Can antidepressants prevent pegylated interferon-α/ribavirin-associated depression in patients with chronic hepatitis C: meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials?

Drug Interactions of Psychiatric and COVID-19 Medications

INTRODUCTION

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a pandemic with 1771514 cases identified in the world and 70029 cases in Iran until April 12, 2020. The co-prescription of psychotropics with COVID-19 medication is not uncommon. Healthcare providers should be familiar with many Potential Drug-Drug Interactions (DDIs) between COVID-19 therapeutic agents and psychotropic drugs based on cytochrome P450 metabolism. This review comprehensively summarizes the current literature on DDIs between antiretroviral drugs and chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine, and psychotropics, including antidepressants, antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, and anxiolytics.

METHODS

Medical databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched to identify studies in English with keywords related to psychiatric disorders, medications used in the treatment of psychiatric disorders and COVID-19 medications.

RESULTS

There is a great potential for DDIs between psychiatric and COVID-19 medications ranging from interactions that are not clinically apparent (minor) to those that produce life-threatening adverse drug reactions, or loss of treatment efficacy. The majority of interactions are pharmacokinetic interactions via the cytochrome P450 enzyme system.

CONCLUSION

DDIs are a major concern in the comorbidity of psychiatric disorders and COVID-19 infection resulting in the alteration of expected therapeutic outcomes. The risk of toxicity or lack of efficacy may occur due to a higher or lower plasma concentration of medications. However, psychiatric medication can be safely used in combination with COVID-19 pharmacotherapy with either a wise selection of medication with the least possibility of interaction or careful patient monitoring and management.

Anti-inflammatory treatment of depression: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of vortioxetine augmented with celecoxib or placebo

Background

In patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), antidepressant response and remission rates are low, highlighting the need for new treatment approaches. Recently, the abundant literature linking inflammatory processes and depressive symptoms have led to the hypothesis that selecting treatment for MDD based on the patient’s inflammatory status could be a promising strategy to improve outcomes in patients suffering from MDD. The aim of the randomised control trial we propose is to investigate the antidepressant efficacy of the combined treatment of MDD with antidepressant medication plus anti-inflammatory medication in individuals with raised inflammation levels. For the first time, this study will prospectively test the efficacy of an antidepressant plus anti-inflammatory augmentation based on baseline inflammatory maker levels in MDD using a randomised controlled trial design.

Methods

This study proposes to measure blood C-reactive protein (CRP) levels before the initiation of treatment in 200 participants with MDD. Study participants are then assigned into one of two study strata: either into the ‘Depression with inflammation’ stratum (CRP levels > 3 mg/L); or into the ‘Depression without inflammation’ stratum (CRP levels ≤ 3 mg/L). Within each of the two study strata, participants randomly receive either antidepressant medication alone (vortioxetine) plus anti-inflammatory medication (celecoxib) or vortioxetine plus placebo for six weeks. At the end of the treatment period, participants have the opportunity to continue vortioxetine alone for a six-month post-trial period. Clinical outcomes are measured at baseline, fortnightly during the treatment period and at the three-month and six-month post-trial visits. The primary outcome is change in MADRS score, with a primary endpoint of a score reduction by 50% from baseline to six weeks (end of augmentation treatment with celecoxib). Secondary clinical outcomes are changes in the cognitive dimensions of depression (cognitive function, emotion processing and social cognition). Biological outcome measures (levels of CRP and other inflammatory markers) are measured at baseline, after six weeks of treatment and at the six-month post-trial visit.

Discussion

The current study will generate novel evidence for biomarker-based personalised antidepressant treatment selection based on patient inflammatory status before treatment.

Trial registration

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), ACTRN12617000527369p. Registered on 11 April 2017.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2829-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Prevalence and detection of neuropsychiatric adverse effects during hepatitis C treatment

BACKGROUND

Current treatment combinations for chronic hepatitis C virus infection still include pegylated interferon and ribavirin despite the new therapeutic options available. Interferon-based treatments are associated with a high incidence of adverse effects. Central nervous system events are among the most frequent adverse drug reactions and their influence on treatment adherence and effectiveness is controversial.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate neuropsychiatric adverse effects of interferon-based treatment for chronic hepatitis C in standard multidisciplinary clinical practice. Risk factors for these adverse effects and their impact on adherence and sustained viral response were also evaluated. Setting Ambulatory care pharmacy in coordination with the liver unit and the infectious diseases unit at a 650-bed tertiary university hospital.

