Notch ankyrin repeat domain variation influences leukemogenesis and Myc transactivation

RBPMS inhibits bladder cancer metastasis by downregulating MYC pathway through alternative splicing of ANKRD10

RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are pivotal mediators of the alternative splicing (AS) machinery of pre-mRNA. Research has demonstrated that the AS process is significantly dysregulated and plays a crucial role in bladder cancer (BLCA). We conducted comprehensive screening and analysis of the TCGA-BLCA cohort, specifically focusing on genes with significant differences in expression levels between carcinoma and adjacent non-cancerous tissues. Among the 500 differentially expressed genes, 5 RNA-binding proteins were identified. Only the RNA-binding protein with multiple splicing (RBPMS) demonstrated a consistent downregulation in BLCA and was correlated with an unfavorable prognosis for affected patients. Subsequent experiments revealed that RBPMS exerted inhibitory effects on the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) pathway and the migratory potential of BLCA cells. RNA-Seq analysis identified ANKRD10 as a key target mRNA regulated by RBPMS in BLCA. RBPMS depletion in BLCA cells resulted in AS of ANKRD10 and increased ANKRD10-2 expression. ANKRD10-2 functioned as a transcriptional co-activator of MYC proteins, thereby augmenting their transcriptional activity. Furthermore, ANKRD10-2 knockdown significantly rescued the migration enhancement induced by RBPMS depletion in BLCA cells. Taken together, this study revealed a mechanism whereby RBPMS suppresses the migration and invasion of BLCA cells by attenuating MYC pathway activity via the AS of ANKRD10.

Unraveling paralog-specific Notch signaling through thermodynamics of ternary complex formation and transcriptional activation of chimeric receptors

Notch signaling in humans is mediated by four paralogous receptors that share conserved architectures and possess overlapping, yet non-redundant functions. The receptors share a canonical activation pathway wherein upon extracellular ligand binding, the Notch intracellular domain (NICD) is cleaved from the membrane and translocates to the nucleus where its N-terminal RBP-j-associated molecule (RAM) region and ankyrin repeat (ANK) domain bind transcription factor CSL and recruit co-activator Mastermind-like-1 (MAML1) to activate transcription. However, different paralogs can lead to distinct outcomes. To better understand paralog-specific differences in Notch signaling, we performed a thermodynamic analysis of the Notch transcriptional activation complexes for all four Notch paralogs using isothermal titration calorimetry. Using chimeric constructs, we find that the RAM region is the primary determinant of stability of binary RAMANK:CSL complexes, and that the ANK regions are largely the determinants of MAML1 binding to pre-formed RAMANK:CSL complexes. Free energies of these binding reactions (ΔGRA and ΔGMAML) vary among the four Notch paralogs, although variations for Notch2, 3, and 4 offset in the free energy of the ternary complex (ΔGTC, where ΔGTC = ΔGRA + ΔGMAML). To probe how these affinity differences affect Notch signaling, we performed transcriptional activation assays with the paralogous and chimeric NICDs, and analyzed the results with an independent multiplicative model that quantifies contributions of the paralogous RAM, ANK, and C-terminal regions (CTR) to activation. This analysis shows that transcription activation correlates with ΔGTC, but that activation is further modified by CTR identity in a paralog-specific way.

Presenilin gene function and Notch signaling feedback regulation in the developing mouse lens

Presenilins (Psen1 and Psen2 in mice) are polytopic transmembrane proteins that act in the γ-secretase complex to make intra-membrane cleavages of their substrates, including the well-studied Notch receptors. Such processing releases the Notch intracellular domain, allowing it to physically relocate from the cell membrane to the nucleus where it acts in a transcriptional activating complex to regulate downstream genes in the signal-receiving cell. Previous studies of Notch pathway mutants for Jagged1, Notch2, and Rbpj demonstrated that canonical signaling is a necessary component of normal mouse lens development. However, the central role of Psens within the γ-secretase complex has never been explored in any developing eye tissue or cell type. By directly comparing Psen single and double mutant phenotypes during mouse lens development, we found a stronger requirement for Psen1, although both genes are needed for progenitor cell growth and to prevent apoptosis. We also uncovered a novel genetic interaction between Psen1 and Jagged1. By quantifying protein and mRNA levels of key Notch pathway genes in Psen1/2 or Jagged1 mutant lenses, we identified multiple points in the overall signaling cascade where feedback regulation can occur. Our data are consistent with the loss of particular genes indirectly influencing the transcription level of another. However, we conclude that regulating Notch2 protein levels is particularly important during normal signaling, supporting the importance of post-translational regulatory mechanisms in this tissue.

