1
|
Pourmorady AD, Bashkirova EV, Chiariello AM, Belagzhal H, Kodra A, Duffié R, Kahiapo J, Monahan K, Pulupa J, Schieren I, Osterhoudt A, Dekker J, Nicodemi M, Lomvardas S. RNA-mediated symmetry breaking enables singular olfactory receptor choice. Nature 2024; 625:181-188. [PMID: 38123679 PMCID: PMC10765522 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06845-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
Olfactory receptor (OR) choice provides an extreme example of allelic competition for transcriptional dominance, where every olfactory neuron stably transcribes one of approximately 2,000 or more OR alleles1,2. OR gene choice is mediated by a multichromosomal enhancer hub that activates transcription at a single OR3,4, followed by OR-translation-dependent feedback that stabilizes this choice5,6. Here, using single-cell genomics, we show formation of many competing hubs with variable enhancer composition, only one of which retains euchromatic features and transcriptional competence. Furthermore, we provide evidence that OR transcription recruits enhancers and reinforces enhancer hub activity locally, whereas OR RNA inhibits transcription of competing ORs over distance, promoting transition to transcriptional singularity. Whereas OR transcription is sufficient to break the symmetry between equipotent enhancer hubs, OR translation stabilizes transcription at the prevailing hub, indicating that there may be sequential non-coding and coding mechanisms that are implemented by OR alleles for transcriptional prevalence. We propose that coding OR mRNAs possess non-coding functions that influence nuclear architecture, enhance their own transcription and inhibit transcription from their competitors, with generalizable implications for probabilistic cell fate decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariel D Pourmorady
- Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University New York, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
- Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind, Brain, and Behavior Institute, Columbia University New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizaveta V Bashkirova
- Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind, Brain, and Behavior Institute, Columbia University New York, New York, NY, USA
- Integrated Program in Cellular, Molecular and Biomedical Studies, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrea M Chiariello
- Department of Physics 'Ettore Pancini', University of Naples, and INFN, Napoli, Italy
| | - Houda Belagzhal
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Albana Kodra
- Integrated Program in Cellular, Molecular and Biomedical Studies, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Genetics and Development, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rachel Duffié
- Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind, Brain, and Behavior Institute, Columbia University New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jerome Kahiapo
- Department of Molecular Biology & Biochemistry, Rutgers School of Arts and Sciences, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Kevin Monahan
- Department of Molecular Biology & Biochemistry, Rutgers School of Arts and Sciences, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Joan Pulupa
- Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind, Brain, and Behavior Institute, Columbia University New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ira Schieren
- Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind, Brain, and Behavior Institute, Columbia University New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexa Osterhoudt
- Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind, Brain, and Behavior Institute, Columbia University New York, New York, NY, USA
- Integrated Program in Cellular, Molecular and Biomedical Studies, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Job Dekker
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Mario Nicodemi
- Department of Physics 'Ettore Pancini', University of Naples, and INFN, Napoli, Italy
| | - Stavros Lomvardas
- Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind, Brain, and Behavior Institute, Columbia University New York, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Komoto T, Fujii M, Awazu A. Epigenetic-structural changes in X chromosomes promote Xic pairing during early differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells. Biophys Physicobiol 2022; 19:1-14. [PMID: 35797402 PMCID: PMC9174021 DOI: 10.2142/biophysico.bppb-v19.0018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
