Improving anticoagulation therapy using point-of-care testing and a standardized protocol

Optimizing warfarin and dual oral anticoagulation practices in an academic clinic during a merger amid the COVID-19 pandemic in a marginalized population

BACKGROUND

The closure of a pharmacy-led anticoagulation clinic, which provided point-of-care (POC) international normalized ratio (INR) testing and face-to-face visits, coupled with the transition to an academic physician-led clinic without POC INR testing and reliance on telephone communication, created significant challenges for warfarin management during the Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The aim of this quality control project was to increase the percentage of patients on warfarin within the optimal time in therapeutic range (TTR) from 52.30% to 65.00%, sustain baseline quarterly cumulative percentage TTR to 59.00%, and transition 20% of eligible patients from warfarin to dual oral anticoagulation (DOAC) within 12 months.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary team employed a Fishbone diagram, stakeholder analysis, process flow map, and a driver diagram. Significant barriers included knowledge gaps, fear of blood draws, lack of POC INR testing, and noninteroperable electronic health records (EHRs). Primary outcome measures included quarterly cumulative percentage TTR, 2-monthly percentage TTR, and the percentage of eligible patients switched to DOAC. Process measures included INR completion rates. Key interventions involved educating patients and the care team, transitioning patients to DOAC, improving EHRs, and optimizing processes. Data analysis utilized run charts.

RESULTS

Monthly INR completion rates rose from 63% to 87% within 12 months and reached 92% during the 6 months post-project period. Among 143 patients, 40.55% (58) were eligible for a DOAC switch, with 51.72% (30/58) successfully transitioning during the project and the 6-month post-project period. Two-monthly TTR rates improved from the baseline of 52.30% to 62.00% during the study period and remained sustainable at 62.80% in the post-project phase. Quarterly cumulative TTR rates remained stable at 59.20% during the study period in 2021. The quarterly cumulative TTR rates continued to increase at 60.50% and 64.40% in 2022 and 2023, respectively, during the post-project period. No bleeding episodes occurred during the 15-month post-project period.

CONCLUSION

Multi-faceted strategies significantly improved warfarin safety during the project and maintained these improvements for 24 months. Transitioning from warfarin to DOACs was crucial for optimizing anticoagulation management with limited resources. The lead physician and team used various tools to address barriers to effective warfarin management, ensure appropriate DOAC prescribing, and enhance practices for DOAC prescriptions. This project effectively addressed barriers, improved population health, and provided a model for anticoagulation management in primary care settings.

XW-100: First FDA CLIA-Waived CBC Analyzer Designed for Physician Office Use

BACKGROUND

The XW-100 hematology analyzer (Sysmex America) is the first complete blood count (CBC) instrument waived by the US Food and Drug Administration. This analyzer also tests for a 3-part white blood cell count differential.

METHODS

The XW-100 analyzer was evaluated for preanalytical specimen variables including the need for mixing, specimen storage conditions, freeze-thaw cycles, the effect of under filling of tubes, precision, linearity, carryover, limits of the blank, detection, and quantification and interferences from common and CBC-specific substances. The clinical study examined 586 blood samples from 6 CLIA-waived clinical sites and 6 paired moderately complex sites. The point-of-care sites had different medical specialties and were using inexperienced operators. The results of 8 measurements and 4 calculated parameters were compared to a moderately complex point-of-care hematology analyzer (pocH-100i, Sysmex).

RESULTS

The precision was <6% for all analytics, and there was no carryover noted. Samples containing interfering substances were appropriately flagged or suppressed by the instrument. The correlation to the predicate analyzer was highly concordant, producing near unity slope and intercept and minimal bias. Delays from sample collection to testing resulted in decreased performance. The percentage of samples inside the allowable error was >98.8% for all parameters studied.

CONCLUSION

This CLIA-waived hematology analyzer produces acceptable results and can be used in offices and clinics.

