Pleiotropic constraints promote the evolution of cooperation in cellular groups

Short-range C-signaling restricts cheating behavior during Myxococcus xanthus development

Myxococcus xanthus uses short-range C-signaling to coordinate multicellular mound formation with sporulation during fruiting body development. A csgA mutant deficient in C-signaling can cheat on wild type (WT) in mixtures and form spores disproportionately, but our understanding of cheating behavior is incomplete. We subjected mixtures of WT and csgA cells at different ratios to co-development and used confocal microscopy and image analysis to quantify the arrangement and morphology of cells. At a ratio of one WT to four csgA cells (1:4), mounds failed to form. At 1:2, only a few mounds and spores formed. At 1:1, mounds formed with a similar number and arrangement of WT and csgA rods early in development, but later the number of csgA spores near the bottom of these nascent fruiting bodies (NFBs) exceeded that of WT. This cheating after mound formation involved csgA forming spores at a greater rate, while WT disappeared at a greater rate, either lysing or exiting NFBs. At 2:1 and 4:1, csgA rods were more abundant than expected throughout the biofilm both before and during mound formation, and cheating continued after mound formation. We conclude that C-signaling restricts cheating behavior by requiring sufficient WT cells in mixtures. Excess cheaters may interfere with positive feedback loops that depend on the cellular arrangement to enhance C-signaling during mound building. Since long-range signaling could not likewise communicate the cellular arrangement, we propose that C-signaling was favored evolutionarily and that other short-range signaling mechanisms provided selective advantages in bacterial biofilm and multicellular animal development.

IMPORTANCE

Bacteria communicate using both long- and short-range signals. Signaling affects community composition, structure, and function. Adherent communities called biofilms impact medicine, agriculture, industry, and the environment. To facilitate the manipulation of biofilms for societal benefits, a better understanding of short-range signaling is necessary. We investigated the susceptibility of short-range C-signaling to cheating during Myxococcus xanthus biofilm development. A mutant deficient in C-signaling fails to form mounds containing spores (i.e., fruiting bodies) but cheats on C-signaling by wild type in starved cell mixtures and forms spores disproportionately. We found that cheating requires sufficient wild-type cells in the initial mix and can occur both before mound formation and later during the sporulation stage of development. By restricting cheating behavior, short-range C-signaling may have been favored evolutionarily rather than long-range diffusible signaling. Cheating restrictions imposed by short-range signaling may have likewise driven the evolution of multicellularity broadly.

Patterns and evolutionary consequences of pleiotropy

Pleiotropy refers to the phenomenon of one gene or one mutation affecting multiple phenotypic traits. While the concept of pleiotropy is as old as Mendelian genetics, functional genomics has finally allowed the first glimpses of the extent of pleiotropy for a large fraction of genes in a genome. After describing conceptual and operational difficulties in quantifying pleiotropy and the pros and cons of various methods for measuring pleiotropy, I review empirical data on pleiotropy, which generally show an L-shaped distribution of the degree of pleiotropy (i.e., the number of traits affected) with most genes having low pleiotropy. I then review the current understanding of the molecular basis of pleiotropy. The rest of the review discusses evolutionary consequences of pleiotropy, focusing on advances in topics including the cost of complexity, regulatory vs. coding evolution, environmental pleiotropy and adaptation, evolution of ageing and other seemingly harmful traits, and evolutionary resolution of pleiotropy.

Host control and the evolution of cooperation in host microbiomes

Humans, and many other species, are host to diverse symbionts. It is often suggested that the mutual benefits of host-microbe relationships can alone explain cooperative evolution. Here, we evaluate this hypothesis with evolutionary modelling. Our model predicts that mutual benefits are insufficient to drive cooperation in systems like the human microbiome, because of competition between symbionts. However, cooperation can emerge if hosts can exert control over symbionts, so long as there are constraints that limit symbiont counter evolution. We test our model with genomic data of two bacterial traits monitored by animal immune systems. In both cases, bacteria have evolved as predicted under host control, tending to lose flagella and maintain butyrate production when host-associated. Moreover, an analysis of bacteria that retain flagella supports the evolution of host control, via toll-like receptor 5, which limits symbiont counter evolution. Our work puts host control mechanisms, including the immune system, at the centre of microbiome evolution.