1
|
Binner P, Starshynov I, Tejeda G, McFall A, Molloy C, Ciccone G, Walker M, Vassalli M, Tobin AB, Faccio D. Optical, contact-free assessment of brain tissue stiffness and neurodegeneration. BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS 2025; 16:447-459. [PMID: 39958854 PMCID: PMC11828460 DOI: 10.1364/boe.545580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2024] [Revised: 12/12/2024] [Accepted: 12/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2025]
Abstract
Dementia affects a large proportion of the world's population. Approaches that allow for early disease detection and non-invasive monitoring of disease progression are desperately needed. Current approaches are centred on costly imaging technologies such as positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. We propose an alternative approach to assess neurodegeneration based on diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS), a remote and optical sensing technique. We employ this approach to assess neurodegeneration in mouse brains from healthy animals and those with prion disease. We find a statistically significant difference in the optical speckle decorrelation times between prion-diseased and healthy animals. We directly calibrated our DCS technique using hydrogel samples of varying Young's modulus, indicating that we can optically measure changes in the brain tissue stiffness in the order of 60 Pa (corresponding to a 1 s change in speckle decorrelation time). DCS holds promise for contact-free assessment of tissue stiffness alteration due to neurodegeneration, with a similar sensitivity to contact-based (e.g. nanoindentation) approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Binner
- School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Ilya Starshynov
- School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Gonzalo Tejeda
- School of Molecular Biosciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Aisling McFall
- School of Molecular Biosciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Colin Molloy
- School of Molecular Biosciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Giuseppe Ciccone
- Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), the Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology (BIST) Barcelona, Spain
- James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Walker
- James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Massimo Vassalli
- James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew B. Tobin
- School of Molecular Biosciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Daniele Faccio
- School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Evered C, Li K, Fan Y. Experimental study of the influence of variable external optical feedback on visible laser diode speckle. OPTICS LETTERS 2024; 49:3524-3527. [PMID: 38875661 DOI: 10.1364/ol.525686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024]
Abstract
This study employs an experimental setup with a variable feedback fraction (fext), external cavity length (ECL), and pump current (J) to investigate their relationships with optical linewidth and external optical feedback-induced speckle contrast (SC) reduction in a visible laser diode. In total, speckle contrast and optical linewidth data for seven feedback fractions, two pump currents, and three external cavity lengths were collected. Achieving optical linewidths up to 3.90 nm (1/e2 width) and a reduction in speckle contrast of up to 41.6%, we also revealed negative correlations between speckle contrast and optical linewidth, and speckle contrast and feedback fraction, and a positive correlation between optical linewidth and feedback fraction.
Collapse
|
3
|
Barros BJ, Cunha JPS. Neurophotonics: a comprehensive review, current challenges and future trends. Front Neurosci 2024; 18:1382341. [PMID: 38765670 PMCID: PMC11102054 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1382341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
The human brain, with its vast network of billions of neurons and trillions of synapses (connections) between diverse cell types, remains one of the greatest mysteries in science and medicine. Despite extensive research, an understanding of the underlying mechanisms that drive normal behaviors and response to disease states is still limited. Advancement in the Neuroscience field and development of therapeutics for related pathologies requires innovative technologies that can provide a dynamic and systematic understanding of the interactions between neurons and neural circuits. In this work, we provide an up-to-date overview of the evolution of neurophotonic approaches in the last 10 years through a multi-source, literature analysis. From an initial corpus of 243 papers retrieved from Scopus, PubMed and WoS databases, we have followed the PRISMA approach to select 56 papers in the area. Following a full-text evaluation of these 56 scientific articles, six main areas of applied research were identified and discussed: (1) Advanced optogenetics, (2) Multimodal neural interfaces, (3) Innovative therapeutics, (4) Imaging devices and probes, (5) Remote operations, and (6) Microfluidic platforms. For each area, the main technologies selected are discussed according to the photonic principles applied, the neuroscience application evaluated and the more indicative results of efficiency and scientific potential. This detailed analysis is followed by an outlook of the main challenges tackled over the last 10 years in the Neurophotonics field, as well as the main technological advances regarding specificity, light delivery, multimodality, imaging, materials and system designs. We conclude with a discussion of considerable challenges for future innovation and translation in Neurophotonics, from light delivery within the brain to physical constraints and data management strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatriz Jacinto Barros
