The Efficacy and Safety of Entecavir and Interferon Combination Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection: A Meta-Analysis

Entecavir combined with interferon-α Is superior to entecavir monotherapy in reducing hepatic and extrahepatic cancer in patients with chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to assess whether entecavir (ETV) in combination with interferon-α (IFN-α) could reduce hepatocellular cancer (HCC) and extrahepatic cancers (EHCs) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

METHODS

The cohort consisted of 4194 patients with CHB treated with ETV combined with IFN-α or ETV monotherapy at a tertiary hospital in Beijing, China, from January 2009 to December 2017. The risks, hazard ratios (HRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of HCC and EHCs were compared in the 2 groups.

RESULTS

In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, a significantly lower risk of HCC (HR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.3-0.9; P = .0310) and a marginally significantly lower risk of EHCs (HR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.02-1.3; P = .0854) were observed in the group receiving ETV combined with IFN-α in comparison with the ETV monotherapy group. The annual virological response rates were significantly higher in the combination therapy group versus the monotherapy group (33.8% vs 21.2%; P < .0001), but the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance rates were not (1.2% vs 0.9%; P = .8537). The HRs were consistent with propensity score-based matching, inverse probability weighting adjustments, and adjustments for virological response and HBsAg seroclearance.

CONCLUSIONS

ETV combined with IFN-α therapy is superior to ETV monotherapy in reducing the risk of HCC and EHCs for patients with CHB. People who can tolerate and benefit from IFN-α therapy could consider combination therapy.

Yin and Yang: The dual effects of interferons on hematopoiesis

Interferons are an ancient and well-conserved group of inflammatory cytokines most famous for their role in viral immunity. A decade ago, we discovered that interferons also play an important role in the biology of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), which are responsible for lifelong blood production. Though we have learned a great deal about the role of interferons on HSC quiescence, differentiation, and self-renewal, there remains some controversy regarding how interferons impact these stem cells, with differing conclusions depending on experimental models and clinical context. Here, we review the contradictory roles of Type 1 and 2 interferons in hematopoiesis. Specifically, we highlight the roles of interferons in embryonic and adult hematopoiesis, along with short-term and long-term adaptive and maladaptive responses to inflammation. We discuss experimental challenges in the study of these powerful yet short-lived cytokines and strategies to address those challenges. We further review the contribution by interferons to disease states including bone marrow failure and aplastic anemia as well as their therapeutic use to treat myeloproliferative neoplasms and viral infections, including SARS-CoV2. Understanding the opposing effects of interferons on hematopoiesis will elucidate immune responses and bone marrow failure syndromes, and future therapeutic approaches for patients undergoing HSC transplantation or fighting infectious diseases and cancer.

New Therapeutics for Hepatitis B: The Road to Cure

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection impacts an estimated 257-291 million people globally. The current approach to treatment for chronic HBV infection is complex, reflecting a risk:benefit approach driven by the lack of an effective curative regimen. This complexity and the lack of a durable treatment response, necessitating indefinite treatment in the majority of cases, have resulted in low uptake of testing and treatment, particularly in regions where comprehensive primary care is lacking and access to affordable testing and treatment is limited. Multiple targeted therapies are now in early human study with the primary goal to achieve persistent HBV DNA and hepatitis B surface antigen suppression after a finite course of treatment, which is referred to as functional cure. This article summarizes the current therapies for HBV infection and discusses the limitations of these therapies, novel approaches to HBV cure, and therapeutic endpoints of clinical trials aimed to cure hepatitis B.

Ciclopirox inhibits Hepatitis B Virus secretion by blocking capsid assembly

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection can cause cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma and is therefore a serious public health problem. Infected patients are currently treated with nucleoside/nucleotide analogs and interferon α, but this approach is not curative. Here, we screen 978 FDA-approved compounds for their ability to inhibit HBV replication in HBV-expressing HepG2.2.15 cells. We find that ciclopirox, a synthetic antifungal agent, strongly inhibits HBV replication in cells and in mice by blocking HBV capsid assembly. The crystal structure of the HBV core protein and ciclopirox complex reveals a unique binding mode at dimer-dimer interfaces. Ciclopirox synergizes with nucleoside/nucleotide analogs to prevent HBV replication in cells and in a humanized liver mouse model. Therefore, orally-administered ciclopirox may provide a novel opportunity to combat chronic HBV infection by blocking HBV capsid assembly.