Implementation of point-of-care testing in a pediatric healthcare setting

Point-of-care testing (POCT) refers to testing performed outside the clinical laboratory near the patient or at the site of patient care. This could be in critical care settings like the intensive care unit (ICU) and emergency department (ED) or primary care settings like physician offices where testing is performed by nonlaboratory personnel. POCT circumvents several steps in central laboratory testing including specimen transportation and processing resulting in faster turnaround times. Provider access to rapid test results at the site of patient care allows for prompt medical decision making which can lead to improved patient outcomes, operational efficiencies, patient satisfaction, and even cost savings in some cases. In addition to providing results rapidly, POCT devices have small specimen volume requirements compared to central laboratory tests making POCT particularly attractive for pediatric healthcare settings. The availability of published reports on the impact of POCT implementation in pediatric care are helpful resources when evaluating the clinical necessity of POCT prior to implementation. Even though several studies have shown advantages to implementing POCT in different pediatric settings, it is important to note that limitations exist that might limit the utilization of certain POCTs in some pediatric populations. So, it is important that these limitations and the analytical performance of a test are considered while keeping the target patient population in mind. Since POCTs are performed by non-laboratory staff who are not trained laboratory personnel, one challenge with POCT is maintaining regulatory compliance and quality assurance. It is therefore important that regulatory and quality assurance programs be put in place prior to implementing POCT in the pediatric hospital. With advances in POCT technology, most POCT devices have the capability to interface to the laboratory information system (LIS) and electronic medical record (EMR). POCT device interfacing allows for improved compliance to regulatory and quality assurance standards. Maintaining a cost efficient POCT program is becoming increasingly important as hospitals and healthcare systems are undergoing consolidation and harmonization. This includes assessing the clinical and operational benefit of POCT before implementation and inventory management to ensure minimal reagent wastage. This review discusses these different considerations when implementing POCT with a focus on the pediatric healthcare setting.

Warfarin Patients With Anemia Show Trend of Out-of-Range International Normalized Ratio Frequency With Point-of-Care Testing in an Anticoagulation Clinic

INTRODUCTION

Many factors influence international normalized ratio (INR); however, few studies have examined the impact of anemia in warfarin patients. The primary objective of this study was to explore the relationship between in-clinic anemia and the control of INR within an anticoagulation clinic.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on a random sample of patients seen in an academic medical center pharmacy-managed anticoagulation clinic. Hemochron® Signature Elite machine was utilized to monitor point-of-care (POC) INR. In-clinic anemia was defined as hematocrit <32%. Statistical analyses were conducted using STATA MP a webbased platform ( https://www.stata.com/statamp/ ).

RESULTS

Of the 300 patients analyzed, 45 (15%) patients had in-clinic anemia. Patients with in-clinic anemia were more likely to be younger (P < .05), female (P < .05), and have a diagnosis of sickle cell disease or anemia (P < .05). In the unadjusted logistic regression model, patients with in-clinic anemia were less likely to have an in-range INR ( OR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.27-0.98). The adjusted regression model did not show significance.

CONCLUSION

Study results suggest that in-clinic anemia may be more prevalent among younger, female patients prescribed warfarin, and patients diagnosed with in-clinic anemia may be a risk factor for out-of-range INR. Pharmacists practicing in anticoagulation clinics can incorporate this information into patient care practice in efforts to maintain optimal management.

Implementation of point-of-care testing in a general internal medicine practice: A confirmation study

BACKGROUND

In a previous study we reported on the impact of point-of-care testing (POCT) on practice efficiency in an academic primary care practice that was established to develop new models of care delivery. Here we report a follow-on confirmation study in a more typical primary care practice in the community.

METHODS

In this observational study with a retrospective comparison analysis we measured metrics of practice efficiency on two patient cohorts: those that did not receive POCT and those that did.

RESULTS

In the patient cohort that received POCT there was a 99% reduction in letters to patients (p<0.001), a 75% decrease in calls to patients (not significant due to small numbers), a 50% reduction in follow-up tests per visit (p=0.044) and a 38% reduction in follow-up visits due to abnormal test results (p=0.178). Financial analysis including testing costs, revenues and efficiency gains to the practice demonstrated a net financial benefit of $11.90-14.74 per patient visit.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirm the earlier published findings that POCT can improve metrics of practice efficiency in a primary care practice.

Quality of anticoagulation management with warfarin among outpatients in a tertiary hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a retrospective cross-sectional study

Background

Warfarin is the most widely used anticoagulant in the world. The difficulty of managing warfarin contributes to great potential for patient harm, both from excessive anticoagulation and insufficient anticoagulation. This study assessed the International Normalized Ratio (INR) control outcome measures and warfarin dose adjustment practices at cardiology and hematology outpatient clinics at a teaching hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Methods

The study was based on a cross - sectional study design involving 360 retrospective patients’ chart review among outpatients who received warfarin for its various indications.

Results

The mean frequency of INR monitoring per patient was 62.9 days (17.2–143.7 days).

Patients spent 52.2%, 29.0% and 18.8% of the time in sub-therapeutic, therapeutic and supra-therapeutic ranges, respectively. The daily warfarin dose was increased 50.9% and 36.9% and decreased in 52.8% and 60.9% of the time for occurrences of sub-therapeutic and supra-therapeutic INRs to achieve target ranges of 2.0–3.0 and 2.5–3.5, respectively.

Conclusion

The quality of anticoagulation management with warfarin among outpatients in Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital was sub-optimal. This was reflected by low Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR), longer than recommended INR monitoring frequency, and minimal actions taken to adjust warfarin dose after occurrences of non-therapeutic INRs.

