1
|
Miller JS, Wan E, O'Fallon S, Pinter-Wollman N. Modularity and connectivity of nest structure scale with colony size. Evolution 2021; 76:101-113. [PMID: 34773247 DOI: 10.1111/evo.14402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Revised: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Large body sizes have evolved structures to facilitate resource transport. Like unitary organisms, social insect colonies must transport information and resources. Colonies with more individuals may experience transport challenges similar to large-bodied organisms. In ant colonies, transport occurs in the nest, which may consist of structures that facilitate movement. We examine three attributes of nests that might have evolved to mitigate transport challenges related to colony size: (1) subdivision-nests of species with large colonies are more subdivided to reduce crowd viscosity; (2) branching-nest tunnels increase branching in species with large colonies to reduce travel distances; and (3) shortcuts-nests of species with large colonies have cross-linking tunnels to connect distant parts of the nest and create alternative routes. We test these hypotheses by comparing nest structures of species with different colony sizes in phylogenetically controlled meta-analyses. Our findings support the hypothesis that nest subdivision and branching evolved to mitigate transport challenges related to colony size. Nests of species with large colonies contain more chambers and branching tunnels. The similarity in how ant nests and bodies of unitary organisms have evolved in response to increasing size suggests common solutions across taxa and levels of biological organization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie S Miller
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, 90095
| | - Emma Wan
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, 90095
| | - Sean O'Fallon
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, 90095
| | - Noa Pinter-Wollman
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, 90095
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gelblum A, Fonio E, Rodeh Y, Korman A, Feinerman O. Ant collective cognition allows for efficient navigation through disordered environments. eLife 2020; 9:55195. [PMID: 32393436 PMCID: PMC7332297 DOI: 10.7554/elife.55195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The cognitive abilities of biological organisms only make sense in the context of their environment. Here, we study longhorn crazy ant collective navigation skills within the context of a semi-natural, randomized environment. Mapping this biological setting into the ‘Ant-in-a-Labyrinth’ framework which studies physical transport through disordered media allows us to formulate precise links between the statistics of environmental challenges and the ants’ collective navigation abilities. We show that, in this environment, the ants use their numbers to collectively extend their sensing range. Although this extension is moderate, it nevertheless allows for extremely fast traversal times that overshadow known physical solutions to the ‘Ant-in-a-Labyrinth’ problem. To explain this large payoff, we use percolation theory and prove that whenever the labyrinth is solvable, a logarithmically small sensing range suffices for extreme speedup. Overall, our work demonstrates the potential advantages of group living and collective cognition in increasing a species’ habitable range.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aviram Gelblum
- Department of Physics of Complex Systems, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Ehud Fonio
- Department of Physics of Complex Systems, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Yoav Rodeh
- Department of Physics of Complex Systems, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.,Department of Software Engineering, Ort Braude College, Karmiel, Israel
| | - Amos Korman
- The Research Institute on the Foundations of Computer Science (IRIF), CNRS and University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Ofer Feinerman
- Department of Physics of Complex Systems, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen R, Meyer B, Garcia J. A computational model of task allocation in social insects: ecology and interactions alone can drive specialisation. SWARM INTELLIGENCE 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s11721-020-00180-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
AbstractSocial insects allocate their workforce in a decentralised fashion, addressing multiple tasks and responding effectively to environmental changes. This process is fundamental to their ecological success, but the mechanisms behind it are not well understood. While most models focus on internal and individual factors, empirical evidence highlights the importance of ecology and social interactions. To address this gap, we propose a game theoretical model of task allocation. Our main findings are twofold: Firstly, the specialisation emerging from self-organised task allocation can be largely determined by the ecology. Weakly specialised colonies in which all individuals perform more than one task emerge when foraging is cheap; in contrast, harsher environments with high foraging costs lead to strong specialisation in which each individual fully engages in a single task. Secondly, social interactions lead to important differences in dynamic environments. Colonies whose individuals rely on their own experience are predicted to be more flexible when dealing with change than colonies relying on social information. We also find that, counter to intuition, strongly specialised colonies may perform suboptimally, whereas the group performance of weakly specialised colonies approaches optimality. Our simulation results fully agree with the predictions of the mathematical model for the regions where the latter is analytically tractable. Our results are useful in framing relevant and important empirical questions, where ecology and interactions are key elements of hypotheses and predictions.