Entecavir-based combination therapies for chronic hepatitis B: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Currently, there is no consensus on the efficacy and safety of the entecavir (ETV) monotherapy versus the ETV-based combination therapy for chronic hepatitis B.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed on the comparison of ETV-based combination therapy and monotherapy for chronical hepatitis B (CHB) patients in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Libraries, and the Chinese BioMedical Literature Database. Both dichotomous and continuous variables were extracted, and pooled outcomes were expressed as odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD).

RESULTS

We included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and cohorts involving Group A: nucleos(t)ide-naive patients (four RCTs, n = 719 patients), Group B: nucleos(t)ide-resistant patients (four cohorts, n = 196 patients), and Group C: entecavir-treated patients with undetectable hepatitis B virus DNA (two RCTs and two cohorts, n = 297). Group A. ETV monotherapy was better for rates of undetectable HBV DNA, while the rates of the HBV DNA levels at the end of treatment, HBeAg Loss, ALT normalization were similar between the two groups [MD, -0.85 (95% CI, -0.173-0.03); OR, 0.92 (95% CI, 0.24-3.56); OR, 1.31 (95% CI, 0.17-9.82)]; Group B. ETV monotherapy was better for rates of undetectable HBV DNA, while the rates of the HBV DNA levels at the end of treatment, HBeAg Loss, ALT normalization were similar; Group C. The ETV-based combination therapy was better for the rate of HBV DNA relapse.

CONCLUSION

Based on the current data, ETV-based combination therapy seemed to be no better than ETV monotherapy. Further studies are needed to verify this conclusion.

An expert consensus for the management of chronic hepatitis B in Asian Americans

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is common with major clinical consequences. In Asian Americans, the HBsAg carrier rate ranges from 2% to 16% which approximates the rates from their countries of origin. Similarly, HBV is the most important cause of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver related deaths in HBsAg positive Asians worldwide.

AIM

To generate recommendations for the management of Asian Americans infected with HBV.

METHODS

These guidelines are based on relevant data derived from medical reports on HBV from Asian countries as well as from studies in the HBsAg positive Asian Americans. The guidelines herein differ from other recommendations in the treatment of both HBeAg positive and negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB), in the approach to HCC surveillance, and in the management of HBV in pregnant women.

RESULTS

Asian American patients, HBeAg positive or negative, with HBV DNA levels >2000 IU/mL (>104 copies/mL) and ALT values above normal are candidates for anti-viral therapy. HBeAg negative patients with HBV DNA >2000 IU/mL and normal ALT levels but who have either serum albumin <3.5 g/dL or platelet count <130 000 mm3 , basal core promoter (BCP) mutations, or who have first-degree relatives with HCC should be offered treatment. Patients with cirrhosis and detectable HBV DNA must receive life-long anti-viral therapy. Indications for treatment include pregnant women with high viraemia, coinfected patients, and those requiring immunosuppressive therapy. In HBsAg positive patients with risk factors, life-long surveillance for HCC with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) testing and abdominal ultrasound examination at 6-month intervals is required. In CHB patients receiving HCC treatments, repeat imaging with contrast CT scan or MRI at 3-month intervals is strongly recommended. These guidelines have been assigned to a Class (reflecting benefit vs. risk) and a Level (assessing strength or certainty) of evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of the recommendations made based on a review of the relevant literature and the opinion of a panel of Asian American physicians with expertise in HBV treatment will inform physicians and improve patient outcomes.

Predictors for efficacy of combination therapy with a nucleos(t)ide analogue and interferon for chronic hepatitis B

