Kinetic and sequence-structure-function analysis of LinB enzyme variants with β- and δ-hexachlorocyclohexane

Comprehensive review on Haloalkane dehalogenase (LinB): a β-hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) degrading enzyme

Haloalkane dehalogenase, LinB, is a member of the α/β hydrolase family of enzymes. It has a wide range of halogenated substrates, but, has been mostly studied in context of degradation of hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) isomers, especially β-HCH (5-12% of total HCH isomers), which is the most recalcitrant and persistent among all the HCH isomers. LinB was identified to directly act on β-HCH in a one or two step transformation which decreases its toxicity manifold. Thereafter, many studies focused on LinB including its structure determination using X-ray crystallographic studies, structure comparison with other haloalkane dehalogenases, substrate specificity and kinetic studies, protein engineering and site-directed mutagenesis studies in search of better catalytic activity of the enzyme. LinB was mainly identified and characterized in bacteria belonging to sphingomonads. Detailed sequence comparison of LinB from different sphingomonads further revealed the residues critical for its activity and ability to catalyze either one or two step transformation of β-HCH. Association of LinB with IS6100 elements is also being discussed in detail in sphingomonads. In this review, we summarized vigorous efforts done by different research groups on LinB for developing better bioremediation strategies against HCH contamination. Also, kinetic studies, protein engineering and site directed mutagenesis studies discussed here forms the basis of further exploration of LinB's role as an efficient enzyme in bioremediation projects.

Lessons from the genomes of lindane-degrading sphingomonads

Bacterial strains capable of degrading man-made xenobiotic compounds are good materials to study bacterial evolution towards new metabolic functions. Lindane (γ-hexachlorocyclohexane, γ-HCH, or γ-BHC) is an especially good target compound for the purpose, because it is relatively recalcitrant but can be degraded by a limited range of bacterial strains. A comparison of the complete genome sequences of lindane-degrading sphingomonad strains clearly demonstrated that (i) lindane-degrading strains emerged from a number of different ancestral hosts that have recruited lin genes encoding enzymes that are able to channel lindane to central metabolites, (ii) in sphingomonads lin genes have been acquired by horizontal gene transfer mediated by different plasmids and in which IS6100 plays a role in recruitment and distribution of genes, and (iii) IS6100 plays a role in dynamic genome rearrangements providing genetic diversity to different strains and ability to evolve to other states. Lindane-degrading bacteria whose genomes change so easily and quickly are also fascinating starting materials for tracing the bacterial evolution process experimentally in a relatively short time period. As the origin of the specific lin genes remains a mystery, such genes will be useful probes for exploring the cryptic 'gene pool' available to bacteria.

Comparison of the complete genome sequences of four γ-hexachlorocyclohexane-degrading bacterial strains: insights into the evolution of bacteria able to degrade a recalcitrant man-made pesticide

γ-Hexachlorocyclohexane (γ-HCH) is a recalcitrant man-made chlorinated pesticide. Here, the complete genome sequences of four γ-HCH-degrading sphingomonad strains, which are most unlikely to have been derived from one ancestral γ-HCH degrader, were compared. Together with several experimental data, we showed that (i) all the four strains carry almost identical linA to linE genes for the conversion of γ-HCH to maleylacetate (designated “specific” lin genes), (ii) considerably different genes are used for the metabolism of maleylacetate in one of the four strains, and (iii) the linKLMN genes for the putative ABC transporter necessary for γ-HCH utilization exhibit structural divergence, which reflects the phylogenetic relationship of their hosts. Replicon organization and location of the lin genes in the four genomes are significantly different with one another, and that most of the specific lin genes are located on multiple sphingomonad-unique plasmids. Copies of IS6100, the most abundant insertion sequence in the four strains, are often located in close proximity to the specific lin genes. Analysis of the footprints of target duplication upon IS6100 transposition and the experimental detection of IS6100 transposition strongly suggested that the IS6100 transposition has caused dynamic genome rearrangements and the diversification of lin-flanking regions in the four strains.

Covalent docking predicts substrates for haloalkanoate dehalogenase superfamily phosphatases

Enzyme function prediction remains an important open problem. Though structure-based modeling, such as metabolite docking, can identify substrates of some enzymes, it is ill-suited to reactions that progress through a covalent intermediate. Here we investigated the ability of covalent docking to identify substrates that pass through such a covalent intermediate, focusing particularly on the haloalkanoate dehalogenase superfamily. In retrospective assessments, covalent docking recapitulated substrate binding modes of known cocrystal structures and identified experimental substrates from a set of putative phosphorylated metabolites. In comparison, noncovalent docking of high-energy intermediates yielded nonproductive poses. In prospective predictions against seven enzymes, a substrate was identified for five. For one of those cases, a covalent docking prediction, confirmed by empirical screening, and combined with genomic context analysis, suggested the identity of the enzyme that catalyzes the orphan phosphatase reaction in the riboflavin biosynthetic pathway of Bacteroides.