Optimality of sparse olfactory representations is not affected by network plasticity

Plasticity in inhibitory networks improves pattern separation in early olfactory processing

Distinguishing between nectar and non-nectar odors is challenging for animals due to shared compounds and varying ratios in complex mixtures. Changes in nectar production throughout the day and over the animal's lifetime add to the complexity. The honeybee olfactory system, containing fewer than 1000 principal neurons in the early olfactory relay, the antennal lobe (AL), must learn to associate diverse volatile blends with rewards. Previous studies identified plasticity in the AL circuits, but its role in odor learning remains poorly understood. Using a biophysical computational model, tuned by in vivo electrophysiological data, and live imaging of the honeybee's AL, we explored the neural mechanisms of plasticity in the AL. Our findings revealed that when trained with a set of rewarded and unrewarded odors, the AL inhibitory network suppresses responses to shared chemical compounds while enhancing responses to distinct compounds. This results in improved pattern separation and a more concise neural code. Our calcium imaging data support these predictions. Analysis of a graph convolutional neural network performing an odor categorization task revealed a similar mechanism for contrast enhancement. Our study provides insights into how inhibitory plasticity in the early olfactory network reshapes the coding for efficient learning of complex odors.

Plasticity in inhibitory networks improves pattern separation in early olfactory processing

Distinguishing between nectar and non-nectar odors is challenging for animals due to shared compounds and varying ratios in complex mixtures. Changes in nectar production throughout the day - and potentially many times within a forager's lifetime - add to the complexity. The honeybee olfactory system, containing fewer than 1,000 principal neurons in the early olfactory relay, the antennal lobe (AL), must learn to associate diverse volatile blends with rewards. Previous studies identified plasticity in the AL circuits, but its role in odor learning remains poorly understood. Using a biophysical computational network model, tuned by in vivo electrophysiological data, and live imaging of the honeybee's AL, we explored the neural mechanisms and functions of plasticity in the early olfactory system. Our findings revealed that when trained with a set of rewarded and unrewarded odors, the AL inhibitory network suppresses shared chemical compounds while enhancing responses to distinct compounds. This results in improved pattern separation and a more concise neural code. Our calcium imaging data support these predictions. Analysis of a graph convolutional neural network performing an odor categorization task revealed a similar mechanism for contrast enhancement. Our study provides insights into how inhibitory plasticity in the early olfactory network reshapes the coding for efficient learning of complex odors.

Olfactory receptor neurons generate multiple response motifs, increasing coding space dimensionality

Odorants binding to olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) trigger bursts of action potentials, providing the brain with its only experience of the olfactory environment. Our recordings made in vivo from locust ORNs showed that odor-elicited firing patterns comprise four distinct response motifs, each defined by a reliable temporal profile. Different odorants could elicit different response motifs from a given ORN, a property we term motif switching. Further, each motif undergoes its own form of sensory adaptation when activated by repeated plume-like odor pulses. A computational model constrained by our recordings revealed that organizing responses into multiple motifs provides substantial benefits for classifying odors and processing complex odor plumes: each motif contributes uniquely to encode the plume's composition and structure. Multiple motifs and motif switching further improve odor classification by expanding coding dimensionality. Our model demonstrated that these response features could provide benefits for olfactory navigation, including determining the distance to an odor source.

Cortical feedback and gating in odor discrimination and generalization

A central question in neuroscience is how context changes perception. In the olfactory system, for example, experiments show that task demands can drive divergence and convergence of cortical odor responses, likely underpinning olfactory discrimination and generalization. Here, we propose a simple statistical mechanism for this effect based on unstructured feedback from the central brain to the olfactory bulb, which represents the context associated with an odor, and sufficiently selective cortical gating of sensory inputs. Strikingly, the model predicts that both convergence and divergence of cortical odor patterns should increase when odors are initially more similar, an effect reported in recent experiments. The theory in turn predicts reversals of these trends following experimental manipulations and in neurological conditions that increase cortical excitability.

What the odor is not: Estimation by elimination

Olfactory systems use a small number of broadly sensitive receptors to combinatorially encode a vast number of odors. We propose a method of decoding such distributed representations by exploiting a statistical fact: Receptors that do not respond to an odor carry more information than receptors that do because they signal the absence of all odorants that bind to them. Thus, it is easier to identify what the odor is not rather than what the odor is. For realistic numbers of receptors, response functions, and odor complexity, this method of elimination turns an underconstrained decoding problem into a solvable one, allowing accurate determination of odorants in a mixture and their concentrations. We construct a neural network realization of our algorithm based on the structure of the olfactory pathway.

A spiking neural program for sensorimotor control during foraging in flying insects

Foraging is a vital behavioral task for living organisms. Behavioral strategies and abstract mathematical models thereof have been described in detail for various species. To explore the link between underlying neural circuits and computational principles, we present how a biologically detailed neural circuit model of the insect mushroom body implements sensory processing, learning, and motor control. We focus on cast and surge strategies employed by flying insects when foraging within turbulent odor plumes. Using a spike-based plasticity rule, the model rapidly learns to associate individual olfactory sensory cues paired with food in a classical conditioning paradigm. We show that, without retraining, the system dynamically recalls memories to detect relevant cues in complex sensory scenes. Accumulation of this sensory evidence on short time scales generates cast-and-surge motor commands. Our generic systems approach predicts that population sparseness facilitates learning, while temporal sparseness is required for dynamic memory recall and precise behavioral control. Our work successfully combines biological computational principles with spike-based machine learning. It shows how knowledge transfer from static to arbitrary complex dynamic conditions can be achieved by foraging insects and may serve as inspiration for agent-based machine learning.

In vivo odorant input induces spike timing-dependent plasticity of glutamatergic synapses in developing zebrafish olfactory bulb

Early odorant experience and neural activity are essential for refining developing neural connections. Although neural activity-induced synaptic plasticity is one of the most important cellular mechanisms underlying the refinement of neural circuits, whether and how natural odorant experience induces long-term plasticity in the olfactory bulb remains unknown. In vivo perforated whole-cell recording from mitral cells (MCs) in larval zebrafish showed that odorant experience induced persistent modification of developing olfactory bulb circuits via spike timing-dependent plasticity (STDP). Repetitive odorant stimuli paired with postsynaptic spiking in a critical time window (pre-post, positive timing) resulted in persistent enhancement of glutamatergic inputs from olfactory sensory neurons, but long-term depression within the opposite time window (post-pre, negative timing). Furthermore, spike-timing-dependent potentiation (tLTP) in STDP induced by repetitive odorant stimulation had similar cellular processes to those of electrical stimulation-induced tLTP. Finally, odorant input induced STDP required the activation of postsynaptic N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors (NMDARs). Thus, the NMDAR is likely to be a postsynaptic coincidence detector responsible for the sensory experience-dependent refinement of developing connections.