Individual and organisational determinants associated with maintenance tocolysis in the management of preterm labour: a multilevel analysis

Maintenance tocolysis, tocolysis in preterm premature rupture of membranes and in cervical cerclage - a Germany-wide survey on the current practice after dissemination of the German guideline

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the adherence of German perinatal specialist units and those of basic obstetric care to the national guideline we compared data from a nation-wide survey on the practice of maintenance tocolysis, tocolysis in preterm premature rupture of membranes and in the perioperative setting of cervical cerclage, and bedrest during and after tocolysis with recommendations from the current German Guideline 015/025 "Prevention and Treatment of Preterm Birth".

METHODS

632 obstetric clinics in Germany were approached and received a link to an online questionnaire. Data were descriptively analyzed by performing measures of frequency. To compare two or more groups Fisher's exact test was used.

RESULTS

The response rate was 19%; 23 (19.2%) of respondents did not perform maintenance tocolysis, while 97 (80.8%) conducted maintenance tocolysis; 30 (25.0%) of obstetric units performed cervical cerclage without tocolysis and 90 (75.0%) combined cervical cerclage with tocolysis; 11 (9.2%) of respondents did not use tocolytics in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes, while 109 (90.8%) conducted tocolysis in these patients; 69 (57.5%) of obstetric units did not recommend bed rest during tocolysis, whereas 51 (42.5%) favored bedrest. Perinatal care centers of basic obstetric care recommend bed arrest during tocolysis statistically significant more often to their patients than those of higher perinatal care levels (53.6 vs. 32.8%, p=0.0269).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our survey are in accordance to others from different countries and reveal considerable discrepancies between evidence-based guideline recommendations and daily clinical practice.

Frequency and determinants of misuse of augmentation of labor in France: A population-based study

Introduction

While use of augmentation of labor (AL) is appropriate for labor dystocia, it is frequently used inadequately and unnecessarily. The objective was to assess at a national level, the frequency and determinants of misuse of augmentation of labor (AL).

Material and methods

Women of the French perinatal survey of 2016 with a singleton cephalic fetus, delivering at term after a spontaneous labor were included. “Misuse of AL” was defined by artificial rupture of the membranes (ROM) and/or oxytocin within one hour of admission and/or duration between ROM and oxytocin of less than one hour. Women, labor and maternity unit’s characteristics were compared between the “misuse of AL” and “no misuse of AL” groups by bivariate analysis. To identify the determinants of misuse of AL, a multivariable multilevel logistic regression was performed taking into account the data’s hierarchical structure (first level: women, second level: maternity units).

Results

Among the 7196 women included, 1524 (21.2%) had a misuse of AL. The determinants of misuse of AL were middle school educational level (reference high school), aOR = 1.21; 95%CI[1.01–1.45], gestational age at delivery ≥41weeks (reference 39–40 weeks), aOR = 1.19; 95%CI[1.00–1.42], cervical dilation ≥6cm at admission (reference <3cm), aOR = 1.39; 95%CI[1.10–1.76], epidural analgesia aOR = 1.63; 95%CI[1.35–1.96], delivery in a private hospital (reference public teaching hospital), aOR = 2.25; 95%CI[1.57–3.23]; and maternity units with <1000 deliveries/year and 1000–1999 deliveries/year (reference ≥3000 deliveries/year), respectively aOR = 1.52; 95%CI[1.11–2.08] and aOR = 1.42; 95%CI[1.05–1.92]. Less than 3% of the variance was explained by women characteristics, and 24.17% by the maternity units’ characteristics.

Conclusions

In France, one spontaneous laboring woman among five is subject to misuse of AL. The misuse is mostly explained by maternity unit’s characteristics. The determinants identified in this study can be used to implement targeted actions in small and private maternity units.

Maintenance tocolysis: a reappraisal of clinical evidence

INTRODUCTION

Maintenance tocolysis, mostly defined as the continuation of tocolytic treatment beyond 48 h, remains a matter of debate. There is no sufficient evidence from randomized controlled trials, that maintenance tocolysis is able to prolong pregnancy significantly and to reduce severe neonatal morbidity and mortality. Hence, it is not recommended in current guidelines. On the contrary, maintenance tocolysis is commonly used in clinical practice and subject of current clinical-scientific investigations.

TOCOLYTICS FOR MAINTENANCE TREATMENT

None of the conventional tocolytics (beta-sympathomimetics, calcium-channel blockers, magnesium, cyclooxygenase inhibitors, and oxytocin receptor antagonists) have proven to be appropriate for maintenance treatment. Progesterone and 17-α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate have shown promising results in low-quality randomized trials, but not in high-quality studies.

DISCUSSION

Basically, the value of studies regarding maintenance tocolysis is limited by a considerable heterogeneity, its mostly low quality, significant differences in methodology as well as the inadequate statistical power due to the small number of women studied. So far, maintenance tocolysis is a case-by-case decision outweighing the benefits and harms of tocolytic treatment.

Maintaining and repeating tocolysis: A reflection on evidence

It is inherent to human logic that both doctors and patients want to suppress uterine contractions when a woman presents in threatened preterm labor. Tocolysis is widely applied in women with threatened preterm labor with a variety of drugs. According to literature, tocolysis is indicated to enable transfer to a tertiary center as well as to ensure the administration of corticosteroids for fetal maturation. There is international discrepancy in the content and the implementation of guidelines on preterm labor. Tocolysis is often maintained or repeated. Nevertheless, the benefit of prolonging pregnancy has not yet been proven, and it is not impossible that prolongation of the pregnancy in a potential hostile environment could harm the fetus. Here we reflect on the use of tocolysis, focusing on maintenance and repeated tocolysis, and compare international guidelines and practices to available evidence. Finally, we propose strategies to improve the evaluation and use of tocolytics, with potential implications for future research.

Practice patterns in the management of threatened preterm labor in Korea: A multicenter retrospective study

Objective

This study aimed to examine clinical practice patterns in the management of pregnant women admitted with threatened preterm labor (TPL) in Korea.

Methods

Data from women admitted with a diagnosis of TPL were collected from 22 hospitals. TPL was defined as regular uterine contractions with or without other symptoms such as pelvic pressure, backache, increased vaginal discharge, menstrual-like cramps, bleeding/show and cervical changes. Data on general patient information, clinical characteristics at admission, use of tocolytics, antibiotics, and corticosteroids, and pregnancy outcomes were collected using an online data collections system.

Results

A total of 947 women with TPL were enrolled. First-line tocolysis was administered to 822 (86.8%) patients. As a first-line tocolysis, beta-agonists were used most frequently (510/822, 62.0%), followed by magnesium sulfate (183/822, 22.3%), calcium channel blockers (91/822, 11.1%), and atosiban (38/822, 4.6%). Of the 822 women with first-line tocolysis, second-line tocolysis were required in 364 (44.3%). Of 364 with second-line, 199 had third-line tocolysis (37.4%). Antibiotics were administered to 29.9% of patients (284/947) with single (215, 22.7%), dual (26, 2.7%), and triple combinations (43, 4.5%). Corticosteroids were administered to 420 (44.4%) patients. Betamethasone was administered to 298 patients (71.0%), and dexamethasone was administered to 122 patients (29.0%).

Conclusion

Practice patterns in the management of TPL in Korea were quite various. It is needed to develop standardized practice guidelines for TPL management.