Curing of dental composites by use of InGaN light-emitting diodes

Optical design of dental light with high performance and low power based on white LEDs

This paper presents an optical design of a dental light that meets the regulation of ISO 9680. The designed light pattern on the target is an elliptical shape with uniform illumination. Moreover, the real module contains four optical modules, and is operated at 9 W and performs a maximum illuminance of 42,010 lx. In order to reduce the correlated color temperature (CCT) variation, we replace the original white light-emitting diode with a new one, which has an extremely low angular CCT derivation. Accordingly, the CCT variation is reduced to 232 K from 1323 K of the original module.

The effect of different light-curing units on tensile strength and microhardness of a composite resin

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different light-curing units on the tensile bond strength and microhardness of a composite resin (Filtek Z250 – 3M/ESPE). Conventional halogen (Curing Light 2500 – 3M/ESPE; CL) and two blue light emitting diode curing units (Ultraled – Dabi/Atlante; UL; Ultrablue IS – DMC; UB3 and UB6) were selected for this study. Different light intensities (670, 130, 300, and 600 mW/cm², respectively) and different curing times (20s, 40s and 60s) were evaluated. Knoop microhardness test was performed in the area corresponding to the fractured region of the specimen. A total of 12 groups (n=10) were established and the specimens were prepared using a stainless steel mold composed by two similar parts that contained a cone-shaped hole with two diameters (8.0 mm and 5.0 mm) and thickness of 1.0 mm. Next, the specimens were loaded in tensile strength until fracture in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min and a 50 kg load cell. For the microhardness test, the same matrix was used to fabricate the specimens (12 groups; n=5). Microhardness was determined on the surfaces that were not exposed to the light source, using a Shimadzu HMV-2 Microhardness Tester at a static load of 50 g for 30 seconds. Data were analyzed statistically by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (p<0.05). Regarding the individual performance of the light-curing units, there was similarity in tensile strength with 20-s and 40-s exposure times and higher tensile strength when a 60-s light-activation time was used. Regarding microhardness, the halogen lamp had higher results when compared to the LED units. For all light-curing units, the variation of light-exposure time did not affect composite microhardness. However, lower irradiances needed longer light-activation times to produce similar effect as that obtained with high-irradiance light-curing sources.

Real-time measurement of internal stress of dental tissue using holography

We describe a real-time holographic technique used to observe dental contraction due to photo-polymerization of dental filling during LED lamp illumination. An off-axis setup was used, with wet in-situ processing of the holographic plate, and consequent recording of interference fringes using CCD camera. Finite elements method was used to calculate internal stress of dental tissue, corresponding to experimentally measured deformation. A technique enables selection of preferred illumination method with reduced polymerization contraction. As a consequence, durability of dental filling might be significantly improved.

Designing light-emitting diode arrays for uniform near-field irradiance

We analyze the first-order design of light sources consisting of multiple light-emitting diodes (LEDs) to uniformly illuminate a near target plane by considering each single LED as an imperfect Lambertian emitter. Simple approximate equations and formulas are derived for the optimum LED-to-LED spacing, i.e., the optimum packaging density, of several array configurations to achieve uniform near-field irradiance.

Thermal risks from LED- and high-intensity QTH-curing units during polymerization of dental resins

The aim of this study was to test the ability of an infrared (IR) camera to assess temperature changes and distributions in teeth below restorations when quartz-tungsten-halogen (QTH) and light-emitting diode (LED) curing lights were used to photopolymerize the restorative material. Our hypothesis was that the higher power density and broader spectral distribution of the QTH source would cause greater increases in tooth temperature than the LED source, and that these differences would be best demonstrated with the IR camera. Cavities were prepared on human third molars and restored with a resin composite restorative material. The material was light-cured using three light-curing sources using several exposure times. The external (outside the tooth) and internal (inside the pulp chamber) temperature changes during polymerization of the composite material were recorded over 360 s with thermocouples and an IR camera. Using thermocouples the maximum increase in external temperature (+17.7 degrees C) was reported for the Swiss Master light after 20 s of curing time while the minimum temperature rise (+7.8 degrees C) was reported for the Freelight 2. Whereas a 2.6 degrees C increase in internal temperature was observed after curing 20 s with the Freelight 2, 7.1 degrees C was reported after 60 s of light exposure to Astralis 10. Infrared images showed similar trends in external-internal rises in temperature as the thermocouples, although temperatures measured by the IR were generally higher. These results indicate that the higher power density QTH sources caused greater increases in tooth temperatures than the LED source and that thermocouples may underestimate the heat applied to the tooth.