METHODS

We included all consecutive patients with chronic hepatitis C who completed treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin between 2005 and 2013. All patients underwent a multidisciplinary follow-up during treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Neuropsychiatric adverse effects were evaluated in relation to severity, management and outcome. The presence of anxiety and depression was evaluated by means of specific tests.

RESULTS

A total of 717 treatments in 679 patients were included. During treatment, we detected 1679 neuropsychiatric adverse effects in 618 patients (86.2 %), generating 1737 clinical interventions. Fifty-seven (3.3 %) neuropsychiatric adverse effects were severe and 2 (0.1 %) were life-threatening (suicidal attempts). Most neuropsychiatric adverse effects (1555 events, 92.6 %) resolved without sequelae. Psychiatric medication was required in 289 patients (40.3 %). Sustained viral response was achieved in 400 cases (55.8 %) and was associated with adherence (OR = 1.942, 95 % CI = 1.235-3.052, p = 0.004). A multivariate analysis did not show any relationship between neuropsychiatric adverse effects and treatment adherence or sustained viral response. A psychiatric history was a strong risk factor for depression, anxiety and other psychiatric disorders during treatment.

CONCLUSION

Neuropsychiatric adverse effects during interferon-based treatments in patients with chronic hepatitis C were common but mostly mild or moderate. Early detection and accurate multidisciplinary management avoided treatment discontinuation, ensuring adherence and attaining sustained viral response. The identified risk factors could be used to determine patients eligible for interferon-free combinations, thus optimizing health system economics.

Hepatitis C and HIV Coinfection for Social Workers in Public Health, Medical and Substance Use Treatment Settings

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a leading cause of liver disease and liver-related deaths among those living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Due to recent pharmacologic advancements with direct acting antivirals, if detected and treated, HCV antiviral therapy can prevent liver disease progression and permanently cure coinfected patients of HCV. The objectives of this article are to inform public health social workers and social workers in medical and substance use treatment settings of the public health burden of HCV/HIV coinfection and to highlight state-of-the art pharmacologic advancements in HCV antiviral therapy.

The definition of placebo in the informed consent forms of clinical trials

Aim

Lack of knowledge concerning the nature of placebo and why it is necessary may influence the participation of patients in clinical trials. The objective of the present study is to review how placebo is described in written information for participants in clinical trials to be evaluated by a Human Research Ethics Committee.

Methods

All research protocols submitted for evaluation in a Spanish hospital during 2007–2013 were reviewed. The main characteristics of the studies using a placebo were collected. Three authors read each of them to determine how the term “placebo” was explained and if there was any comment on its efficacy and safety.

Results

Two thousand seven-hundred and forty research protocols were evaluated, of which three hundred and fifty-nine used a placebo. Pharmaceutical companies sponsored most placebo-controlled clinical trials (91.9%), and phase III studies were the commonest (59.9%). Oncology (15.0%), cardiology (14.2%), and neurology (13.1%) made the greatest contributions. A review of the informed consent forms showed that placebo was described in a similar manner in most studies: the explanation was limited to between four and eight words. Very few gave information about the risks of its use or adverse reactions from its administration. None of the studies provided details about the placebo effect. And 23 lacked any information about placebo at all.

Conclusions

Explanations about placebo in informed consent forms is often scarce, and information about the placebo effect and associated risks are absent. This situation may influence a full understanding of placebo by participants in clinical trials and might reduce their informed decision to participate.

