Investigation of the influence of sampling schemes on quantitative dynamic fluorescence imaging

Kinetic modeling and analysis of dynamic bioluminescence imaging of substrates administered by intraperitoneal injection

Background

Bioluminescence imaging (BLI) has been found to have diverse applications in the life sciences and medical research due to its ease of use and high sensitivity. From kinetics analysis, dynamic imaging studies have significant advantages for diagnosis when compared to traditional static imaging studies. This work focuses on modeling and quantitatively analyzing the dynamic data produced from the intraperitoneal (IP) injection of D-luciferin in longitudinal BLI, aiming to provide a powerful tool for monitoring the growth of tumors.

Methods

We constructed a three-compartment pharmacokinetic (PK) model and employed the standard Michaelis-Menten (M-M) kinetics to investigate the dynamic BLI data produced from the IP injection of D-luciferin. The 3 compartments were the plasma compartment, the non-specific compartment, and the specific compartment. The validity of this PK model was tested by the dynamic BLI data of MKN28M-luc xenograft mice, along with the published longitudinal dynamic BLI data of B16F10-luc xenograft mice.

Results

The R-squares between the simulated lines and the measurement were 1 and 0.99, respectively, for the mice data and the published data. In addition, the 2 kinetic macroparameters obtained reflected the rate of tumor growth in vivo. In particular, the values of macroparameters A showed a significant dependence on tumor surface area.

Conclusions

The proposed PK model may be an effective tool for use in drug development programs and for monitoring the response of tumors to treatment.

Intravenous Administration-Oriented Pharmacokinetic Model for Dynamic Bioluminescence Imaging

OBJECTIVE

In vivo bioluminescence imaging (BLI) is a promising tool for monitoring the growth and metastasis of tumors. However, quantitative BLI research based on intravenous (IV) injection is limited, which greatly restricts its further application. To address this problem, we designed a pharmacokinetic (PK) model which is suitable for applying on IV administration of small amounts of D-Luciferin.

METHODS

After three weeks of postimplantation, mkn28-luc xenografted mice were subjected to 40-min dynamic BLI immediately following D-Luciferin intravenous injection on days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9. Furthermore, the PK model was applied on dynamic BLI data to obtain the sum of kinetic rate constants (SKRC).

RESULTS

Results showed that the SKRC values decreased rapidly with the growth of the tumor. There was a statistical difference between the SKRC values measured at different time points, while the time point of luminous intensity peak was unaffected by the growth of the tumor.

CONCLUSION

In short, our results imply that dynamic BLI combined with our PK model can predict tumor growth earlier and with higher sensitivity compared to the conventional method, which is crucial for improving drug evaluation efficacy. In addition, the dynamic BLI may provide a valuable reference for the noninvasive acquiring arterial input function, which may also provide a new application prospect for hybrid PET-optical imaging.