Collapse
|
4
|
Verification of mathematical models of response threshold through statistical characterisation of the foraging activity in ant societies. Sci Rep 2019; 9:8845. [PMID: 31222162 PMCID: PMC6586672 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-45367-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2018] [Accepted: 06/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
The concept of response threshold (RT) has been developed to explain task allocation in social insect colonies, wherein individual workers engage in tasks depending on their responsiveness to the task-related stimulus. Moreover, a mathematical model of RT has been proposed to explain data obtained from task allocation experiments; however, its applicability range warrants clarification through adequate quantitative analysis. Hence, we used an automatic measuring system to count passage events between a nest chamber and a foraging arena in five colonies of ants, Camponotus japonicus. The events were measured using radio-frequency identification tags attached to all workers of each colony. Here, we examined the detailed forms of i) labour distribution during foraging among workers in each colony and ii) the persistence of rank-order of foraging among workers. We found that labour distribution was characterized by a generalized gamma-distribution, indicating that only few workers carried out a large part of the workload. The rank-order of foraging activity among workers in each colony was maintained for a month and collapsed within a few months. We compared the obtained data with testable predictions of the RT model. The comparison indicated that proper evaluation of the mathematical model is required based on the obtained data.
Collapse
|
5
|
Mardoukhi Y, Jeon JH, Chechkin AV, Metzler R. Fluctuations of random walks in critical random environments. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2018; 20:20427-20438. [PMID: 30043029 DOI: 10.1039/c8cp03212b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Percolation networks have been widely used in the description of porous media but are now found to be relevant to understand the motion of particles in cellular membranes or the nucleus of biological cells. Random walks on the infinite cluster at criticality of a percolation network are asymptotically ergodic. On any finite size cluster of the network stationarity is reached at finite times, depending on the cluster's size. Despite of this we here demonstrate by combination of analytical calculations and simulations that at criticality the disorder and cluster size average of the ensemble of clusters leads to a non-vanishing variance of the time averaged mean squared displacement, regardless of the measurement time. Fluctuations of this relevant experimental quantity due to the disorder average of such ensembles are thus persistent and non-negligible. The relevance of our results for single particle tracking analysis in complex and biological systems is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yousof Mardoukhi
- Institute of Physics and Astronomy, University of Potsdam, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Crall JD, Gravish N, Mountcastle AM, Kocher SD, Oppenheimer RL, Pierce NE, Combes SA. Spatial fidelity of workers predicts collective response to disturbance in a social insect. Nat Commun 2018; 9:1201. [PMID: 29615611 PMCID: PMC5882771 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03561-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2017] [Accepted: 02/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Individuals in social insect colonies cooperate to perform collective work. While colonies often respond to changing environmental conditions by flexibly reallocating workers to different tasks, the factors determining which workers switch and why are not well understood. Here, we use an automated tracking system to continuously monitor nest behavior and foraging activity of uniquely identified workers from entire bumble bee (Bombus impatiens) colonies foraging in a natural outdoor environment. We show that most foraging is performed by a small number of workers and that the intensity and distribution of foraging is actively regulated at the colony level in response to forager removal. By analyzing worker nest behavior before and after forager removal, we show that spatial fidelity of workers within the nest generates uneven interaction with relevant localized information sources, and predicts which workers initiate foraging after disturbance. Our results highlight the importance of spatial fidelity for structuring information flow and regulating collective behavior in social insect colonies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James D Crall
- Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford St., Cambridge, MA, 02143, USA.