X chromosome inactivation center (Xic) pairing occurs during the differentiation of embryonic stem (ES) cells from female mouse embryos, and is related to X chromosome inactivation, the circadian clock, intra-nucleus architecture, and metabolism. However, the mechanisms underlying the identification and approach of X chromosome pairs in the crowded nucleus are unclear. To elucidate the driving force of Xic pairing, we developed a coarse-grained molecular dynamics model of intranuclear chromosomes in ES cells and in cells 2 days after the onset of differentiation (2-day cells) by considering intrachromosomal epigenetic-structural feature-dependent mechanics. The analysis of the experimental data showed that X-chromosomes exhibit the rearrangement of their distributions of open/closed chromatin regions on their surfaces during cell differentiation. By simulating models where the excluded volume effects of closed chromatin regions are stronger than those of open chromatin regions, such rearrangement of open/closed chromatin regions on X-chromosome surfaces promoted the mutual approach of the Xic pair. These findings suggested that local intrachromosomal epigenetic features may contribute to the regulation of cell species-dependent differences in intranuclear architecture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tetsushi Komoto
- Graduate School of Integrated Sciences for Life, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan
| | - Masashi Fujii
- Graduate School of Integrated Sciences for Life, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan
| | - Akinori Awazu
- Graduate School of Integrated Sciences for Life, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan
- Research Center for the Mathematics on Chromatin Live Dynamics, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mutzel V, Schulz EG. Dosage Sensing, Threshold Responses, and Epigenetic Memory: A Systems Biology Perspective on Random X-Chromosome Inactivation. Bioessays 2021; 42:e1900163. [PMID: 32189388 DOI: 10.1002/bies.201900163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2019] [Revised: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
X-chromosome inactivation ensures dosage compensation between the sexes in mammals by randomly choosing one out of the two X chromosomes in females for inactivation. This process imposes a plethora of questions: How do cells count their X chromosome number and ensure that exactly one stays active? How do they randomly choose one of two identical X chromosomes for inactivation? And how do they stably maintain this state of monoallelic expression? Here, different regulatory concepts and their plausibility are evaluated in the context of theoretical studies that have investigated threshold behavior, ultrasensitivity, and bistability through mathematical modeling. It is discussed how a twofold difference between a single and a double dose of X-linked genes might be converted to an all-or-nothing response and how mutually exclusive expression can be initiated and maintained. Finally, candidate factors that might mediate the proposed regulatory principles are reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verena Mutzel
- Otto Warburg Laboratories, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, 14195, Germany
| | - Edda G Schulz
- Otto Warburg Laboratories, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, 14195, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
trans-Acting Factors and cis Elements Involved in the Human Inactive X Chromosome Organization and Compaction. Genet Res (Camb) 2021; 2021:6683460. [PMID: 34035662 PMCID: PMC8121581 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6683460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
During X chromosome inactivation, many chromatin changes occur on the future inactive X chromosome, including acquisition of a variety of repressive covalent histone modifications, heterochromatin protein associations, and DNA methylation of promoters. Here, we summarize trans-acting factors and cis elements that have been shown to be involved in the human inactive X chromosome organization and compaction.
Collapse
|
5
|
Akematsu T, Sánchez-Fernández R, Kosta F, Holzer E, Loidl J. The Transmembrane Protein Semi1 Positions Gamete Nuclei for Reciprocal Fertilization in Tetrahymena. iScience 2019; 23:100749. [PMID: 31884169 PMCID: PMC6941865 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2019.100749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2019] [Revised: 11/01/2019] [Accepted: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
During sexual reproduction in the ciliate, Tetrahymena thermophila, cells of complementary mating type pair ("conjugate") undergo simultaneous meiosis and fertilize each other. In both mating partners only one of the four meiotic products is "selected" to escape autophagy, and this nucleus divides mitotically to produce two pronuclei. The migrating pronucleus of one cell translocates to the mating partner and fuses with its stationary pronucleus and vice versa. Selection of the designated gametic nucleus was thought to depend on its position within the cell because it always attaches to the junction with the partner cell. Here we show that a transmembrane protein, Semi1, is crucial for attachment. Loss of Semi1 causes failure to attach and consequent infertility. However, a nucleus is selected and gives rise to pronuclei regardless of Semi1 expression, indicating that attachment of a nucleus to the junction is not a precondition for selection but follows the selection process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takahiko Akematsu
- Department of Chromosome Biology, University of Vienna, Dr. Bohr-Gasse 9, Vienna 1030, Austria.
