Clinical implications of non-steatotic hepatic fat fractions on quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver

Comparison of the Effects of Hepatic Steatosis on Monoexponential DWI, Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-weighted Imaging and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) techniques have drawn attention for their capability of staging hepatic fibrosis. However, the diagnostic performance of DWI for hepatic fibrosis might be affected by hepatic steatosis because hepatic steatosis and fibrosis may have a similar effect on diffusion/perfusion parameters. Therefore, the purpose of our study is to investigate the effect of hepatic steatosis on DWI parameters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

51 patients with MR elastography liver stiffness values below 3.45kPa underwent DWI with multiple b-values and a multi-echo Dixon sequence for fat quantification. Correlation analysis was conducted between fat fraction and DWI parameters, and DWI parameters were compared between steatosis and non-steatosis groups.

RESULTS

Significant negative correlation was observed between fat fraction and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) (r = -0.62, p <0.001), pure molecular diffusion (D) (r = -0.62, p <0.001), corrected ADC (D_app) (r = -0.36, p = 0.01) and a positive correlation with mean kurtosis (K_app) (r = 0.53, p <0.001). The results of the comparison of DWI parameters were that ADC, D and D_app were statistically lower in the steatosis group (p < 0.001, p < 0.001 and p = 0.026, respectively) and K_app was significantly higher in the steatosis group (p <0.001) compared to the non-steatosis group. However, perfusion-related parameters (D* and f) did not show any statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

DWI parameters except for perfusion-related parameters (D* and f) are affected by changes in hepatic steatosis. Thus, hepatic steatosis may be considered as a possible confounding factor in DWI-based assessment of liver fibrosis.

Role of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis and Grading of Hepatic Steatosis in Patients With Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Comparison With Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

BACKGROUND

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is becoming the most common cause of cirrhosis. Although magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is considered the gold standard, it has a few limitations. The role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), which is a simpler sequence, in the diagnosis and grading of fatty liver is not well studied. The aim of the study was to investigate the value of DWI in the diagnosis and grading of hepatic steatosis in patients with NAFLD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-one adults (mean age: 38 years; 28 men, 23 women) with NAFLD, diagnosed clinically and by ultrasonography (USG), were included in the study after obtaining informed consent and approval from the institute ethics committee. USG was performed for grading of hepatic steatosis in all patients, followed by magnetic resonance imaging with DWI and MRS, on a 1.5T scanner. The mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and proton density fat fraction (PDFF) were calculated, and MRS was used as the gold standard. The mean ADC values were compared with the PDFF and USG grades.

RESULTS

There was a weak correlation between ADC values and PDFF (r = -0.36; P < 0.05). In addition, there was a weak correlation between the ADC values of the liver and USG grade (r = -0.34; P < 0.05). However, an overall increase in USG grades and PDFF was associated with decrease in the mean ADC value (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

DWI is not accurate in the diagnosis and grading of hepatic steatosis in patients with NAFLD. However, a significant increase in fat deposition in the liver lowers the ADC values.

Inter-observer reproducibility of quantitative dynamic susceptibility contrast and diffusion MRI parameters in histogram analysis of gliomas

Background

Dynamic-susceptibility contrast and diffusion-weighted imaging are promising techniques in diagnosing glioma grade.

Purpose

To compare the inter-observer reproducibility of multiple dynamic-susceptibility contrast and diffusion-weighted imaging parameters and to assess their potential in differentiating low- and high-grade gliomas.

Material and Methods

Thirty patients (16 men; mean age = 40.6 years) with low-grade (n = 13) and high-grade (n = 17) gliomas and known pathology, scanned with dynamic-susceptibility contrast and diffusion-weighted imaging were included retrospectively between March 2006 and March 2014. Three observers used three different methods to define the regions of interest: (i) circles at maximum perfusion and minimum apparent diffusion coefficient; (ii) freeform 2D encompassing the tumor at largest cross-section only; (iii) freeform 3D on all cross-sections. The dynamic-susceptibility contrast curve was analyzed voxelwise: maximum contrast enhancement; time-to-peak; wash-in rate; wash-out rate; and relative cerebral blood volume. The mean was calculated for all regions of interest. For 2D and 3D methods, histogram analysis yielded additional statistics: the minimum and maximum 5% and 10% pixel values of the tumor (min5%, min10%, max5%, max10%). Intraclass correlations coefficients (ICC) were calculated between observers. Low- and high-grade tumors were compared with independent t-tests or Mann–Whitney tests.