- INESC TEC – Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, Porto, Portugal
| | - João P. S. Cunha
- INESC TEC – Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, Porto, Portugal
- Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu B, Postnov D, Boas DA, Cheng X. Dynamic light scattering and laser speckle contrast imaging of the brain: theory of the spatial and temporal statistics of speckle pattern evolution. BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS 2024; 15:579-593. [PMID: 38404305 PMCID: PMC10890898 DOI: 10.1364/boe.510333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
Dynamic light scattering (DLS) and laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) are closely related techniques that exploit the statistics of speckle patterns, which can be utilized to measure cerebral blood flow (CBF). Conventionally, the temporal speckle intensity auto-correlation function g 2 t ( τ ) is calculated in DLS, while the spatial speckle contrast Ks is calculated in LSCI measurements. Due to the rapid development of CMOS detection technology with increased camera frame rates while still maintaining a large number of pixels, the ensemble or spatial average of g 2 s ( τ ) as well as the temporal contrast Kt can be easily calculated and utilized to quantify CBF. Although many models have been established, a proper summary is still lacking to fully characterize DLS and LSCI measurements for spatial and temporal statistics, laser coherence properties, various motion types, etc. As a result, there are many instances where theoretical models are misused. For instance, mathematical formulas derived in the diffusive regime or for ergodic systems are sometimes applied to small animal brain measurements, e.g., mice brains, where the assumptions are not valid. Therefore, we aim to provide a review of the speckle theory for both DLS and LSCI measurements with detailed derivations from first principles, taking into account non-ergodicity, spatial and temporal statistics of speckles, scatterer motion types, and laser coherence properties. From these calculations, we elaborate on the differences between spatial and temporal averaging for DLS and LSCI measurements that are typically ignored but can result in inaccurate measurements of blood flow, particularly the spatially varying nature of the static component in g 2 t ( τ ) and Kt. We also obtained g 2 s ( τ ) maps in in vivo mouse brain measurements using high frame rate CMOS cameras which have not been demonstrated before, and compared with g 2 t ( τ ) and Ks,t. This work provides a useful guide for choosing the correct model to analyze spatial and temporal speckle statistics in in-vivo DLS and LSCI measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bingxue Liu
- Neurophotonics Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA
| | - Dmitry Postnov
- Aarhus University, CFIN Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus, 1710, Denmark
| | - David A. Boas
- Neurophotonics Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA
| | - Xiaojun Cheng
- Neurophotonics Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Favilla CG, Carter S, Hartl B, Gitlevich R, Mullen MT, Yodh AG, Baker WB, Konecky S. Validation of the Openwater wearable optical system: cerebral hemodynamic monitoring during a breath-hold maneuver. NEUROPHOTONICS 2024; 11:015008. [PMID: 38464864 PMCID: PMC10923543 DOI: 10.1117/1.nph.11.1.015008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Revised: 02/10/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
Significance Bedside cerebral blood flow (CBF) monitoring has the potential to inform and improve care for acute neurologic diseases, but technical challenges limit the use of existing techniques in clinical practice. Aim Here, we validate the Openwater optical system, a novel wearable headset that uses laser speckle contrast to monitor microvascular hemodynamics. Approach We monitored 25 healthy adults with the Openwater system and concurrent transcranial Doppler (TCD) while performing a breath-hold maneuver to increase CBF. Relative blood flow (rBF) was derived from changes in speckle contrast, and relative blood volume (rBV) was derived from changes in speckle average intensity. Results A strong correlation was observed between beat-to-beat optical rBF and TCD-measured cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFv), R = 0.79 ; the slope of the linear fit indicates good agreement, 0.87 (95% CI: 0.83 - 0.92 ). Beat-to-beat rBV and CBFv were also strongly correlated, R = 0.72 , but as expected the two variables were not proportional; changes in rBV were smaller than CBFv changes, with linear fit slope of 0.18 (95% CI: 0.17 to 0.19). Further, strong agreement was found between rBF and CBFv waveform morphology and related metrics. Conclusions This first in vivo validation of the Openwater optical system highlights its potential as a cerebral hemodynamic monitor, but additional validation is needed in disease states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher G. Favilla
- University of Pennsylvania, Department of Neurology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Sarah Carter
- University of Pennsylvania, Department of Neurology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Brad Hartl
- Openwater, San Francisco, California, United States
| | - Rebecca Gitlevich
- University of Pennsylvania, Department of Neurology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Michael T. Mullen
- Temple University, Department of Neurology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Arjun G. Yodh
- University of Pennsylvania, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Wesley B. Baker
- Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Department of Neurology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|