Knoop hardness depth profiles and compressive strength of selected dental composites polymerized with halogen and LED light curing technologies

After the first light-emitting diode (LED) light curing units (LCUs) became available commercially, a comparison of mechanical properties between materials polymerized with conventional halogen lamps and this new technology was required. This study, therefore, investigated the curing performance of two conventional commercial halogen LCUs (Translux CL, Spectrum800), a custom-made LED LCU prototype, and one of the first commercially available LED LCUs (LUXoMAX). The Spectrum800 was adjusted to a similar irradiance to the custom-made LED LCU prototype. Both technologies were compared by measuring compressive strength and Knoop hardness depth profiles for selected dental composites polymerized for 20 or 40 s. Four dental composites (Z100, Spectrum TPH, Solitaire2, and Definite) were used. Two of these composites (Solitaire2 and Definite) contain co-initiators in addition to the standard photoinitiator camphorquinone. In general, the material hardness obtained with the LUXoMAX was statistically significantly (p < 0.05) lower at the depths of 0.1, 1.0, 1.9, and 3.1 mm, for all composites and curing times, than for the other three LCUs. The LED LCU prototype achieved, with one exception, up to a depth of 1.9 mm a material hardness for the composites Z100, Spectrum TPH and Solitaire2 that was not statistically significant different (p < 0.05) from the hardness obtained with the halogen LCUs. At a greater depth (3.1 mm), however, the LED LCU prototype showed statistically significantly lower hardness values than the halogen units. The compressive strength test showed at a 95% confidence level that similar compressive strengths were achieved with the LCUs LUXoMAX and Spectrum800, and the Translux and LED LCU prototype.

Polymerization and light-induced heat of dental composites cured with LED and halogen technology

Most commercial light curing units (LCUs) for dental applications use conventional halogen bulbs. Commercial LCUs using light emitting diodes (LEDs) have recently become established on the market, even though some aspects of their performance have not been fully investigated. Temperature rise of dental composites during the light-induced polymerization is considered to be a potential hazard for the pulp of the tooth. This study, therefore, investigated the temperature rise in three different composites (Z100, Durafill, Solitaire2) in two shades (A2, A4) polymerized for 40s with two LED LCUs (Freelight, custom-made LED LCU prototype) and two halogen LCUs (Trilight, Translux). The Trilight was used in the standard and soft-start mode. The temperature rise within the composites were recorded for 60s with a thermocouple and also observed with a high-resolution infrared (HRIR) camera. The factors LCU (p < 0.0001), composite (p < 0.0001) and shade (p = 0.0014) had statistically significant influences on the temperature rise. All composites cured with the halogen LCUs reached at a depth of 2 mm, a statistically significant higher temperature (p < 0.0001) than those cured with the LED LCUs. Only one composite showed a statistically significant lower temperature rise for the halogen LCUs at the 95% confidence level, when the soft-start mode was used instead of the standard mode. In general, the composites with the lighter shade (A2) reached higher temperatures than the darker shade (A4), if the LED LCUs were used. When the halogen LCUs were used, the situation was reversed, the composites with the darker shade (A4) reaching higher temperatures than the lighter shade (A2). This study showed that a HRIR camera represents a powerful tool for the observation of temperature propagation on small samples. This study also showed that LED LCUs represent a viable alternative to halogen LCUs for the light polymerization of dental composites because of a generally lower temperature increase within the composite.

Optical power outputs, spectra and dental composite depths of cure, obtained with blue light emitting diode (LED) and halogen light curing units (LCUs)

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that a prototype LED light curing unit, (LCU), a commercial LED LCU and a halogen LCU achieve similar cure depths, using two shades of a camphorquinone photoinitiated dental composite. To measure the LCUs' outputs and the frequency of the LED LCU's pulsed light, using a blue LED array as a photodetector.

DESIGN

Cure depth and light output characterisation to compare the LCUs.

SETTING

An in vitro laboratory study conducted in the UK.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The LCUs cured A2 and A4 composite shades. A penetrometer measured the depth of cure. Analysis was by one-way ANOVA, two-way univariate ANOVA and Fisher's LSD test with a 95% confidence interval. A power meter and spectrograph characterised the LCUs' emissions. A blue LED array measured the pulsed light frequency from an LED LCU.

RESULTS

Statistically significant different LCU irradiances (119 mW/cm2 to 851 mW/cm2) and cure depths (3.90 mm SD +/- 0.08 to 6.68 mm SD +/- 0.07) were achieved. Composite shade affected cure depth. A blue LED array detected pulsed light at 12 Hz from the commercial LED LCU.

CONCLUSIONS

The prototype LED LCU achieved a greater or equal depth of cure when compared with the commercial LCUs. LEDs may have a potential in dentistry for light detection as well as emission.

Hardness evaluation of a dental composite polymerized with experimental LED-based devices

OBJECTIVE

The main goal of this study was the hardness evaluation of a composite resin cured by five LED (Light Emitting Diodes) based devices and a comparison with a conventional curing unit. The hardness test was used to compare the efficacy of both types of light source.

METHODS

The LED-based devices were made employing an array of LEDs (Nichia Chem. Ind., Japan) emitting light peaked at 470nm. Composite resin (Z100, shade A3) was cured for 20, 40, 60, 120 and 180s with each LED-based device and for 40s with the halogen lamp. The composite samples were prepared with 0.35, 1.25 and 1.8mm of thickness. Five samples of each set of parameters were done. The hardness evaluation was performed at the non-illuminate surface with three indentations for each sample.

RESULTS

All the samples cured by the LED-based devices showed inferior hardness values when compared with the halogen lamp at the typical curing time (40s). The L6 (device composed of six LEDs) was the most efficient one of the LED-based devices. Its obtained irradiance was 79mW/cm(2), whereas the halogen lamp irradiance was of 475mW/cm(2). For the L6 device here presented, longer exposure times or a thinner resin layer are required to achieve reasonable hardness values.

SIGNIFICANCE

Besides the difference of irradiance when compared with halogen lamps, LED-based devices show to be a promising alternative curing instrument. Further development in instrumentation may result in devices even more efficient than conventional lamps.