Comparison of international normalized ratio audit parameters in patients enrolled in GARFIELD-AF and treated with vitamin K antagonists

Vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) requires monitoring of the international normalized ratio (INR). We evaluated the agreement between two INR audit parameters, frequency in range (FIR) and proportion of time in the therapeutic range (TTR), using data from a global population of patients with newly diagnosed non-valvular AF, the Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD-Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF). Among 17 168 patients with 1-year follow-up data available at the time of the analysis, 8445 received VKA therapy (±antiplatelet therapy) at enrolment, and of these patients, 5066 with ≥3 INR readings and for whom both FIR and TTR could be calculated were included in the analysis. In total, 70 905 INRs were analysed. At the patient level, TTR showed higher values than FIR (mean, 56·0% vs 49·8%; median, 59·7% vs 50·0%). Although patient-level FIR and TTR values were highly correlated (Pearson correlation coefficient [95% confidence interval; CI], 0·860 [0·852-0·867]), estimates from individuals showed widespread disagreement and variability (Lin's concordance coefficient [95% CI], 0·829 [0·821-0·837]). The difference between FIR and TTR explained 17·4% of the total variability of measurements. These results suggest that FIR and TTR are not equivalent and cannot be used interchangeably.

Implementation of point-of-care testing in an ambulatory practice of an academic medical center

OBJECTIVES

Point-of-care laboratory testing (POCT) offers reduced turnaround time and may promote improved operational efficiency. Few studies have been reported that document improvements from implementing POCT in primary care.

METHODS

We measured metrics of practice efficiency in a primary care practice before and after implementation of POCT, including the total number of tests ordered, letters and phone calls to patients, and revisits due to abnormal test results. We performed a cost and revenue analysis.

RESULTS

Following implementation of POCT, there was a 21% decrease in tests ordered per patient (P < .0001); a decrease in follow-up phone calls and letters by 89% and 85%, respectively (P < .0001 and P < .0001); and a 61% decrease in patient revisits (P = .0002). Estimated testing revenues exceeded expenses by $6.62 per patient, and potential cost savings from improved efficiency were $24.64 per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

POCT can significantly improve clinical operations with cost reductions through improved practice efficiency.

Prospective comparison of point-of-care international normalised ratio measurement versus plasma international normalised ratio for acute traumatic coagulopathy

OBJECTIVE

Early detection of acute traumatic coagulopathy (ATC) might be useful to guide trauma resuscitation. This study aimed to compare results from a point-of-care (POC) international normalised ratio (INR) measuring device with plasma INR in acute trauma patients.

METHODS

This was a single-centre, prospective, blinded comparative study. All trauma patients meeting trauma call-out criteria in a major trauma centre were screened. Patients predicted to have ATC were identified by the Coagulopathy of Severe Trauma score and a convenience sample of 72 patients included in this study. Whole blood was used to measure INR at the bedside, whereas blood from the same sample was sent to the hospital laboratory for plasma INR testing. Agreement between the laboratory and bedside INR was determined using a Bland-Altman plot.

RESULTS

There were 38 (52.8%) patients with ATC by laboratory measure, defined as INR >1.5 or activated partial thrombin time >60 s, whereas the POC system identified 28 (38.9%) patients with an INR >1.5. Assuming the laboratory measure as the gold standard, the POC system had a specificity of 88.2% (95% confidence interval 71.6-96.2) and a sensitivity of 63.1% (95% confidence interval 46.0-77.7). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated inadequate agreement between the two methods of INR measurement for the major trauma patient.

CONCLUSIONS

POC INR measurements using this method during the trauma reception and resuscitative phases cannot be used to identify or exclude patients with ATC. Further studies are required to determine if there is any role for POC INR measures during trauma resuscitation.

Addressing the Scholarly Activity Requirements for Residents: One Program's Solution

BACKGROUND

Scholarly activity as a component of residency education is becoming increasingly emphasized by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. "Limited or no evidence of resident or faculty scholarly activity" is a common citation given to family medicine residency programs by the Review Committee for Family Medicine.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to provide a model scholarly activity curriculum that has been successful in improving the quality of graduate medical education in a family medicine residency program, as evidenced by a record of resident academic presentations and publications.

METHODS

We provide a description of the Clinical Scholars Program that has been implemented into the curriculum of the Trident/Medical University of South Carolina Family Medicine Residency Program.

RESULTS

During the most recent 10-year academic period (2000-2010), a total of 111 residents completed training and participated in the Clinical Scholars Program. This program has produced more than 24 presentations during national and international meetings of medical societies and 15 publications in peer-reviewed medical journals. In addition, many of the projects have been presented during meetings of state and regional medical organizations.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper presents a model curriculum for teaching about scholarship to family medicine residents. The success of this program is evidenced by the numerous presentations and publications by participating residents.

