Sleep and wake cycles dynamically modulate hippocampal inhibitory synaptic plasticity

Latent mechanisms of plasticity are upregulated during sleep

Sleep is thought to serve an important role in learning and memory, but the mechanisms by which sleep promotes plasticity remain unclear. Even in the absence of plastic changes in neuronal function, many molecular, cellular, and physiological processes linked to plasticity are upregulated during sleep. Therefore, sleep may be a state in which latent plasticity mechanisms are poised to respond following novel experiences during prior wake. Many of these plasticity-related processes can promote both synaptic strengthening and weakening. Signaling pathways activated during sleep may interact with complements of proteins, determined by the content of prior waking experience, to establish the polarity of plasticity. Furthermore, precise reactivation of neuronal spiking patterns during sleep may interact with ongoing neuromodulatory, dendritic, and network activity to strengthen and weaken synapses. In this review, we will discuss the idea that sleep elevates latent plasticity mechanisms, which drive bidirectional plasticity depending on prior waking experience.

Sleep links hippocampal propensity for epileptiform activity to its viscerosensory inputs

The development of a seizure relies on two factors. One is the existence of an overexcitable neuronal network and the other is a trigger that switches normal activity of that network into a paroxysmal state. While mechanisms of local overexcitation have been the focus of many studies, the process of triggering remains poorly understood. We suggest that, apart from the known exteroceptive sources of reflex epilepsy such as visual, auditory or olfactory signals, there is a range of interoceptive triggers, which are relevant for seizure development in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy (TLE). The hypothesis proposed here aims to explain the prevalence of epileptic activity in sleep and in drowsiness states and to provide a detailed mechanism of seizures triggered by interoceptive signals.

Brief sleep disruption alters synaptic structures among hippocampal and neocortical somatostatin-expressing interneurons

Study objectives

Brief sleep loss alters cognition and synaptic structures of principal neurons in hippocampus and neocortex. However, while in vivo recording and bioinformatic data suggest that inhibitory interneurons are more strongly affected by sleep loss, it is unclear how sleep and sleep deprivation affect interneurons' synapses. Disruption of the SST+ interneuron population seems to be a critical early sign of neuropathology in Alzheimer's dementia, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder - and the risk of developing all three is increased by habitual sleep loss. We aimed to test how the synaptic structures of SST+ interneurons in various brain regions are affected by brief sleep disruption.

Methods

We used Brainbow 3.0 to label SST+ interneurons in the dorsal hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, and visual cortex of male SST-CRE transgenic mice, then compared synaptic structures in labeled neurons after a 6-h period of ad lib sleep, or gentle handling sleep deprivation (SD) starting at lights on.

Results

Dendritic spine density among SST+ interneurons in both hippocampus and neocortex was altered in a subregion-specific manner, with increased overall and thin spine density in CA1, dramatic increases in spine volume and surface area in CA3, and small but significant changes (primarily decreases) in spine size in CA1, PFC and V1.

Conclusions

Our suggest that the synaptic connectivity of SST+ interneurons is significantly altered in a brain region-specific manner by a few hours of sleep loss. This suggests a cell type-specific mechanism by which sleep loss disrupts cognition and alters excitatory-inhibitory balance in brain networks.

Release your inhibitions: The cell biology of GABAergic postsynaptic plasticity

GABAergic synaptic inhibition controls circuit function by regulating neuronal plasticity, excitability, and firing. To achieve these goals, inhibitory synapses themselves undergo several forms of plasticity via diverse mechanisms, strengthening and weakening phasic inhibition in response to numerous activity-induced stimuli. These mechanisms include changing the number and arrangement of functional GABAARs within the inhibitory postsynaptic domain (iPSD), which can profoundly regulate inhibitory synapse strength. Here, we explore recent advances in our molecular understanding of inhibitory postsynaptic plasticity, with a focus on modulation of the trafficking, protein-protein interactions, nanoscale-organization, and posttranscriptional regulation of GABAARs and iPSD proteins. What has emerged is a complex mechanistic picture of how synaptic inhibition is controlled, with critical ramifications for cognition under typical and pathogenic conditions.

