrogenic injuries, specifically neurovascular damage, in orthopedic surgeries. Orthopedic surgeries frequently involve the use of drills, which are essential tools for various procedures. However, improper handling of drills can lead to iatrogenic soft tissue injuries, causing severe consequences such as permanent disability or life-threatening complications. To address this issue, we propose the use of a drill stopper as a safeguard to prevent excessive drill penetration and reduce the risk of soft tissue damage during surgery.

Materials and Methods

The study involved 32 orthopedic surgeons, half of whom were experienced and the other half inexperienced. Synthetic femur bone models (Synbone) were used for drilling exercises, employing four configurations: a sharp drill bit without a stopper (SF, Sharp Free), a sharp drill bit with a stopper (SS, Sharp Stopper), a blunt drill bit without a stopper (BF, Blunt Free), and a blunt drill bit with a stopper (BS, Blunt Stopper). Each participant conducted three trials for each configuration, and the penetration depth was measured after each trial.

Results

For experienced surgeons, the average penetration depths were 3.83 (±1.826)mm for SF, 11.02 (±3.461)mm for BF, 2.88 (±0.334)mm for SS, and 2.75 (±0.601)mm for BS. In contrast, inexperienced surgeons had average depths of 8.52 (±4.608)mm for SF, 18.75 (±4.305)mm for BF, 2.96 (±0.683)mm for SS, and 2.83 (±0.724)mm for BS.

Conclusion

The use of a drill stopper was highly effective in controlling drill penetration depth and preventing iatrogenic injuries during orthopedic surgeries. We recommend its incorporation, particularly when using a blunt drill bit or when an inexperienced surgeon operates in an anatomically unfamiliar area. Using the drill stopper, the risk of severe injuries from excessive drill penetration can be minimized, leading to improved patient safety and better surgical outcomes.