| | - Nick Gravish
- Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California San Diego, Engineer Ln, San Diego, CA, 92161, USA
| | | | - Sarah D Kocher
- Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08540, USA
| | - Robert L Oppenheimer
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of New Hampshire, 105 Main St., Durham, NH, 03824, USA
| | - Naomi E Pierce
- Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford St., Cambridge, MA, 02143, USA
| | - Stacey A Combes
- Department of Neurobiology, Physiology, and Behavior, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Feinerman O, Korman A. Individual versus collective cognition in social insects. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 220:73-82. [PMID: 28057830 DOI: 10.1242/jeb.143891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
The concerted responses of eusocial insects to environmental stimuli are often referred to as collective cognition at the level of the colony. To achieve collective cognition, a group can draw on two different sources: individual cognition and the connectivity between individuals. Computation in neural networks, for example, is attributed more to sophisticated communication schemes than to the complexity of individual neurons. The case of social insects, however, can be expected to differ. This is because individual insects are cognitively capable units that are often able to process information that is directly relevant at the level of the colony. Furthermore, involved communication patterns seem difficult to implement in a group of insects as they lack a clear network structure. This review discusses links between the cognition of an individual insect and that of the colony. We provide examples for collective cognition whose sources span the full spectrum between amplification of individual insect cognition and emergent group-level processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ofer Feinerman
- Department of Physics of Complex Systems, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel
| | - Amos Korman
- Institut de Recherche en Informatique Fondamentale (IRIF), CNRS and University Paris Diderot, Paris 75013, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Richardson TO, Giuggioli L, Franks NR, Sendova‐Franks AB. Measuring site fidelity and spatial segregation within animal societies. Methods Ecol Evol 2017; 8:965-975. [PMID: 28943999 PMCID: PMC5586202 DOI: 10.1111/2041-210x.12751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2016] [Accepted: 01/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Animals often display a marked tendency to return to previously visited locations that contain important resources, such as water, food, or developing brood that must be provisioned. A considerable body of work has demonstrated that this tendency is strongly expressed in ants, which exhibit fidelity to particular sites both inside and outside the nest. However, thus far many studies of this phenomena have taken the approach of reducing an animal's trajectory to a summary statistic, such as the area it covers.Using both simulations of biased random walks, and empirical trajectories from individual rock ants, Temnothorax albipennis, we demonstrate that this reductive approach suffers from an unacceptably high rate of false negatives.To overcome this, we describe a site-centric approach which, in combination with a spatially-explicit null model, allows the identification of the important sites towards which individuals exhibit statistically significant biases.Using the ant trajectories, we illustrate how the site-centric approach can be combined with social network analysis tools to detect groups of individuals whose members display similar space-use patterns.We also address the mechanistic origin of individual site fidelity; by examining the sequence of visits to each site, we detect a statistical signature associated with a self-attracting walk - a non-Markovian movement model that has been suggested as a possible mechanism for generating individual site fidelity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas O. Richardson
- Department of Ecology and EvolutionUniversity of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland
- Department of Engineering Design and MathematicsUniversity of the West of EnglandBristolUK
| | - Luca Giuggioli
- Bristol Centre for Complexity SciencesUniversity of BristolBristolUK
- Department of Engineering MathematicsUniversity of BristolBristolUK
- School of Biological SciencesUniversity of BristolBristolUK
| | | | - Ana B. Sendova‐Franks
- Department of Engineering Design and MathematicsUniversity of the West of EnglandBristolUK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
LeBoeuf AC, Grozinger CM. Me and we: the interplay between individual and group behavioral variation in social collectives. CURRENT OPINION IN INSECT SCIENCE 2014; 5:16-24. [PMID: 32846737 DOI: 10.1016/j.cois.2014.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2014] [Revised: 09/12/2014] [Accepted: 09/17/2014] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
In social insects, substantial behavioral variation exists among individuals and across colonies. Here, we discuss the role of individual variation in shaping behavioral tendencies of social groups, and highlight gaps in our knowledge about the role of the social group in modulating individual behavioral tendencies. We summarize our knowledge of the genetic mechanisms underpinning these processes, and describe the use of genomic tools to better understand the influence of social context on individuals. We discuss rapid collective phasic transitions, in which a group of individuals engages in a common novel behavior together, as a potentially highly informative model system in which to comprehensively investigate the interplay between individual and group variation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adria C LeBoeuf
- Department of Ecology and Evolution, Center for Integrative Genomics, University of Lausanne, UNIL-Sorge, Batiment Biophore, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Christina M Grozinger
