Spatial loss factor for the analysis of accommodation depth cue on near-eye light field displays

Extended depth of field in augmented reality

The 3D display device shows an image with depth information. Conventional 3D display devices based on binocular parallax can focus accurately only on the depth of a specific screen. Because the human eye has a narrow depth of field (DOF) under normal circumstances, 3D displays that provide a relatively wide range of virtual depth areas have limitations on the DOF where clear 3D images are seen. To resolve this problem, it is necessary to find the optical conditions to extend the DOF and analyze the phenomena related to it. For this, by using the Rayleigh criterion and the Strehl ratio, a criterion for this extension of the DOF is suggested. A practical optical structure that can effectively extend the DOF is devised using a flat panel display. This optical structure could be applied to AR, VR, and MR in the field of near-eye displays. From the results of this research, the fundamental optical conditions and standards are proposed for 3D displays that will provide 3D images with extended DOF in the future. Furthermore, it is also expected that these conditions and criteria can be applied to optical designs for the required performance in the development of 3D displays in various fields.

Interaction between sampled rays' defocusing and number on accommodative response in integral imaging near-eye light field displays

In an integral imaging near-eye light field display using a microlens array, a point on a reconstructed depth plane (RDP) is reconstructed by sampled rays. Previous studies respectively suggested the accommodative response may shift from the RDP under two circumstances: (i) the RDP is away from the central depth plane (CDP) to introduce defocusing in sampled rays; (ii) the sampled ray number is too low. However, sampled rays' defocusing and number may interact, and the interaction's influence on the accommodative response has been little revealed. Therefore, this study adopts a proven imaging model providing retinal images to analyze the accommodative response. As a result, when the RDP and the CDP coincide, the accommodative response matches the RDP. When the RDP deviates from the CDP, defocusing is introduced in sampled rays, causing the accommodative response to shift from the RDP towards the CDP. For example, in a system with a CDP of 4 diopters (D) and 45 sampled rays, when the RDP is at 3, 2, 1, and 0 D, the accommodative response shifts to 3.25, 2.75, 2, and 1.75 D, respectively. With fewer rays, the accommodative response tends to further shift to the CDP. Eventually, with fewer than five rays, the eye accommodates to the CDP and loses the 3D display capacity. Moreover, under different RDPs, the ray number influences differently, and vice versa. An x-y polynomial equation containing three interactive terms is finally provided to reveal the interaction between RDP position and ray number. In comparison, in a pinhole-based system with no CDP, the accommodative response always matches the RDP when the sampled ray number is greater than five.