Excitatory/Inhibitory imbalance as a mechanism linking autism and sleep problems

Sleep problems occur more frequently in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) than in typically developing individuals, and recent studies support a genetic link between ASD and sleep disturbances. However, it remains unclear how sleep problems may be mechanistically connected to ASD phenotypes. A longstanding hypothesis posits that an imbalance between excitatory and inhibitory (E/I) signaling in the brain underlies the behavioral characteristics of ASD. In recent years, emerging evidence has shown that regulation of the E/I ratio is coupled to sleep/wake states in wild-type animal models. In this review, we will explore the idea of altered E/I regulation over the sleep/wake cycle as a mechanism bridging sleep disruption and behavioral phenotypes in ASD.

Molecular mechanisms of the GABA type A receptor function

The GABA type A receptor (GABAAR) belongs to the family of pentameric ligand-gated ion channels and plays a key role in inhibition in adult mammalian brains. Dysfunction of this macromolecule may lead to epilepsy, anxiety disorders, autism, depression, and schizophrenia. GABAAR is also a target for multiple physiologically and clinically relevant modulators, such as benzodiazepines (BDZs), general anesthetics, and neurosteroids. The first GABAAR structure appeared in 2014, but the past years have brought a particularly abundant surge in structural data for these receptors with various ligands and modulators. Although the open conformation remains elusive, this novel information has pushed the structure-function studies to an unprecedented level. Electrophysiology, mutagenesis, photolabeling, and in silico simulations, guided by novel structural information, shed new light on the molecular mechanisms of receptor functioning. The main goal of this review is to present the current knowledge of GABAAR functional and structural properties. The review begins with an outline of the functional and structural studies of GABAAR, accompanied by some methodological considerations, especially biophysical methods, enabling the reader to follow how major breakthroughs in characterizing GABAAR features have been achieved. The main section provides a comprehensive analysis of the functional significance of specific structural elements in GABAARs. We additionally summarize the current knowledge on the binding sites for major GABAAR modulators, referring to the molecular underpinnings of their action. The final chapter of the review moves beyond examining GABAAR as an isolated macromolecule and describes the interactions of the receptor with other proteins in a broader context of inhibitory plasticity. In the final section, we propose a general conclusion that agonist binding to the orthosteric binding sites appears to rely on local interactions, whereas conformational transitions of bound macromolecule (gating) and allosteric modulation seem to reflect more global phenomena involving vast portions of the macromolecule.

Input specificity of NMDA-dependent GABAergic plasticity in the hippocampus

Sensory experiences and learning induce long-lasting changes in both excitatory and inhibitory synapses, thereby providing a crucial substrate for memory. However, the co-tuning of excitatory long-term potentiation (eLTP) or depression (eLTD) with the simultaneous changes at inhibitory synapses (iLTP/iLTD) remains unclear. Herein, we investigated the co-expression of NMDA-induced synaptic plasticity at excitatory and inhibitory synapses in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells (PCs) using a combination of electrophysiological, optogenetic, and pharmacological approaches. We found that inhibitory inputs from somatostatin (SST) and parvalbumin (PV)-positive interneurons onto CA1 PCs display input-specific long-term plastic changes following transient NMDA receptor activation. Notably, synapses from SST-positive interneurons consistently exhibited iLTP, irrespective of the direction of excitatory plasticity, whereas synapses from PV-positive interneurons predominantly showed iLTP concurrent with eLTP, rather than eLTD. As neuroplasticity is known to depend on the extracellular matrix, we tested the impact of metalloproteinases (MMP) inhibition. MMP3 blockade interfered with GABAergic plasticity for all inhibitory inputs, whereas MMP9 inhibition selectively blocked eLTP and iLTP in SST-CA1PC synapses co-occurring with eLTP but not eLTD. These findings demonstrate the dissociation of excitatory and inhibitory plasticity co-expression. We propose that these mechanisms of plasticity co-expression may be involved in maintaining excitation-inhibition balance and modulating neuronal integration modes.

Long-term α5 GABA A receptor negative allosteric modulator treatment reduces NMDAR-mediated neuronal excitation and maintains basal neuronal inhibition