| | | | - Felix Kosta
- Department of Chromosome Biology, University of Vienna, Dr. Bohr-Gasse 9, Vienna 1030, Austria
| | - Elisabeth Holzer
- Department of Chromosome Biology, University of Vienna, Dr. Bohr-Gasse 9, Vienna 1030, Austria
| | - Josef Loidl
- Department of Chromosome Biology, University of Vienna, Dr. Bohr-Gasse 9, Vienna 1030, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Goodrich L, Panning B, Leung KN. Activators and repressors: A balancing act for X-inactivation. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2016; 56:3-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2016] [Revised: 05/06/2016] [Accepted: 05/06/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
7
|
Froberg JE, Yang L, Lee JT. Guided by RNAs: X-inactivation as a model for lncRNA function. J Mol Biol 2013; 425:3698-706. [PMID: 23816838 PMCID: PMC3771680 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.06.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2013] [Accepted: 06/14/2013] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The recent revolution in sequencing technology has helped to reveal a large transcriptome of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs). A major challenge in the years to come is to determine what biological functions, if any, they serve. Although the purpose of these transcripts is largely unknown at present, existing examples suggest that lncRNAs play roles in a wide variety of biological processes. Exemplary cases are lncRNAs within the X-inactivation center. Indeed, lncRNAs dominate control of random X-chromosome inactivation (XCI). The RNA-based regulatory mechanisms of XCI include recruitment of chromatin modifiers, formation of RNA-based subnuclear compartments, and regulation of transcription by antisense transcription. XCI and lncRNAs now also appear to be very relevant in the development and progression of cancer. This perspective focuses on new insights into lncRNA-dependent regulation of XCI, which we believe serve as paradigms for understanding lncRNA function more generally.
Collapse
|
8
|
Human X-chromosome inactivation pattern distributions fit a model of genetically influenced choice better than models of completely random choice. Eur J Hum Genet 2013; 21:1396-402. [PMID: 23652377 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.84] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2012] [Revised: 02/13/2013] [Accepted: 03/20/2013] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
In eutherian mammals, one X-chromosome in every XX somatic cell is transcriptionally silenced through the process of X-chromosome inactivation (XCI). Females are thus functional mosaics, where some cells express genes from the paternal X, and the others from the maternal X. The relative abundance of the two cell populations (X-inactivation pattern, XIP) can have significant medical implications for some females. In mice, the 'choice' of which X to inactivate, maternal or paternal, in each cell of the early embryo is genetically influenced. In humans, the timing of XCI choice and whether choice occurs completely randomly or under a genetic influence is debated. Here, we explore these questions by analysing the distribution of XIPs in large populations of normal females. Models were generated to predict XIP distributions resulting from completely random or genetically influenced choice. Each model describes the discrete primary distribution at the onset of XCI, and the continuous secondary distribution accounting for changes to the XIP as a result of development and ageing. Statistical methods are used to compare models with empirical data from Danish and Utah populations. A rigorous data treatment strategy maximises information content and allows for unbiased use of unphased XIP data. The Anderson-Darling goodness-of-fit statistics and likelihood ratio tests indicate that a model of genetically influenced XCI choice better fits the empirical data than models of completely random choice.
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
A variety of important cellular processes require, for functional purposes, the colocalization of multiple DNA loci at specific time points. In most cases, the physical mechanisms responsible for bringing them in close proximity are still elusive. Here we show that the interaction of DNA loci with a concentration of diffusing molecular factors can induce spontaneously their colocalization, through a mechanism based on a thermodynamic phase transition. We consider up to four DNA loci and different valencies for diffusing molecular factors. In particular, our analysis illustrates that a variety of nontrivial stable spatial configurations is allowed in the system, depending on the details of the molecular factor/DNA binding-sites interaction. Finally, we discuss as a case study an application of our model to the pairing of X chromosome at X inactivation, one of the best-known examples of DNA colocalization. We also speculate on the possible links between X colocalization and inactivation.