- Department of Entomology, Center for Pollinator Research, Center for Chemical Ecology, The Pennsylvania State University, 1 Chemical Ecology Lab, Orchard Road, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pamminger T, Foitzik S, Kaufmann KC, Schützler N, Menzel F. Worker personality and its association with spatially structured division of labor. PLoS One 2014; 9:e79616. [PMID: 24497911 PMCID: PMC3907378 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2013] [Accepted: 10/03/2013] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Division of labor is a defining characteristic of social insects and fundamental to their ecological success. Many of the numerous tasks essential for the survival of the colony must be performed at a specific location. Consequently, spatial organization is an integral aspect of division of labor. The mechanisms organizing the spatial distribution of workers, separating inside and outside workers without central control, is an essential, but so far neglected aspect of division of labor. In this study, we investigate the behavioral mechanisms governing the spatial distribution of individual workers and its physiological underpinning in the ant Myrmica rubra. By investigating worker personalities we uncover position-associated behavioral syndromes. This context-independent and temporally stable set of correlated behaviors (positive association between movements and attraction towards light) could promote the basic separation between inside (brood tenders) and outside workers (foragers). These position-associated behavior syndromes are coupled with a high probability to perform tasks, located at the defined position, and a characteristic cuticular hydrocarbon profile. We discuss the potentially physiological causes for the observed behavioral syndromes and highlight how the study of animal personalities can provide new insights for the study of division of labor and self-organized processes in general.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Pamminger
- Department of Evolutionary Biology, Institute of Zoology, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | - Susanne Foitzik
- Department of Evolutionary Biology, Institute of Zoology, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Katharina C. Kaufmann
- Department of Evolutionary Biology, Institute of Zoology, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Natalie Schützler
- Department of Evolutionary Biology, Institute of Zoology, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Florian Menzel
- Department of Evolutionary Biology, Institute of Zoology, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Delistraty D. Ecotoxicity and risk to human fish consumers of polychlorinated biphenyls in fish near the Hanford Site (USA). THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2013; 445-446:14-21. [PMID: 23314118 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.12.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2012] [Revised: 12/01/2012] [Accepted: 12/03/2012] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to quantify three groups of polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) congeners (i.e., dioxin-like toxic equivalents [TEQ], non-dioxin-like PCBs, total PCBs) in fish in several species, tissues, and locations in the Columbia River near the Hanford Site. For TEQ and total PCBs, fish ecotoxicity and risk to human fish consumers were also evaluated. Non-dioxin-like PCBs were not assessed for toxicity, due to lack of available benchmarks. In sturgeon liver, TEQ was significantly higher (P<0.05) within the Hanford Site study areas, relative to upriver. However, this same spatial relationship in sturgeon liver did not attain statistical significance for non-dioxin-like PCBs and total PCBs. Non-dioxin-like PCBs and total PCBs were significantly higher (P<0.05) in whitefish fillet than in other species (except carp) and significantly higher (P<0.05) in carp fillet, relative to bass. All PCB residues in carcass were significantly elevated (P<0.005) in comparison to fillet. In addition to PCB source, many factors (e.g., dietary composition, tissue lipid content, fish mobility and home range, age, toxicokinetic processes, seasonal adaptations) influence patterns in PCB bioaccumulation across species, tissues, and locations. TEQ and total PCB residues in liver, fillet, and carcass, observed in this study, were below corresponding no effect residues for TEQ and Aroclors in the literature for fish survival, growth, and reproduction. In contrast, TEQ and total PCBs in fillet in this study exceeded USEPA tissue screening levels for cancer (1E-6 risk) and noncancer (hazard quotient [HQ]=1) toxicity for human fish consumers. Key uncertainties in these comparisons to assess toxicity relate to variation in fish species sensitivity to PCBs and use of Aroclor data in the literature to represent total PCBs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damon Delistraty
- Washington State Department of Ecology, N. 4601 Monroe Street, Spokane, WA 99205, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Duarte A, Pen I, Keller L, Weissing FJ. Evolution of self-organized division of labor in a response threshold model. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2012; 66:947-957. [PMID: 22661824 PMCID: PMC3353103 DOI: 10.1007/s00265-012-1343-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2011] [Revised: 02/23/2012] [Accepted: 02/28/2012] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Division of labor in social insects is determinant to their ecological success. Recent models emphasize that division of labor is an emergent property of the interactions among nestmates obeying to simple behavioral rules. However, the role of evolution in shaping these rules has been largely neglected. Here, we investigate a model that integrates the perspectives of self-organization and evolution. Our point of departure is the response threshold model, where we allow thresholds to evolve. We ask whether the thresholds will evolve to a state where division of labor emerges in a form that fits the needs of the colony. We find that division of labor can indeed evolve through the evolutionary branching of thresholds, leading to workers that differ in their tendency to take on a given task. However, the conditions under which division of labor evolves depend on the strength of selection on the two fitness components considered: amount of work performed and on worker distribution over tasks. When selection is strongest on the amount of work performed, division of labor evolves if switching tasks is costly. When selection is strongest on worker distribution, division of labor is less likely to evolve. Furthermore, we show that a biased distribution (like 3:1) of workers over tasks is not easily achievable by a threshold mechanism, even under strong selection. Contrary to expectation, multiple matings of colony foundresses impede the evolution of specialization. Overall, our model sheds light on the importance of considering the interaction between specific mechanisms and ecological requirements to better understand the evolutionary scenarios that lead to division of labor in complex systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Duarte
- Theoretical Biology Group, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Studies, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 11103, Groningen, 9700 CC Netherlands
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CB2 3EJ Cambridge, UK
| | - Ido Pen
- Theoretical Biology Group, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Studies, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 11103, Groningen, 9700 CC Netherlands
| | - Laurent Keller
- Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Franz J. Weissing
- Theoretical Biology Group, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Studies, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 11103, Groningen, 9700 CC Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|