COMMIT: Consideration of metabolite leakage and community composition improves microbial community reconstructions

Machine learning for the advancement of genome-scale metabolic modeling

Constraint-based modeling (CBM) has evolved as the core systems biology tool to map the interrelations between genotype, phenotype, and external environment. The recent advancement of high-throughput experimental approaches and multi-omics strategies has generated a plethora of new and precise information from wide-ranging biological domains. On the other hand, the continuously growing field of machine learning (ML) and its specialized branch of deep learning (DL) provide essential computational architectures for decoding complex and heterogeneous biological data. In recent years, both multi-omics and ML have assisted in the escalation of CBM. Condition-specific omics data, such as transcriptomics and proteomics, helped contextualize the model prediction while analyzing a particular phenotypic signature. At the same time, the advanced ML tools have eased the model reconstruction and analysis to increase the accuracy and prediction power. However, the development of these multi-disciplinary methodological frameworks mainly occurs independently, which limits the concatenation of biological knowledge from different domains. Hence, we have reviewed the potential of integrating multi-disciplinary tools and strategies from various fields, such as synthetic biology, CBM, omics, and ML, to explore the biochemical phenomenon beyond the conventional biological dogma. How the integrative knowledge of these intersected domains has improved bioengineering and biomedical applications has also been highlighted. We categorically explained the conventional genome-scale metabolic model (GEM) reconstruction tools and their improvement strategies through ML paradigms. Further, the crucial role of ML and DL in omics data restructuring for GEM development has also been briefly discussed. Finally, the case-study-based assessment of the state-of-the-art method for improving biomedical and metabolic engineering strategies has been elaborated. Therefore, this review demonstrates how integrating experimental and in silico strategies can help map the ever-expanding knowledge of biological systems driven by condition-specific cellular information. This multiview approach will elevate the application of ML-based CBM in the biomedical and bioengineering fields for the betterment of society and the environment.

Comparative analysis of metabolic models of microbial communities reconstructed from automated tools and consensus approaches

Genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) of microbial communities offer valuable insights into the functional capabilities of their members and facilitate the exploration of microbial interactions. These models are generated using different automated reconstruction tools, each relying on different biochemical databases that may affect the conclusions drawn from the in silico analysis. One way to address this problem is to employ a consensus reconstruction method that combines the outcomes of different reconstruction tools. Here, we conducted a comparative analysis of community models reconstructed from three automated tools, i.e. CarveMe, gapseq, and KBase, alongside a consensus approach, utilizing metagenomics data from two marine bacterial communities. Our analysis revealed that these reconstruction approaches, while based on the same genomes, resulted in GEMs with varying numbers of genes and reactions as well as metabolic functionalities, attributed to the different databases employed. Further, our results indicated that the set of exchanged metabolites was more influenced by the reconstruction approach rather than the specific bacterial community investigated. This observation suggests a potential bias in predicting metabolite interactions using community GEMs. We also showed that consensus models encompassed a larger number of reactions and metabolites while concurrently reducing the presence of dead-end metabolites. Therefore, the usage of consensus models allows making full and unbiased use from aggregating genes from the different reconstructions in assessing the functional potential of microbial communities.

Strategies for tailoring functional microbial synthetic communities

Natural ecosystems harbor a huge reservoir of taxonomically diverse microbes that are important for plant growth and health. The vast diversity of soil microorganisms and their complex interactions make it challenging to pinpoint the main players important for the life support functions microbes can provide to plants, including enhanced tolerance to (a)biotic stress factors. Designing simplified microbial synthetic communities (SynComs) helps reduce this complexity to unravel the molecular and chemical basis and interplay of specific microbiome functions. While SynComs have been successfully employed to dissect microbial interactions or reproduce microbiome-associated phenotypes, the assembly and reconstitution of these communities have often been based on generic abundance patterns or taxonomic identities and co-occurrences but have only rarely been informed by functional traits. Here, we review recent studies on designing functional SynComs to reveal common principles and discuss multidimensional approaches for community design. We propose a strategy for tailoring the design of functional SynComs based on integration of high-throughput experimental assays with microbial strains and computational genomic analyses of their functional capabilities.