Collapse
|
10
|
Scialdone A, Cataudella I, Barbieri M, Prisco A, Nicodemi M. Conformation regulation of the X chromosome inactivation center: a model. PLoS Comput Biol 2011; 7:e1002229. [PMID: 22046112 PMCID: PMC3203058 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2011] [Accepted: 08/30/2011] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
X-Chromosome Inactivation (XCI) is the process whereby one, randomly chosen X becomes transcriptionally silenced in female cells. XCI is governed by the Xic, a locus on the X encompassing an array of genes which interact with each other and with key molecular factors. The mechanism, though, establishing the fate of the X's, and the corresponding alternative modifications of the Xic architecture, is still mysterious. In this study, by use of computer simulations, we explore the scenario where chromatin conformations emerge from its interaction with diffusing molecular factors. Our aim is to understand the physical mechanisms whereby stable, non-random conformations are established on the Xic's, how complex architectural changes are reliably regulated, and how they lead to opposite structures on the two alleles. In particular, comparison against current experimental data indicates that a few key cis-regulatory regions orchestrate the organization of the Xic, and that two major molecular regulators are involved. In mammal female cells X-Chromosome Inactivation (XCI) is the vital process whereby one X, randomly chosen, is silenced to compensate dosage of X products with respect to males. XCI is governed by a region on the X, the X Inactivation Centre (Xic), which undergoes a sequence of conformational modifications during the process. The two Xic are exposed, though, to the same environment, and it is obscure how they attain different architectures. By use of computer simulations of a molecular model, here we individuate general physical mechanisms whereby random Brownian molecules can assemble chromatin stable architectures, reliably regulate conformational changes, and establish opposite transformations on identical alleles. In the case-study of the murine Xic, our analysis highlights the existence of a few key regulatory regions and molecular factors. It also predicts, e.g., the effects of genetic modifications in the locus, which are compared with current deletion/insertion experiments. The physical mechanisms we describe are rooted in thermodynamics and could be relevant well beyond XCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Scialdone
- Department of Computational and Systems Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | - Ilaria Cataudella
- Center for Models of Life, Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mariano Barbieri
- Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, Università di Napoli “Federico II,” INFN, Napoli, Italy
| | - Antonella Prisco
- CNR Istituto di Genetica e Biofisica “B. Traverso”, Napoli, Italy
| | - Mario Nicodemi
- Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, Università di Napoli “Federico II,” INFN, CNR-SPIN, Napoli, Italy
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Veglio A. The shade avoidance syndrome: a non-Markovian stochastic growth model. J Theor Biol 2010; 264:722-8. [PMID: 20219481 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.02.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2008] [Revised: 01/13/2010] [Accepted: 02/23/2010] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Plants at high population density compete for light, showing a series of physiological responses known as the shade avoidance syndrome. These responses are controlled by the synthesis of the hormone auxin, which is regulated by two signals, an environmental one and an internal one. Considering that the auxin signal induces plant growth after a time lag, this work shows that plant growth can be modelled in terms of an energy-like function extremization, provided that the Markov property is not applied. The simulated height distributions are bimodal and right skewed, as in real community of plants. In the case of isolated plants, theoretical growth dynamics and speed correctly fit Arabidopsis thaliana experimental data reported in literature. Moreover, the growth dynamics of this model is shown to be consistent with the biomass production function of an independent model. These results suggest that memory effects play a non-negligible role in plant growth processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Veglio
- Department of Oncological Sciences and Division of Vascular Biology, Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment, University of Torino, Str Prov 142 Km 3.95, 10060 Candiolo, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
The X-linked region now known as the "X-inactivation center" (Xic) was once dominated by protein-coding genes but, with the rise of Eutherian mammals some 150-200 million years ago, became infiltrated by genes that produce long noncoding RNA (ncRNA). Some of the noncoding genes have been shown to play crucial roles during X-chromosome inactivation (XCI), including the targeting of chromatin modifiers to the X. The rapid establishment of ncRNA hints at a possible preference for long transcripts in some aspects of epigenetic regulation. This article discusses the role of RNA in XCI and considers the advantages RNA offers in delivering allelic, cis-limited, and locus-specific control. Unlike proteins and small RNAs, long ncRNAs are tethered to the site of transcription and effectively tag the allele of origin. Furthermore, long ncRNAs are drawn from larger sequence space than proteins and can mark a unique region in a complex genome. Thus, like their small RNA cousins, long ncRNAs may emerge as versatile and powerful regulators of the epigenome.