α5 subunit-containing GABA type-A receptors (α5 GABAARs) are enriched in the hippocampus and play critical roles in neurodevelopment, synaptic plasticity, and cognition. α5 GABAAR preferring negative allosteric modulators (α5 NAMs) show promise mitigating cognitive impairment in preclinical studies of conditions characterized by excess GABAergic inhibition, including Down syndrome and memory deficits post-anesthesia. However, previous studies have primarily focused on acute application or single-dose α5 NAM treatment. Here, we measured the effects of chronic (7-day) in vitro treatment with L-655,708 (L6), a highly selective α5 NAM, on glutamatergic and GABAergic synapses in rat hippocampal neurons. We previously showed that 2-day in vitro treatment with L6 enhanced synaptic levels of the glutamate NMDA receptor (NMDAR) GluN2A subunit without modifying surface α5 GABAAR expression, inhibitory synapse function, or L6 sensitivity. We hypothesized that chronic L6 treatment would further increase synaptic GluN2A subunit levels while maintaining GABAergic inhibition and L6 efficacy, thus increasing neuronal excitation and glutamate-evoked intracellular calcium responses. Immunofluorescence experiments revealed that 7-day L6 treatment slightly increased the synaptic levels of gephyrin and surface α5 GABAARs. Functional studies showed that chronic α5 NAM treatment did not alter inhibition or α5 NAM sensitivity. Surprisingly, chronic L6 exposure decreased surface levels of GluN2A and GluN2B subunits, concurrent with reduced NMDAR-mediated neuronal excitation as seen by faster synaptic decay rates and reduced glutamate-evoked calcium responses. Together, these results show that chronic in vitro treatment with an α5 NAM leads to subtle homeostatic changes in inhibitory and excitatory synapses that suggest an overall dampening of excitability.

GABAergic synapses onto SST and PV interneurons in the CA1 hippocampal region show cell-specific and integrin-dependent plasticity

It is known that GABAergic transmission onto pyramidal neurons shows different forms of plasticity. However, GABAergic cells innervate also other inhibitory interneurons and plasticity phenomena at these projections remain largely unknown. Several mechanisms underlying plastic changes, both at inhibitory and excitatory synapses, show dependence on integrins, key proteins mediating interaction between intra- and extracellular environment. We thus used hippocampal slices to address the impact of integrins on long-term plasticity of GABAergic synapses on specific inhibitory interneurons (containing parvalbumin, PV + or somatostatin, SST +) known to innervate distinct parts of principal cells. Administration of RGD sequence-containing peptide induced inhibitory long-term potentiation (iLTP) at fast-spiking (FS) PV + as well as on SST + interneurons. Interestingly, treatment with a more specific peptide GA(C)RRETAWA(C)GA (RRETAWA), affecting α5β1 integrins, resulted in iLTP in SST + and iLTD in FS PV + interneurons. Brief exposure to NMDA is known to induce iLTP at GABAergic synapses on pyramidal cells. Intriguingly, application of this protocol for considered interneurons evoked iLTP in SST + and iLTD in PV + interneurons. Moreover, we showed that in SST + cells, NMDA-evoked iLTP depends on the incorporation of GABA_A receptors containing α5 subunit to the synapses, and this iLTP is occluded by RRETAWA peptide, indicating a key role of α5β1 integrins. Altogether, our results revealed that plasticity of inhibitory synapses at GABAergic cells shows interneuron-specificity and show differences in the underlying integrin-dependent mechanisms. This is the first evidence that neuronal disinhibition may be a highly plastic process depending on interneuron type and integrins' activity.

Remembering and forgetting in sleep: Selective synaptic plasticity during sleep driven by scaling factors Homer1a and Arc

Sleep is a conserved and essential process that supports learning and memory. Synapses are a major target of sleep function and a locus of sleep need. Evidence in the literature suggests that the need for sleep has a cellular or microcircuit level basis, and that sleep need can accumulate within localized brain regions as a function of waking activity. Activation of sleep promoting kinases and accumulation of synaptic phosphorylation was recently shown to be part of the molecular basis for the localized sleep need. A prominent hypothesis in the field suggests that some benefits of sleep are mediated by a broad but selective weakening, or scaling-down, of synaptic strength during sleep in order to offset increased excitability from synaptic potentiation during wake. The literature also shows that synapses can be strengthened during sleep, raising the question of what molecular mechanisms may allow for selection of synaptic plasticity types during sleep. Here I describe mechanisms of action of the scaling factors Arc and Homer1a in selective plasticity and links with sleep need. Arc and Homer1a are induced in neurons in response to waking neuronal activity and accumulate with time spent awake. I suggest that during sleep, Arc and Homer1a drive broad weakening of synapses through homeostatic scaling-down, but in a manner that is sensitive to the plasticity history of individual synapses, based on patterned phosphorylation of synaptic proteins. Therefore, Arc and Homer1a may offer insights into the intricate links between a cellular basis of sleep need and memory consolidation during sleep.