This study aims to explore the efficacy of interferon-α (IFN-α) combined with either entecavir (ETV) or adefovir (ADV) therapy versus IFN-α mono-therapy for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients, and to identify the factors associated with treatment outcomes. Totally, 159 CHB patients receiving interferon-based treatment for 48 weeks were enrolled in this retrospective study, including IFN-α mono-therapy group (group A, n=44), IFN-α plus ADV group (group B, n=53) and IFN-α plus ETV group (group C, n=62). The primary measures of efficacy assessments were the changes in HBsAg. Cox regression analysis was used to identify the predictors of treatment outcomes. The predictive values of the factors were assessed by ROC analysis. For patients with baseline hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) level <1000 IU/mL, the reductions in mean HBsAg levels at week 48 were greater in group C than that in group A (P<0.05). Higher rate of HBeAg seroconversion was achieved in the combined therapy group than in IFN-α mono-therapy group at week 48 (P<0.05). Two factors were independently associated with HBeAg seroconversion: baseline HBeAg level <2.215 log10 index/mL and ΔHBeAg (decline in HBeAg from baseline) >0.175 log10 at week 12. In conclusion, interferon-α plus ETV therapy can accelerate HBsAg decline as compared with interferon-α mono-therapy in CHB patients with lower baseline HBsAg levels, and the combination therapy was superior to IFN-α mono-therapy in increasing the rate of HBeAg seroconversion. Baseline HBeAg and ΔHBeAg at week 12 can independently predict HBeAg seroconversion in patients subject to interferon-based therapy for 48 weeks.

Toward cure chronic hepatitis B infection and hepatocellular carcinoma prevention: Lessons learned from nucleos(t)ide analogues therapy

Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) could successfully suppress hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). However, due to probable development of drug resistance or low/delayed response, these treatments may not be satisfactory. In addition to the HBV DNA polymerase inhibiting activity, these drugs could lead to changes in cytokines profiles. It is important to monitor these changes so that they could be used as target of treatment. Evaluating the previously reported immune responses due to NAs treatments, it was concluded that interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-4 (IL-4), and IL-12 increase after the treatment. This will be followed by the improved capacity of immune cells for eliminating HBV. In contrast, regulatory responses including IL-10 and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) significantly decreased as the result of NAs therapy. Unexpectedly, T helper (Th) 17-associated cytokines also decreased significantly. These results could be used to employ the new strategies to suppress viral replication, minimize HBV DNA levels, inducing hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion or even hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance. In order to accomplish these goals, extended treatment with high dose of both IL-12 and IFN in combination with high barrier to resistance NA might significantly improve the HBsAg seroclearance rate. Considering the danger of emerging aberrant immune responses, determining the optimum dosage as well as close monitoring of patients during the treatment is strongly advised. In order to make HBV immunotherapy practical, further studies are needed to confirm these results.

Factors associated with the decrease in hepatitis B surface antigen titers following interferon therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B: Is interferon and adefovir combination therapy effective?

The purpose of antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is generally to achieve a decrease and ultimately disappearance of HBs antigen (HBsAg). Interferon (IFN) therapy of CHB appears to be less effective in Asian countries than in European countries, and the advantage of IFN and nucleotide(s) analog (NA) combination therapy has yet to be fully investigated. The present study focused on the factors associated with a decrease in HBs antigen following IFN monotherapy or IFN + NA combination therapy. A total of 35 patients with CHB who received IFN-based therapy (mean ± standard deviation age 36.7±8.5 years; 27 males and 8 females) were enrolled in this study. Of the 35 patients, 21 patients received pegylated IFN monotherapy and 14 patients received IFN and adefovir (ADV) combination therapy. We examined the factors associated with reductions in the HBsAg titer of >1.0 log IU/ml from the initial HBsAg titer to the end of treatment and to 24 weeks after treatment. Although 13 patients (37%) had a reduction in HBsAg of >1.0 IU/ml at the end of treatment, it was only maintained to 24 weeks after treatment in 7 patients (20%). The HBV core-related antigen (HBcrAg) titer before treatment was significantly higher in patients with a decrease in HBsAg at the end of treatment than in patients without a decrease in HBsAg (6.56±0.78 vs. 5.30±1.66 log IU/ml, P<0.05). Moreover, an increase in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) of >2 times from baseline occurred significantly more frequently in patients with a decrease in HBsAg (62 vs. 14%, P<0.05). The proportion of patients with a decrease in HBsAg was significantly greater in patients who received IFN monotherapy than in patients who received IFN and ADV combination therapy (43 vs. 29%, P<0.05). The present results revealed that the HBcr antigen titer before therapy and an on-treatment elevation of ALT (indicative of host instruction flare) are important factors associated with a decrease in HBsAg titers after IFN-based therapy. The efficacy of IFN and ADV combination therapy was not apparent in terms of a reduction in the HBsAg titer.