Collapse
|
13
|
Barakat TS, Jonkers I, Monkhorst K, Gribnau J. X-changing information on X inactivation. Exp Cell Res 2010; 316:679-87. [PMID: 20083102 DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2009] [Revised: 01/04/2010] [Accepted: 01/10/2010] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
In female somatic cells of mammalian species one X chromosome is inactivated to ensure dosage equality of X-encoded genes between females and males, during development and adulthood. X chromosome inactivation (XCI) involves various epigenetic mechanisms, including RNA mediated gene silencing in cis, DNA methylation, and changes in chromatin modifications and composition. XCI therefore provides an attractive paradigm to study epigenetic gene regulation in a more general context. The XCI process starts with counting of the number of X chromosomes present in a nucleus, and initiation of XCI follows if this number exceeds one per diploid genome. Recently, X-encoded RNF12 has been identified as a dose-dependent activator of XCI. In addition, other factors, including the pluripotency factors OCT4, SOX2 and Nanog, have been implicated to play a role in suppression of initiation of XCI. In this review, we highlight and explain these new and old findings in the context of a stochastic model for X chromosome counting and XCI initiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tahsin Stefan Barakat
- Department of Reproduction and Development, Room Ee 09-71, Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Barakat TS, Gribnau J. X chromosome inactivation and embryonic stem cells. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2010; 695:132-54. [PMID: 21222204 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7037-4_10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
X chromosome inactivation (XCI) is a process required to equalize the dosage of X-encoded genes between female and male cells. XCI is initiated very early during female embryonic development or upon differentiation of female embryonic stem (ES) cells and results in inactivation of one X chromosome in every female somatic cell. The regulation of XCI involves factors that also play a crucial role in ES cell maintenance and differentiation and the XCI process therefore provides a beautiful paradigm to study ES cell biology. In this chapter we describe the important cis and trans acting regulators of XCI and introduce the models that have been postulated to explain initiation of XCI in female cells only. We also discuss the proteins involved in the establishment of the inactive X chromosome and describe the different chromatin modifications associated with the inactivation process. Finally, we describe the potential of mouse and human ES and induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells as model systems to study the XCI process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tahsin Stefan Barakat
- Department of Reproduction and Development, University Medical Center, Room Ee 09-71, Erasmus MC, 3015 GE, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
DNA loci cross-talk through thermodynamics. J Biomed Biotechnol 2009; 2009:516723. [PMID: 19759859 PMCID: PMC2744883 DOI: 10.1155/2009/516723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2009] [Revised: 06/05/2009] [Accepted: 07/08/2009] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The recognition and pairing of specific DNA loci, though crucial for a plenty of important cellular processes, are produced by still mysterious physical mechanisms. We propose the first quantitative
model from Statistical Mechanics, able to clarify the interaction allowing such “DNA cross-talk”
events. Soluble molecules, which bind some DNA recognition sequences, produce an effective attraction
between distant DNA loci; if their affinity, their concentration, and the relative DNA binding
sites number exceed given thresholds, DNA colocalization occurs as a result of a thermodynamic
phase transition. In this paper, after a concise report on some of the most recent experimental results,
we introduce our model and carry out a detailed “in silico” analysis of it, by means of Monte
Carlo simulations. Our studies, while rationalize several experimental observations, result in very
interesting and testable predictions.