Primary care practices and determinants of optimal anticoagulation management in a collaborative care model

BACKGROUND

In a collaborative care model (CCM) for managing oral anticoagulant therapy, patients are followed at a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation service and, once stabilized, are transferred to their primary care physician. The objective of this study was to describe physicians' clinical practices and the practice characteristics associated with better international normalized ratio (INR) control in a CCM.

METHODS

A telephone questionnaire about their practices was administered to 121 physicians exposed to a CCM. The physicians followed 121 patients for a mean of 14.5 weeks. The percentage of time within the exact INR target range was computed and dichotomized (> or = or < median time within target range). Determinants of better INR control were identified using logistic regression models.

RESULTS

The survey revealed that, after discharge from the pharmacist-managed anticoagulation service, patients are followed mainly by physicians and their secretaries. Physicians do not often consult other health professionals. Few report using technological resources to obtain INR results (39.7%), document medical follow-up (6.6%), or detect drug (32.2%) and food (9.9%) interactions. The median percentage of time within the exact INR target range was 84%. Determinants of better INR control include using computerized support to monitor patients (odds ratio [OR] 9.16, 95% CI 1.77-47.4) and detect drug interactions (OR 3.49, 95% CI 1.71-7.10) and consulting specialists (OR 5.92, 95% CI 1.49-32.48).

CONCLUSIONS

Primary care physicians are poorly supported by technological and human resources to monitor patients on oral anticoagulant. Even in a CCM, interprofessional collaboration and better technological support may be associated with optimal INR control.

Effect of a simple two-step warfarin dosing algorithm on anticoagulant control as measured by time in therapeutic range: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of vitamin K antagonists for the prevention of thromboembolism are dependent on the time for which the International Normalized Ratio (INR) is in the therapeutic range. The objective of our study was to determine the effect of introducing a simple two-step dosing algorithm, as compared with dosing by anticoagulation clinic staffs on the basis of their experience, on time in therapeutic range (TTR) of warfarin therapy.

METHODS

We compared TTRs of all clinic patients before and after the introduction of a simple two-step dosing algorithm at a single anticoagulation clinic in Canada, between 1 August 2006 and 24 December 2008. TTR was calculated using the linear interpolation method of Rosendaal.

RESULTS

We included 873 patients in the 'before' phase and 1088 patients in the 'after' phase. Introduction of the dosing algorithm significantly increased TTR of patients with a therapeutic INR range of 2-3 from 67.2% to 73.2% (P < 0.001), and that of patients with a therapeutic INR range of 2.5-3.5 from 49.8% to 63.8% (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of a simple two-step warfarin-dosing algorithm in place of dosing by experienced anticoagulation clinic staff significantly improved mean TTR for patients in a tertiary-care anticoagulation clinic. This inexpensive and widely applicable algorithm has the potential to improve warfarin control.

Physician wellness: a missing quality indicator

When physicians are unwell, the performance of health-care systems can be suboptimum. Physician wellness might not only benefit the individual physician, it could also be vital to the delivery of high-quality health care. We review the work stresses faced by physicians, the barriers to attending to wellness, and the consequences of unwell physicians to the individual and to health-care systems. We show that health systems should routinely measure physician wellness, and discuss the challenges associated with implementation.

Impact of discrepant results from clinical laboratories on patients and pharmaceutical trials: evidence from proficiency testing results

Aims: Despite improvements achieved in laboratory medicine over the years, discrepant results from different clinical laboratories are still a source of imminent risk to patients and the pharmaceutical industry. The problem is aggravated by a disconnection between laboratorians and clinicians or drug developers. Materials & methods: In this report, results from proficiency testing, originally established as a tool for good laboratory practice, were used to highlight the size of the problem and its impact on patients and pharmaceutical trials. Results from three laboratory tests, believed to be standardized and commonly requested as tools in the management of patients, and decision-making biomarkers in drug development were used: prothrombin time expressed as international normalization ratio, digoxin and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol. Results: Unfortunately, data demonstrate that results for the same sample or batch of samples, if analyzed by different laboratories or even by one laboratory that employs different platforms or reagents, can be extremely different. Conclusion: In the absence of an effective laboratory-to-laboratory, method-to-method or platform-to-platform standardization, or at lowest harmonization of test results, laboratory results could be misleading to clinicians and the drug industry. Drug developers need to understand the current challenge before any attempt to use biomarker data to make decisions, compile data for a biomarker from different studies or use biomarkers to bridge between different drug candidates belonging to a particular class of compounds.