Recent advances in treatment of chronic hepatitis B with entecavir

Entecavir (ETV) is a potent hepatitis B virus inhibitor with a high barrier to resistance, and it has been recommended as one of the first-line drugs for treating chronic hepatitis B (CHB) by guidelines from several international and national societies. This paper reviews the recent advances in the treatment of CHB with ETV, in terms of treatment adherence, efficacy in the treatment of various kinds of patients with CHB, management of patients with partial virological response, viral resistance or treatment failure to ETV, treatment cessation, sequential or combination therapy with ETV and pegylated interferon, as well as the surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma.

A Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Interferon Monotherapy or Combined with Different Nucleos(t)ide Analogues for Chronic Hepatitis B

Background: The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of interferon (IFN) with or without different nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs). Methods: The PubMed, Wan Fang and CNKI databases were searched to identify relevant trials up to May 2015. Meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.0. The stability and reliability were evaluated by publication bias tests. Results: Fifty-six studies fulfilled the criteria for the meta-analysis. Compared with IFN monotherapy, combination therapy were superior in HBV DNA undetectable rate (Risk Ratio (RR) = 1.55, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.44–1.66, p < 0.00001), HBeAg and HBsAg loss rate (RR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.22–1.56, p < 0.00001; RR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.03–2.78, p = 0.04, respectively) at the end of week 48 treatment. Sub-analysis showed the RRs of virological response for entecavir (ETV), adefovir (ADV), and lamivudine (LAM) were 1.64, 1.61 and 1.52, respectively; RRs of HBeAg loss rate were 1.34, 1.71 and 1.34, respectively. However, at the end of follow-up, IFN plus NAs therapy was better than IFN monotherapy only in terms of HBV DNA undetectable rate (p = 0.0007). Conclusions: Combination therapy was better than IFN monotherapy in virological and serological responses at the end of treatment. After follow-up, only HBV DNA undetectable rate was superior for combination therapy.

Combination or sequential therapy with entecavir and interferon in chronic hepatitis B patients: Current status, problems and prospects

Sixteen years have passed since the initial antiviral treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Goal of the antiviral treatment is not only to suppress viral replication, but to achieve sustained response after a limited period of treatment and then discontinuation of drugs. Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) and interferons are two types of therapeutic agents with different antiviral mechanisms for treatment of CHB. Monotherapy with NAs or interferons can only achieve ideal goal in a part of CHB patients, and combination and/or sequential therapy with both is an important attempt for CHB treatment in recent years. For patients previously treated with NAs, interferons can be used to replace NAs or in combination with them for a limited period. If interferons do not show good efficacy, then NAs, alone or in combination with interferons, can be used. For patients with high viral load, initial combination therapy may show better efficacy. According to the baseline and response guidelines, the treatment plan should be optimized frequently, and the treatment compliance emphasized with maintenance, medication and examination, along with the administration of chronic diseases, in order to ensure that HBV DNA level is lower than baseline level. For those who have had a continuous drop of HBsAg and HBeAg levels, prolonged treatment or combination of the treatment with dendritic cell (DC) therapy and immunotherapy may achieve more persistent immune control.

Peginterferon α-2a for the treatment of HIV infection

INTRODUCTION

Novel approaches are urgently needed to achieve the next level of control of HIV infection beyond antiretroviral medications that will lead to the ultimate goal of curing HIV infection. Exploiting the innate immune system control of HIV is one possible component of that strategy with pegylated interferon α representing a well-characterized agent that is being applied to this effort.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors summarize the history of interferon α treatment in the setting of HIV infection with a focus on clinical trials that examined the downstream effects on innate immune responses. More recently, clinical trials that administered pegylated interferon α-2a have demonstrated which interferon-stimulated genes are associated with its antiviral effects and which of these host-restriction factors may play a role in limiting the magnitude of the HIV reservoir.

EXPERT OPINION

The potential to exploit interferon α as part of a cure strategy is provocative. Whether key interferon-induced antiviral factors can be upregulated sufficiently to affect the reservoir is unknown. Additional research employing pegylated interferon α-2a is needed to identify which innate immune pathways are candidate targets for novel biological therapies for the potential cure of HIV infection.