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
Transcriptome studies are revealing that the eukaryotic genome actively transcribes a diverse repertoire of large noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs), many of which are unannotated and distinct from the small RNAs that have garnered much attention in recent years. Why are they so pervasive, and do they have a function? X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) is a classic epigenetic phenomenon associated with many large ncRNAs. Here, I provide a perspective on how XCI is achieved in mice and suggest how this knowledge can be applied to the rest of the genome. Emerging data indicate that long ncRNAs can function as guides and tethers, and may be the molecules of choice for epigenetic regulation: First, unlike proteins and small RNAs, large ncRNAs remain tethered to the site of transcription, and can therefore uniquely direct allelic regulation. Second, ncRNAs command a much larger sequence space than proteins, and can therefore achieve very precise spatiotemporal control of development. These properties imply that long noncoding transcripts may ultimately rival small RNAs and proteins in their versatility as epigenetic regulators, particularly for locus- and allele-specific control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeannie T Lee
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Thermodynamic pathways to genome spatial organization in the cell nucleus. Biophys J 2009; 96:2168-77. [PMID: 19289043 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2008.12.3919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2008] [Revised: 11/16/2008] [Accepted: 12/09/2008] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The architecture of the eukaryotic genome is characterized by a high degree of spatial organization. Chromosomes occupy preferred territories correlated to their state of activity and, yet, displace their genes to interact with remote sites in complex patterns requiring the orchestration of a huge number of DNA loci and molecular regulators. Far from random, this organization serves crucial functional purposes, but its governing principles remain elusive. By computer simulations of a statistical mechanics model, we show how architectural patterns spontaneously arise from the physical interaction between soluble binding molecules and chromosomes via collective thermodynamics mechanisms. Chromosomes colocalize, loops and territories form, and find their relative positions as stable thermodynamic states. These are selected by thermodynamic switches, which are regulated by concentrations/affinity of soluble mediators and by number/location of their attachment sites along chromosomes. Our thermodynamic switch model of nuclear architecture, thus, explains on quantitative grounds how well-known cell strategies of upregulation of DNA binding proteins or modification of chromatin structure can dynamically shape the organization of the nucleus.
Collapse
|
18
|
Mechanics and dynamics of X-chromosome pairing at X inactivation. PLoS Comput Biol 2008; 4:e1000244. [PMID: 19112484 PMCID: PMC2592697 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2008] [Accepted: 11/06/2008] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
At the onset of X-chromosome inactivation, the vital process whereby female mammalian cells equalize X products with respect to males, the X chromosomes are colocalized along their Xic (X-inactivation center) regions. The mechanism inducing recognition and pairing of the X's remains, though, elusive. Starting from recent discoveries on the molecular factors and on the DNA sequences (the so-called “pairing sites”) involved, we dissect the mechanical basis of Xic colocalization by using a statistical physics model. We show that soluble DNA-specific binding molecules, such as those experimentally identified, can be indeed sufficient to induce the spontaneous colocalization of the homologous chromosomes but only when their concentration, or chemical affinity, rises above a threshold value as a consequence of a thermodynamic phase transition. We derive the likelihood of pairing and its probability distribution. Chromosome dynamics has two stages: an initial independent Brownian diffusion followed, after a characteristic time scale, by recognition and pairing. Finally, we investigate the effects of DNA deletion/insertions in the region of pairing sites and compare model predictions to available experimental data. Some important cellular processes involve homologous chromosome recognition and pairing. A prominent example is the colocalization of X chromosomes occurring at the onset of X chromosome inactivation, the vital process whereby female mammalian cells silence one of their two X chromosomes to equalize the dosage of X products with respect to males (having just one X). The crucial question on how the Xs recognize each other and come together is, however, still open. Starting from important recent experimental discoveries, we propose a quantitative model, from statistical mechanics, which elucidates the mechanical basis of such phenomena. We demonstrate that a set of soluble molecules binding specific DNA sequences are sufficient to induce recognition and colocalization. This is possible, however, only when their binding energy/concentration exceeds a threshold value, and this suggests how the cell could regulate colocalization. The pairing mechanism that we propose is grounded in general thermodynamic principles, so it could apply to other DNA pairing processes. While we also explore the kinetics of X colocalization, we compare our results to available experimental data and produce testable predictions.