The common oncogenomic program of NOTCH1 and NOTCH3 signaling in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Notch is a major oncogenic driver in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), in part because it binds to an enhancer that increases expression of MYC. Here, we exploit the capacity of activated NOTCH1 and NOTCH3 to induce T-ALL, despite substantial divergence in their intracellular regions, as a means to elucidate a broad, common Notch-dependent oncogenomic program through systematic comparison of the transcriptomes and Notch-bound genomic regulatory elements of NOTCH1- and NOTCH3-dependent T-ALL cells. ChIP-seq studies show a high concordance of functional NOTCH1 and NOTCH3 genomic binding sites that are enriched in binding motifs for RBPJ, the transcription factor that recruits activated Notch to DNA. The interchangeability of NOTCH1 and NOTCH3 was confirmed by rescue of NOTCH1-dependent T-ALL cells with activated NOTCH3 and vice versa. Despite remarkable overall similarity, there are nuanced differences in chromatin landscapes near critical common Notch target genes, most notably at a Notch-dependent enhancer that regulates MYC, which correlates with responsiveness to Notch pathway inhibitors. Overall, a common oncogenomic program driven by binding of either Notch is sufficient to maintain T-ALL cell growth, whereas cell-context specific differences appear to influence the response of T-ALL cells to Notch inhibition.

Notch3 activation is sufficient but not required for inducing human T-lineage specification

Although the role for the individual Notch receptors in early hematopoiesis have been thoroughly investigated in mouse, studies in human have been mostly limited to the use of pan-Notch inhibitors. However, such studies in human are important to predict potential side effects of specific Notch receptor blocking reagents because these are currently being considered as therapeutic tools to treat various Notch-dependent diseases. In this study, we studied the individual roles of Notch1 and Notch3 in early human hematopoietic lineage decisions, particularly during T-lineage specification. Although this process in mice is solely dependent on Notch1 activation, we recently reported Notch3 expression in human uncommitted thymocytes, raising the possibility that Notch3 mediates human T-lineage specification. Although expression of a constitutive activated form of Notch3 (ICN3) results in the induction of T-lineage specification in human CD34(+) hematopoietic progenitor cells, similar to ICN1 overexpression, loss-of-function studies using blocking Abs reveal that only Notch1, but not Notch3, is critical in this process. Blocking of Notch1 activation in OP9-DLL4 cocultures resulted in a complete block in T-lineage specification and induced monocytic and plasmacytoid dendritic cell differentiation instead. In fetal thymus organ cultures, impeded Notch1 activation resulted in B and dendritic cell development. In contrast, Notch3 blocking Abs only marginally affected T-lineage specification and hematopoietic differentiation with a slight increase in monocyte development. No induction of B or dendritic cell development was observed. Thus, our results unambiguously reveal a nonredundant role for Notch1 in human T-lineage specification, despite the expression of other Notch receptors.

Notch4 reveals a novel mechanism regulating Notch signal transduction

Notch4 is a divergent member of the Notch family of receptors that is primarily expressed in the vasculature. Its expression implies an important role for Notch4 in the vasculature; however, mice homozygous for the Notch4(d1) knockout allele are viable. Since little is known about the role of Notch4 in the vasculature and how it functions, we further investigated Notch4 in mice and in cultured cells. We found that the Notch4(d1) allele is not null as it expresses a truncated transcript encoding most of the NOTCH4 extracellular domain. In cultured cells, NOTCH4 did not signal in response to ligand. Moreover, NOTCH4 inhibited signalling from the NOTCH1 receptor. This is the first report of cis-inhibition of signalling by another Notch receptor. The NOTCH4 extracellular domain also inhibits NOTCH1 signalling when expressed in cis, raising the possibility that reported Notch4 phenotypes may not be due to loss of NOTCH4 function. To better address the role of NOTCH4 in vivo, we generated a Notch4 null mouse in which the entire coding region was deleted. Notch4 null mice exhibited slightly delayed vessel growth in the retina, consistent with our novel finding that NOTCH4 protein is expressed in the newly formed vasculature. These findings indicate a role of NOTCH4 in fine-tuning the forming vascular plexus.