Results

ICCs were highest for 3D freeform (ICC = 0.836–0.986) followed by 2D freeform (ICC = 0.854–0.974) and circular regions of interest (0.141–0.641). High ICC and significant discrimination between low- and high-grade gliomas was found for the following optimized parameters: apparent diffusion coefficient (P < 0.001; ICC = 0.641; mean; circle); time-to-peak (P = 0.015; ICC = 0.986; mean; 3D); wash-in rate (P = 0.004; ICC = 0.826; min10%; 3D); wash-out rate (P < 0.001; ICC = 0.860; min10%; 2D); and relative cerebral blood volume (P ≤ 0.001; ICC = 0.961; mean; 3D).

Conclusion

Dynamic-susceptibility contrast perfusion parameters relative cerebral blood volume and time-to-peak yielded high inter-observer reproducibility and significant glioma grade differentiation for the means of 2D and 3D freeform regions of interest. Choosing a freeform 2D method optimizes observer agreement and differentiation in clinical practice, while a freeform 3D method provides no additional benefit.

Renal Adiposity Confounds Quantitative Assessment of Markers of Renal Diffusion With MRI: A Proposed Correction Method

OBJECTIVES

Recent studies have indicated that excessive fat may confound assessment of diffusion in organs with high fat content, such as the liver and breast. However, the extent of this effect in the kidney, which is not considered a major fat deposition site, remains unclear. This study tested the hypothesis that renal fat may impact diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) parameters, and proposes a 3-compartment model (TCM) to circumvent this effect.

METHODS

Using computer simulations, we investigated the effect of fat on assessment of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), and TCM-derived pure-diffusivity. We also investigated the influence of magnetic resonance repetition (TR) and echo time (TE) on DWI parameters as a result of variation in the relative contribution of the fat signal. Apparent diffusion coefficient, IVIM and TCM DWI parameters were calculated in domestic pigs fed a high-cholesterol (obese group) or normal diet (lean group), and correlated to renal histology. Intravoxel incoherent motion-derived pure-diffusivity was also compared among 15 essential hypertension patients classified by body mass index (BMI) (high vs normal). Finally, pure-diffusivity was calculated and compared in 8 patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) and 5 healthy subjects using IVIM and TCM.

RESULTS

Simulations showed that unaccounted fat results in the underestimation of IVIM-derived pure diffusivity. The underestimation increases as the fat fraction increases, with higher pace at lower fat contents. The underestimation was larger for shorter TR and longer TE values due to the enhancement of the relative contribution of the fat signal. Moreover, TCM, which incorporates highly diffusion-weighted images (b > 2500 s/mm), could correct for fat-dependent underestimation. Animal studies in the lean and obese groups confirmed lower ADC and IVIM pure-diffusivity in obese versus lean pigs with otherwise healthy kidneys, whereas pure-diffusivity calculated using TCM were not different between the 2 groups. Similarly, essential hypertension patients with high BMI had lower ADC (1.9 vs 2.1 × 10 mm/s) and pure-diffusivity (1.7 vs 1.9 × 10 mm/s) than those with normal BMI. Pure-diffusivity calculated using IVIM was not different between the ARAS and healthy subjects, but TCM revealed significantly lower diffusivity in ARAS.

CONCLUSIONS

Excessive renal fat may cause underestimation of renal ADC and IVIM-derived pure-diffusivity, which may hinder detection of renal pathology. Models accounting for fat contribution may help reduce the variability of diffusivity calculated using DWI.