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
X chromosome inactivation (XCI) reduces the number of actively transcribed X chromosomes to one per diploid set of autosomes, allowing for dosage equality between the sexes. In eutherians, the inactive X chromosome in XX females is randomly selected. The mechanisms for determining both how many X chromosomes are present and which to inactivate are unknown. To understand these mechanisms, researchers have created X chromosome mutations and transgenes. Here, we introduce a new model of X chromosome inactivation that aims to account for the findings in recent studies, to promote a re-interpretation of existing data and to direct future experiments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Starmer
- Department of Genetics and the Carolina Center for the Genome Sciences, and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
A general model for the early recognition and colocalization of homologous DNA sequences is proposed. We show, on thermodynamic grounds, how the distance between two homologous DNA sequences is spontaneously regulated by the concentration and affinity of diffusible mediators binding them, which act as a switch between two phases corresponding to independence or colocalization of pairing regions.
Collapse
|
21
|
Nicodemi M, Panning B, Prisco A. The colocalization transition of homologous chromosomes at meiosis. PHYSICAL REVIEW. E, STATISTICAL, NONLINEAR, AND SOFT MATTER PHYSICS 2008; 77:061913. [PMID: 18643306 DOI: 10.1103/physreve.77.061913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2007] [Revised: 03/28/2008] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Meiosis is the specialized cell division required in sexual reproduction. During its early stages, in the mother cell nucleus, homologous chromosomes recognize each other and colocalize in a crucial step that remains one of the most mysterious of meiosis. Starting from recent discoveries on the system molecular components and interactions, we discuss a statistical mechanics model of chromosome early pairing. Binding molecules mediate long-distance interaction of special DNA recognition sequences and, if their concentration exceeds a critical threshold, they induce a spontaneous colocalization transition of chromosomes, otherwise independently diffusing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Nicodemi
- Department of Physics and Complexity Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Angelopoulou R, Lavranos G, Manolakou P. Regulatory RNAs and chromatin modification in dosage compensation: a continuous path from flies to humans? Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2008; 6:12. [PMID: 18355403 PMCID: PMC2324084 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-6-12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2007] [Accepted: 03/20/2008] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Chromosomal sex determination is a widely distributed strategy in nature. In the most classic scenario, one sex is characterized by a homologue pair of sex chromosomes, while the other includes two morphologically and functionally distinct gonosomes. In mammalian diploid cells, the female is characterized by the presence of two identical X chromosomes, while the male features an XY pair, with the Y bearing the major genetic determinant of sex, i.e. the SRY gene. In other species, such as the fruitfly, sex is determined by the ratio of autosomes to X chromosomes. Regardless of the exact mechanism, however, all these animals would exhibit a sex-specific gene expression inequality, due to the different number of X chromosomes, a phenomenon inhibited by a series of genetic and epigenetic regulatory events described as "dosage compensation". Since adequate available data is currently restricted to worms, flies and mammals, while for other groups of animals, such as reptiles, fish and birds it is very limited, it is not yet clear whether this is an evolutionary conserved mechanism. However certain striking similarities have already been observed among evolutionary distant species, such as Drosophila melanogaster and Mus musculus. These mainly refer to a) the need for a counting mechanism, to determine the chromosomal content of the cell, i.e. the ratio of autosomes to gonosomes (a process well understood in flies, but still hypothesized in mammals), b) the implication of non-translated, sex-specific, regulatory RNAs (roX and Xist, respectively) as key elements in this process and the location of similar mediators in the Z chromosome of chicken c) the inclusion of a chromatin modification epigenetic final step, which ensures that gene expression remains stably regulated throughout the affected area of the gonosome. This review summarizes these points and proposes a possible role for comparative genetics, as they seem to constitute proof of maintained cell economy (by using the same basic regulatory elements in various different scenarios) throughout numerous centuries of evolutionary history.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxani Angelopoulou
- Department of Histology-Embryology, Medical School, Athens University, Greece
| | - Giagkos Lavranos
- Department of Histology-Embryology, Medical School, Athens University, Greece
| | - Panagiota Manolakou
- Department of Histology-Embryology, Medical School, Athens University, Greece
| |
Collapse
|