Insights from interferon-α-related depression for the pathogenesis of depression associated with inflammation

Interferon-α (IFN-α) is a pleiotropic cytokine that is administered as a therapeutic in highly prevalent medical conditions such as chronic hepatitis C and B virus infection, melanoma and lymphoma. IFN-α induces, to a clinically relevant degree, concentration, memory, drive and mood disturbances in almost half of all patients. For this reason, IFN-α is increasingly being replaced by more specifically acting drugs. In the past decades, IFN-α has offered a valuable insight into the pathogenesis of major depression, particularly in settings associated with inflammation. IFN-α triggers immune responses, hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis abnormalities and disturbances of brain metabolism resembling those in other depression states. IFN-α stimulates indoleamine-2,3 dioxygenase-1, activating the kynurenine pathway with reduced formation of the neurotransmitters serotonin and dopamine, excessive formation of the NMDA agonist quinolinic acid, and reduced formation of the NMDA antagonist kynurenic acid. In addition, IFN-α disturbs neurotrophic signaling and impedes neurite outgrowth, synaptic plasticity, endogenous neurogenesis and neuronal survival. Consequently, IFN-α-related depression may represent a model for the neurodegenerative changes that are noticed in late-life major depression. Indeed, the observation that brain responses in IFN-α-related depression resemble idiopathic depression is supported by the existence of common genetic signatures, among which of note, a number of neuronal survival and plasticity genes have been identified. In view of the high incidence of depressive symptoms, IFN-α-related depression is an attractive model for studying links between neuronal plasticity, neurodegeneration and depression. We predict that in the latter areas new targets for anti-depressant therapies could be identified, which may deepen our understanding of idiopathic major depression.

Role of baseline depressive symptoms in the development of depressive episode in patients receiving antiviral therapy for hepatitis C infection

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the symptom profile and the role of baseline depressive symptoms in the development of depressive episode in patients receiving pegylated IFN-alpha and ribavirin.

METHODS

82 consecutive patients with HCV infection in whom combination of pegylated interferon-α 2a/2b and ribavirin was prescribed were assessed at baseline and thereafter at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks. At the baseline, patients were assessed on Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II). Thereafter patients were assessed on PHQ-9 and when ever found to have Major Depressive Disorder as per PHQ-9, they were assessed on MINI. Those found to have Major Depressive Episode (MDE) on MINI were rated on BDI-II for phenomenology and severity of depression.

RESULTS

Common symptoms of pegylated IFN-alpha and ribavirin induced MDE include sadness, irritability, work inhibition, sleep disturbance, fatigability and loss of appetite. Presence of certain depressive symptoms i.e., presence of little interest or pleasure in doing things, feeling tired or having little energy, poor appetite, social withdrawal and work inhibition at the baseline were associated with development of depression during the course of pegylated IFN-alpha plus ribavirin therapy.

CONCLUSION

Depressive symptoms in patients with pegylated IFN-alpha and ribavirin induced MDE are influenced by the symptoms of depression prior to starting of pegylated IFN-alpha and ribavirin combination. A short screening questionnaire may be constructed which will include the symptoms which predict the development of depression to screen patients at high risk for the development of depression.

Psychiatric Adverse Effects Of Interferon Therapy

A number of data support the involvement of immunological mechanisms in the etiology of psychiatric disorders. The nervous and immune systems are physiologically integrated and influence each other's functioning. Clinical studies have reported a larger number of psychiatric symptoms consecutive to immunomodulating interferon therapy. The most frequent are depression, suicidal behavior, manic syndrome, anxiety disorders, psychotic disorders and delirium associated with an array of unspecific psychiatric symptoms: fatigue, irritability, psycho-motor retardation, decreased libido, insomnia, concentration difficulties and attention deficit. Another undesired consequence of interferon therapy is the worsening of a preexistent psychiatric disorder. Thus, a history of psychiatric disorder is currently one of the contraindications of interferon therapy. Psychiatric adverse events may occur either shortly after the initiation of therapy, or as a result of ongoing treatment, but most adverse events occur after 3 weeks of treatment. Although there are relatively few studies on statistically significant patient samples, current data underline the importance of managing these effects and also the most indicated treatment strategies. Therefore, an improved psychiatric management of these adverse effects may change the gastroenterologist's decision to exclude from treatment high - risk patient categories such as those with mood disorders, alcohol or drug abuse, or other addiction.